Research network on work/family reconciliation

Lead Research Organisation: University of Reading
Department Name: Sch of Law

Abstract

The context of the research
The broad context for this research network is the ongoing quest, in western industrialised nations, for the achievement of work/family reconciliation. Many countries have attempted, through a variety of laws of differing nature and scope, to help families balance the responsibilities of labour market participation and the need to care for dependants. Yet, despite this legal engagement, tensions continue to exist and this remains a controversial topic. The challenges, at an individual and a societal level, posed by the need to reconcile the demands of work and care are often explored by academics and policy makers individually. There is, however, a need for interdisciplinary thinking in this area, so as to draw together the links between government policies and everyday experiences, theories and practices, laws and society.

Aims and objectives
The central aim of this research network is to establish and facilitate links between a group of academics and professionals, from a variety of backgrounds, with a common interest in exploring and improving law's engagement with working families. This will be achieved in two ways:
1.Three one-day seminars: by bringing together interested parties for face-to-face interactions in three inter-related seminars which will explore the challenges of work/family reconciliation.
2.The establishment of a Work/Family Reconciliation Network web-site, which will support the seminar series and provide a virtual space for interactions between interested parties prior to, during and after the seminars series.


Potential applications and benefits
This research network is of relevance to all those interested in work/family reconciliation, be it academics, practitioners, policy makers or the wider community. The initial benefits will be the establishment of links and knowledge transfer between parties, with different skills and backgrounds, interested in promoting effective 'family-friendly' laws. Key speeches from the seminars, which will provide an opportunity to explore ideas and develop strategies for improving law's engagement with working families, will be available on-line and an edited collection or journal special edition will be published at the end of the series.

However, the links initiated during the life-cycle of the funded network will continue and develop further through the creation of the Web-site. The networking as a whole will promote the establishment of a self-sustaining research cluster for consideration of issues relating to work and families: a critical mass of associate researchers who are capable of engaging with government and other policy-makers on issues concerning work and family reconciliation with an ability to, for example, undertake supervision of postgraduate research (through the acquisition of funded studentships) or undertake independent and commissioned research (collaborative/inter and multi-disciplinary).

Planned Impact


Who will benefit from this research?
This research network will be of benefit to all those user-communities interested in the legal regulation of working families. This includes;
- Policy and law makers and advisors (e.g. the Government Equalities Office, BERR, solicitors, EHCR)
- Charities (e.g. Maternity Action, the Fatherhood Institute, the Fawcett Society)
- Employers and employee representatives (e.g. British Chamber of Commerce, Confederation of British Industry, trade unions, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development).
- The general public.

How will they benefit?
The research network encourages knowledge-exchange and detailed, on-going assessment of the law thus contributing to an improvement in the regulation of working families. By facilitating the creation of new contacts and providing an on-line forum for information and discussion the network can provide a structure through which user-communities can
(a) keep a targeted audience informed about new research, publications, funding opportunities, legal developments in the UK and in other countries,
(b) promote, engage in or organise further capacity building events,
(c) respond to future policy proposals and legal developments.

This research is of potential benefit to the general public as most people are confronted with the conflict between paid and unpaid work at some stage in the life-cycle. If regulatory amendments are better informed (e.g. about the needs of different cohorts in society), the research network would help improve the quality of regulation in this area and, hence, improve working and living conditions for those who combine unpaid care with paid work.

Publications

10 25 50
publication icon
Busby N (2015) Regulating working families in the European Union: a history of disjointed strategies in Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

 
Description ESRC seminar series - work-life balance in the recession and beyond 
Organisation Middlesex University
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Nicole Busby and I (co-directors of FAWN) are Co-I s on this ESRC seminar series and are hosting a seminar at Reading University on jan 2015 - re: Care and Austerity . Both of us have also contributed papers to the series.
Collaborator Contribution PI of the ESRC seminar series - so are overall faciliators of the seminars. They also host the website.
Impact multi-disciplinary collaboration. 3 seminars to date 1 book proposal has been drafted
Start Year 2012
 
Description WFRN 
Organisation Work and Family Researchers Network
Country United States 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution FAWN have made links with the Work and Family Researchers Network in the USA and Grace James is a member of the International Committee Grace James and Nicole Busby organised 3 panels at the WFRN conference in June 2014, for FAWN members to disseminate their research. Symposium Men and Work-Family Reconciliation Thursday Jun 19 | 11:15 AM-12:45 PM • New Zealand Men and Work Family Reconciliation: How Does the Legal Framework Support Men and How Could It be Improved? Amanda Reilly, Victoria University of Wellington • Fathers, Responsibility and Social Capital: Changing Times in the UK and Australia Alex Masardo, University of Bath; Susan Milner, University of Bath • The Construction of a Legal Identity for Fathers in Work-Family Reconciliation: Notes from the UK Nicole Busby, University of Strathclyde; Michelle Weldon-Johns, University of Abertay • Linking Organizational Culture to Work-Life Conflict, Satisfaction, and Stress for Men Sunny L. Munn, Ohio State University; Tomika W. Greer, University of Houston; Joshua C. Collins, Florida International University Symposium Caregiving, Work-life Balance and the EU Friday Jun 20 | 2:10 PM-3:40 PM • Changes in Working Conditions and Work-Life Balance Perspectives of European Men and Women in Times of Crisis Jérôme De Henau, Open University • Work and Carers in the EU: A Case for Regulation? Rachel Horton, University of Reading • Pregnancy, Maternity and Parental Rights in Europe: The Real Cost of Social Reproduction Annick Masselot, University of Canterbury; Eugenia Caracciolo Di Torella, University of Leicester • Sense of Entitlement to Workplace Support for Infertility Treatment Nicola Payne, Middlesex University; Suzan Lewis, Middlesex University; Christina Constantinou, Middlesex University; Olga van den Akker, Middlesex University Symposium Caregiving Conundrums and Possible Policy Responses Saturday Jun 21 | 1:30 PM-3:00 PM • Who Benefits from Household Resources? An Issue for Work-Family Reconciliation Susan Himmelweit, Open University • Elderly Dependents and Working Care-Givers: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Responses Grace James, University of Reading; Emma Spruce, University of Reading • The Right to Request for Flexible Work: An Effective Policy Response to Work-Family Reconciliation in a Globalised Economy? Emily Rose, University of Strathclyde
Collaborator Contribution WFRN are a newly established network in the USA and oganise a multi-disciplnary annual conference and faciliate global knowledge exchange in this field of research.
Impact Outcomes - 3 panels organised at WFRN conference in NYC - which was attended by a number of FAWN members.
Start Year 2014
 
Description FAWN blog 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact This is an addition to the FAWN website that we have - it provides a means of disseminating information / thoughts / Comments on cases or legislation or events fairly quickly

Hard to judge, but have heard that peers have enjoyed reading them and found them interesting.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
URL http://blogs.reading.ac.uk/fawn-news/
 
Description invited to become UK member of European Network of Legal Experts in the field of Gender Equality 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact The European network of legal experts in gender equality and non-discrimination succeeds the former European network of legal experts in the non-discrimination field and the European network of legal experts in the field of gender equality. The purpose of the joint network is to support the European Commission in its work on protection of equal treatment and against discrimination by providing independent, reliable and expert information and advice on relevant developments at EU level and in the countries covered by the network. We produce an annual general report, flash reports, thematic reports and meet once a year in Brussels
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017,2018,2019
URL https://www.humanconsultancy.com/projects/european-equality-law-network