Contextual influences on orientation perception
Lead Research Organisation:
City, University of London
Department Name: Optometry and Visual Science
Abstract
Forty years of neuroscience have cemented the notion that vision depends on a population of brain cells whose individual responses depend both on the contrast and the spatial orientation of visual stimuli. Consequently, our ability to discriminate between different contrasts should be related to our ability to discriminate between different orientations. However, it is only recently that biologically inspired models have had any success in explaining both of these abilities. Naturally, these early successes have focused on simple targets, like line segments, which are thought to optimally stimulate individual neurons. To parallel neuroscience's progress understanding brain connectivity, we propose to extend (or refine) contemporary models in order to explain how our perception of simple targets depends on visual context.
Technical Summary
We propose to investigate contextual influences on visual perception, using orientation as a key example. Orientation perception has a long and distinguished experimental history, but most previous investigations of visual context have used either a psychophysical or a computational perspective. Support from the Foresight Project will help forge a link between these two disciplines. When an oriented line segment appears in an array of other oriented line segments, three well-known phenomena typically occur. One is the tilt illusion; an exaggeration of the difference between the orientations of adjacent line segments. The second is acuity loss; it becomes more difficult to identify the orientation of any individual line segment. The third is facilitation; a low-contrast target becomes easier to see when aligned with high-contrast flanks. (NB: Certain viewing conditions produce the opposite effects.) Various mathematical and computational models have been suggested to account for each of these contextual effects, but no model has yet to account for all of them. The initial focus of our research will be to collect experimental results against which the predictions of these models can be tested. Existing models can then be refined or replaced in the light of our results.
Publications
Coen-Cagli R
(2012)
Cortical Surround Interactions and Perceptual Salience via Natural Scene Statistics.
in PLoS computational biology
Dayan P
(2010)
Selective Bayes: attentional load and crowding.
in Vision research
Gheri C
(2007)
The relationship between search efficiency and crowding.
in Perception
Mareschal I
(2010)
Attentional modulation of crowding.
in Vision research
Mareschal I
(2010)
Cortical distance determines whether flankers cause crowding or the tilt illusion.
in Journal of vision
Mareschal I
(2008)
Contextual effects on decision templates for parafoveal orientation identification.
in Vision research
Schwartz O
(2009)
Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion.
in Journal of vision
Solomon JA
(2007)
Contrast discrimination: second responses reveal the relationship between the mean and variance of visual signals.
in Vision research
Solomon JA
(2009)
The history of dipper functions.
in Attention, perception & psychophysics
Solomon JA
(2009)
Strong tilt illusions always reduce orientation acuity.
in Vision research
Description | Our most significant scientific achievement was a demonstration that some supposedly cognitive behaviours were consistent with normative strategies for dealing with neuroanatomical limitations. Dayan and Solomon published this Bayesian analysis of attentional load crowding in 2010. Solomon's (2009) tutorial review on dipper functions may also have significant impact. Aimed at the postgraduate reader, this tutorial was solicited by editors (Jeremy Wolfe and Charles Chubb) familiar with our early work on this grant. |