How does the spindle checkpoint convert Cdc20 into an APC/C substrate?

Lead Research Organisation: University of Cambridge
Department Name: Gurdon Institute

Abstract

It is crucial that cell division should generate two identical daughter cells. The daughter cells recieve an exact copy of the genetic material from the original cell. The distribution of the genetic material in the form of chromosomes is monitored carefully by the cell during cell division. The system monitoring this process is referred to as the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint. If the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint is not working properly the daughter cells will not get an exact copy of the genetic material. This results in an unequal number of chromosomes being passed to the two daughters and this is called called aneuploidy. Recent research indicates that aneuploidy can initiate tumor formation and indeed many tumor cell lines appear to have a weak Spindle Assembly Checkpoint. We are focusing our efforts on trying to understand how the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint functions in normal cells, and to gain insight into why it might become defective in tumors. We know the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint inhibits the protein Cdc20. Cdc20 is an activator of a large complex called the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) that is responsible for degrading specific proteins in mitosis. Two components of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint namely Mad2 and BubR1 bind directly to Cdc20 and are responsible for this inhibition. We have recently found that not only does the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint inhibit Cdc20 but it also targets Cdc20 for degradation via APC/C. This means that when the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint is active Cdc20 switches from an activator of the APC/C to a substrate. We have also shown that this degradation of Cdc20 is important for maintaining an active checkpoint. We now want to understand how the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint turns Cdc20 into a substrate of the APC/C and we are particular focusing on the role of BubR1 in this aspect since this appear to be the key component responsible for this. For BubR1 to target Cdc20 for degradation it needs to be able to bind to Cdc20. We have found that Mad2 is absolutely essential for the binding of BubR1 to Cdc20 and we will investigate why this is so.

Technical Summary

We aim to understand how Cdc20 becomes a substrate of the APC/C during an active checkpoint. Our efforts will focus on establishing an in vitro ubiquitination assay for Cdc20 to clarify the role of the spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in converting Cdc20 into an APC/C substrate. The in vitro system will allow us to establish the role of the individual checkpoint proteins in this process, and to map the domains in the proteins required for this function. The results will be combined with a live-cell Cdc20 degradation assay to confirm the results from the in vitro system. In parallel with these studies we seek to understand why the complex between Cdc20 and BubR1/Bub3 is only generated during an active checkpoint and why Mad2 is required to form this complex in vivo. Finally we will analyze the rate of translation and degradation of Cdc20 in mitosis in different tumor cell lines to determine if this is defective in different tumor cells and could explain a weak Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in these cells.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description We found that one APC/C subunit is particularly important to disassemble the checkpoint complex after it has bound to the APC/C. These results were published in Nature Cell Biology as Mansfeld et al., 2011. We built on these results in a subsequent grant (BB/1022376/1) and found that the strength of the spindle assembly checkpoint varies according to the number of unattached kinetochores, and in different types of spindle poisons. These results were published in Nature Cell Biology as Collin et al., 2013.

Mansfeld et al has been cited 127 times and Collin et al 170 times (Google scholar) since publication.
Exploitation Route It is possible that this understanding will help to improve anti-cancer therapy through synergy with taxol treatment. We published these findings in international peer-reviewed journals and are following up the results in our current research.
Sectors Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology

URL http://www.nature.com/ncb/journal/v13/n10/full/ncb2347.html
 
Description Project grant
Amount £293,249 (GBP)
Funding ID BB/I022376/1 
Organisation Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 10/2011 
End 09/2014