A new generation of insect resistant GM crops: transgenic wheat synthesising the aphid alarm signal

Lead Research Organisation: Rothamsted Research
Department Name: Directorate

Abstract

When aphids (greenfly) are attacked by predators they release a warning signal to alert other neighbouring aphids. This is achieved by a chemical called an alarm pheromone that other aphids can smell. This alarm pheromone is completely non-toxic, even at levels far higher than would be used in this project. As well as being produced by aphids, it is produced naturally by some non-crop plants. One such plant is peppermint and we have isolated the gene responsible for the production of pure aphid alarm pheromone in peppermint plants. By inserting this gene into other plants we can make them produce the pheromone and we have recently performed this transformation with a simple plant called thale cress which is widely used by biologists as a model. When we did this aphid pests were no longer attracted to the transformed cress. Furthermore, natural insect control was improved because a key natural enemy of aphids, called a parasitoid, searched for aphids for a longer period of time on the transformed thale cress. Following this success we now need to carry out a similar transformation with wheat, a crop plant of worldwide importance, so as eventually to exploit this system for aphid pest control and breed a new generation of environmentally friendly GM crops. Other insect pests also have pheromones and the approach developed here should lead to possibilities for replacing toxic insecticides with non-toxic insect behaviour signal chemicals in other crops too. Studies will initially be conducted under contained laboratory conditions and then extended to carefully regulated field trials. We propose to transform wheat plants with the aphid alarm pheromone gene, check that the transformed wheat plants are emitting the pheromone and then examine the effects on aphid pests and their natural enemies. Groups of aphids on leaves will be exposed to the odour of the transformed wheat and the proportion of aphids scuttling away will be recorded. Special devices called olfactometers will then be used to give aphids and their parasitoids a choice between air passing from the transformed wheat or a blank airflow. We expect that aphids will be attracted to normal wheat odour but repelled by odours of the transformed plants and that the aphid parasitoids will be more attracted to the transformed wheat. Parasitoid behaviour on the transformed plants will also be compared with behaviour on normal plants. Field simulator containers will be used to measure aphid settlement on normal and transformed wheat. Once we have identified the most promising wheat varieties under lab conditions we will test them outdoors in field plot trials. Aphid numbers will be counted in samples of 100 plants per plot every week during the growing season. We expect that aphid settlement will be reduced on the transformed wheat plants and that any aphids that do settle will be more exposed to attack by natural enemies. The combined effect of an aphid repellent odour and attraction of natural enemies will mean lower aphid infestations on the transformed wheat plants. This will provide a new option for reducing insecticide use on crops in the future.

Technical Summary

The alarm pheromone for many aphids is a volatile sesquiterpene (E)-beta-farnesene (EBf). Here we propose to develop EBf emitting wheat, Triticum aestivum, by transforming plants with Mentha x piperita EBf synthase fused to a strong constitutive promoter (maize Ubi1). Molecular and biochemical characterisation of transformed phenotypes will be used to check the presence of the EBf synthase gene, its expression levels and EBf emission from the plants. We will also enhance EBf emission via targeting EBf synthase to plastids and also via the co-expression of a farnesyl diphosphate synthase (both strategies have been shown to enhance the transgenic accumulation of terpenoids). Specialised insect behavioural bioassays developed by the Chemical Ecology Group will then be used to determine responses of cereal aphids Sitobion avenae and Rhopalosiphum padi and their parasitoids Aphidus ervi and Aphidius rhopalosiphi to the wheat plants. These insects are known to respond to EBf. Bioassays will comprise: 1) an aphid alarm response bioassay in which colonies of aphids are exposed to volatiles and disturbance is quantified; 2) an olfactometer repellency and attraction bioassay in which walking insects are introduced into an arena where they have a choice between test volatiles or control areas (without the volatiles); 3) a no-choice field simulator test for aphid settlement on plants in special containers with a gentle air-flow in which large numbers of aphids are released, and 4) a parasitoid foraging bioassay where parasitoid behaviour is quantified. These bioassays will allow us to compare responses to wild-type and transformed EBf emitting wheat plants to determine whether transgenic plants subvert the aphid alarm signal to deter aphids and attract their enemies. Furthermore, the project includes two field trials in which aphid infestation levels of two GM lines under typical field conditions will be determined and compared with wild type control plots.

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
Birkett MA (2014) Prospects of genetic engineering for robust insect resistance. in Current opinion in plant biology

publication icon
Pickett JA (2014) Push-pull farming systems. in Current opinion in biotechnology

publication icon
Pickett JA (2014) Delivering sustainable crop protection systems via the seed: exploiting natural constitutive and inducible defence pathways. in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences

 
Description It was demonstrated conclusively that elite crop cultivars, exemplified here with wheat, can be genetically modified to produce insect pheromones, here the aphid alarm pheromone, that could provide a new means of controlling pests, here cereal aphids. Field trials were conducted during 2012/13 and, although the GM crop produced the pheromone constitutively as planned, tested in the natural environment this did not control aphids also the positive effect expected in the natural environment on aphid parastoids was insufficient for the hoped for conservation biological control to be successful. However the principle was demonstrated and further approaches to utilising this type of technology are being advanced and responsive mode funding will be sought.
Exploitation Route Although the technology is clearly feasible, new work will need to take into account specific issues relating to the natural environment in which the anticipated new generation of GM crops would be deployed.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink,Chemicals

 
Description Early in May 2012 as soon as ministerial sanction for the field trials was granted and the sites and technical details for these posted publically a consortium of those antagonistic to such trials stated their aim which was to destroy the crop on May 27th 2012. A major programme of public engagement was mounted via the social media as well as conventional public media. This resulted in an apparent separation between those wishing to destroy the crops and those wanting to see experiments done in order to determine any value from using GM in this context. The lessons learnt have been widely discussed and form the basis of further GM field trials which were conducted without threat of destruction. Scientists involved in this programme engaged widely with policy makers on this new state in to which the UK has apparently now moved, largely as a consequence of the activities in engaging with the public in early 2012 relating to this project. Although crop protection was not demonstrated by the field trials, that this was published in peer reviewed journal added further to demonstrating the role that hypothesis driven science plays in developing new sustainable approaches to agricultural food production.
First Year Of Impact 2012
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Communities and Social Services/Policy,Environment
Impact Types Cultural,Societal,Policy & public services