ShareIT: A theoretical and empirical investigation of co-located collaborative activities using shareable interfaces
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Sussex
Department Name: Sch of Psychology
Abstract
Technology now provides us with new ways of helping people to work together in small groups. Shareable interfaces (SIs) are combinations of displays and devices that allow several people in the same place to have their own input (e.g. multiple mice controlling the same display) and to interact at the same time on a shared task (e.g. electronic whiteboards). Input is not restricted to mice or keyboards: users might point, gesture, or use special pens or tokens to have input to a shared display. SIs, it is claimed, will have huge benefits for small groups working together. There are many piecemeal studies of how specific tools can help group work. However, there is no overall guidance on the best way to design these interfaces and no consistent evidence directly comparing the collaborative benefits of different designs for different tasks and different users. For example, a tabletop surface with people sitting around it can be more democratic and support more equal input than a vertical screen where one person has privileged access to control, while a multi-user game that provides some control of turn-taking may help children with language problems to participate more fully.This proposal aims to provide- an initial theoretical framework to explain what design features of SIs will promote collaboration- evidence directly comparing the effects of different SIs on the same task. We will systematically compare 3 major factors affecting design: SI type, task type and user group.We will study 4 types of SI covering the common range of ways they are used (tangible, graphic, multiple or single input devices), 4 types of task (involving creative planning, negotiating or reaching a solution to an intellectual problem) and three different user groups (adults, typically developing children and young people with communication difficulties). Truly collaborative work requires understanding other people's points of view. Little attention has been paid to differences between users in this understanding, so interfaces designed for adults may be provided with little modification for young children, or for people with special needs such as autism, whose ability to collaborate will be affected by cognitive and developmental factors. High-tech shareable interfaces are often very popular and initially appealing for users, but any benefits for collaboration can be lost if we do not understand what different features of SIs might provide and how they are best fitted to the needs of particular groups of users.We will run 6 studies assessing the collaborative behaviour of small groups of 3 people, using the different SIs for each type of task with different user groups. We will assess conversation and non-verbal behaviour (e.g. gestures and attention sharing, which we know are important in negotiation, learning and collaboration), and we will study how people coordinate their behaviour with that of others, and how they interact with the technology.The results of our work will produce initial guidelines for designers of SIs and evidence of the effects on group working for people who want to use SIs for different groups in work and educational settings. The results will help designers, educators and work organisers to choose resources more wisely and cost-effectively for small group settings.
Organisations
Publications
Aytac A.B.
(2009)
'Your half is bigger than mine': Motivating children to understand fractions
in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Farr W
(2010)
Social benefits of a tangible user interface for children with Autistic Spectrum Conditions.
in Autism : the international journal of research and practice
Fleck R
(2009)
Actions speak loudly with words
Harris A.
(2009)
Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions?
in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference
Hinske S
(2009)
Kingdom of the Knights
Holt S
(2014)
Facilitating other-awareness in low-functioning children with autism and typically-developing preschoolers using dual-control technology.
in Journal of autism and developmental disorders
Marshall P
(2009)
Fighting for control
Description | This project studied shareable technologies, that are designed specifically for more than one person to use at a time, and how these can be designed to help to collaborate better --be it learning maths, planning seating allocation, conducting financial forecasting or socialising. We produced a framework to help future designers and our examples are being further developed for use in schools, homes and workplaces. |
Exploitation Route | supporting learning through group work in classrooms providing multi-user displays for leisure and tourism helping children with autism and limited communication to interact with their peers |
Sectors | Creative Economy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections |
URL | http://shareitproject.org |
Description | This grant resulted in a range of well-cited conference papers and a framework for understanding and evaluating the design and influence of co-located devices and settings to support collaboration. We developed and evaluated environments to support collaboration in adults, in children and in people with autism. |
Sector | Creative Economy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections |
Impact Types | Societal,Economic |
Description | EPSRC |
Amount | £52,500 (GBP) |
Funding ID | EPSRC/University of Sussex Phd studentship |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start |
Description | University of Nottingham |
Amount | £4,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | Ubicomp grand challenge |
Organisation | University of Nottingham |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start |
Description | University of Sussex |
Amount | £1,800 (GBP) |
Funding ID | Junior Research bursary scheme |
Organisation | University of Sussex |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start |
Description | University of Sussex |
Amount | £1,800 (GBP) |
Funding ID | Junior Research Bursary |
Organisation | University of Sussex |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start |
Description | Autism Conference |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | demo and publicity for free app to suppor technology development for Autism, developed from th eDigital Bubbles seminar series |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://ascme-it.org.uk |
Description | Brighton Science Festival |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | About 300 people visited our demo exhibits on collaborative technology to support children in classrooms, including childrne with extra communication needs |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Science Festival event |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Brighton Science Festival Bright Sparks event: about 100 people ([primary age children and parents) visited for activities including a stall displaying the ASCmeI.T. app developed through the Digital Bubbles series. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://ascme-it.org. |