International Rural Gentrification

Lead Research Organisation: University of Leicester
Department Name: Sch of Geog, Geol & the Environment

Abstract

This project will deliver the first in-depth examination of the cross-national rural geographies of both the concept and phenomenon of gentrification, through an integrated comparative study of the theory, forms and dynamics of gentrification across rural France, UK and USA. The project aims to investigate the salience of rural gentrification as a concept that is capable of explaining rural change in France, the UK and the USA. As a starting point, the project draws upon the concept of 'sociologies of translation' to understand past and current differential meanings and uses of the term rural gentrification within academic, policy and popular discourses in France, UK and USA. An asset-based theorisation of rural gentrification will be developed to create empirical indicators of the presence and use of social assets within rural gentrification. Using these empirical indicators and comparable measures of rural, urban and peri-urban spaces, census and other national datasets will be mapped to analyse the geographies of gentrification in rural France, UK and USA, and to develop a typology of rural gentrification. Using this typology, detailed comparative studies of rural gentrification spanning a contrasting range of rural regions and rural settlement areas within France, UK and USA will be undertaken using comparable interviews, surveys, and focus groups.

Planned Impact

Who will benefit from this research?
As noted in the Case for Support, there are four potential beneficiaries of this research: namely academics, rural policy makers, the media, and residents within rural communities. This last group includes people who are running or working in rural businesses, as well as people who may commute to urban areas for work or education, are retired or have undertake no paid employment.

How will they benefit from this research?
Each of the potential audiences of the research can accrue benefits as outlined below.

Academic community. See Academic Beneficiaries section.

Rural policy makers. Benefits will include:
- A publicly accessible database of policy literatures in the UK, USA and France that make reference to the concept of rural gentrification;
- A comparative classification of rural areas in the UK, France and USA;
- Maps of the presence and extent of rural across the UK, France and USA;
- In-depth studies of the causes and consequences of rural gentrification;
- Workshop discussions on the relevance of gentrification to rural planning and policy, the identification and mapping of rural gentrification, and the causes and consequences of rural gentrification.

The media. Benefits will include:
- A publicly accessible database of newspaper articles, public blogs and webpages relating to the concept of rural gentrification since the 1970s covering the UK, France and USA
- Publicly available working papers, articles and maps detailing the presence, form, processes and consequences of rural gentrification in the UK, France and USA.

Residents of the rural communities. Benefits to those involved in the study, and potentially to other people living in or with businesses in rural communities, include:
- Increased awareness of the extent, potential drivers and consequences of change within rural communities;
- Improved awareness of the diversity of migrational streams into the countryside and the presence of economic and cultural assets that might foster rural development and businesses;
- Heightened understanding of environmental and social impacts of own and other people's lifestyles.

What will be done to ensure that they benefit from this research?
The project will involve:
- Establishment of 3 nationally constituted advisory committees that include experts on rural development, rural planning and media representations of rural space and social change;
- Workshops at major national and international conferences in the UK, France and USA with academics and planning practitioners (to include representatives of public sector planners and private/third sector organisations with interests in rural development such as, in the UK, the British Property Federation, CPRE, CLA, Countryside Alliance and Rural Housing Trust);
- Creation of policy briefings on the concept of gentrification and its relevance to rural planning and policy, the identification and mapping of rural gentrification; and the causes and consequences of rural gentrification (to be circulated at national planning conferences, as well as available as downloads from the project website and details of availability circulated by email to all rural local authorities in France, UK and USA);
- Establishment of a project web-site containing a downloadable copy of an Endnote database in both French and English, a selection of key texts and abstracts of the top 10 cited rural gentrification references by authors based in France, UK and USA, plus project working papera produced in English and French;
- Contextual interviews with local community organisations and planners in case study regions and feedback focus groups with residents in case-study settlement areas;
- An end of project conferences in London, Paris and Washington DC. to which academics, rural planning practioners, media representative and residents from case-studies settlements will be invited.
- Dissemination through academic publications.
 
Description One aim of this project was to understand the usage of the term rural gentrification in France, UK and USA. A key achievement of the project has been the identification of differential temporalities and spatialities in the application of the concept in academic studies in these countries. Academic publications started to refer to rural gentrification at different times in the UK (early 1970s), USA (early 1980s) and France (early 2000s). However, the project also identified a significant gap between initial coinage of the term gentrification in the early 1960s and widespread academic employment of the term in the 1970s. Exploration of this gap highlighted the uptake of the concept of gentrification within planning and social welfare discourses in the intervening period, with these discourses then acting to stimulate academic engagement with the concept, both within urban and rural contexts. In the UK, many of the studies of rural gentrification have been in areas of close proximity to urban areas - in areas that might be classified as 'peri-urban' or rural-urban fringe, but in both France and the USA application of the concept of rural gentrification has been most marked in areas that are distant from large urban centres. This differential application of rural gentrification in part reflects differences in governmental classifications of space, with schemas in France and the USA employing metrics that exclude many areas close to urban locations from a rural designation, which is not the case in the UK's rural-urban classification. One consequence is that quite different forms and processes are being identified with UK studies of rural gentrification than those examined in France and the USA.

A second achievement of this project has been the elaboration of an asset-based theorisation of class relating to economic capital, organizational capital, institutionalized culture, objectified culture, embodied culture and emotional capital, which was then linked to the Office of National Statistics' socio-economic and occupational group classifications to create a framework to analyse the 2011 Census. Eight distinct middle-class groups (professional, industrial/managerial, technical, commercial, creative, welfare, agricultural and non-agricultural petit bourgeoisie) were identified and their spatial distribution mapped for rural areas in England and Wales. This analysis was then used to identify case study areas for in-depth study.

A third achievement of the project has been the successful implementation of an in-depth, multi-method questionnaire survey to enable the detailed investigation of the forms and processes of rural gentrification within five case study districts within England. This study provided confirmation of the asset-based class analysis and also highlighted the presence of a displacement and range of different forms of rural gentrification, including super-gentrification in which existing gentrifiers are being replaced by incoming asset richer in-coming migrants.

A fourth achievement of the project has been to highlight the intersectionality of processes of rural gentrification. Whilst widely conceptualised as social classed process of rural change, this research project has revealed the significance of recognising how these processes intersection with demographic- related processes such as ageing and household recomposition.
Exploitation Route We expect that the key findings of the project will be taken-up within academic studies of rural and urban gentrification, and wider discourses within rural, urban, planning, housing and population studies. The analysis of the temporalities and spatialities of gentrification, and the inter-flow between academic and policy discourses, is likely to generate debate amongst not only gentrification scholars, but also researchers interested in the sociologies of knowledge.

The asset-based theorisation of social class and its operationalisation through Census statistics is also likely to be of interest both within and beyond academic gentrification scholars. The geographies of class created through the analysis raise major questions about the geographies of class and gentrification, and this is likely to stimulate studies of these geographies.

The in-depth analysis of forms and processes of gentrification highlights a series of policy and planning related issues, particular in relation to the demand and supply of housing and the relationships between housing and service and infrastructure provision, including transport and education markets. The project's highlighting of intersectionality of processes of gentrification with demographic change is likely to interest both academic research and policy-makers in the field of housing provision and rural social and economic development, and community cohesion.

Data from the project has also been offered to the UK Data Archive, where it can be access by other researchers. The dataset includes information that may be of interest to researchers examining a range of subjects, including rural migration, use and access to rural services, and rural community life.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink,Communities and Social Services/Policy,Environment,Transport

 
Description This research attracted public attention whilst it was still being undertaken, with the Sunday Times reporting on early findings of the research in an article by Tony Allen-Mills entitled 'Middle class gentrifies 70% of our villages' published on the 30th August 2015. Results of the research has also been presented at a meeting with Nottinghamshire County Council in September 2016 and at planning policy related events at the Folkestone Triennial Conference in October 2014, the RTPI East Midlands Centenary Debate in December 2014, and an ESRC Festival of Social Science event in November 2019. Discussions of the research with some of the participants at these events is continuing.
First Year Of Impact 2014
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy
Impact Types Societal,Policy & public services

 
Description UK-Japan SSH Connections
Amount £50,400 (GBP)
Funding ID ES/S014357/1 
Organisation Economic and Social Research Council 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2018 
End 06/2020
 
Description Coastal Regeneration, In-migration and UK Census Data 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This was a presentation of coastal regeneration and migration at an event organised to explore the relationship between art and architecture in the way that cities and towns are planned, built and experienced as places to live, work, play and learn.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Rural population change in Nottinghamshire 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This was a presentation of rural population change and analyses of demographic census data in Nottinghamshire to inform the future planning activities and regeneration in Nottinghamshire, and the possible use of a regional typology of rural change.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
 
Description The Challenges of Contemporary Rural Living 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The workshop was organised as part of the ESRC Festival of Social Science and was organised to attract academic researchers, students, planners, rural policy makers and development practitioners, which it succeeded in doing. Four presentations were given by academic researchers and three were given by rural policy-makers and practitioners, with a lively discussion emerging. Contacts were made that have led to further discussions related to potential further collaborations.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL http://le.ac.uk/festival-social-science/public-events/the-challenges-of-contemporary-rural-living
 
Description Urban and rural regeneration 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This was a presentation at a meeting of East Midlands branch of the RTPI. The presentation explored regeneration activities in rural and urban contexts within Leicestershire.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014