Can Indoor Residual Spraying provide additional protection against clinical malaria over current best practice?

Lead Research Organisation: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Department Name: Infectious and Tropical Diseases

Abstract

We propose to carry out a large field trial in The Gambia, West Africa, to find out whether there is any additional benefit of spraying homes with DDT in addition to the normal practice of getting everyone to sleep under bednets impregnated with long-lasting insecticides. The study will have two groups of villages: one with only treated nets and the other with both treated nets and DDT spraying. We will measure how effective the interventions are by sampling mosquitoes in the houses and measuring malaria in study children in both sets of villages. Importantly we will determine whether the vectors are likely to become resistant to the insecticides used and we will be able to determine how much it will cost to prevent cases of malaria using the DDT. This study is important since many Afircan countries, including The Gambia, are either spraying houses with DDT at present or intend to do so in the near future.

Technical Summary

A 2 armed cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess whether DDT IRS and LLINs combined provide better protection against clinical malaria in children, aged from 6-120 months, than LLINs alone. Clinical malaria will be recorded using passive case detection and exposure to malaria parasites assessed using light and exit traps followed by detection of Anopheles gambiae species and sporozoite infection. Susceptibility of vectors to insecticides will be measured phenotypically and by biomarkers for insecticide-resistance genes. A detailed economic assessment will be made to estimate the additional cost of averting a clinical case of malaria using IRS.

Publications

10 25 50