Widening patient engagement for orphan drugs trials

Lead Research Organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER
Department Name: Institute of Health Research

Abstract

Background
Orphan drugs are medicines intended for diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or progressive disorders that are rare. A rare (or 'orphan') disease affects less than 1 in 2,000 people within the general population. An example is Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), a life shortening lung disease that gets worse over time making it hard for the person who has it to breathe.

The pharmaceutical industry has recently highlighted the importance of the development of orphan drugs for both medical and financial reasons. The number of rare diseases increases each year as new sub-types of disease are identified, as does the amount of money spent on creating new medicines to treat them.

The UK is a European leader in the early stages of drug development, but falls behind other counties in the later phases which assess the safety of a drug or how it might compare with other treatments. This matters if the UK wants to become a world-leader in drug development. In response to Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK Strategy for Rare Diseases and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry have both called for the inclusion of a wider range of patients in clinical drug trials, but research suggests that the needs and experiences of patients who take part and decline or withdraw from orphan drug trials are often overlooked.

What we know about patient experience of orphan drugs is based on survey responses from patients who have had a positive experience of trial participation and/or treatment, doctors who provide these treatments, and patient and public representatives who have played a role in drug/trial development. Survey responses are largely descriptive, and lack in-depth, rich detail needed to inform improvement or innovation.

There are particular gaps in knowledge about the experience of patients in clinical trials of orphan drugs who do not receive the active treatment (placebo or comparator groups), and those who drop out of a trial.

What will we do?
An experienced qualitative researcher will be seconded to a European-wide pharmaceutical company (Galapagos) to facilitate knowledge exchange between the biomedical industry and academia, to identify opportunities for deep learning for the UK pharmaceutical industry and patients with orphan conditions.

We aim to:
- Learn more about orphan drug development and in-depth patient/families experience of IPF.
- Embed qualitative research (e.g. in-depth interviews and focus groups) in pharmaceutical practice to enable a wider group of patients/families to have the opportunity to be involved in orphan drug research.
- Expand orphan drug engagement to widen their reach and benefit, improve clinical trials and medicine use, to benefit both people with orphan conditions and the pharmaceutical industry.

This will be possible through the following research activities:
- In-depth interviews with IPF patients, their healthcare professionals, and people from organisations that recruit patients to drug trials.
- Interviews with staff and observations of Galapagos' values and practice.
- Training Galapagos staff to conduct interviews and focus groups with patients, and assess their effectiveness.
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) representatives will regularly review and input into the research findings and co-design accessible resources for patients, and third party organisations that recruit patients to orphan drug trials.

This information will be used to produce a comprehensive understanding of the Galapagos' transformation planning for widening patient engagement. Training and guidance for using qualitative methods to embed patient engagement for knowledge exchange in host's activities will be developed and assessed. Final outputs will address the ABPI objectives and include patient-facing resources for recruitment to trials of orphan drugs, seminars for scientists and academics, and peer reviewed publications.

Technical Summary

Aim:
To improve clinical trials and medicine use, to benefit both people with orphan conditions and the pharmaceutical industry.

Objectives:
1) To generate theoretically informed and empirically grounded knowledge to inform wider patient engagement in orphan drug development.
2) To embed the use of qualitative research methods in pharmaceutical developments and practice, to enable a wider group of patients to participate and inform orphan drug research.
3) To synthesise understanding from objectives 1 and 2 to enable the redefinition, expansion and reconceptualising of orphan drug engagement to widen their reach and benefit.

Research questions:
1) How do patients and other members of the public experience engaging with the process of orphan drug development, and how can engagement be optimised?
2) What is the promise of orphan drugs for patients and where are the gaps in understanding patients' experience and perspectives in drug development?
3) What would a broader definition of patient engagement entail and how can it best be embedded in the practice of orphan drug development to maximise productivity?

Methods: I will:
1) Convene a patient advisory group to provide insights throughout the project.
2) Conduct semi-structured interviews with 30 patients with IPF; ten health professionals who support them; and ten members of organisations that recruit patients to trials.
3) Conduct nonparticipant observation of host organisations' staff practice (n=15) and semi-structured interviews with key staff (n=10). Support host organisation to trial and evaluate the use of qualitative methods to embed patient engagement into industry organisational practices.

Outputs:
1) Draft guidance for embedding patient engagement for knowledge exchange in industry activities.
2) Ethnography of host's transformation planning for widening patient engagement.
3) Co-designed resources to recruit patients to orphan drug trials, seminar series and publications.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description First trip to work with Galapagos NV in Belgium 
Organisation Galapagos NV
Country Belgium 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution First visit to the Biotech company to which I am seconded for this award. Although I am still awaiting REC approval and cannot yet collect data, this was part of the knowledge exchange function of the award. I supplied teaching about patient engagement, qualitative research methods, and systematic reviewing.
Collaborator Contribution Galapagos allowed me to participate in all of their patient facing activities re: trial recruitment and participation
Impact I inputted into Galapagos recruitment activities for patients with orphan conditions. Galapagos fed into my qualitative interviews withe patients about their experience of orphan drugs and trial participation.
Start Year 2021
 
Description A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue - Steering meetings 2 and 3 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Patients, carers and/or patient groups
Results and Impact Discussion with international patient groups twice, to further make sense of observation and interviews of 'pharma' and change of direction in their drug pipeline and research and patient engagement strategies. helped me to refine questions for continuing the research
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description A talk or presentation - Stakeholder engagement (Pharmaceutical) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact 4 trips to international industry partner and ongoing knowledge exchange regarding patient engagement:
what it is and what it is not
need for different levels of engagement with naive and expert patients
health literacy
hard to engage populations
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Inaugural patient meeting to inform my project design 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact Discussion around why patients have such a limited role in clinical trial protocols, and parameters for discussion around patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, and patients information needs. We discussed the landscape of (professional) Patient Organisations, and how it is a regulatory requirement, which the pharmaceutical industry outsources to Contract Research Organisations. This needs to be agile, but excludes many marginal patients. The focus is on effectiveness, but not the cost-benefit analysis of patients.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Participation in an activity, workshop or similar - second, third and fourth patient meeting to inform my project design 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Patients, carers and/or patient groups
Results and Impact This patient advisory group has met 4 times this year, and have helped with the sense making of:
observations of industry (5) and interviews (10) with pharma staff re: widening patient engagement for orphan drug trials
Interviews with 31 patients with IPF
interviews with 4 clinical/trial staff that recruit patients
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Stakeholder engagement (Clinical) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Discussions with clinicians in other European country about the clinical pathway for a rare disease. Different perspective than the clinicians involved in clinical trials. Would like to see trial criteria to include patients who are likely to die, because this is not an adverse event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Stakeholder engagement (Pharmaceutical) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Discussion around what industry would want my research to do, to be useful:
1) I need to make a company understand what is meaningful for a patient.
2) I need to provide the information that industry needs to be able to recruit more patients to clinical trials.
These are part of the same problem, but require different solutions.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Steering meeting 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Patients, carers and/or patient groups
Results and Impact Discussed Project remit and progress, and set Terms of reference for the steering group
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022