NERC Policy Placement Secondment to support Defra's Chief Scientific Advisor

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Geography

Abstract

Making evidence-based policy decisions relies on assessing the totality of the evidence from all sides of the policy debate. The UK Government Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is responsible for policy on the natural environment, marine and fisheries, food and farming, animal and plant health, and rural communities. The broad remit of Defra means their evidence needs are substantial and cross multiple disciplines. Strong links between government and the wider research community are therefore particularly important for improving the access and use of evidence in policy development and evaluation.

The Defra Chief Scientific Advisor (CSA) and strategic evidence and analysis teams are responsible for Defra's approach to the acquisition and use of evidence to inform strategy, policy and operational delivery. The fellowship will work with Defra's CSA to promote knowledge exchange between academic organisations and Defra to provide research-informed evidence to develop and review policy.

The aims of the fellowship are to: i) Help drive improvements in the evidence base and its use in Defra by providing high-quality, strategic analyses of challenging science-policy issues; ii) Work with the CSA and Defra evidence teams to support the development of Evidence Statements for science-policy issues; iii) Support the development of other innovative approaches to the management and use of evidence in Defra as it develops the Evidence Investment Strategy; iv) Provide the CSA and Defra with assessments of emerging scientific issues of importance to Defra's remit; v) Act as a conduit between Defra evidence teams and the wider academic community, and facilitate new links and networks.

The outcome of the fellowship is improved use of evidence for policy decisions. Specifically, the outcomes and impacts of the fellowship are: i) A series of assessments of high-profile science policy issues to support the CSA in improving the use of science and evidence in Defra; ii) The development of Evidence Statements in partnership with Defra evidence teams to enable policymakers to benefit from the widest and most comprehensive evidence base; iii) The development of innovative mechanisms for the management and use of evidence in Defra, including arrangements for working with external experts; iv) New and strengthened links between Defra and the wider research community.

Publications

10 25 50
publication icon
Bilotta G (2014) On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies in Environmental Science & Policy

publication icon
Bilotta G (2015) How to increase the potential policy impact of environmental science research in Environmental Sciences Europe

publication icon
Bilotta G (2014) Quality assessment tools for evidence from environmental science in Environmental Evidence

publication icon
Kass G (2022) The 'borderlands' of the science-policy interface in The Geographical Journal

 
Description I have contributed to the development and implementation of systematic methods for reviewing evidence for use in policy decisions. In collaboration with the Chief Scientific Adviser Ian Boyd and Research Fellow Gary Bilotta, my research has highlighted the suitability of systematic reviews (primarily used in healthcare) to be adopted for environmental sciences and environmental decisions; and has contributed to the development of a quality assessment tool for environmental studies included in systematic reviews.
Exploitation Route My research at Defra can be advanced by continuing to develop evidence review methods that provide a reliable, unbiased, transparent and rigorous evidence base for policy decisions. This work would best be conducted by academic research fellows seconded to Defra, in partnership with Defra.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment,Government, Democracy and Justice

 
Description My work with the Defra Chief Scientific Adviser is contributing to improving the use of high-quality, unbiased evidence for policy-making. Our research on developing innovative methods for reviewing evidence for policy decisions is contributing to improving the evidence base for policy decisions, improving the management and use of evidence in government, and facilitating new links between evidence experts and policy.
First Year Of Impact 2014
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description NERC Policy Placement Secondment to support Defra's Chief Scientific Advisor
Amount £40,082 (GBP)
Funding ID NE/L008599/2 
Organisation Natural Environment Research Council 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 09/2014 
End 06/2016
 
Description Evidence review workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Workshop brought evidence review experts and government decision-makers together for the decision-makers to learn from the experts and provide feedback on what works in policy.

The workshop:
- Initiated the development of a set of guidelines on conducting evidence reviews for policy makers in Defra.
- Created new links between evidence review experts and policy makers
- Led to the suggestion of future similar meetings with a wider audience
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Quality Framework for Evidence Reviews Workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact One-day workshop on reviewing evidence for policy decision-making. The objectives of the workshop were to: i) Raise awareness in Defra of methods available for reviewing and communicating evidence, ii) Improve understanding in Defra of the sources of bias affecting evidence reviews. The participants reported improved understanding of the need for evidence review standards and clear communication of the quality of evidence being generated; ii) improve knowledge of different evidence review methods and examples of their use, iii) improved understanding of how to implement evidence review and communicate standards throughout their teams.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
 
Description Reviewing and Communicating Evidence Seminar 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Invited seminar to UK Government Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) on best practice in reviewing and communicating evidence. Policy makers need reliable information in order to develop evidence-based policies. The volume of information generated on environment, food and rural issues is vast, making it difficult for policy makers to efficiently integrate information for rational decision making. Reviewing evidence reduces information into manageable nuggets, separating insignificant, unsound or redundant information from the salient. Common methods of reviewing information (e.g. literature review and expert opinion) are useful but may not detect all information required for rational decision making. There are methods available that can increase the credibility and transparency of evidence review findings. The aim of the talk was to: i) Outline the principles of systematic methods for reviewing evidence, ii) Discuss the strengths and limitations of the difference evidence reviewing methods available, iii) Provide practical tips on how to search, appraise and summarise evidence to achieve reliable, credible and transparent findings.

Members of policy and evidence teams attended; the presentation was distributed to evidence teams across Defra; several requests received for further information; and it was reported that some attendees had changed their practice to reflect some of the considerations raised in the seminar.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015