Seminar Series on Food Options, Opinions and Decisions (FOOD): Integrating perspectives on consumer perceptions of food safety, nutrition and waste
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Leeds
Department Name: Leeds University Business School (LUBS)
Abstract
Our seminar series aims to understand and improve UK consumers' decisions about nutrition, food safety, and food waste. Our goals align with DEFRA, the Food and Agricultural Organisation and others who use the modern view of 'food security' for developed countries, by defining it as access to food that is nutritious, affordable, safe, and sustainable, while producing minimum waste. Better food safety and reduced food waste are also high priority for the EU. Improvement is needed because (1) foodborne illnesses amount to 17 mln cases per year in the UK, including 20,000 hospitalizations and 500 deaths; (2) warnings about food risks can cause undue alarm and increase food waste; (3) UK domestic food waste is 7 mln tonnes per year, of which 4.2 mln tonnes is deemed preventable; (4) Fresh food is more nutritious but also more perishable, potentially affecting food safety and food waste; (5) UK consumers are increasingly making unhealthy food choices, contributing to 62% of UK adults being overweight or obese, and leading to health problems that cost the NHS more than £5 billion per year.
Our seminar series is timely and novel because it follows calls to better understand and inform the complex decisions consumers face about nutrition, food safety, and food waste. We aim to identify strategies that help consumers to achieve nutritious food choices that both improve food safety and reduce food waste. Our seminar series has been designed by our team of practitioners and academics, with the goal of achieving the best impact. Our practitioner team members come from the Food Standards Agency which aims to improve food safety and healthy eating, as well as at the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) which aims to reduce food waste. Our academic team members come from the University of Leeds Centre for Decision Research and the Human Appetite Research Unit who are experts in consumer food choice, domestic food waste, and risk communication, as well as from the NewCastle University Food and Society Group at the School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development who are experts in food safety and risk communication. Through 9 seminars to be held over 3 years, we will create a lasting network of users and academics who have mostly been working separately on these different topics to date. We have confirmed academic and practitioner speakers from across the UK and overseas who are key experts in the relevant domains. Seminars will be hosted at and promoted by participating universities and practitioner agencies, thus drawing diverse audiences. We will fund the travel of junior researchers and PhD students, for whom participation provides a unique opportunity for creating new networks and research ideas.
Our project will identify strategies for helping consumers to improve food safety and reduce food waste. The PI and her team of users and academics will build on their international connections to share our findings at meetings with academics, users, consumers, and other interested parties worldwide. Our findings will be summarized in joint review papers that represent practitioner and academic experiences with developing effective strategies for helping consumers with food-related decisions. Our project website will provide public access to recordings and presentation slides from our seminar series, with information for academics, users and consumers about how to improve food safety and reduce food waste. Academics and users will work together to write joint grant proposals, with the goal of designing, implementing and testing the most promising strategies, thus identifying the best ways for helping consumers to make healthier, safer, and less wasteful food choices.
Our seminar series is timely and novel because it follows calls to better understand and inform the complex decisions consumers face about nutrition, food safety, and food waste. We aim to identify strategies that help consumers to achieve nutritious food choices that both improve food safety and reduce food waste. Our seminar series has been designed by our team of practitioners and academics, with the goal of achieving the best impact. Our practitioner team members come from the Food Standards Agency which aims to improve food safety and healthy eating, as well as at the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) which aims to reduce food waste. Our academic team members come from the University of Leeds Centre for Decision Research and the Human Appetite Research Unit who are experts in consumer food choice, domestic food waste, and risk communication, as well as from the NewCastle University Food and Society Group at the School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development who are experts in food safety and risk communication. Through 9 seminars to be held over 3 years, we will create a lasting network of users and academics who have mostly been working separately on these different topics to date. We have confirmed academic and practitioner speakers from across the UK and overseas who are key experts in the relevant domains. Seminars will be hosted at and promoted by participating universities and practitioner agencies, thus drawing diverse audiences. We will fund the travel of junior researchers and PhD students, for whom participation provides a unique opportunity for creating new networks and research ideas.
Our project will identify strategies for helping consumers to improve food safety and reduce food waste. The PI and her team of users and academics will build on their international connections to share our findings at meetings with academics, users, consumers, and other interested parties worldwide. Our findings will be summarized in joint review papers that represent practitioner and academic experiences with developing effective strategies for helping consumers with food-related decisions. Our project website will provide public access to recordings and presentation slides from our seminar series, with information for academics, users and consumers about how to improve food safety and reduce food waste. Academics and users will work together to write joint grant proposals, with the goal of designing, implementing and testing the most promising strategies, thus identifying the best ways for helping consumers to make healthier, safer, and less wasteful food choices.
Planned Impact
Our seminar series aims to understand and improve consumer decisions about nutrition, while increasing food safety and reducing domestic food waste. Our beneficiaries include consumers, practitioners, and policy makers. (See also the Pathways to Impact document)
1. Beneficiaries include consumers in the UK and other developed countries. Our seminar series will identify novel strategies for helping consumers to make more informed decisions about nutrition, food safety and food waste. This effort will build on the PI's expertise in developing effective risk communication for diverse audiences (Bruine de Bruin & Bostrom, 2013). Consumers will also be given access to seminar recordings and presentation slides through our project website. The project website will also provide consumers with information about nutrition, food safety and food waste. We will also create press releases on these topics, targeting consumers. We will bring together practitioners and academic who will jointly seek external funding to take this work forward. Planned follow-up work will involve implementing and testing the most promising strategies - with the ultimate goal of improving consumers' food-related decisions and outcomes.
2. Beneficiaries include practitioners who aim to inform consumers' decisions about nutrition, food safety or food waste. These practitioners will initially benefit by participating in our seminar series. Confirmed participants and speakers include practitioners from our project partners the Food Standards Agency, and Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) as well as agencies such as DEFRA and industry such as Marks and Spencers. Additionally, our project partners Food Standards Agency and WRAP will be hosting some of the seminars, thus making it easier for their practitioner colleagues to attend. Project partners have also agreed to promote our seminar series, helping us to invite practitioners from other user organisations. As noted, our project website will provide access to seminar recordings and presentation slides, to allow even users who can't attend to benefit from our seminar series. Our seminar series will allow practitioners to grow lasting networks with each other and with key academic experts in relevant domains, thus providing a unique opportunity for practitioners and academics to identify promising strategies for helping consumers, and to jointly seek external funding so as to systematically implement and test those strategies. To discuss ongoing work, we plan to continue holding seminars beyond the planned project period.
3. Beneficiaries include policy makers who aim to help consumers with decisions about food safety, food waste, and nutrition. The goal of our seminar series is to identify effective strategies for promoting better consumer decisions about these topics, as well as to take the work forward by forming lasting networks of practitioners and academics, and by seeking joint funding for implementing and testing promising strategies. Although our seminar series will be conducted in the UK, we will share our findings in outreach workshops to international policy makers as organised by the Swiss-based International Risk Governance Council, where the PI is on the scientific committee. She will also address policy makers at risk communication workshops organised by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, and an expert panel at HealthCanada. Our team members also regularly address policy makers, with for example CoI Frewer being scheduled to speak at the Institute for Global Food Security. Our project partner the Food Standards Agency is co-hosting the Paris Risk Group Workshop, which informs the work of international Risk Assessment Agencies and will involve speakers from our project team.
NOTE: The Pathways to Impact document provides more information about our plans for user involvement, our website, press releases, continued seminars and outreach.
1. Beneficiaries include consumers in the UK and other developed countries. Our seminar series will identify novel strategies for helping consumers to make more informed decisions about nutrition, food safety and food waste. This effort will build on the PI's expertise in developing effective risk communication for diverse audiences (Bruine de Bruin & Bostrom, 2013). Consumers will also be given access to seminar recordings and presentation slides through our project website. The project website will also provide consumers with information about nutrition, food safety and food waste. We will also create press releases on these topics, targeting consumers. We will bring together practitioners and academic who will jointly seek external funding to take this work forward. Planned follow-up work will involve implementing and testing the most promising strategies - with the ultimate goal of improving consumers' food-related decisions and outcomes.
2. Beneficiaries include practitioners who aim to inform consumers' decisions about nutrition, food safety or food waste. These practitioners will initially benefit by participating in our seminar series. Confirmed participants and speakers include practitioners from our project partners the Food Standards Agency, and Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) as well as agencies such as DEFRA and industry such as Marks and Spencers. Additionally, our project partners Food Standards Agency and WRAP will be hosting some of the seminars, thus making it easier for their practitioner colleagues to attend. Project partners have also agreed to promote our seminar series, helping us to invite practitioners from other user organisations. As noted, our project website will provide access to seminar recordings and presentation slides, to allow even users who can't attend to benefit from our seminar series. Our seminar series will allow practitioners to grow lasting networks with each other and with key academic experts in relevant domains, thus providing a unique opportunity for practitioners and academics to identify promising strategies for helping consumers, and to jointly seek external funding so as to systematically implement and test those strategies. To discuss ongoing work, we plan to continue holding seminars beyond the planned project period.
3. Beneficiaries include policy makers who aim to help consumers with decisions about food safety, food waste, and nutrition. The goal of our seminar series is to identify effective strategies for promoting better consumer decisions about these topics, as well as to take the work forward by forming lasting networks of practitioners and academics, and by seeking joint funding for implementing and testing promising strategies. Although our seminar series will be conducted in the UK, we will share our findings in outreach workshops to international policy makers as organised by the Swiss-based International Risk Governance Council, where the PI is on the scientific committee. She will also address policy makers at risk communication workshops organised by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, and an expert panel at HealthCanada. Our team members also regularly address policy makers, with for example CoI Frewer being scheduled to speak at the Institute for Global Food Security. Our project partner the Food Standards Agency is co-hosting the Paris Risk Group Workshop, which informs the work of international Risk Assessment Agencies and will involve speakers from our project team.
NOTE: The Pathways to Impact document provides more information about our plans for user involvement, our website, press releases, continued seminars and outreach.
Publications
Frewer L
(2016)
Synthetic biology applied in the agrifood sector: Societal priorities and pitfalls
in Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce
Frewer L
(2016)
Handbook of Hygiene Control in the Food Industry
George S
(2014)
Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: survey study from Singapore
in Journal of Nanoparticle Research
Kaptan G
(2017)
Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases
in Journal of Risk Research
Description | Our seminar series aimed to understand and improve UK consumers' decisions about nutrition, food safety, and domestic food waste. In 9 seminars held over 3 years, we therefore brought together academics from different disciplines (e.g., psychology, sociology, environmental and food science) and practitioners from different agencies (e.g., Food Standards Agency, Waste Resources Action Programme) and industry (e.g., Co-operative, Nestle). Summaries, presentation slides, and videos of the seminars, are available from our publicly available website: https://cdr.leeds.ac.uk/food-options-opinions-and-decisions/ Based on our seminar series and additional interviews conducted with practitioners and academics, the following strategies were identified as relevant for informing future research and practice for helping consumers to achieve nutritious food choices that both improve food safety and reduce food waste: Strategy 1: To help consumers eat healthy food with less waste, communications should focus on • how to shop - shopping with a list and not buying excess, being aware of the importance of portion size for being healthy • how to cook - not wasting much when cooking, knowing how to cook leftover food. • communicating that frozen vegetables are healthy to buy and cook Strategy 2: To help consumers to eat healthy and safe food, communications should focus on • how long to keep food or leftover food • the importance of following food safety practices when preparing and cooking at home Strategy 3: To help consumers to eat safe food with less waste, communications should focus on • how to handle leftovers • what date labels (e.g., use by date, best before date) mean to get particularly informed that it is still safe to eat after the best before date, and not safe to eat after the use by date Strategy 4: To develop effective communications, • be clear and consistent across topic areas • use participatory processes, taking into account consumers' preferred language, wants and needs, as well as socio-economic and cultural factors • collaborate with the media to prevent inaccuracies • involve collaborations between academia, food industry and policy makers to develop communications that are effective from farm to fork • evaluate drafts of communications using a variety of methods Strategy 5: Other interventions In addition to developing more effective communications, seminar participants suggested that interventions should include social media, apps, smart food labeling, cameras in the fridge, cooking classes, breakfast clubs, and pledges. |
Exploitation Route | To follow up on our seminar series, we received funding from the Higher Education Funding Council for England for an N8 Agri-Food Resilience Programme (reported in Further Funding section of Common Outcomes). This 5-year project aims to combine the research excellence of the eight Northern universities to stimulate research and innovation on different themes, including consumption and health. As part of this project, Prof. Louise Dye (Co-I of our seminar series and Leeds Lead of N8 Agri-Food) is leading an interdisciplinary seminar series that aims to enhance our understanding of the role that values play in food choice. As a result of a collaboration that was built during our seminar series, Co-I Gulbanu Kaptan is leading a 3-year research project to examine why people eat traditionally vs. modern, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (reported in Collaborations and Partnerships section of Common Outputs). This project brings together researchers from 10 countries and aims to develop a comprehensive systematization tool that reflects different dimensions of traditional and modern eating behavior, with the ultimate goal of creating interventions that promote healthy eating and prevent the development of obesity. |
Sectors | Agriculture Food and Drink |
URL | https://cdr.leeds.ac.uk/food-options-opinions-and-decisions/ |
Description | The findings from our seminar series have been applied by our partners at the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and Waste Resources Action Programme (WRAP), to inform the design of their communications and interventions. FSA's communications and interventions focus on improving food safety, while WRAP's communications and interventions focus on reducing food waste. The seminar series highlighted that recommendations towards either goal were contradictory, but that strategies are available for achieving both goals. |
First Year Of Impact | 2016 |
Sector | Agriculture, Food and Drink |
Description | HEFCE Catalyst Fund |
Amount | £16,000,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Higher Education Funding Council for England |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 03/2015 |
End | 04/2020 |
Description | Research Centre Funding Scheme |
Amount | £4,450 (GBP) |
Organisation | University of Leeds |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2015 |
End | 07/2015 |
Description | Project on Why People eat in a Traditional or Modern Way: A Cross-cultural Study |
Organisation | University of Konstanz |
Department | Department of Psychology |
Country | Germany |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | developing a comprehensive systematization and assessment tool that will reflect different dimensions and facets of traditional and modern eating behavior to create interventions that promote normal eating and prevent the development of obesity and eating disorders. |
Collaborator Contribution | developing a comprehensive systematization and assessment tool that will reflect different dimensions and facets of traditional and modern eating behavior to create interventions that promote normal eating and prevent the development of obesity and eating disorders. |
Impact | A survey measuring people's understanding of traditional and modern eating was developed. |
Start Year | 2017 |
Description | 30th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, Aberdeen (UK) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Title: Food Evaluations and Eating Decisions: Are Judgments Contagious? Abstract: . We examined the effects of denotative (i.e., being nutritious, being safe) and connotative attributes (being ethical, inducing craving, and causing disgust) on attitudes (food evaluations) and behaviors (eating decisions). The results suggest that people generally ate and gave high evaluations to foods with high ratings on the positive connotative attributes, even if they believed them to be non-nutritious. Conversely, they did not eat or rate highly foods with negative connotative judgments, however nutritious and safe they seemed. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Dubrovnik International University |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | About 50 postgraduate students attended a presentation entitled "A behavioural decision research approach to developing effective communications" which sparked questions and discussion afterwards. Abstract: In their lives, people face decisions about risks affecting their health, finances, and environmental footprint. Experts in different domains may be asked to develop communications with the goal of improving people's judgments and decisions about specific risks. Such communication efforts may fail if experts lack information about what wording people prefer to use to describe relevant concepts, what information people need or want to know to make more informed decisions, and what barriers people experience when trying to change their behavior. In this presentation, I will present the social science behind effective communication development, and end with key lessons learned. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | https://www.facebook.com/wandibruinedebruin/posts/172181656635508?pnref=story |
Description | Food, Consumer Behaviour and Heath Research Centre and School of Law at the University of Surrey |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | This workshop sought to initiate the development of a model which can improve regulatory design for nutrition and health needs in food law. It brought together academics, practitioners and policy-makers from a range of disciplines and locations to explore whether and how public health nutrition research can inform better the design and implementation of European Union (EU) food law. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Keynote address. Mediating climate change conference, University of Leeds, School of English. |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | This keynote address was entited 'Understanding and Informing People's Decisions About Climate Change' Abstract: Consumers face many daunting decisions about climate change, mitigation and adaptation. Communication efforts to inform these decisions may fail if communicators lack information about what information people need or want to know to make more informed decisions, and what barriers people experience when trying to change their behavior. In this presentation, I will present examples of how behavioural decision research can help to understand and inform people's decisions. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | http://romanticcatastrophe.leeds.ac.uk/files/2017/06/MCCProgramme-4.pdf |
Description | National University of Singapore's Lloyd's Register Foundation Institute for the Public Understanding of Risk, Public Lecture, Singapore. |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Improving communications about complex scientific data to non-expert audiences |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, US |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | TITLE: Behavioral decision research approaches to developing effective communications ABSTRACT: Consumers face decisions about health, environmental and financial risks. Domain experts are often tasked with developing communications to improve people's risk understanding and decision-making competence. However, their communication efforts may fail if experts misunderstand the informational needs of their audiences. In this presentation, I will present the social science behind effective communication development, using examples from a wide range of contexts. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | https://www.santafe.edu/events/behavioral-decision-research-approaches-to-de |
Description | Seminar 1 Practitioners' perspectives on consumers' choices about food safety, nutrition and waste |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Seminar 1 Title: Practitioners' perspectives on consumers' choices about food safety, nutrition and waste Location: University of Leeds Speakers: Professor Wandi Bruine de Bruin, Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School; Dr Sian Thomas, Food Standards Agency (FSA); Dr Andrew Parry Waste Resources Action programme (WRAP); and Dr Kieron Stanley, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 2 Consumer behaviour: overlaps between health, safety, waste and sustainability |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Seminar 2 Seminar 2 Consumer behaviour: overlaps between health, safety, waste and sustainabili Location: Food Standards Agency (FSA), London Speakers: Professor Matteo Vittuari, University of Bologna; Professor Julie Barnett, University of Bath; and Dr Tom Quested, WRAP. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 3 Food choice and behaviour, nutrition interventions, and implications for waste |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Seminar 3 Food choice and behaviour, nutrition interventions, and implications for waste Location: Newcastle University, hosted by the School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development Speakers: Professor Paul Rozin, University of Pennsylvania; Professor Louise Dye, University of Leeds; and Professor Peter Jackson from the University of Sheffield. Panel discussion members: Michael Shields, General Manager at FareShare Northeast, and Andrew Griffiths, Sustainability Manager at Nestle. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 4 Psychological and sociological factors contributing to food waste, safety and nutrition |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Seminar 4 Psychological and sociological factors contributing to food waste, safety and nutrition Location: Banbury Town Hall, Oxfordshire. (Hosted by WRAP) Speakers: Professor Daniel Read, Warwick Business School. (Facilitated discussions were led by Dr Tom Quested, WRAP, and Dr Nicola Bown, Leeds University Business School.) |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 5: Communicating better about food |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Seminar 5: Communicating better about food Date: 14th April 2016 Host: University of Leeds (Leeds) Speakers: Professor Baruch Fischhoff (Carnegie Mellon University), Professor Lynn Frewer (Newcastle University), and Dr Eric VanEpps (University of Pennsylvania). Panel discussion: All speakers, as well as Dr Sian Thomas (Food Standards Agency) and Sarah Bromley (Waste and Resources Action Programme) Approximate number of attendees: 40 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 6: The role of supermarkets in consumer food choices and sustainable strategies |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Seminar 6: The role of supermarkets in consumer food choices and sustainable strategies Date: 30th June 2016 Host: Food Standards Agency (London) Speakers: Dr. Sian Thomas (Food Standards Agency), Craig Noonan (Co-operative), Professor William Young (University of Leeds). Panel discussion with: Prof. William Young (University of Leeds), Ylva Haglund (Zero Waste Scotland), dietician Deborah David, and Kieron Stanley (DEFRA) Panel discussion: All speakers Approximate number of attendees: 40 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 7: Integrating perspectives on consumer perceptions for food safety, nutrition and waste. |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Seminar 7: Integrating perspectives on consumer perceptions for food safety, nutrition and waste. Date: 17 January 2017 Host: Waste Resources Action Programme (Banbury) Speakers: Dr Gulbanu Kaptan, (University of Leeds), Professor Jason Halford (University of Liverpool), Professor Monique Raats, (University of Surrey). For the panel discussion, the three speakers were joined by Dr Angela Meah from the University of Sheffield and Dr Bojana Bajzelj from WRAP. The panel discussion was chaired by Prof Louise Dye (Univ of Leeds). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://lubswww.leeds.ac.uk/cdr/projects/seminar-series-on-food/ |
Description | Seminar 8: Food security and novel food solutions: Implications for food choice, safety, and waste. |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Title: Food security and novel food solutions: Implications for food choice, safety, and waste. Location: School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, the event was held at Newcastle University. Speakers: Michael Siegrist (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Margot Kuttschreuter (University of Twente, Netherlands), and Gavin Stewart (Newcastle University). For the panel discussion, the speakers were joined by Angela Booth (AB Agri Director of Feed Safety). The panel discussion chaired by Dr Sharron Kuznesof (Newcastle University). Taking questions from the audience, the panel and delegates discussed: who are the agents of change; how do the different areas (health, safety and waste) trade off each other and is there a priority; how to communicate the issues to consumers; the need to make food security more prominent in consumers' minds; how the topics are political issues; how much responsibility lies with the consumer; the customer perception of quality and safety; and whether food waste is a market failure. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | https://cdr.leeds.ac.uk/food-options-opinions-and-decisions/ |
Description | Seminar 9: Facing the future of FOOD |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Title: Facing the future of food. Host: University of Leeds. Speakers: Hannelore Daniel (University of Munich, Germany), Adam Smith (The Real Junk Food Project), and Tim Benton (University of Leeds). All our speakers then joined a panel discussed chaired by Jay Rayner, journalist, food critic and musician. Taking questions from the audience, the panel had a lively discussion about the various issues surrounding the future of food. Rounding up the event, Professor Wändi Bruine de Bruin (University of Leeds) gave a presentation summarising the seminar series and Professor Louise Dye, (University of Leeds) discussed how the series could be developed further through the N8 AgriFood project. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | https://cdr.leeds.ac.uk/food-options-opinions-and-decisions/ |
Description | Seminar at University of Michigan's Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (US) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | This seminar was focused on helping health care professionals and medical experts to improve communications with patients and other non-expert audiences. A youtube video was made. Audience members said to have learned new ways to communicate. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7tjW7FAmkQ&index=6 |
Description | Seminar at University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.) |
Results and Impact | Talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards. New interdisciplinary collaborations and grant writing were planned. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/research/events/seminars |
Description | Seminar at University of Surrey |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Presentation followed by discussion |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Smithsonian Museum of Natural Science, Department of Mineral Sciences, Washington DC, US. |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Title: A behavioural decision research approach to developing effective communications Abstract: In their lives, people face decisions about risks affecting their health, finances, and environmental footprint. Experts in different domains may be asked to develop communications with the goal of improving people's judgments and decisions about specific risks. Such communication efforts may fail if experts lack information about what wording people prefer to use to describe relevant concepts, what information people need or want to know to make more informed decisions, and what barriers people experience when trying to change their behavior. In this presentation, I will present the social science behind effective communication development. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Society for Risk Analysis Annual Meeting, Arlington, Virginia (USA) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Title: Identifying critical gaps in consumers' understanding. Abstract: Drawing on methods and results from cognitive psychology, this study applies the mental models approach to characterizing consumers' beliefs regarding food safety, with a focus on how those beliefs shape their responses to communications regarding food recalls and foodborne illnesses. The interview and survey results revealed good knowledge of food-handling practices, but limited knowledge of several key processes shaping those risks. In particular, participants underestimated both (a) the incubation period between exposure and illness, leading them to misattribute health problems, and (b) the contagiousness of foodborne illnesses, leading them to expose others inadvertently. Communications addressing such gaps in consumers' mental models would help them to translate their existing knowledge into action, when food recalls raise their level of concern. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Society for Risk Analysis Europe Conference, Bath (UK) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Title: Eliciting expert opinion on consumers' understanding of the interactions between nutrition, food safety, and food waste: implications for communications. Abstract: We interviewed experts from the domains of nutrition, food safety, and food waste to summarize their perspectives of the interactions between these domains, and their relevance for informing consumers' food choices. The participants indicated that consuming smaller portions, using more frozen food, and improving culinary skills may improve healthy eating and food safety practices, while reducing food waste. Second, they identified major problems with existing communications about food, such as the proliferation of inconsistent information from competing sources, and consumers' consistent confusion about labels. Third, they suggested integrating research and policy-related activities across these domains to improve communications. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | US National Academy of Sciences Expert Consensus Panel on "Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda." |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | An expert panel organised by the US National Academy of Sciences prepared a consensus report on The Science of Science Communication, which was made publicly available online and released in a public event that was web-casted all over the world. Report: https://www.nap.edu/read/23674/chapter/2 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | https://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/CommitteeView.aspx?key=49754 |
Description | University of Leeds |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | The participants discussed the current academic and professional practice regarding household food insecurity in the UK and research and training needs regarding this topic. It was agreed to establish a household food insecurity network.to share research ideas, find researchers to collaborate with and open up the resource to stakeholders. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | University of Trieste, Department of Life Sciences |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Title: A behavioral decision research approach to developing effective environmental and health communications Abstract: Members of the general public and stakeholders from industry and government face difficult decisions about environmental and health risks. Experts in environmental and health domains face the challenge of communicating about those risks to various audiences without a background in health or environmental science. Such communication efforts may fail if experts lack an understanding of their audience, what language they prefer, and what information they need or want to make more informed decisions. In this presentation, I will present a behavioral decision research approach towards developing effective communications. Examples focus on sustainability, climate change, and HIV prevention, but recommendations can be applied across multiple domains. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Workshop at Public Health England |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | The PI gave a presentation at Public Health England about how to communicate with non-expert audiences about hot weather and other health risks. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Workshop for practitioners and policy makers (Utrecht, Netherlands) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | The PI gave a workshop as part of the course "Psychology of Sustainability" for the Impact Academy in Utrecht, The Netherlands. The course was taken by practitioners and policy makers. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | http://www.agnesvandenberg.nl/duurzaamheid.pdf |