Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor (I2S-LWR)
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Cambridge
Department Name: Engineering
Abstract
This research project will evaluate the concept of an advanced (beyond Gen-III+), large light water reactor (LWR) (GWe-class), with advanced fuel design, several specific novel design features, and safety enhanced beyond the passive safety in state-of-the-art LWRs. It is not competing with the current large Gen-III+ reactors (such as the Westinghouse AP1000 or the Areva EPR) with respect to markets or timeline, but addressing the next step in nuclear power generation.
State-of-the-art LWR designs include:
1. Large LWRs with power levels by definition >700MWe, and in practice of the order of 1 GWe (typically in the 900-1,600 MWe range for modern large LWRs).
2. Passive safety in some of the large Gen-III+ LWRs (e.g., AP1000) notably enhances safety characteristics when compared to the older generation reactors currently operating.
3. Enhanced safety is achieved in some conceived small modular reactor designs by features (including an integral primary circuit) which deterministically eliminate some accident initiators and probabilistically promote the safety level beyond passive safety ("inherent safety").
However, it is perceived that inherent safety limits the power level to small/medium size. The new concept to be investigated in this project aims to achieve both large power and inherent safety simultaneously.
This project will evaluate a novel concept of a high-power ("GWe-class", i.e., at least 900 MWe, and preferably 1 GWe or more) inherently safe LWR. Inherent safety is used to denote:
- a safety level beyond that of passive Gen-III+ LWRs (achieved by elimination of accident initiators and enhanced probabilistic indicators);
- a long-term self-sustained decay heat removal capability with no need for intervention in case of an accident and loss of external power;
- improved resilience to seismic events.
Additional desirable safety characteristics are incorporated as well.
Key design elements enabling the design objectives to be achieved are:
- fuel with increased accident tolerance;
- compact core design;
- compact heat exchanger design;
- ambient/air as the ultimate heat sink for decay heat removal;
- integral primary circuit layout;
- seismic isolators.
This project will investigate and evaluate a range of design details and choices in respect of the reactor core, fuel design, fuel cladding, coolant flow conditions, heat exchangers, instrumentation and plant configuration in order to identify and assess both technically and economically options that meet the design objectives.
A critical novel aspect of the concept is high power (and high power density) in an integral primary system layout. Conventional wisdom is that a higher power density will challenge safety performance. However, in this new assessment, it is realised that high power density may have both positive and negative impacts on safety indicators, and thus the overall effect is not necessarily negative. The major positive impact, as compared to large power loop reactors, is that it enables an integral configuration, which is significantly more conducive to inherent safety.
From an economic perspective, the compact design leads to a reduced footprint which reduces the cost. High specific power reduces fuel carryover charges. Compact design facilitates (and reduces cost) of a design resilient to seismic events and security treats. A portion of that saving is used for a long-term self-sustained decay heat removal system, overall providing increased safety and competitive design.
State-of-the-art LWR designs include:
1. Large LWRs with power levels by definition >700MWe, and in practice of the order of 1 GWe (typically in the 900-1,600 MWe range for modern large LWRs).
2. Passive safety in some of the large Gen-III+ LWRs (e.g., AP1000) notably enhances safety characteristics when compared to the older generation reactors currently operating.
3. Enhanced safety is achieved in some conceived small modular reactor designs by features (including an integral primary circuit) which deterministically eliminate some accident initiators and probabilistically promote the safety level beyond passive safety ("inherent safety").
However, it is perceived that inherent safety limits the power level to small/medium size. The new concept to be investigated in this project aims to achieve both large power and inherent safety simultaneously.
This project will evaluate a novel concept of a high-power ("GWe-class", i.e., at least 900 MWe, and preferably 1 GWe or more) inherently safe LWR. Inherent safety is used to denote:
- a safety level beyond that of passive Gen-III+ LWRs (achieved by elimination of accident initiators and enhanced probabilistic indicators);
- a long-term self-sustained decay heat removal capability with no need for intervention in case of an accident and loss of external power;
- improved resilience to seismic events.
Additional desirable safety characteristics are incorporated as well.
Key design elements enabling the design objectives to be achieved are:
- fuel with increased accident tolerance;
- compact core design;
- compact heat exchanger design;
- ambient/air as the ultimate heat sink for decay heat removal;
- integral primary circuit layout;
- seismic isolators.
This project will investigate and evaluate a range of design details and choices in respect of the reactor core, fuel design, fuel cladding, coolant flow conditions, heat exchangers, instrumentation and plant configuration in order to identify and assess both technically and economically options that meet the design objectives.
A critical novel aspect of the concept is high power (and high power density) in an integral primary system layout. Conventional wisdom is that a higher power density will challenge safety performance. However, in this new assessment, it is realised that high power density may have both positive and negative impacts on safety indicators, and thus the overall effect is not necessarily negative. The major positive impact, as compared to large power loop reactors, is that it enables an integral configuration, which is significantly more conducive to inherent safety.
From an economic perspective, the compact design leads to a reduced footprint which reduces the cost. High specific power reduces fuel carryover charges. Compact design facilitates (and reduces cost) of a design resilient to seismic events and security treats. A portion of that saving is used for a long-term self-sustained decay heat removal system, overall providing increased safety and competitive design.
Planned Impact
This research project will evaluate the concept of an advanced (beyond Gen-III+), large light water reactor (LWR) (GWe-class), with advanced fuel design, several specific novel design features, and safety enhanced beyond the passive safety in state-of-the-art LWRs. If this evaluation confirms the expectations of the concept's proponents, it will bring a safer, more cost-effective and more environmentally friendly form of nuclear power closer to realisation.
This will benefit:
- electricity consumers, through provision of electricity in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way;
- the nuclear power industry and the electricity supply industry, through the development of a new, more cost-effective and inherently safer reactor design;
- the general public, through the provision of electricity with low carbon emissions and less environmental impact than current nuclear reactor designs;
- UK science and engineering, through the increased interest generated in these disciplines by groundbreaking projects such as this, and in particular in young people, attracting more of them to study these strategically important subjects at university.
The research to be conducted at the University of Cambridge will focus in particular on evaluating the potential to use thorium-bearing fuels in the inherently safe high-power LWR concept. In addition to establishing basic feasibility, we will assess the extent to which the use of thorium-bearing fuels facilitates better use of uranium resources in comparison to conventional Gen-III+ reactors and fuel cycles. If thorium-bearing fuels are indeed an attractive option, then there is considerable potential for Springfields Fuels Limited in Preston to benefit as Westinghouse (the parent company) are substantially involved in this proposal.
This will benefit:
- electricity consumers, through provision of electricity in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way;
- the nuclear power industry and the electricity supply industry, through the development of a new, more cost-effective and inherently safer reactor design;
- the general public, through the provision of electricity with low carbon emissions and less environmental impact than current nuclear reactor designs;
- UK science and engineering, through the increased interest generated in these disciplines by groundbreaking projects such as this, and in particular in young people, attracting more of them to study these strategically important subjects at university.
The research to be conducted at the University of Cambridge will focus in particular on evaluating the potential to use thorium-bearing fuels in the inherently safe high-power LWR concept. In addition to establishing basic feasibility, we will assess the extent to which the use of thorium-bearing fuels facilitates better use of uranium resources in comparison to conventional Gen-III+ reactors and fuel cycles. If thorium-bearing fuels are indeed an attractive option, then there is considerable potential for Springfields Fuels Limited in Preston to benefit as Westinghouse (the parent company) are substantially involved in this proposal.
Organisations
People |
ORCID iD |
Geoffrey Parks (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Kotlyar D
(2017)
Screening the design space for optimized plutonium incineration performance in the thorium-based I2S-LWR
in Annals of Nuclear Energy
Kotlyar D
(2017)
Thorium-based plutonium incineration in the I2S-LWR
in Annals of Nuclear Energy
Kotlyar D
(2016)
Enhancing plutonium incineration in the thorium-based I 2 S-LWR design with loading pattern optimization
in Annals of Nuclear Energy
Kotlyar D
(2016)
Thorium-based plutonium incineration in the I$^2$S-LWR
Kotlyar D.
(2016)
A multi-batch approach for enhanced plutonium incineration in the thorium-based I2S-LWR design
in Physics of Reactors 2016, PHYSOR 2016: Unifying Theory and Experiments in the 21st Century
Li S.
(2016)
First core design for the I2S-LWR 18-month cycle
in Physics of Reactors 2016, PHYSOR 2016: Unifying Theory and Experiments in the 21st Century
Lindley B
(2016)
Reactor physics modelling of accident tolerant fuel for LWRs using ANSWERS codes
in EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies
Description | This research has demonstrated that a thorium-plutonium mixed oxide (TOX) fuel cycle deployed in the Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor has the potential to incinerate plutonium far more efficiently than the conventional uranium-plutonium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel cycle. This incineration performance is improved through the use of multi-batch refueling strategies. Other plausible modifications to the TOX cycle design may further enhance its performance considerably. We have also found that such a TOX cycle may simplify the design and operation of the spent fuel waste repository. |
Exploitation Route | This project was the UK contribution to the US Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy University Programs Integrated Research Project "Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor (I2S-LWR)". The US PIs are in discussion with DOE about a follow-on project. Our research on the deployment of thorium-plutonium mixed oxide fuel in light water reactors is not specific to the I2S-LWR, and follow-on work is being taken forward in a PhD project "Use of Thorium-fuelled LWRs to Manage the UK's Plutonium Stockpile" sponsored by Thor Energy AS through the Imperial-Cambridge-Open (ICO) universities Nuclear Centre for Doctoral Training. |
Sectors | Energy Environment Security and Diplomacy |
Description | The research project was featured in a departmental newsletter distributed to alumni and supporters. |
First Year Of Impact | 2015 |
Sector | Energy,Environment |
Impact Types | Policy & public services |
Description | 3 February 2015 NE Herts IMechE |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Talk entitled "Thorium-fueled Nuclear Power: What's all the fuss about?" to NE Herts branch of the IMechE, which sparked questions and discussions afterwards. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | 8 January 2015 Kimberley STEM Academy talk |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Schools |
Results and Impact | Talk entitled "Thorium-fueled Nuclear Power: What's all the fuss about?" to about 40 Year 12 students at Kimberley STEM Academy which sparked questions and discussions afterwards. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Research Showcase for DECC |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | The latest work on this project was presented (in a 20 minute presentation) to a delegation of staff from the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and other invited parties interested in research in future nuclear energy systems and fuel cycles as part of a workshop to showcase current research in these areas at the University of Cambridge Department of Engineering (organised at the request of DECC). The workshop resulted in several follow-up actions and a request from DECC to make this an annual event. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2014 |