Respiratory sensitisation in humans: Characterisation of pulmonary epithelial:dendritic cell interactions
Lead Research Organisation:
Imperial College London
Department Name: National Heart and Lung Institute
Abstract
We are exposed to a range of chemicals in day-to-day life, at home and at work, which may have unwanted health effects. In this study we are interested in the sensitivity of the lung to chemicals that are inhaled, usually while at work. Not everybody is affected, but when those who are affected are exposed to the same chemical again they may experience an asthma attack, and they may also react to other agents that they inhale from the air (this accounts for approximately 10% of adult-onset asthma). This is called respiratory sensitisation. It is important to determine whether existing or newly-developed chemicals will cause respiratory sensitisation, and if so, the magnitude of the response. It is also important to understand the cellular mechanisms that are involved. The immunological responses of the lung are complex, and no validated tests exist to determine the potential of chemicals to initiate these responses. Animal experiments are often used to help make these assessments, but they are not always very accurate, although they do help us understand some of the mechanisms involved. Furthermore, the 7th Amendment to the European Union Cosmetics Directive (European Commission, 2003) recommends that we develop new ways of testing compounds so that we reduce animal experimentation. The strategy is called the 3Rs, Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of the use of animals in scientific tests. One aim of this study is to establish testing methods that avoid using animals by using human cells. Use of human cells is important as it will ensure development of a more representative model for assessing the potency of these chemicals in man. The cells in the lung that respond to inhaled particles are the lung's 'skin', epithelial cells, as well as cells that act like a vacuum cleaner, internalising and neutralising inhaled material that settles on the 'skin'; which are called macrophages. Epithelial cells and macrophages send messages to dendritic cells that sit underneath the lung epithelial cells. Dendritic cells also extend long 'probes' onto the epithelial surface where they can directly interact with any inhaled chemicals. Depending on the messages received, dendritic cells then activate the immune response to fight infection and other foreign particles that reach the lung. However, sometimes the messages go wrong, and this is when the lung becomes very sensitive to some types of inhaled particles and chemicals. We aim to isolate cells from adult human lung tissue that is removed during an operation to remove a tumour. Normal regions of lung that are attached to, but not affected by, the tumour can be used. We will then culture epithelial, macrophage and dendritic cells alone, and together in a 3-dimensional model resembling the lung. We will expose the cells to chemicals that we know are respiratory sensitisers, as well as chemicals that do not cause respiratory sensitisation, to examine the cellular messaging pathways involved in respiratory sensitisation. We also want to determine whether there are unique responses that identify chemical sensitisers so that these culture models can be developed and used for routine testing of existing and new compounds that might affect the lung. In addition, with this knowledge, it should be possible to develop drugs that prevent these abnormal responses. These models could be used to avoid the use of animals to investigate respiratory sensitisers to understand mechanisms of respiratory sensitisation.
Technical Summary
Respiratory chemical sensitisation usually occurs as a result of occupational exposure and forms 10% of adult-onset asthma. Animal models may be used to examine putative sensitisers but have not been validated and do not accurately measure and rank respiratory sensitisers. We aim to use primary human lung alveolar epithelial type II cells (HATII) and macrophages, as well as human monocte-derived dendritic cells (DC) to establish in vitro models to a) investigate molecular mechanisms b) identify unique markers of chemical respiratory sensitisation which may be used for in vitro testing to avoid use of animals. Techniques already established by us will be used to isolate epithelial cells and macrophages from normal regions of human lung tissue following resection for carcinoma; established techniques will be used to prepare monocyte-derived DC. Ultimately, if primary human lung DC can be isolated, their responses will be compared with the monocyte-derived DC to validate the models. The cells will be exposed to known respiratory sensitisers as well as control chemicals that do not elicit a pulmonary response (eg contact sensitisers). Each cell type will be exposed alone, to generate conditioned media, to test the effects of released mediators on DC maturation, migration and function (eg measuring chemokine, cytokine and cell receptor switching). Co-cultures will be established of all three cell types with macrophages situated apically on HATII, on transwell membranes, and DC below the membranes. Responses to apically administered chemicals will be examined. Analysis will include use of leading-edge technologies including targeted gene microarray analysis of gene expression, multiplex analysis of chemokine, cytokine, surface receptor and growth factor protein release/expression, confocal microscopy and FACS analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of the molecular signalling pathways involved.
People |
ORCID iD |
Teresa Dorothy Tetley (Principal Investigator) |
Publications

BéruBé K
(2009)
In vitro models of inhalation toxicity and disease. The report of a FRAME workshop.
in Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA

Mukherjee D
(2015)
Modeling In Vivo Interactions of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Pulmonary Alveolar Lining Fluid.
in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)

Tsoumakidou M
(2009)
Expression of blood dendritic cell antigens (BDCAs) by CD1a+ human pulmonary cells.
in Respiratory medicine
Description | The ability of a respiratory (trimellitic anhydride;TMA) and dermal (dinitrochlorobenzene;DNCB) sensitizer to induce human alveolar epithelial cell mediators, notably dendritic cell (DC) chemoattractants, was examined in vitro. The ability of these epithelial cell mediators to induce DC migration across a transwell membrane was also assessed. Protein conjugation of the test chemical haptens was found to be critical in determining their allergenicity. This is important as it emulates the conditions in vivo. In this instance, the in vitro culture model using primary human alveolar type 2 epithelial cells (AT2 cells) has demonstrated that at sub-toxic doses the sensitizing potential of DNCB and TMA in their 'raw' form are limited. Thus, AT2 cell MIP-3_ (a known chemoattractant for DCs) release increased at the sub-toxic doses of chemical haptens chosen, and in particular the conjugated forms of both DNCB and TMA had a higher sensitizing potential than the non-conjugated forms as observed by the greater amount of MIP-3_ secreted. The conjugated form of TMA elicited a greater and more rapid response compared with conjugated DNCB. Therefore the rate of MIP-3a secretion at this early time-point could be used as an endpoint to discriminate between contact sensitizers and respiratory sensitizers, and subsequently provide the basis of an in vitro screening tool. Conjugation of the sensitizer with an endogenous protein (in this case albumin) is also more representative of in vivo conditions and is crucial in differentiating respiratory from dermal sensitizers in this model. This differentiation between respiratory and dermal sensitizers was also evident in the work carried out with the monocyte derived human dendritic cells (DCs). Conjugated TMA caused an increase in the production of IL-10 which fits the profile of a Th2 type response, as has been associated with respiratory allergy. Exposure of DCs to conjugated DNCB was associated with an increase in IL-12 production which fits the expected profile of a Th-1 type response. Another key outcome is that significant differences in response between alveolar epithelial type 1 cells (AT1) and AT2 cells in vitro were observed. As AT1 and AT2 cells have discrete functions in vivo this is perhaps not surprising. When challenged with the conjugated DNCB and TMA, AT2 cell-derived mediators induced a greater degree of DC migration (across a transwell membrane) than the AT1 cell-derived mediators, although both induced a response greater than control. Although AT2 cells secrete MIP3a, a well documented DC chemoattractant, AT1 cells do not, suggesting that the induction of DC migration by AT1 cells is due to other as yet unidentified chemoattractant molecules. The non-conjugated chemicals did not induce any responses significantly different from control, demonstrating again the role of haptenation in sensitization in vivo. Although both conjugated sensitisers induced significant responses, the TMA conjugate induced a significantly greater migration of DCs than conjugated DNCB. This demonstrated that differences in DC migration stimuli could be used as a biomarker for differentiating dermal and respiratory sensitizers in vitro. The primary AT2 model was more sensitive as a hazard assessment tool than AT1 cells. However this model is less practical due to insufficient human tissue for routine screening. The AT1 model is effective when using DC migration towards AT1 conditioned media and as these cells are routinely available, they are a more accessible basis for a screening model. Compared to AT2 cells, a novel finding is that AT1 cells must release alternative mediators of DC recruitment which are likely to be important in vivo. Determination of these mediators will provide important differential markers of respiratory sensitization using the AT1 model. In summary, this study has identified several key factors which should be part of a future hazard assessment tool for the determination of respiratory sensitizers: • AT2 cells appear more responsive to sensitising chemicals than AT1 cells, therefore may provide a more sensitive basis for a hazard assessment tool. • Conjugation of test item with a protein that exists within the cellular environment in vivo increases the sensitivity of the screen and differentiates respiratory and dermal sensitizers • DC chemoattractants have been identified as having potential application as specific biomarkers of respiratory sensitisation (e.g. MIP-3a) • Short-term responses are more notable for respiratory than dermal sensitizers and this rapid response could provide a basis for differentiating such sensitizers as part of a hazard screen |
Exploitation Route | These models could be exploited to test existing and potential sensitisers |
Sectors | Chemicals Environment Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology |
Description | National Nanotoxicology Research Committee |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
Description | FP7 Programme |
Amount | £437,500 (GBP) |
Organisation | European Commission |
Department | Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) |
Sector | Public |
Country | European Union (EU) |
Start | 11/2008 |
End | 10/2012 |
Description | MRC-HPA Center PhD studentship |
Amount | £80,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Medical Research Council (MRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 08/2011 |
End | 08/2014 |
Description | NE/H012893/1 Risk Assessment for Manufactured Nanoparticles Used in Consumer Products (RAMNUC) (£1.4m shared between T Lee, P Elliott and T Tetley |
Amount | £1,200,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NE/H012893/1 |
Organisation | Natural Environment Research Council |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 04/2010 |
End | 04/2014 |
Description | Nanoparticles effects on cell membranes and function - programme grant/Naional Institute for Environmentyal Health, US |
Amount | £1,200,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NIEHS No. U19ES019536 |
Organisation | National Institutes of Health (NIH) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United States |
Start | 04/2010 |
End | 04/2015 |
Description | PhD Studentship |
Amount | £140,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Unilever |
Sector | Private |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2010 |
End | 09/2013 |
Description | PhD studentship |
Amount | £80,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Public Health England |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2011 |
End | 01/2015 |
Description | PhD studentship |
Amount | £80,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Innovate UK |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2012 |
End | 01/2015 |
Description | PhD studentship National Heart & Lung Institute |
Amount | £60,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Imperial College London |
Department | National Heart & Lung Institute (NHLI) |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2010 |
End | 09/2013 |
Description | RCUK Fellowship |
Amount | £125,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start |
Description | Royal Brompton NHS Trust PhD studentship |
Amount | £80,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 08/2010 |
End | 08/2013 |
Description | Travel award |
Amount | £340 (GBP) |
Organisation | European Respiratory Society (ERS) |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 08/2009 |
End | 09/2010 |
Description | Travel award |
Amount | £1,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | The Royal Society |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 04/2007 |
End | 05/2007 |
Description | Travel award |
Amount | £750 (GBP) |
Organisation | British Lung Foundation (BLF) |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 04/2009 |
End | 05/2009 |
Description | Travel award NanImpactNet EU |
Amount | £400 (GBP) |
Organisation | European Commission |
Sector | Public |
Country | European Union (EU) |
Start |
Description | Travel award NanoImpact EU |
Amount | £400 (GBP) |
Organisation | European Commission |
Sector | Public |
Country | European Union (EU) |
Start |
Description | Travel award NanoImpactnet EU |
Amount | £400 (GBP) |
Organisation | European Commission |
Sector | Public |
Country | European Union (EU) |
Start |
Title | In vitro models of human respiratory unit |
Description | The work in this project was the start of examining exactly how inhaled nanomaterials would interact with the alveolar epithelium and translocate into the pulmonary interstitium or possibly the vasculature. Very exact mechanisms have been identified, including punching holes into the epithelium and active processes involving clathrin. a small percentage (3%) of particles have been shown to translocate to the basal compartment. |
Type Of Material | Model of mechanisms or symptoms - in vitro |
Year Produced | 2012 |
Provided To Others? | Yes |
Impact | This research tool allows for very accurate determinstion of the uptake and translocation of nanosized objects through human respiratory epithelium. |
URL | http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn505399e |
Description | Exposure of experimental animals to aerosolised nanoparticulates |
Organisation | Public Health England |
Department | Centre for Radiation, Chemicals and Environmental Hazards (CRCE) |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Public |
PI Contribution | We will be performing the cellular/molecular analyses. The material scientists associated with this research will provide the nanoparticles. |
Collaborator Contribution | The agency has uniqure inhalation facilities which have been established by experts in aerosol science who will set up the facility, advise on exposure protocols and will perform the exposures and lung function studies. Although there is no direct funding through this collaboration, sections of two grants, RAMNUC and RESAC, include in vivo exposures to be carried out at the HPA which we believe proved attractive to the reviewers. |
Impact | The inhalation studies in RAMNUC and RESAC will not start until late 2011. This collaboration involves aerosol scientists, physicists, pathologists, cell biologists, material scientists and chemists. |
Start Year | 2009 |
Description | Identification of mechanisms of platelet activation by nano-particle pollutants in the UK |
Organisation | Imperial College London |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Lung cell biology, knowledge of role of inhaled particulate air pollution in cardiorespiratory disease, working with nanoparticles |
Collaborator Contribution | Knowledge of the cardiovascular system and measurement of platelet activation |
Impact | One publication. |
Start Year | 2011 |
Description | NanoRetox programme |
Organisation | Natural History Museum |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Public |
PI Contribution | Our expertise with primary human lung cells and our long experience studying environmental toxicants in experimental models in vitro and in vivo. |
Collaborator Contribution | We have set up NaNoRISK, Nanotoxicology Research In South Kensington. This facilitates collaborative, multidisciplinary research between the instutions and has provided a platform from which to obtain funding. |
Impact | We have, between us, obtained over ten million pounds worth of funding from the UK, EU and US agencies. Those involving me have been listed. These studies involve cell biologists, materials scientists, chemists, physicists, aerosol scientists, clinicians, epidemiologists. |
Start Year | 2006 |
Description | Nanoparticles, sensory irritation and the lung: environmental influences on biological processes |
Organisation | Imperial College London |
Department | National Heart & Lung Institute (NHLI) |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am providing the nanoparticle expertise and analytical techniques |
Collaborator Contribution | One partner works on the vagus nerve model and cough, the other is an expert in imaging. |
Impact | None yet. Brings together a materials scientist, a pharmacologist and lung cell biologist |
Start Year | 2012 |
Description | Respiratory effects of silver and carbon nanomaterials (RESAC) |
Organisation | University of Southern California |
Country | United States |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the UK PI on this study and the working hypothesis was proposed by me. I co-ordinated all the UK applicants and integrated the core research (materials scientists) with the 3 research WPs. I was responsible for writing 2 of the 3 WPs. We have set up unique in vitro models of the human lung, we can establish well-characterised in vivo models to study lung surfactant metabolism, we work closely with the material scientists and use unique imaging methods to study particle-cell interactions. |
Collaborator Contribution | The collaborators have experience in modelling, in lung surfactant biology and in oxidative stress that will add to the research programme in my laboratory. |
Impact | This is a very recent collaboration which was funded end of September 2010. We will be working with modellers, epidemiologists, experts in lung surfactant biology, immunology and oxidative stress to complement the imperial College expertise in cell biology, in vivo models of lung disease and materials science. |
Start Year | 2010 |
Description | Risk Assessment for Manufactured Nanoparticles Used in Consumer Products (RAMNUC) |
Organisation | Rutgers University |
Country | United States |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am a co-PI of the grant. I brought together all the PIs from the UK consortium (material scientists, the collaborators at the HPA inhalation facility, the in vivo scientist) and wrote a significant portion of the work packages for the in vitro and in vivo studies. I will be the PI for the in vitro work package (WP1), reflecting my group's expertise with primary human lung cells in vitro and models to assessnanoparticle reactivity. |
Collaborator Contribution | We have links with modellers to investigate the possible environmental and other risks associated with exposure to ZnO and Ag nanomaterials that are being used in commercial products. Specifally to study nanoparticles' life cycle: (1) sources, (2) environmental fate and transport, (3) concentrations in environmental media, (4) human exposure, (5) dose at target organs and bioavailability, (6) toxicological effects, and (7) ecological impacts. In addition, access to immune in vitro models of human monocytes and macrophages to investigate susceptibility to TB in the presence of nanoparticles. The combined expertise allows us to examine and understand better the impact of these nanopartoicles throughout their lifespan and therefore to predict hazard and risk. |
Impact | We started this research this year and there aree no outputs/outcomes as yet. The research is multidisciplinary, involving cell biologists, clinicians, epidemiologists, modellers, aerosol scientists and material scientists. |
Start Year | 2009 |
Description | The cytoxicity of carbon nanostructures to lung epithelial cells: The effect of aspect ratio and surface functionalisation |
Organisation | Imperial College London |
Department | Faculty of Engineering |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lung cell biologist, providing expertise with human lung cell models in vitro, knowledge of the lung and analysis of the exposure models |
Collaborator Contribution | The Materials scientists are synthesising the carbon nanotubes in specific formats. The interaction of these nanomaterials with the lung cells are being studied using state of the art electron microscopy (Titan) and other analytical techniques |
Impact | I am a cell biologist, one partner is a chemist, the other is a materials scientist. |
Start Year | 2011 |
Description | Breathing Easy |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | Yes |
Type Of Presentation | Keynote/Invited Speaker |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Schools |
Results and Impact | The lecture theatre at the Royal Instuitute was full (200?) of schoolchildren between 8 and 12 years. They were very excited at some of the demonstrations and asked lots of questions. They alos came to talk to me afterwards, as did their parents/teachers.. I did not get any feedback; perhaps the RI did. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2008 |