RESEARCH COUNCILS UK ENERGY PROGRAMME: ENERGY STRATEGY FELLOWSHIP
Lead Research Organisation:
Imperial College London
Department Name: Centre for Environmental Policy
Abstract
This work has two principal aims: a) to develop a roadmap that will help the Research Councils and others to plan their research activities in ways that will contribute to the achievement of the UK's energy policy goals; and b) to conduct a programme of research that will assess how effectively different countries conduct their energy research and development (R&D) activities in different technology areas with a view to learning lessons for the more successful execution of policy.
The roadmap will consist of a top-level document which will act as a bridge between higher level energy strategies and more specific R&D plans for individual technologies. The aim is to improve the coherence of energy policy on the one hand and energy research activities on the other. The top-level document will be supplemented by web-based roadmaps for individual technology areas such as carbon capture and storage or different forms of renewable energy. Demand-side technologies, for example for transport and buildings, will also be covered. Given the interplay between technology and human behaviour, especially on the demand side, social scientists as well as scientists and engineers will be involved. The roadmaps will address both technological needs and needs for training and capacity-building. The roadmaps will be produced through interviews with policymakers and R&D funders and through a mixture of facilitated technical workshops and strategic workshops engaging a wider range of stakeholders.
The first task in the research programme is to map out "systems of innovation" for different energy technologies in different countries. We intend to cover a small number of EU countries, the US and China. The mapping will cover institutions and their roles, networks and research capacity. The task will be carried out through documentary analysis and interviews in the relevant countries. We will also look at systems of innovation internationally, for example through education and training, and the activities of multinational companies.
The second task will be to develop and analyse measures for the effectiveness of R&D activities in different systems of innovation. Many countries intend to achieve fundamental transitions in their energy systems, for example by moving to low-carbon technologies. We will draw on a new branch of innovation theory, "transitions theory", to develop measures of effectiveness.
Finally, we will review hypotheses and findings from the analysis of the effectiveness of R&D activities with experts and draw conclusions about how the success of energy R&D programmes and their contributions to energy policy can be improved.
The roadmap will consist of a top-level document which will act as a bridge between higher level energy strategies and more specific R&D plans for individual technologies. The aim is to improve the coherence of energy policy on the one hand and energy research activities on the other. The top-level document will be supplemented by web-based roadmaps for individual technology areas such as carbon capture and storage or different forms of renewable energy. Demand-side technologies, for example for transport and buildings, will also be covered. Given the interplay between technology and human behaviour, especially on the demand side, social scientists as well as scientists and engineers will be involved. The roadmaps will address both technological needs and needs for training and capacity-building. The roadmaps will be produced through interviews with policymakers and R&D funders and through a mixture of facilitated technical workshops and strategic workshops engaging a wider range of stakeholders.
The first task in the research programme is to map out "systems of innovation" for different energy technologies in different countries. We intend to cover a small number of EU countries, the US and China. The mapping will cover institutions and their roles, networks and research capacity. The task will be carried out through documentary analysis and interviews in the relevant countries. We will also look at systems of innovation internationally, for example through education and training, and the activities of multinational companies.
The second task will be to develop and analyse measures for the effectiveness of R&D activities in different systems of innovation. Many countries intend to achieve fundamental transitions in their energy systems, for example by moving to low-carbon technologies. We will draw on a new branch of innovation theory, "transitions theory", to develop measures of effectiveness.
Finally, we will review hypotheses and findings from the analysis of the effectiveness of R&D activities with experts and draw conclusions about how the success of energy R&D programmes and their contributions to energy policy can be improved.
Planned Impact
The impact of the Fellowship activity falls into two parts. However, given that the research programme is closely linked to the roadmap activity, there is considerable overlap.
The main contribution of the roadmap development will be to promote a greater degree of coherence between energy policy-making with a short-medium term time perspective, and energy R&D with a longer term perspective. Given that the UK has binding legal requirements affecting the energy sector out to 2050 (the 80% greenhouse gas reduction target), and technology and policies as they currently stand will not by themselves allow that target to be reached, aligning research and development activities with policy needs will be essential. In addition, there is a need to ensure that the Research Council's investment in basic and applied research is aligned with applied research, development and demonstration (RD&D) supported by other organisations operating closer to market deployment. This will meet the recommendation emerging from the EPSRC's International Review of Energy that weaknesses in taking research through to deployable commercial technologies be addressed. The DECC Strategy and Evidence Group, the Technology Strategy Board, the Energy Technologies Institute and the Research Councils themselves are all potential beneficiaries.
Thus, the roadmap should contribute towards evidence-based policy-making and, specifically, the development of energy and energy research policies. Since environmental pressures, and climate change in particular, are major drivers of energy policy, the roadmap should also contribute indirectly to environmental sustainability and impact reduction. The business sector will be involved in roadmap development and we have engaged with the public-private Energy Research Partnership in preparing the proposal. There could also be indirect contributions to the exploitation of scientific knowledge and the performance of both public and private sector organisations, plus a contribution to the enhancement of the research capacity, knowledge and skills of businesses. The workplan includes a set of engagement activities with likely beneficiaries at the end of the initial roadmap development process.
Those benefitting from the roadmap would also benefit from the subsequent research programme. However, given the international nature of the research programme, there are additional beneficiaries. We have engaged with the FCO Science and Innovation network which will both support and benefit from the systematic intentional comparisons of key countries. The work is also relevant to those involved in international technology co-operation at DECC and the development of EU Framework Programme activities. We will also engage with BIS as many of the innovation insights may be applicable beyond the energy domain. International bodies such as the International Energy Agency and the European Commission may also benefit. The Advisory Group that we will establish for the research programme will engage a range of these potential beneficiaries to ensure a two-way flow of information.
The main contribution of the roadmap development will be to promote a greater degree of coherence between energy policy-making with a short-medium term time perspective, and energy R&D with a longer term perspective. Given that the UK has binding legal requirements affecting the energy sector out to 2050 (the 80% greenhouse gas reduction target), and technology and policies as they currently stand will not by themselves allow that target to be reached, aligning research and development activities with policy needs will be essential. In addition, there is a need to ensure that the Research Council's investment in basic and applied research is aligned with applied research, development and demonstration (RD&D) supported by other organisations operating closer to market deployment. This will meet the recommendation emerging from the EPSRC's International Review of Energy that weaknesses in taking research through to deployable commercial technologies be addressed. The DECC Strategy and Evidence Group, the Technology Strategy Board, the Energy Technologies Institute and the Research Councils themselves are all potential beneficiaries.
Thus, the roadmap should contribute towards evidence-based policy-making and, specifically, the development of energy and energy research policies. Since environmental pressures, and climate change in particular, are major drivers of energy policy, the roadmap should also contribute indirectly to environmental sustainability and impact reduction. The business sector will be involved in roadmap development and we have engaged with the public-private Energy Research Partnership in preparing the proposal. There could also be indirect contributions to the exploitation of scientific knowledge and the performance of both public and private sector organisations, plus a contribution to the enhancement of the research capacity, knowledge and skills of businesses. The workplan includes a set of engagement activities with likely beneficiaries at the end of the initial roadmap development process.
Those benefitting from the roadmap would also benefit from the subsequent research programme. However, given the international nature of the research programme, there are additional beneficiaries. We have engaged with the FCO Science and Innovation network which will both support and benefit from the systematic intentional comparisons of key countries. The work is also relevant to those involved in international technology co-operation at DECC and the development of EU Framework Programme activities. We will also engage with BIS as many of the innovation insights may be applicable beyond the energy domain. International bodies such as the International Energy Agency and the European Commission may also benefit. The Advisory Group that we will establish for the research programme will engage a range of these potential beneficiaries to ensure a two-way flow of information.
People |
ORCID iD |
Jim Skea (Principal Investigator / Fellow) |
Publications
Bale C
(2012)
Strategic energy planning within local authorities in the UK: A study of the city of Leeds
in Energy Policy
Hannon M
(2013)
The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition
in Energy Policy
Hannon M
(2015)
Raising the temperature of the UK heat pump market: Learning lessons from Finland
in Energy Policy
Hannon M
(2014)
UK innovation support for energy demand reduction
in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy
Hu R
(2018)
Measuring the energy innovation process: An indicator framework and a case study of wind energy in China
in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Kokoni S
(2013)
Input-output and life-cycle emissions accounting: applications in the real world
in Climate Policy
Description | We have developed an Energy Research and Training Prospectus - a set of reports which sets out priorities for Research Council energy research and training across six areas of the energy domain, identifies ways of working with funders of applied research and demonstration to help accelerate the take-up of novel technologies and approaches, and suggests ways of promoting interdisciplinarity and cooperation across the Research Councils. Research has been undertaken into how energy innovation systems are organised and can be made more effective across a range of countries and energy technology areas. It has been based on seven technology case studies, with a review of energy innovation activities in Europe, North America and East Asia. This has generated insights and recommendations across seven themes: a) how the physical characteristics of technologies, including the need for test and demonstration facilities, can affect innovation and deployment processes. b) the respective roles of disruptive technological change and incremental advances in energy innovation. There are examples of both in the case studies and it is evident that both have a role to play, and that incremental innovation can be rapid with far-reaching consequences. c) the respective roles of the private and public sectors, noting that much of the energy innovation promoted by the public sector has been motivated by public good arguments in areas such as climate change and energy security while private sector actors continue to innovate in pursuit of competitive advantage, creating and exploiting new technological possibilities as they do so. d) the design of public institutions to promote and manage research, development, and demonstration (RD&D), there being a ubiquitous concern globally as to the need to accelerate innovation from basic science and research through to applied R&D, demonstration and commercial deployment. e) institutional design and the need for coordinated action supported by long-term strategies and a stable institutional setting. f) links between energy innovation and economic development and performance, with East Asian countries and Germany revealing a particularly strong focus on the potential economic opportunities arising from energy innovation. This theme ties back to the widespread aspiration to accelerate innovation and achieve commercialisation of promising technologies. g) lessons for innovation studies themselves. This covers how well innovation theories perform in explaining and interpreting the case studies, and what theoretical extensions might be called for. It also addresses promising new directions for research focusing on energy innovation as well as some methodological issues. |
Exploitation Route | The findings of the Prospectus are already being adopted by the Research Councils and have also influenced their links with other research funders. The reseach programme has fed into, and been cited, in Parliamentary inquiries. It has also been used as input to an International Energy Agency workshop preparing for the 2020 edition of the Energy Technology Perspectives report. |
Sectors | Energy Environment Transport |
URL | http://www.imperial.ac.uk/a-z-research/rcuk-energy-strategy-fellowship/ |
Description | The findings from the first part of the Fellowship (the Prospectus for UK Energy Research) have fed into the development of the RCUK Energy Programme, providing evidence for its Scientific Advisory Committee. They have been presented as oral and written evidence to parliamentary committees and have been referred to in the HC Energy and Climate Change report on energy innovation. The work was fed into the Nurse review on the future of the research councils. The second part of the Fellowship, the research programme on the effectiveness of energy innovation systems, has led to the production of a multi-author book published by Edward Elgar: Energy Innovation for the 21st Century: Accelerating the Energy Revolution. The findings from the book were presented as the main input to an informal International Energy Agency meeting which preceded their workshop on the design of the 2020 edition of their influential Energy Technology Perspective report. Skea also chaired the opening session and presented based on the findings of the book/project at the workshop. |
First Year Of Impact | 2013 |
Sector | Energy,Environment |
Impact Types | Policy & public services |
Description | Co-Chair of Working Group III (Mitigation) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Scientific Support |
Amount | £2,683,313 (GBP) |
Funding ID | EP/P022820/1 |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 03/2017 |
End | 03/2023 |
Description | CIRED Workshop on climate and Land (Paris) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Presneted at Workshop in Paris organised by CIRED, to convene scientists relevant to the field of climate change and land use in advance of the Scoping Meeting for the IPCC Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Carbon Trust Public Sector Conference (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | The Carbon Trust Public Sector Conference brought together a national collaboration of public sector decision makers who are accountable for delivering carbon reduction policies, strategies and targets across UK cities, towns, local authorities, estates, assets and facilities. Keynote speaker, presentation entitled 'Climate aspirations and climate action: bridging the gap'. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | http://www.ipcc-wg3.ac.uk/Presentations/20170221%20Carbontrust%20Public%20Sector%20Skea.pdf |
Description | Energy Institute Fellows debate (London) - energy policy post-Brexit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Speaking at a debate on the 'Implications of Brexit for the UK energy sector', organised by the Energy Institute and chaired by John Moylan, Employment and Industry correspondent, BBC. This was a high level debate with panel members discussing what impacts Brexit may have across the energy spectrum. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Energy Institute debate (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Speaking at the Energy Institute debate, 'Meeting the Carbon Budgets - how "disruptive" technologies could be game changers towards a low carbon future'. The event provided an update on the progress made to meet the UK carbon budgets and considered which technologies will be the game changers in accelerating a transition to a low carbon future. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | https://www.energyinst.org/events/view/4723 |
Description | Energy Systems Conference: 21st Century Challenges (Energy Institute/Elsevier) (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Speaking at the Energy Systems Conference 2016: 21st Century Challenges. The conference brings together researchers, academia, industry, investors and policymakers to explore the most suitable and efficient ways to design, finance and build better and more sustainable energy systems. Outcomes of the meeting are published with the aim of providing new questions and challenges to be answered by research and academia, recommendations for policy and decision makers, and insights for industry to implement. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://www.energysystemsconference.com/ |
Description | Implications of Paris Workshop for politcial science (Norway) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Implications of Paris Workshop, organised by scientists and policy experts from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, the Frisch Centre for Economic Research, and the University of Maryland. This meeting took a deeper look at the challenge of implementing the Paris Agreement of 2015 in terms of the contribution of individual sectors, independently and in combination with other sectors. It also looked at the implementation of the NDCs in the period to 2030 sector by sector, in developed and developing economies and by mid-century consistent with the long-term goals of 2oC or potentially 1.5oC. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | https://www.ntnu.edu/censes/implications-of-paris |
Description | Indian MP delegation meeting (London) organised by Climate Parliament |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Roundtable session with presentation to a delegation of MPs from India, organised by Climate Parliament India. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Interfaith meetings (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Meetings with faith representatives to engage with those less active/ skeptical faith groups, and discuss needs for the IPCC AR6. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Investing in the Planet - side event to COP22 (Marrakech) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Attended the COP22 official side-event, organised by Imperial College London, the Institution of Chemical Engineers and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), entitled 'Investing in the planet: Green banks and other financial tools to scale up mitigation technologies'. The event looked to highlight financing as essential for both mitigation and adaptation, and in the broader context of the sustainable development goals. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/naturalsciences/climatechange/eventssu... |
Description | LCS-RNet meeting - Is 1.5 degrees feasible? (Marrakech) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Attended side event at COP22, hosted by the Institute for Global environmental Strategies (IGES), Low Carbon Societies Research Network (LCS-RNet), entitled 'Is 1.5°C feasible? - Pathways for net zero GHG emissions consistent with the 1.5°C target'. The event discussed the feasibility of the net zero GHG emissions in the 1.5 pathways on both a global and national level. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://lcs-rnet.org/lcsrnet_meetings/2016/11/2005 |
Description | Media interviews on IPCC plans for 2016--2022 Carbon Brief (London) - interview on news website |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Media Interview for Carbon Brief |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Modelling for Sustainability workshop (Paris) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Attended IPCC 'Modelling for sustainable development' Workshop in Paris involving French climate scientists |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI) launch (London) - contributed to Panel |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Participation in a private session for CEOs and VIPs, discussing the role of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative in addressing climate change. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Panel launch for EI 2016 Energy Barometer (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Breakfast panel launch for the Energy Institute 2016 Energy Barometer. Presentation |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Presentation at COP22 side event 'Can CCS deliver on the IPCC mitigation needs?' (Marrakech) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Presentation delivered at COP22 side event entitled 'Can CCS deliver on the IPCC mitigation needs?', hosted by Global CCS Institute (GCCSI). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Presentation to the Energy Modeling Forum Annual Meeting (Colorado, via video link) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Presentation given with PR Shukla (IPCC WGIII Co-Chair), during session 8 of the Energy Modeling Forum Annual Meeting - Assessing Transformation pathways and 1.5 - entitled 'IPCC AR6, the Special Report on 1.5 and the IAM Community'. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | https://www.stanford.edu/group/emf-research/docs/CCIIA/2016/Shukla_Skea_IPCC.pdf |
Description | RCUK Energy Catalyst Advisory Board Meeting (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | RCUK Energy Catalyst Advisory Board Meeting |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Research Council of Norway political Science Meeting (Oslo) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Research Council of Norway political Science Meeting |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Round table discussion - Shell Scenarios (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A round table discussion to mark the launch of the Shell Scenarios New Lens Scenarios supplement: 'A better life with a healthy planet - pathways to net-zero emissions'. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Roundtable event: delivering 'zero carbon Britain' (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Attended a roundtable Liberal Democrat event on the role of business and industry in delivering a 'zero carbon Britain', as part of a research review of the latest thinking on how the UK can reach a goal of being a net zero carbon emitter by 2050. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | TV and Climate Change meeting (London) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Media (as a channel to the public) |
Results and Impact | Meeting with TV broadcasters regarding climate change, hosted by Channel 4. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Talk on IPCC to High Level Members of the French Climate Change Research Community |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Meeting at the Academy of Sciences with High Level Members of the French Community |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | UNFCCC Subsidiary Body on Scientifc and Technical Affairs (SBSTA) (Bonn) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | The 44th session of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA 44) Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |