Exploring co-occurring UK HYDRo-meteorological extremes that exAcerbate risk (HYDRA)
Lead Research Organisation:
Loughborough University
Department Name: Geography and Environment
Abstract
In wintertime, infrastructure in Great Britain (GB) is threatened by multiple significant meteorological hazards, and it is increasingly apparent that these interact in a complex yet poorly studied multi-hazard system (e.g. Hillier et al, 2020). For example, the impacts of the dramatic February 2022 storm sequence (Dudley, Eunice, Franklin) demonstrated the pressing need for a more sophisticated view of GB's multi-hazard risk. The high windspeeds of Eunice left over 1 million homes without power and caused major transport disruption (trains and flights cancelled, roads blocked) in southern England, with snow causing further disruption in Scotland and northern England. Persistent heavy rain then resulted in the flooding of >400 homes during Franklin. In addition, there was ~£3 billion in direct insurance damage, road closures due to landslips (e.g. A57 'snake pass', Derbyshire, closed for 1 month) and other societal impacts in GB (e.g. school and port closures, trees felled). The impacts underlined the need to properly account for severe episodes that might (i) encompass a number of storms, (ii) span many days, and (iii) present a variety of hazards that manifest in different locations and affect various critical systems of UK plc (e.g. infrastructure).
This contrasts to current practice where GB's hydro-meteorological hazards (related to wind and rain) are almost always considered separately (e.g. the UK's Climate Change Risk Assessment very much places single weather risks into siloes). There is some grouping for convenience (e.g. risks to transport from high and low temperatures), and the related issue of cascading failure is discussed, but there is no integrated logic applied to risk driven by co-occurring hazards. Likewise, insurers apply sophisticated, stochastic risk models (e.g. >10,000 simulated events), yet inland flooding and extreme wind are still modelled as separate and independent.
A critical advance to better understanding flooding and extreme wind was identifying that they were systematically linked (Hillier et al., 2015). Spurred on by this initial observation, various UKRI funded projects (i.e. UKCGFI, a KTP with Lloyds Bank Group, STORMY-WEATHER, ROBUST) are building a scientific evidence base for a link between these two hazards. As part of this, in 2022 the Bank of England introduced an initial (cautious) requirement for insurers to account for this link in the stress tests to which they must submit. HYDRA will take this work to a new level, extending this important line of enquiry to the wider wintertime multi-hazard system (i.e. inland flooding, landslide, extreme wind, storm surge, extreme cold, snow).
HYDRA is an exploratory project that aims to identify, quantify, and provisionally explain how the co-occurrence of six key GB hydro-meteorological wintertime extremes exacerbates risk. HYDRA will use historical observations (assimilated in ERA5, GLOFAS) and UKCP18 regional climate projections to better understand how linked hazards will evolve into the future. Rail and other infrastructure providers' sensitivity to identified co-occurrences will then be mapped in workshops book-ending the scientific work. HYDRA's science is ground-breaking due to the lack of systematic, highly multi-hazard risk evidence currently available. In addition to contributing to NERC science, it will define the engineering (EPSRC) challenge by identifying drivers for risk modelling of infrastructure networks, and will feed into policy (via DEFRA and the CCRA) and industry (e.g. reinsurance) practice.
This contrasts to current practice where GB's hydro-meteorological hazards (related to wind and rain) are almost always considered separately (e.g. the UK's Climate Change Risk Assessment very much places single weather risks into siloes). There is some grouping for convenience (e.g. risks to transport from high and low temperatures), and the related issue of cascading failure is discussed, but there is no integrated logic applied to risk driven by co-occurring hazards. Likewise, insurers apply sophisticated, stochastic risk models (e.g. >10,000 simulated events), yet inland flooding and extreme wind are still modelled as separate and independent.
A critical advance to better understanding flooding and extreme wind was identifying that they were systematically linked (Hillier et al., 2015). Spurred on by this initial observation, various UKRI funded projects (i.e. UKCGFI, a KTP with Lloyds Bank Group, STORMY-WEATHER, ROBUST) are building a scientific evidence base for a link between these two hazards. As part of this, in 2022 the Bank of England introduced an initial (cautious) requirement for insurers to account for this link in the stress tests to which they must submit. HYDRA will take this work to a new level, extending this important line of enquiry to the wider wintertime multi-hazard system (i.e. inland flooding, landslide, extreme wind, storm surge, extreme cold, snow).
HYDRA is an exploratory project that aims to identify, quantify, and provisionally explain how the co-occurrence of six key GB hydro-meteorological wintertime extremes exacerbates risk. HYDRA will use historical observations (assimilated in ERA5, GLOFAS) and UKCP18 regional climate projections to better understand how linked hazards will evolve into the future. Rail and other infrastructure providers' sensitivity to identified co-occurrences will then be mapped in workshops book-ending the scientific work. HYDRA's science is ground-breaking due to the lack of systematic, highly multi-hazard risk evidence currently available. In addition to contributing to NERC science, it will define the engineering (EPSRC) challenge by identifying drivers for risk modelling of infrastructure networks, and will feed into policy (via DEFRA and the CCRA) and industry (e.g. reinsurance) practice.
Publications
Description | In wintertime, infrastructure in Great Britain (GB) is threatened by multiple significant meteorological hazards, and it is increasingly apparent that these interact in a complex yet poorly studied multi-hazard system. Taking the railway network as a use case, HYDRA is an exploratory project that aims to identify, quantify, and provisionally explain how the co-occurrence of six key GB HYDRo-meteorological wintertime extremes exAcerbates risk (i.e. extreme wind, storm surge, inland flooding, landslide, extreme cold, snow) now and in the future. To achieve this in a small project (i.e. 2.5 person/days per week for 6 months), there were three activities: 1. Initial stakeholder workshop with (i.e. primarily road, rail & energy sectors), 'You tell us' e.g. Which hazard pairs actually matter? What conditions actually cause damage? 2. Initial, exploratory research using the UK Climate projections. 3. Final stakeholder workshop 'Here's what we did, now what do you think?' and 'Where do we go next?'. Key findings and achievements are: • Increasing the detailed awareness of 40-50 key stakeholders about the types and implications of multiple co-occurring risks. • There is great interest in summer (e.g. heat, wildfire), and summer-winter transitions, not only wintertime. Although, flooding and extreme wind in winter storm remains the greatest concern. • Using metrics reflecting how the railway is impacted, the future (2061-2080) will be different with more flood-wind and almost no cold-snow. • Timing and sequence of storms are important to those responding. Illustratively, storm-after-storm causes fatigue (e.g. in personnel), highlighting that the gap (if any) between storms in relation to an organisation's recovery time is critical. • Both university researchers and infrastructure operators now (increasingly) recognise, after HYDRA and the many storms of 2023/4, that it is necessary to better understand how multiple-hazards are likely to manifest in future and how we might plan to mitigate them. |
Exploitation Route | The wet, windy and disruptive winter of 2023-4 was chosen as a focus for HYDRA's final workshop. Using this as an illustration, the intention is to publish a 'position piece' paper to motivate and focus on research relevant to infrastructure providers, and with a plan to also input into the UK's 4th Climate Change Risk Assessment. |
Sectors | Energy Environment Transport |
Description | In terms of impact HYDRA's purpose was to raise awareness of stakeholders about multi-hazard risk, both through improving science and by facilitating discussion to compare experiences. It did this in two ways. • Increasing the detailed awareness of 40-50 key stakeholders about the types and implications of multiple co-occurring risks. • The wet, windy and disruptive winter of 2023-4 was chosen as a focus for HYDRA's final workshop. Using this as an illustration, the intention is to publish a 'position piece' paper to motivate and focus on research relevant to infrastructure providers, and with a plan to also input into the UK's 4th Climate Change Risk Assessment. Further impact may be achieved if a continuation of this research is funded to take it beyond the pilot stage. |
First Year Of Impact | 2023 |
Sector | Energy,Environment,Transport |
Impact Types | Policy & public services |
Description | John Dora Ltd |
Organisation | John Dora Consulting |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Private |
PI Contribution | [2024] John Dora is a consultant with 40 years experience in the rail sector, who set up and leads the IOAF (Infrastructure Operators Adaptation Forum). He supported and helped to run run HYDRA. |
Collaborator Contribution | [2024] John Dora is a consultant with 40 years experience in the rail sector, who set up and leads the IOAF (Infrastructure Operators Adaptation Forum). He supported and helped to run run HYDRA. |
Impact | Two internal reports for HYDRA workshops in 2023 / 2024. |
Start Year | 2023 |
Description | Network Rail |
Organisation | Network Rail Ltd |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Private |
PI Contribution | [2024] After a long preparatory dialogues (i.e. since 2014), supported (e.g. with data, time) and attended workshops of HYDRA. |
Collaborator Contribution | [2024] After a long preparatory dialogues (i.e. since 2014), supported (e.g. with data, time) and attended workshops of HYDRA. |
Impact | None yet. |
Start Year | 2023 |
Description | Relationship with Willis Towers Watson |
Organisation | Willis Re. |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Private |
PI Contribution | [2018] In a developing relationship with WTW, Hillier contributed of time and knowledge to their understanding of how to derive value from scientific work by leading collaborative work with them on understanding academics' motivations. [2019] Involved WTW as a key partner in the TECHNGI project, leading to Loughborough becoming a member of Willis' research network (WRN), and Willis hosting the TECHNGI launch event as part of their WRN programme. [2020] Loughborough and WRN co-designed a survey into 'Data Visions' in the (re)insurance sector to underpin a co-written insights publication for Willis. [2023] As at Jan 2023, Loughborough is a member of the WTW Research Network, a formal link that Hillier & Milne built. This built during the Climate Scenarios and AURIE projects continuing, and in continuing through three main avenues: (i) a cross-school AI mini-CDT (Geography, School of Business and Economics, Computer Science, Physics, Engineering); (ii) WTW serve on Advisory Board of ROBUST; (iii) A PhD is funded and co-supervised by WTW (i.e. Thompson). |
Collaborator Contribution | [2018] Willis contributed time and knowledge to the 'Demystifying Academics' part of Hillier's KE Fellowship, co-writing a briefing note and academic paper. [2019] WTW contributed greatly as a key partner in the TECHNGI project, and inviting Loughborough becoming a member of Willis' research network (WRN), and hosting the TECHNGI launch event as part of their WRN programme. [2020] Loughborough and WRN co-designed a survey into 'Data Visions' in the (re)insurance sector to underpin a co-written insights publication for Willis. [2023] As at Jan 2023, Loughborough is a member of the WTW Research Network, a formal link that Hillier & Milne built. This built during the Climate Scenarios and AURIE projects continuing, and in continuing through three main avenues: (i) a cross-school AI mini-CDT (Geography, School of Business and Economics, Computer Science, Physics, Engineering); (ii) WTW serve on Advisory Board of ROBUST; (iii) A PhD is funded and co-supervised by WTW (i.e. Thompson). |
Impact | • [1] John K. Hillier, Geoffrey R. Saville, Mike J. Smith, Alister J. Scott, Emma K. Raven, Jonathon Gascoigne, Louise J. Slater, Nevil Quinn, Andreas Tsanakas, Claire Souch, Gregor C. Leckebusch, Neil Macdonald, Alice M. Milner, Jennifer Loxton, Rebecca Wilebore, Alexandra Collins, Colin MacKechnie, Jaqui Tweddle, Sarah Moller, MacKenzie Dove, Harry Langford, Jim Craig (2019) Demystifying academics to enhance university-business collaborations in environmental science. Geoscience Communications, 2, 1-23 doi: dooi:10.5194/gc-2-1-2019. • [2] Willis partnered a successful UKRI funding bid i.e. 'Technology Driven Change and Next Generation Insurance Value Chains (TECHNGI)' e.g. Holland, C. P., Zarkadakis1, G., Hillier, J. K., Timms, P. D., Stanborough1, L. (2021) Data sharing models in the insurance industry: Strategic change and future direction Willis Research Network - Insights 22nd Feb. 1Willis Towers Watson. https://www.willistowerswatson.com/en-GB/Insights/2021/02/data-sharing-models-in-the-insurance-industry • [3] Thompson, J. Wilby, R., Hillier J. K., Saville, G., Connell, R. (2023) Climate gentrification: Valuing perceived climate risks in property prices. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Doi: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2156318 |
Start Year | 2018 |