The Collector's Desire: an investigation into the relationship between the collection, the collector and the collected
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Cambridge
Department Name: Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology
Abstract
This Fellowship will create the opportunity to experience and understand the collections at the Museum of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Cambridge, in a new light. On the basis of research into the collections and their histories, a series of temporary installations and will be produced for the museum that will reflect critically on some of the subtexts of the Museum's history, ranging over varied past and present interests in objects in the collections, the nature of the institution, the design of displays, and their architectural contexts, as well as the deeper ideological and political assumptions behind them. The interventions may include rewriting signage and interpretive texts, the redisplay of objects, new juxtapositions, the inclusion of new material, like contemporary artworks, into the museum context. Some interventions will be experienced digitally, others within the physical context of the building and the present displays. Both subtle and minimal, and more ambitious in scope, interventions will attempt to alter the experience of the museum as a whole, or propose ways in which it might be radically altered.
An exhibition with invited artists who are similarly concerned with anthropology and the display of artefacts from non-Western cultures will also take place and again the aim is to invite audiences to question assumptions behind and within these types of collections and their display in the present day. The concept behind the interventions and the exhibition is to invite audiences and other stakeholders in the museum (curators, students and teachers in related disciplines) to reflect on their relationship with the material and to consider ourselves in relation to the act of collecting and display. Rather than judging collectors from a previous age for their imperialist ambitions, I am more interested in seeing similarities in how we acquire curios from our own travels today and how we make sense of our experiences with other cultures.
Informed by a sustained period of research into this museum's history, into debates about collecting and collections, and wide-ranging evaluation of contemporary artistic interventions in museums, these interventions and the exhibition will aim to highlight the various tensions within the collection's display. While it is widely presumed that ethnographic collections are made up essentially of imperial loot, in fact the objects in collections today reached institutions in diverse ways, some were legitimately bought, some received by collectors as gifts, or were bartered or traded, and a considerable amount of material was in fact produced for collectors or researchers, in effect commissioned in the field. Some were forged or faked by Europeans, some to be sure was stolen or seized during armed conflict. The variety of stories behind these objects are often obscured, variously by the rationalities of classificatory displays, and sometimes by overwhelming political or religious perspectives. The telling of their stories is complex; this series of exhibitions, and associated outcomes, such as conference talks, will take on the nuances of the collection, the history of their display, and attempt to draw out the sometimes quirky and haphazard reason for their coming to be collected and seen.
The exhibition series will culminate in making a 'wunderkammer', a cabinet of curiosities, as a mobile museum in miniature. The wunderkammer will take ideas honed by my work with the museum into a wider context, reflecting on the relationship between the collector and the collected in the contemporary context. It will explore a wider idea of collections and their display taking insights gleaned from working with artists and curators from other cultures with collections and artefacts from the past into the present with our contemporary context of global travel and collections of foreign curios. This wunderkammer will be exhibited in contemporary art galleries.
An exhibition with invited artists who are similarly concerned with anthropology and the display of artefacts from non-Western cultures will also take place and again the aim is to invite audiences to question assumptions behind and within these types of collections and their display in the present day. The concept behind the interventions and the exhibition is to invite audiences and other stakeholders in the museum (curators, students and teachers in related disciplines) to reflect on their relationship with the material and to consider ourselves in relation to the act of collecting and display. Rather than judging collectors from a previous age for their imperialist ambitions, I am more interested in seeing similarities in how we acquire curios from our own travels today and how we make sense of our experiences with other cultures.
Informed by a sustained period of research into this museum's history, into debates about collecting and collections, and wide-ranging evaluation of contemporary artistic interventions in museums, these interventions and the exhibition will aim to highlight the various tensions within the collection's display. While it is widely presumed that ethnographic collections are made up essentially of imperial loot, in fact the objects in collections today reached institutions in diverse ways, some were legitimately bought, some received by collectors as gifts, or were bartered or traded, and a considerable amount of material was in fact produced for collectors or researchers, in effect commissioned in the field. Some were forged or faked by Europeans, some to be sure was stolen or seized during armed conflict. The variety of stories behind these objects are often obscured, variously by the rationalities of classificatory displays, and sometimes by overwhelming political or religious perspectives. The telling of their stories is complex; this series of exhibitions, and associated outcomes, such as conference talks, will take on the nuances of the collection, the history of their display, and attempt to draw out the sometimes quirky and haphazard reason for their coming to be collected and seen.
The exhibition series will culminate in making a 'wunderkammer', a cabinet of curiosities, as a mobile museum in miniature. The wunderkammer will take ideas honed by my work with the museum into a wider context, reflecting on the relationship between the collector and the collected in the contemporary context. It will explore a wider idea of collections and their display taking insights gleaned from working with artists and curators from other cultures with collections and artefacts from the past into the present with our contemporary context of global travel and collections of foreign curios. This wunderkammer will be exhibited in contemporary art galleries.
People |
ORCID iD |
| Alana Jelinek (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Jelinek
(2013)
This is Not Art: Activism and Other 'Not-Art'
Jelinek
(2013)
This is Not Art: Activism and Other 'Not-Art'
Jelinek A
(2014)
The Collector's Set
Jelinek A
(2018)
Censoring Art: Silencing the Artwork
Jelinek A
(2015)
A Response to the Issues Raised in the Special Edition of Ethnos
in Ethnos
Jelinek A
(2016)
An artist's response to an anthropological perspective (Grimshaw and Ravetz) An Artist's Response to an Anthropological Perspective
in Social Anthropology
Jelinek A
(2014)
The Fork's Tale, as Narrated by Itself
Jelinek A
(2012)
Deschooling Society
in Journal of Visual Culture
Zinnenburg-Carr Khadija Von
(2020)
Botanical Drift - Protagonists of the Invasive Herbarium
| Title | Cannibal Forking: an experiment in distributed protocol |
| Description | An event where participants are invited to make their own cannibal fork using traditional European skills and native British wood and question whether the making of cannibal forks predisposes one to cannibalism. The event was held at The Field, Essex (2010), MAA, University of Cambridge (2010); Hong Kong University (2011); The Bodger's Ball, Dorset, (2012) |
| Type Of Art | Artistic/Creative Exhibition |
| Year Produced | 2010 |
| Impact | The event has inspired its imitators who have been in touch via social networking. It was described as an experiment in distributed protocol and it has been a successful one in those terms. |
| URL | http://alanajelinek.com/participatory.html#CF |
| Title | Not Praising, Burying |
| Description | Performed on 12 November 2012 by an invited group of artists, archaeologists, art educators, philosophers in order to interrogate the idea of Greek pottery as art and the idea of Greek artefacts as the pinnacle or origins of artistic practices as we understand them today. |
| Type Of Art | Artwork |
| Year Produced | 2012 |
| Impact | It became an interesting model for future inter-disciplinary collaborations using art practice at the central interrogatory model. |
| URL | http://alanajelinek.com/participatory.html#NPB |
| Title | Tall Stories: Cannibal Forks |
| Description | 8min DVD and new collection of cannibal forks made by staff and scholars at the Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Cambridge. DVD shows hands making cannibal forks from tree branch to decorated object with a sound track of various voices, 8min DVD and new collection of cannibal forks made by staff and scholars at the Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Cambridge. DVD shows hands making cannibal forks from tree branch to decorated object with a sound track of various voices recounting the variety of knowledge of the contested objects known as 'cannibal forks' in the museum's collection. |
| Type Of Art | Artistic/Creative Exhibition |
| Year Produced | 2010 |
| Impact | This work was accessioned by the museum and later shown as part of 'Gifts and Discoveries' |
| URL | http://alanajelinek.com/interventions.html#TSCF |
| Title | Tall Stories: Cannibal Forks |
| Description | The 'autonomous' version of the original site-specific intervention shown at Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge in 2010. This version included all the newly made cannibal forks plus all the historical 'cannibal forks' in the museum's collection as well as the video of the process of making the stories and knowledge around the cannibal forks |
| Type Of Art | Artwork |
| Year Produced | 2012 |
| Impact | This work was bought and accessioned by the museum. The video also exists online |
| URL | http://vimeo.com/44869091 |
| Title | The BLACCXN archaeological story |
| Description | An intervention into the final months display of the archaeology gallery, Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Cambridge, in which it was imagined that a transnational corporation, BLACCXN, had sponsored the display and highlighted those aspects of archaeological knowledge that best suited its current aims and expansionist ambitions. |
| Type Of Art | Artistic/Creative Exhibition |
| Year Produced | 2009 |
| Impact | This was a divisive exhibition with audiences and archaeologists alike either hating it or loving it. It sparked debate about corporate sponsorship of culture and scholarship. |
| URL | http://blaccxn.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/the-archaeological-story-according-to-blaccxn/ |
| Title | The Fork's Tale, as narrated by Itself |
| Description | A novel written from the point of view of a nineteenth century Fijian cannibal fork in the collection of the Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Cambridge, written and published a month at a time throughout 2013, published by LemonMelon, funded by Arts Council England |
| Type Of Art | Creative Writing |
| Year Produced | 2013 |
| Impact | Originally available a chapter at a time by subscription, it is now a limited edition art-book in both hard back coptic bound form and loose chapter form. The Fork's Tale was selected by David Senior, Elizabeth James and Sofie Dederen to be part of Kaleid 2014 Best Books |
| URL | http://www.lemonmelon.org/index.php/publications/the-forks-tale/ |
| Description | This research into the relationship between collections, collectors and the collected involved a process of creating artworks as interventions into the host organisation, the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, and creating 'autonomous' exhibitions and events within that context as well as in related ones within the wider University of Cambridge. The research did indeed produce complex and effective work that reflected on the relationship between 'collector' and 'collected', acknowledging that this is not the simple binary it first appears to be. Specifically, it was through an engagement that was open and yet rigorous with the disciplines of archaeology and anthropology, while also maintaining the knowledge specific to contemporary art practice, that this nuance and complexity emanated. Originally, like the artistic precedents cited in my application, my focus was on institutional critique and an assumption that the institution requires art to serve as its conscience, bringing to light the less-than-auspicious colonial origins of its collections and displays, or the ongoing impact of these. It was because of the process of research as an artist and research within this inter-disciplinary environment that the work was able to move beyond the somewhat simplistic binaries that continue to find favour within the larger artworld. The artworks that formed part of the research process became more nuanced through their engagement with the scholarship and findings of colleagues in other disciplines. While our areas of research may have overlapped, (for example, nineteenth century Fiji at the point of its accession to Britain) what became clear was that the discipline of art is interested in different knowledge, ideas or stories that can be drawn from the same set of 'data' shared by historians and anthropologists and that, not only do we have 'creative outputs' but we ask different questions from historians or anthropologists. It was through this inter-disciplinary engagement that the research travelled in an unexpected direction. Not only was the research conducted in terms of the relationship between collections, collectors and the collected, but it also involved an analysis and reflection on art practice as a discipline in its own right, and the inter-disciplinary research process created the understanding that art is capable of producing knowledge akin to any other academic discipline. |
| Exploitation Route | There are two findings from this research project that have potential impact. The first is understanding afresh the potential for art in museums and inter-disciplinary work with artists in non-art contexts and the second is understanding art as a knowledge-forming discipline. I would also hope that artists and curators will move beyond the stereotypes of both institutional critique and ethnography (taking on board the findings of the ostensible content of my research) but I feel this is less likely. Instead I hope to influence directors and curators of museums, particularly ethnographic museums, to reflect on the uses and abuses of contemporary art by museums and to help commission art to do something important in artistic terms. I also hope to influence the direction of art and particularly the understanding of the potential for art as research at doctoral and post-doctoral levels (as distinct from all other types of art practice). |
| Sectors | Education Culture Heritage Museums and Collections |
| Description | The work has inspired educational, cultural, societal events based at the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and also in other organisations, including Arts And Minds, a mental health charity, based in Cambridge. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2014 |
| Sector | Creative Economy,Education,Healthcare |
| Impact Types | Cultural Societal |
| Description | Pacific Presences |
| Organisation | University of Cambridge |
| Department | Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Building on research methods used for Collector's Desire and the creative outputs that ensued, I was invited to collaborate as part of ERC funded research project as creative associate researcher, Pacific Presences: Oceanic Art in European Museums (2013-2018) (0.2fte 2013-2015 and 0.4fte 2016-2018) with Prof Nicholas Thomas as Principal Investigator. |
| Collaborator Contribution | The project has a variety of partners based at University of Cambridge and in various universities and museums across the globe, including in Europe and Oceania. Each partner is investigating the historical collections of artefacts in European museums of Melanesian and Micronesian origin, and their contemporary salience. |
| Impact | Multidisciplinary collaboration with art historians, anthropologists, historians, museum curators and artists. Outputs include journal articles and a film as well as community outreach events. |
| Start Year | 2013 |
| Description | BLACCXN art |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | Yes |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards Was later commission by August Art to do another talk in a similar vein |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2009 |
| Description | BLACCXN art collecting |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | Yes |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards interesting discussion with those who do not ordinarily form part of the audience for this type of work |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2011 |
| Description | The Big Idea |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Performance as BLACCXN PR guru for Festival of Ideas event, The Big Idea with Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Cambridge This event was aimed at children, families and young people, as a way of opening up the idea of critical thinking about how we obtain knowledge and the history of scientific thought. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2009 |