Knowledge Assessment Platform for the valuation of Energy and Nature together (KAPtEN)

Lead Research Organisation: University of East Anglia
Department Name: Environmental Sciences

Abstract

The work to help internationalise ADVENT and facilitate assessment of its findings in the long term will be conducted in three phases.

In the initial phase, KAPtEN and ADVENT teams will produce a set of questions and initial statements that are relevant internationally and that will be explored further, building on ADVENT's four initial workshops. In particular, a workshop on the role of energy in ecosystem services and natural capital conceptual frameworks will set the basis for characterising the impacts of specific energy chains and energy infrastructure development on the UK's marine, aquatic, coastal and terrestrial environments, and understand how different means of sourcing energy from outside the UK would impact global ecosystem services. Similarly, a workshop on currently projected energy pathways will look at what we currently know about the nexus between energy, land and water and the trade-offs and synergies associated with different patterns of energy development. These are important topics that will grow with the increasing pressure and desire to move towards a sustainable use of resources. The very first contribution of KAPtEN will be to develop a simplified web portal to facilitate the crowd-sourcing of a literature review around each of the questions and statements arising from these workshops, which will be turned into a databank of resources exportable in reference management systems (e.g. Endnote).

In the second phase, a new, professional-looking and easy to use ICT platform will be developed and tested on the valuation of Energy and Nature together. The principle behind the ICT platform is that users more easily react to statements that are already made, by confirming or contradicting them. Thus the ICT platform will start from a set of key statements that together will form the 'Map of Current Knowledge' - or the MoCK. The ICT platform hosting the MoCK statements will include options to link new research papers and to explain how these papers support, challenge, or contradict the existing statements. Anyone can link papers, not just the authors. This is the crowd-sourcing part of the project. If a paper is linked to a MoCK statement, the authors (who are the 'experts'), will be invited to revise the explanations if they wish and to rank other papers up or down, so that with time the papers voted 'up' by most experts will appear at the top.

In the final phase, we will publish 10-20 key statements on the valuation of Energy and Nature together, in a joint ADVENT-KAPtEN effort, including international partners, and co-chaired by senior colleagues with extensive experience, to be submitted to a high-impact journal (e.g. Nature Energy). These 10-20 statements will be the ADVENT MoCK that will be posted on the KAPtEN ICT platform and start the continuous assessment process of forming the Map of New Knowledge - or the MoNK.

We will use our extensive networks through connections with our international partners, Future Earth, Tyndall Centre partners, IPBES, IPCC and others to invite people to link their papers and show how they inform the assessment made in ADVENT with their international knowledge.

As the KAPtEN ICT platform develops, we will be working with Future Earth and IPBES partners to develop other MoCKs, so that with time, KAPtEN will make a step change in our capacity to transparently and continuously assess the state of science, inter-link fields such as Energy and Nature, and inform policy of the environment and beyond. One of our international project partner said 'this ICT platform has the potential to revolutionize the way scientific assessments are done, by opening up the process for contributions by the entire research community, and by establishing a transparent yet organized set of rules to highlight the emerging consensus and issues'.

Planned Impact

KAPtEN will create novel international collaborations that will lead to excellent research. The ADVENT community is mostly UK focussed and weakly connected to global change programmes. The KAPtEN team provides a platform to reach out beyond the UK and to link with the international community, building an extensive network with researchers in Stanford University (USA), the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA; Austria), the Stockholm Resilience Centre of Stockholm University (Sweden), the Sustainability Institute of Monash University (Austria), the Potsdam Institute (PIK; Germany) with strong links with the wider communities of experts from the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), Global Carbon Project (GCP), and Future Earth. The ICT platform will provide support to integrate research findings across a range of countries and landscapes on the valuation of Energy and Nature together. This unique support aims to transforms the way research is conducted, from the current state of production of individual paper contributions, to a much more coordinated state of production of actual knowledge around key questions. This simple concept can provide necessary glue to keep disparate international communities together, over decades.

KAPtEN will support UK leadership in the valuation of Energy and Nature together, by supporting the development the first international assessment in 10-20 key statements on this topic, and follow up, large scale deployment of a continuous assessment.

KAPtEN is novel. As early as 2003, the UN provided a 'Plan of Action' to promote the use of ICT in support of international development goals; such a plan is still discussed in high-level meetings (e.g. UNESCO 2013) but is yet to be implemented. NERC's strategy also states that NERC will 'harness the rapid development of information technology to open the record to the wider world'. The KAPtEN team brings here its extensive experience and innovation to make a step change in the development and use of ICT to produce scientific knowledge differently.

KAPtEN will inform a broad public, including policy makers, businesses, the media, and prospective science students. The continuous availability of up-to-date research knowledge in an open and transparent way could serve multiple needs for society, and could be akin to the development of Wikipedia in 2001, which now hosts nearly five million articles. No assessment exercise, on its own, can harness so openly the power of an entire research community, as KAPtEN aims to do.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description Visual representations of data are intrinsically appealing and better to work with. This, combined with simple explanations of complex and evolving science, are a key differentiator of the platform against similar online tools. In addition to this, the tool provides an attractive visualisation that could be embedded within other sites and act as a source of traffic to the site.

In order to launch a platform which does something new you must invest time in explaining its functionality and operation to your market. Key audiences have been engaged to explain how ScienceBrief can aid dissemination of their research insights. The development of ScienceBrief Reviews and a publication functionality has proved the best delivery mechanism to convey simple messages from complex science. This represents a niche between journal papers, mainstream media and blogs: rigorous scientific literature that is timely, transparent, citable and kept up-to-date.
Exploitation Route The recent experience with the wildfires rapid review and press conference demonstrates an approach that could be applied to other scientific topics. We intend to use the platform to present and disseminate findings from other climate change and environmental research projects we are involved in.
Sectors Energy

Environment

URL https://sciencebrief.org/
 
Description The ScienceBrief web platform (https://news.sciencebrief.org/) allows experts to post statements which they believe represents the state of knowledge in their field; other participants in the site are able to attach evidence (references to journal papers) to statements and everyone can then vote on the quality and applicability of the evidence. In this way we can determine what are the consensus opinions, and controversial areas, regarding science today. The web platform was launched in July 2018 and has been iterated through two major revisions in functionality. As well as the continued addition to the original pilot topics, new topics focusing on the critical issues in climate change have been created with the goal of addressing certain key areas of knowledge for the critical climate decade that is the 2020s. A Rapid Response Review was synthesised from work by experts on wildfires and caused a substantial media impact relating to the wildfires in Australia. The site was featured on 220 online periodicals, including the BBC, New York Times, Mail online, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, Forbes, Met Office. This drove substantial traffic to the site and demonstrated a use case for how the site adds value and impact to researchers and users of the platform. This has taught us that in order to teach our audience the best way to use the platform we will essentially have to develop a "publishing wing" of the site. Further developments include the development of a visual 'map' of the data behind each statement. This Statement Explorer has been a big hit with all who use the platform and is now the primary way the users engage with the statements and evidence. A collection of reviews on 'Critical Reviews in Climate Change Science' was published in December 2021. Key findings: Visual representations of data are intrinsically appealing and better to work with; this is a key differentiator of the platform against any other online tools in similar areas. In addition to this, the tool provides an attractive visualisation that could be embedded within other sites and act as a source of traffic to the site. In order to launch a platform which does something new you will always be required to educate your market - so to speak - of its functionality. The best way to do this is to actually use the platform as we would hope others would. This will lead to a publication functionality which falls into a niche between journal papers and blogs: rigorous scientific literature that can be put out in a timely manner for important events, e.g., the Australian wildfires.
First Year Of Impact 2020
Sector Energy,Environment
Impact Types Societal

Policy & public services

 
Description Climate-Carbon Interactions in the Coming Century
Amount € 8,000,000 (EUR)
Funding ID 821003-2 
Organisation European Commission 
Sector Public
Country European Union (EU)
Start 05/2019 
End 05/2023
 
Description ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle
Amount £14,500 (GBP)
Organisation University of East Anglia 
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 04/2018 
End 03/2019
 
Description ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle Scientific Editorial Board 
Organisation ETH Zurich
Country Switzerland 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I Chair the Scientific Editorial Board
Collaborator Contribution Partners at Exeter University and ETH are members of the Editorial Board. The Global Carbon Project is the parent body who reviews and approves our decisions.
Impact The ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle Science Editorial Board is working together to synthesise and make public the current understanding of the carbon cycle and how it interacts with climate in a changing environment. The team has had multiple interactions with Stakeholdes, including members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), BEIS, and journalists. ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle will come out in 2018.
Start Year 2016
 
Description ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle Scientific Editorial Board 
Organisation Global Carbon Project
Country Australia 
Sector Learned Society 
PI Contribution I Chair the Scientific Editorial Board
Collaborator Contribution Partners at Exeter University and ETH are members of the Editorial Board. The Global Carbon Project is the parent body who reviews and approves our decisions.
Impact The ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle Science Editorial Board is working together to synthesise and make public the current understanding of the carbon cycle and how it interacts with climate in a changing environment. The team has had multiple interactions with Stakeholdes, including members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), BEIS, and journalists. ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle will come out in 2018.
Start Year 2016
 
Description ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle Scientific Editorial Board 
Organisation University of Exeter
Department College of Engineering, Mathematics & Physical Sciences
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I Chair the Scientific Editorial Board
Collaborator Contribution Partners at Exeter University and ETH are members of the Editorial Board. The Global Carbon Project is the parent body who reviews and approves our decisions.
Impact The ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle Science Editorial Board is working together to synthesise and make public the current understanding of the carbon cycle and how it interacts with climate in a changing environment. The team has had multiple interactions with Stakeholdes, including members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), BEIS, and journalists. ScienceBrief Carbon Cycle will come out in 2018.
Start Year 2016
 
Description ScienceBrief Pollination Science Editorial Board 
Organisation The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Country Germany 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution We brought together the ScienceBrief Science Editorial Team on Pollination, Pollinators, and Food Production.
Collaborator Contribution The ScienceBrief Pollination Science Editorial Board is working together to synthesise and make public the current understanding of pollination and pollinators and how they interacts with food production. The team has had multiple interactions with Stakeholders. IPBES is providing overall support and advice. ScienceBrief Pollination will come out in 2018.
Impact Too early to detail specific outcomes.
Start Year 2017
 
Description ScienceBrief Pollination Science Editorial Board 
Organisation University of Reading
Department School of Agriculture, Policy and Development Reading
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution We brought together the ScienceBrief Science Editorial Team on Pollination, Pollinators, and Food Production.
Collaborator Contribution The ScienceBrief Pollination Science Editorial Board is working together to synthesise and make public the current understanding of pollination and pollinators and how they interacts with food production. The team has had multiple interactions with Stakeholders. IPBES is providing overall support and advice. ScienceBrief Pollination will come out in 2018.
Impact Too early to detail specific outcomes.
Start Year 2017
 
Title ScienceBrief Platform 
Description The ScienceBrief web platform allows experts to post statements which they believe represents the state of knowledge in their field; other participants in the site are able to attach evidence (references to journal papers) to statements and everyone can then vote on the quality and applicability of the evidence. In this way we can determine what are the consensus opinions, and controversial areas, regarding science today. 
Type Of Technology Webtool/Application 
Year Produced 2017 
Impact The Alpha version of the platform was launched in 2017. Following on from the platform being released in a prototype version, we were able to generate much greater interest with potential stakeholders and funders of the project. We were also able to iterate on the design, concept and mechanics of the project itself. 
URL https://sciencebrief.org
 
Title ScienceBrief Platform 
Description The ScienceBrief web platform allows experts to post statements which they believe represents the state of knowledge in their field; other participants on the site are able to attach evidence (references to journal papers) to statements and everyone can then vote on the quality and applicability of the evidence. In this way we can determine what are the consensus opinions, and controversial areas, regarding science today. The third major iteration of the platform was released in 2019 and the site can now be updated with new features in an agile manner. The code is not open source, but access can be provided on a per request basis. There is a publicly query-able API for all of the non-sensitive data. 
Type Of Technology Webtool/Application 
Year Produced 2019 
Impact A significant simplification of the scoring system was put into place and the main interaction mechanic was updated - before there was a distinction between top experts and all experts; this is now merged and the topic owners decide who can contribute to the platform, thus enabling scaling. After a significant media event (wild fires press conference) resulting in mentions in over 200 online publications, including the BBC, New York Times, Mail online, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, Forbes, Met Office - it became clear there were bottlenecks in the underlying GraphQL technology that had to be optimised. This has now been done and has resulted in a 100x speed up on processing requests. The highlight of the year and the major feature to be developed going forwards, is the Explorer. This is a visual representation of the data on the platform. It allows a much more compact display of the information thus achieving a balance between the, often competing, goals of information density and legibility. The major users of the platform have all been using the graphical map explorer exclusively to add evidence. The platform was used to quickly and collaboratively compile evidence regarding wildfires and a Rapid Response Review was synthesised and published on the platform. This had major media coverage and demonstrated the value such a platform can have and the niche it can fill in the world. 
URL https://sciencebrief.org/
 
Title ScienceBrief Platform (2020) 
Description The ScienceBrief web platform allows experts to post statements clarifying the state of knowledge in emerging fields of climate science. Other participants in the site attach evidence (referenced journal papers) to statements in support of the statement, mostly, or refuting parts where research is ongoing and undecided. Users can vote on the quality and applicability of the evidence and, in this way, we can visualise the consensus opinions, and controversial areas, regarding emerging science topics. The popularity of ScienceBrief Reviews in the media led to development of a publishing site, news.sciencebrief.org, to host the reviews once published. Other articles can be published announcing new content to the platform, to help drive traffic to the site, using social-media posts. 
Type Of Technology Webtool/Application 
Year Produced 2020 
Impact 2020 saw a big increase in the amount of content uploaded to ScienceBrief, helping to develop and verify the original concept. A significant amount of development has gone into the data model and explorer tool. The controversy scoring system was reviewed and made more comprehensive, while being simply conveyed as a category name, based on the standard deviation of the supporting vote. Once again, significant development of the explorer tool was undertaken, enabling users to pan & zoom the display, select axis scales and filter by search-term or hashtag. This represents a significant increase in the level of interaction users have with the evidence and increase user's ease of engagement. The platform was used to quickly and collaboratively compile evidence for an update of the wildfires ScienceBrief Review, helping to add context to the summer 2020 fires in western north America. The review was published on the platform and attracted major media coverage, demonstrating that ScienceBrief can fulfil a much-needed role as the middle ground between scientific literature and mainstream journalism. ScienceBrief helps to ensure climate change is covered accurately and with the significance required. 
URL https://sciencebrief.org
 
Title ScienceBrief Platform Beta Version 
Description The ScienceBrief web platform allows experts to post statements which they believe represents the state of knowledge in their field; other participants in the site are able to attach evidence (references to journal papers) to statements and everyone can then vote on the quality and applicability of the evidence. In this way we can determine what are the consensus opinions, and controversial areas, regarding science today. 
Type Of Technology Webtool/Application 
Year Produced 2018 
Impact Following a successful round of Beta testing, we were able to analyse feedback on the user flow and map out the overarching motivations behind user engagement with the platform. This resulted in a significant redesign of the platform, which has greatly increased user registration, and made adding new evidence a much smoother and quicker experience. In addition, several new features have been added, including being able to tag evidence and search based on these tags. Furthermore, the platform has been opened up to all universities in the world and several leading research institutions. 
URL https://sciencebrief.org
 
Description A discussion with Policy officers at European Commission on the usefulness of the KAPtEN platform to update biodiversity assessments 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact This was a targeted discussion with policymakers in Brussels on the broader use of the KAPtEN platform to support the IPBES biodiversity assessment. This is part of an open-ended discussion that has gone over multiple years.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Presentation at ADVENT Workshop, Brockenhurst, September 2016 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation by David Cutting on the development of the ScienceBrief platform.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
 
Description Presentation at Carbon footprint day of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Paris. Feb 2017 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation by Professor Corinne Le Quere where ScienceBrief was used as an example of work currently in progress.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Presentation at Future Earth-PROVIA-IPCC risks and solutions workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation by Professor Corinne Le Quere where the ScienceBrief platform supported by the KAPtEN funding was used as an example of work in progress.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
 
Description Presentation at Sustainability week of Zurich University, March 2017 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation by Professor Corinne Le Quere where the ScienceBrief project was used as an example of work currently in progress.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Presentation by Anthony De Gol at CEFAS, Lowestoft, UK 2020 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact A presentation was delivered to a group of internationally renowned researchers working for DEFRA in order to advertise the ScienceBrief platform and interface with the types of people we hope would make use of the platform. There was an increase in the number of users to the site, as well as very good feedback on the essentially international nature of the research they conduct and that embedding geographical information within the site would be beneficial.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://sciencebrief.org/
 
Description Presentation by Anthony De Gol to Tyndall Assembly 2018 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact A presentation was delivered by Anthony De Gol to a group of internationally renowned researchers on the topic of gamification and how the techniques applied to scientific research, with specific regard to the project. This resulted in an increase in signups to the website as well as generated interest for participation with the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Presentation by Anthony De-Gol to IPBES/CBD, Reading, 29/11/17 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact 60 people attended a session which sparked questions and discussions - an increase in interest was reported.

A presentation was delivered to a group of internationally renowned researchers in an area relevant to one of the pilot projects. This resulted in an increase in signups to the website as well as generated interest for participation with the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Presentation by Anthony De-Gol to Tyndall Assembly, September 2017, University of Newcastle-Upon_Tyne 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact A presentation was given to a group of researchers at the annual Tyndall Assembly, this resulted in an increase in sign-ups to the website as well as an increase in general interest and awareness of the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/Assembly-2017
 
Description Presentation to EU H2020 project partners (4C & CONSTRAIN) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact A presentation was delivered to a group of internationally renowned researchers working for the EU H2020 4C and CONSTRAIN consortia, in order to advertise the platform and interface with the target user-base for the platform. There was an increase in the number of users to the site, as well as very good feedback on the messaging for how we attract scientists to contribute to the platform.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020,2021
URL https://4c-carbon.eu/
 
Description Presentation to Tyndall Centre General Assembly 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact A presentation was delivered at the (virtual) Tyndall Centre General Assembly to raise awareness of the functionality and purpose of ScienceBrief, to a group of internationally renowned, multi-disciplinary climate change researchers. The intended outcome was to engage new users of the platform and there was a modest increase, as well as facilitate collaboration for future projects.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://www.tyndall.ac.uk/
 
Description Press briefing on Net Zero UK emissions 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Press briefing on the potential to reach net zero emissions in the UK by 2050, intended as background for the press.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Tyndall Assembly Presentation, Manchester, 2016 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation by David Cutting explaining the development of the ScienceBrief platform.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
 
Description Updated ScienceBrief Review of Wildfires 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact In response to the severe wildfires in western North America, an additional 50 papers were uploaded to the Brief, with a focus on the role of fuel management; burned area and fire weather trends in western North America; and new papers published since January 2020 (the original Review). This review reaffirmed the role of climate change in increasing the risk of wildfires. Publication of the Review attracted international media attention, particularly in the UK, US and Australia. Since then, reports from the BBC and others, have referenced these reviews when discussing the impact of climate change. A formal review article has been drafted and submitted to a journal for publication.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://sciencebrief.org/uploads/reviews/ScienceBrief_Review_WILDFIRES_Sep2020.pdf
 
Description Wildfires press conference and rapid response review 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact In response to the Australian wildfire crisis, a statement was created on the ScienceBrief platform to assess the role climate change has in enhancing fire weather. Two fire-expert researchers compiled 69 publications to provide supporting evidence that fire weather would increase in a warming world. From this they wrote a synthesis report entitled a Rapid Response Review, with additional fire experts, which was published on the platform, as well as the Tyndall Centre website, to coincide with a press conference given in London at the Science Media Centre. This was picked up by many major media (> 220) outlets including the BBC, New York Times, Mail online, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, Forbes, Met Office, and was pushed strongly on twitter. This drove a great deal of traffic to the ScienceBrief site as well as introducing the concept of the platform to the world.
From this other individuals were able to understand the underlying science relating to an important topic and further disseminate the scientific knowledge base.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://sciencebrief.org/