Folklore Without Borders
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Derby
Department Name: College of Arts, Humanities & Education
Abstract
Folklore Without Borders is a network of academics and organisations working to develop greater diversity within folklore. We are holding an international knowledge exchange on folklore theory, methodology and creative practice. The network is focused on the UK, with participants from Estonia, Norway and the United States (US). It connects three groups who work with cultural tradition: academia (research, teaching, impact), individual stakeholders (artists, writers; entrepreneurial folklorists) and cultural industries (museums, galleries, archives; media). This network considers both theoretical and practical ways to make change happen in a number of domains that would not normally have the opportunity to meet.
All of our participants recognise diversity issues in folklore. Some are systemic to Higher Education (HE), creative arts practice and entrepreneurship in the UK (the erasure or under-representation of the minoritized; whether racially, disabled, LGBTQ+, female, particularly at senior career stage), some are specific to the discipline (such as advocacy, representation and agency within folklore research), and some take heightened form in the UK, where interest and involvement in folklore is overwhelmingly white, with an absence of disability, urban, working class voices, diverse genders, races and sexualities.
To facilitate knowledge exchange, the network has international collaborators and two Learned Societies as Project Partners: the Folklore Society and the American Folklore Society. The latter's Cultural Diversity Committee has, since 1994, developed practice and research in diversifying folklore. Knowledge is exchanged on topics such as engagement with local communities and struggles; equality, diversity and inclusion issues around meeting practices; advocacy and acknowledging privilege.
The network problematises the deployment of 19th-century folkloristic concepts, which remain popular, especially in literary and artistic work. For example, in the UK the framing of tradition as survival in the face of modernity often entertains narratives of an 'ancient source' for folklore, despite there being no evidence for this. The network explores whether this serves to code folklore as white and rural, thus consolidating under-representation. It asks what responsibility artists and writers interested in hauntological themes and popular genres such as folk horror have towards diversity. What can be gained by accommodating contemporary thinking, foregrounding folkloristics and history at the intersection of critical race theory, queer theory, transnational, feminist theory/praxis, disability and performance theory?
The network seeks to understand and share the cultural value of folklore. How can the perception of folklore as something available to and practised by all groups enter the practice of those who work with folklore in the UK? A series of digital meetings and three two-day events have been designed to stimulate discussion and generate collaborations, captured by a journal article, a report, conference papers, teaching material, curatorial expertise, an exhibition and a manifesto exemplified by creative outputs. All of this will be discussed on both social media and at international conferences. Our first event focuses on the contemporary challenges of folklore; the second on folklore and the creative economy; and the third on the potential of folklore to unlock cultural assets. All of the network events help us discover ourselves through promoting and discussing rigorous enquiry-led research in folklore. Each event has been designed in collaboration with our Project Partners to maximise their support for the discussion and exchange of ideas concerning diversity. Membership of the network is open to anyone and all physical events are blended to make attendance possible by digital means.
All of our participants recognise diversity issues in folklore. Some are systemic to Higher Education (HE), creative arts practice and entrepreneurship in the UK (the erasure or under-representation of the minoritized; whether racially, disabled, LGBTQ+, female, particularly at senior career stage), some are specific to the discipline (such as advocacy, representation and agency within folklore research), and some take heightened form in the UK, where interest and involvement in folklore is overwhelmingly white, with an absence of disability, urban, working class voices, diverse genders, races and sexualities.
To facilitate knowledge exchange, the network has international collaborators and two Learned Societies as Project Partners: the Folklore Society and the American Folklore Society. The latter's Cultural Diversity Committee has, since 1994, developed practice and research in diversifying folklore. Knowledge is exchanged on topics such as engagement with local communities and struggles; equality, diversity and inclusion issues around meeting practices; advocacy and acknowledging privilege.
The network problematises the deployment of 19th-century folkloristic concepts, which remain popular, especially in literary and artistic work. For example, in the UK the framing of tradition as survival in the face of modernity often entertains narratives of an 'ancient source' for folklore, despite there being no evidence for this. The network explores whether this serves to code folklore as white and rural, thus consolidating under-representation. It asks what responsibility artists and writers interested in hauntological themes and popular genres such as folk horror have towards diversity. What can be gained by accommodating contemporary thinking, foregrounding folkloristics and history at the intersection of critical race theory, queer theory, transnational, feminist theory/praxis, disability and performance theory?
The network seeks to understand and share the cultural value of folklore. How can the perception of folklore as something available to and practised by all groups enter the practice of those who work with folklore in the UK? A series of digital meetings and three two-day events have been designed to stimulate discussion and generate collaborations, captured by a journal article, a report, conference papers, teaching material, curatorial expertise, an exhibition and a manifesto exemplified by creative outputs. All of this will be discussed on both social media and at international conferences. Our first event focuses on the contemporary challenges of folklore; the second on folklore and the creative economy; and the third on the potential of folklore to unlock cultural assets. All of the network events help us discover ourselves through promoting and discussing rigorous enquiry-led research in folklore. Each event has been designed in collaboration with our Project Partners to maximise their support for the discussion and exchange of ideas concerning diversity. Membership of the network is open to anyone and all physical events are blended to make attendance possible by digital means.
Organisations
- University of Derby (Lead Research Organisation)
- The Folklore Society (Collaboration, Project Partner)
- Bloc Projects (Collaboration)
- American Folklore Society (Collaboration, Project Partner)
- Bloc Projects Ltd (Project Partner)
- Folklore Museums Network (Project Partner)
- Folklore Library and Archive (Project Partner)
| Description | The aim of this award was to embed greater equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) within folklore and folkloristics in the UK via a research network. In doing so the network has addressed contemporary challenges and the creative economy, considered its cultural assets and has developed enquiry-led research. This work is ongoing, and the network has carried on beyond its funded period. We have held and continue to hold accessible digital meetings and physical symposiums, run by innovative practices that mitigate academic power, support EDI and welcome new members. Throughout 2024 we conducted knowledge transfer between international and interdisciplinary researchers and stakeholders working on EDI and folklore, mapping past research and preparing future directions. We co-authored a positioning statement that offers thought leadership on the value of emphasising EDI in folklore and folkloristics. We considered the history of EDI within folklore and folkloristics in the UK and identified essential historical work that remains to be done. We detailed how classed, white privilege has dictated the boundaries and content of folklore and folkloristics. We challenged the discourse of revivals within folklore. We understood how the language of EDI itself can be unhelpful, divisive, and in some instances, racist. We have considered the discourse of indigeneity in the United Kingdom, both from US and European perspectives, alongside that of the far right, which has opened up further avenues of research. We have bridged the communities involved in UK folklore, including researchers, practitioners, artists, entrepreneurs and communicators. We have developed an understanding of how folklore knowledge works between the network's three domains: academia (research, teaching, impact), independent stakeholders (artists, writers; entrepreneurial folklorists), cultural industries (museums, galleries, archives; media). Throughout this work we have attempted to share and broaden understandings of EDI, agree commonalities and appreciate differences between domains. We have prepared materials to address the use of folklore in the creative industries (particularly in the relation of artistic representation of folklore to EDI and responsibilities of artists towards tradition). We have planned how to drive the value of foregrounding EDI with the creative industries. We have strengthened working relationships within the international academic community, two learned societies, (the Folklore Society (FLS), American Folklore Society (AFS)) and two new organisations (Folklore Library and Archive and Folklore Museums Network). |
| Exploitation Route | The network is ongoing. It welcomes new members and so others are invited to approach and join it. We are in the process of developing resources to be used by researchers, practitioners, artists, entrepreneurs and the cultural industries. Please do join the network and aid the production of these. |
| Sectors | Communities and Social Services/Policy Creative Economy Leisure Activities including Sports Recreation and Tourism Culture Heritage Museums and Collections |
| URL | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lfVqM1Vp58ioIKxx8JI1jxsCTDvAFsqWqhESHCpn6XU/ |
| Description | There are emerging impacts from this award, that finished in December 2024. Membership of the network itself is diverse and crosses domains academia (research, teaching, impact), independent stakeholders (artists, writers; entrepreneurial folklorists), cultural industries (museums, galleries, archives; media). Through membership there are cultural and societal impacts as members are able to better articulate and work towards embedding greater EDI within UK folkloristics. There is the potential for economic impact in terms of professional development. In bridging the communities involved in UK folklore (such as researchers, practitioners, artists, entrepreneurs and communicators) we are beginning to impact how these groups work together. Culturally, the network has emerging impacts in relation to popular and artistic representation of folklore. We have strengthened working relationships within the international academic community, two learned societies, (the Folklore Society (FLS), American Folklore Society (AFS)) and two new organisations (Folklore Library and Archive and Folklore Museums Network). |
| First Year Of Impact | 2024 |
| Sector | Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections |
| Impact Types | Cultural Societal Economic |
| Description | Folklore Society internal practices |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| Description | Intangible Cultural Heritage implementation |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
| Description | Folklore Without Borders |
| Organisation | American Folklore Society |
| Country | United States |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| PI Contribution | The research team has formed a research network. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Organising meetings, setting agendas, working on shared projects and statements. |
| Impact | Conference presentations. Papers and internal policy documents. |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Folklore Without Borders |
| Organisation | Bloc Projects |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Private |
| PI Contribution | The research team has formed a research network. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Organising meetings, setting agendas, working on shared projects and statements. |
| Impact | Conference presentations. Papers and internal policy documents. |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Folklore Without Borders |
| Organisation | The Folklore Society |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Learned Society |
| PI Contribution | The research team has formed a research network. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Organising meetings, setting agendas, working on shared projects and statements. |
| Impact | Conference presentations. Papers and internal policy documents. |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Network meetings |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Our regular network meetings are open to anyone interested in attending. Through them we have impacted our work on a variety of audiences, from civil servants to artists. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024,2025 |
| URL | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lfVqM1Vp58ioIKxx8JI1jxsCTDvAFsqWqhESHCpn6XU/edit?tab=t.0 |