Equalities in Public Private Partnerships (EQUIPPPS)
Lead Research Organisation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Department Name: Geography
Abstract
This proposal seeks funding for a Strategic Network to identify research gaps and formulate a research agenda on Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in developing countries across four sectors: education, health, housing and water. PPPs increasingly play a significant role in the financing and delivery of public services. They are deemed to offer potential for addressing inequalities in provision and access to public services across the Global South. As such, they are promoted as an important development financing mechanism in support of the Sustainable Development Goals (see SDG 17.3 and the Addis Ababa Declaration of the Third United Nations Financing for Development Summit, July 2015).
The occurrence of PPPs, however, is not new. They first emerged in the Global North in the 1980s as part of a wider strategy of infrastructure development. PPPs were presented as a means to raise finance without increasing public sector debt. They were also heralded as a way to avoid perceived public sector inadequacies through greater involvement of private sector agents with alleged efficiency and cost effectiveness advantages. By the late 1990s, PPPs were being promoted across the Global South by a number of bilateral and multilateral agencies as the solution to growing demands for public services and the advocacy efforts in favour of PPPs have strengthened in the last few years.
Yet, there remains an acute lack of scholarly work on the effects of PPPs within and across sectors in the developing world. Critics have argued that there is insufficient evidence to support many of the claims and assumptions surrounding the presumed benefits of PPPs and their wider ability to contribute to poverty reduction or to address inequalities. Another concern in drawing conclusions regarding the effectiveness of PPPs is that PPP research has tended to remain in sector-specific silos and has failed to address cross-sectoral linkages, challenges or insights. This constrains evaluations of PPPs in general as a means to overcome inadequacies in the public sector. Further, PPP is a loose term that covers a wide range of arrangements across different sectors and it is open to a diverse range of interpretations (IOB, 2013; Languille, 2016; Romero, 2015). This needs unpicking in an attempt to draw lessons regarding PPP outcomes in the developing world. Finally, both the current promotion of and opposition to PPPs largely fail to address some fundamental questions regarding the nature and history of both the public and private sectors in particular regions and countries. The complexities of what constitutes the public and private sectors (types of actors), the nature of PPP partnerships (types of relationships), and their outcomes including with regard to equity (types of impacts) remain to be investigated.
This network seeks to address the need to understand PPP processes across sectors, how PPPs are implemented in practice and what the nature of their effects are in terms of dynamics of inequalities. The network will bring together academics, policy makers, development practitioners and other stakeholders to build capacity to interrogate PPPs as a solution to development challenges. In particular, it seeks to foster cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary fertilization by drawing on academic and non-academic expertise of varying disciplinary and sectoral origin.
The network will be organised around two hubs located in India and South Africa, with the co-ordination of network activities located in the UK. It will engage in scoping exercises, hold various consultative meetings and a final full network meeting. It embodies an early-careers and capacity building element through a doctoral student mentoring component and will engage in an active communication strategy both within the network and beyond through a website, intranet, other forms of social media, and provision of web-links to network activities.
The occurrence of PPPs, however, is not new. They first emerged in the Global North in the 1980s as part of a wider strategy of infrastructure development. PPPs were presented as a means to raise finance without increasing public sector debt. They were also heralded as a way to avoid perceived public sector inadequacies through greater involvement of private sector agents with alleged efficiency and cost effectiveness advantages. By the late 1990s, PPPs were being promoted across the Global South by a number of bilateral and multilateral agencies as the solution to growing demands for public services and the advocacy efforts in favour of PPPs have strengthened in the last few years.
Yet, there remains an acute lack of scholarly work on the effects of PPPs within and across sectors in the developing world. Critics have argued that there is insufficient evidence to support many of the claims and assumptions surrounding the presumed benefits of PPPs and their wider ability to contribute to poverty reduction or to address inequalities. Another concern in drawing conclusions regarding the effectiveness of PPPs is that PPP research has tended to remain in sector-specific silos and has failed to address cross-sectoral linkages, challenges or insights. This constrains evaluations of PPPs in general as a means to overcome inadequacies in the public sector. Further, PPP is a loose term that covers a wide range of arrangements across different sectors and it is open to a diverse range of interpretations (IOB, 2013; Languille, 2016; Romero, 2015). This needs unpicking in an attempt to draw lessons regarding PPP outcomes in the developing world. Finally, both the current promotion of and opposition to PPPs largely fail to address some fundamental questions regarding the nature and history of both the public and private sectors in particular regions and countries. The complexities of what constitutes the public and private sectors (types of actors), the nature of PPP partnerships (types of relationships), and their outcomes including with regard to equity (types of impacts) remain to be investigated.
This network seeks to address the need to understand PPP processes across sectors, how PPPs are implemented in practice and what the nature of their effects are in terms of dynamics of inequalities. The network will bring together academics, policy makers, development practitioners and other stakeholders to build capacity to interrogate PPPs as a solution to development challenges. In particular, it seeks to foster cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary fertilization by drawing on academic and non-academic expertise of varying disciplinary and sectoral origin.
The network will be organised around two hubs located in India and South Africa, with the co-ordination of network activities located in the UK. It will engage in scoping exercises, hold various consultative meetings and a final full network meeting. It embodies an early-careers and capacity building element through a doctoral student mentoring component and will engage in an active communication strategy both within the network and beyond through a website, intranet, other forms of social media, and provision of web-links to network activities.
Planned Impact
We are seeking to integrate impact from the start of the project through the design of the network activities. This will be operationalized by involving through interviews and invitation to the consultative meetings a wide range of PPP stakeholders, including policymakers, advocacy organisations, development practitioners, and by allowing feedback from each consecutive phase in the network's activities to inform subsequent phases. This should allow for new research agenda and policy issues to become identified as the network activities unfold as well as to benefit from progressive feedback through the different activity phases. Our non-academic co-Investigator from Education International will assist in broadening the appeal of the network's activities from the start. The local hubs will also work closely with various local non-academic stakeholders. Finally, members of the Steering Committee straddle academic and non-academic environments and will provide guidance on how to broaden the beneficiaries of the networks' activities beyond academic circles.
The network activities (outlined in the case for support) are designed to promote learning across the hubs and information sharing in all directions (South-South, South-North and North-South). Moreover, network meetings will be livestreamed to enable maximum user engagement and regular social media updates will ensure that stakeholders remain fully informed of network findings and activities.
It is envisaged that the network will benefit a wide range of stakeholders through on-going discussions of cross-sectoral and cross-country PPP policies and outcomes. At the same time, the network will connect researchers with policy makers and civil society representatives to promote a cross fertilization of dialogue on PPPs. The activities of the network will also strengthen our engagement with various civil society organisations that engage with PPP realities, including Eurodad, Global Justice Now, the Heinrich Böll Foundation, the Right to Education, Public Services International, and other.
One key element of the impact of the Strategic Network will be the development of a new analytical and policy frame through which we can understand PPPs across sectors, countries and regions. This will enable future research and provide empirical evidence to guide policy making that will promote sustainable development. The success of the network will be evident in the development of a collaborative research proposal to take this work forward as well as cross-country, cross-sector information sharing that will inform future debates around PPPs and will be made widely accessible via our social media outputs. Contact will be maintained via the network's website and this will be used, alongside the network meetings to promote user engagement and disseminate findings to stakeholders working in this area.
The network activities (outlined in the case for support) are designed to promote learning across the hubs and information sharing in all directions (South-South, South-North and North-South). Moreover, network meetings will be livestreamed to enable maximum user engagement and regular social media updates will ensure that stakeholders remain fully informed of network findings and activities.
It is envisaged that the network will benefit a wide range of stakeholders through on-going discussions of cross-sectoral and cross-country PPP policies and outcomes. At the same time, the network will connect researchers with policy makers and civil society representatives to promote a cross fertilization of dialogue on PPPs. The activities of the network will also strengthen our engagement with various civil society organisations that engage with PPP realities, including Eurodad, Global Justice Now, the Heinrich Böll Foundation, the Right to Education, Public Services International, and other.
One key element of the impact of the Strategic Network will be the development of a new analytical and policy frame through which we can understand PPPs across sectors, countries and regions. This will enable future research and provide empirical evidence to guide policy making that will promote sustainable development. The success of the network will be evident in the development of a collaborative research proposal to take this work forward as well as cross-country, cross-sector information sharing that will inform future debates around PPPs and will be made widely accessible via our social media outputs. Contact will be maintained via the network's website and this will be used, alongside the network meetings to promote user engagement and disseminate findings to stakeholders working in this area.
Publications
Bayliss K
(2017)
Unpacking the Public Private Partnership Revival
in The Journal of Development Studies
Gideon J
(2020)
Public-private partnerships in sexual and reproductive healthcare provision: establishing a gender analysis
in Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Gideon, J.
(2017)
Exploring public private partnerships in health and education: a critique
in Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Languille, S.
(2017)
Public Private partnerships in education and health in the global South: a literature review
in Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Unterhalter E
(2020)
A Review of public private partnerships around girls' education in developing countries: flicking gender equality on and off
in Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Description | Although this is a Network rather than a Research Grant we have identified a set of research themes questions for future consideration. These have emerged out of a series of literature reviews that were undertaken by network members. What do PPPs tell us about neoliberalism? Are PPPs part of a 'third phase' of neoliberalism and what kind of reconfigurations of state and private finance do they draw upon? PPPs take on different meanings in different contexts (sectoral/ geographical) so how can we usefully theorise about the PPPs and their relationship to neoliberalism and financialisation? Contestation and processes of struggle around the different meanings of PPP - what do these tell us about inequalities and inequities? Do PPPs draw attention to new forms of inequalities (as the chain between the individual's access to a particular public service, on the one hand, and the ultimate financier of the provision of the service, on the other, possibly becomes longer and more opaque). What are the origins of PPPs across sectors and do different 'stories of origin' have different implications for inequalities? How do the origins of PPPs link to the stories of neoliberalism and financial crisis in different geographical settings? What discursive forms do debates around PPPs take and where are the silences? Which actors have a voice and where are the knowledge gaps? Who is silenced in these debates? |
Exploitation Route | We would hope that research groups are able to build on our preliminary literature reviews to identify further knowledge gaps and produce new and detailed empirical evidence so we can clearly understand the impact of PPPs on inequalities and inequities in different country contexts. |
Sectors | Education Financial Services and Management Consultancy Healthcare Government Democracy and Justice Other |
URL | https://www.equippps.net/working-papers/ |
Description | The findings of the research have informed a grant submission to the ESRC Open Call to explore the impacts of PPPs in Latin America - this is a way of building on the knowledge generated through the EQUIPPPS network. The grant application was developed in collaboration with NGO advocacy group EURODAD as well as academics in the UK and Latin America. |
First Year Of Impact | 2022 |
Sector | Education,Government, Democracy and Justice |
Impact Types | Societal Policy & public services |
Description | Academic workshop, London ' Privatisation through time and space' |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | This interdisciplinary workshop ' Privatisation through time and space' was directed at postgraduate students and other interested parties to generate wider debate and understanding on how process of privatisation and the role of PPPs have shifted over time and across geographical spaces. Around 40 people attended the event and a lively discussion took place throughout the day as questions followed each presentation and participants asked for additional reading material. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | http://iippe.org/privatisation-through-time-and-space/ |
Description | Conference paper: International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Conference paper at the International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy held in Berlin in Sept 2017. EQUIPPPS members presented work on privatisation, PPPs and water. The presentation generated discussion and questions. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | http://iippe.org/8th-annual-conference-in-political-economy/ |
Description | London International Development Centre/ The Guardian debate: How Effective Are Public-Private Partnerships? |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Two members of the EQUIPPPS network. Dr. Elisa Van Waeyenberge (Lecturer in Economics and Research Tutor at SOAS) and Prof Elaine Unterhalter (Professor of Education and International Development at UCL's Institute of Education), took place in this public debate alongside two other panel members - Neil Jeffery (Chief Executive Officer at WSUP - Water & Sanitation for the Urban Poor, a non-profit partnership between the private sector, NGOs and research institutions) and Dr. Matti Kohonen (Principal Adviser (Private Sector) of Christian Aid, leading Christian Aid's advocacy efforts towards the private sector in the Public Policy Department). This was a public debate that focused on the expansion of PPPs in different sectors of the economy and considered the benefits and disadvantages of working through PPPs. There was a lively discussion with lots of question and comments from the audience. A Youtube recording of the event has been watched over 450 times. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | http://www.lidc.org.uk/lidc-and-guardian-development-debates |
Description | Public Private Schooling Symposium |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | A symposium, Public Private Schooling Symposium was held in Cape Town, South Africa in October 2017 and included EQUIPPPS network members speaking on PPPs and education. The intention of the symposium is to provide an opportunity to better understand and contrast views and positions on the role of public-private partnerships in securing quality public education. An overarching question examined is in what ways the globalizing agenda of PPPs (including in its local variations) influence the state's ability to provide public goods that promote greater equality and equity. Around 50 people attended the event including the Minister for Education. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Website and twitter feed |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Media (as a channel to the public) |
Results and Impact | We have established an EQUIPPPS website and twitter feed which has attracted a significant number of hits and followers. Between the establishment of the website on 1st June 2017 and 9th March 2018 the website has attracted 1,225 visits and 3,320 pageviews; we have 135 Twitter Followers and are Following 441 others. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
URL | https://www.equippps.net/ |