EnergyScapes and Ecosystem Services
Lead Research Organisation:
NERC CEH (Up to 30.11.2019)
Department Name: Shore
Abstract
Renewable energy has recently received considerable media and public attention because of perceived benefits to the environment, including climate change, the potential to replace imported sources of energy, the possible impact on food production, and aesthetic issues related to the location of wind turbines. Potential sources of land-based renewable energy include bioenergy from forests, arable crops, energy crops and waste, solar heating and electricity, hydroelectricity, ground-source heat, and wind-energy. The spatial organisation of such energy sources, together with energy demand, energy infrastructure and other energy-sources within a particular landscape can be termed the 'EnergyScape'. 'Ecosystem Services' is a collective term to describe the various services we obtain from land and its associated ecosystems. They include the provision of food, fibre and fuel, the regulation of nutrients, water supply and water quality, the creation of opportunities for recreation and education, the maintenance of biodiversity, and the space to build and maintain our supporting infrastructure. The development and use of land-based renewable energy resources will have both negative and positive impacts on these services. Positive aspects may include increased biodiversity from biomass crops; negative aspects may include reduced river flows and increased road transport of biomass. This one-year research project aims to determine, through a pilot study, how a systematic understanding of the 'EnergyScape' and 'Ecosystem Services' could help guide the deployment of land-based renewables. For the pilot study we have selected Marston Vale in Bedfordshire which is a sub-catchment of the Great Ouse river, and contains a mix of agricultural, forestry and urban land. It is the site of a community forest and there is local interest in renewable energy. Working with national and local stakeholder groups, the project will identify the key sources of renewable energy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the development of land-based renewables. Using spatial data, geographical information systems and existing models, the project will then develop a spatial description of the EnergyScape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. Because some models are weaker than others, we will use a 'Plug and Play' framework, as used in computing, so that new and improved models can be introduced as they become available. Similarly, the approach will allow new data sources to be included as they become available. Starting from the base-line description, we will then investigate the benefits and losses associated with the deployment of different combinations of land based renewables. Because renewable energy sources have different spatial and temporal characteristics relative to the demand for energy, the outputs will not be simply additive. Similarly, there will be complex interactions between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. Some interactions will be antagonistic (e.g. solar power v demand for heating; food v biofuel) whereas others may be complementary (e.g. sharing of facilities; biofuel v biodiversity). By using appropriate visualisation tools, we hope that the key interactions can be explained to stakeholder groups, who can then use the information to inform future decisions. We intend that the approach developed in this research, which will be limited to the renewables and ecosystems of a specific area, can be applied to other regions and at a national spatial scale in future research projects. To validate the academic efficacy of our approach, we will submit papers for peer review, seeking to get them published in high-impact scientific journals.
Organisations
People |
ORCID iD |
David Howard (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Burgess P
(2012)
A framework for reviewing the trade-offs between, renewable energy, food, feed and wood production at a local level
in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Coleby A
(2011)
Environmental Impact Assessment, ecosystems services and the case of energy crops in England
in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Howard D
(2013)
Energyscapes: Linking the energy system and ecosystem services in real landscapes
in Biomass and Bioenergy
Rivas Casado M
(2014)
Predicting the impacts of bioenergy production on farmland birds.
in The Science of the total environment
Van Der Horst D
(2011)
Local Rights to Landscape in the Global Moral Economy of Carbon
in Landscape Research
Description | We have shown that there are benefits to stakeholders of taking a whole system view of the landscape their development effects. By studying Marston Vale, a sub-catchment of the Great Ouse in Bedfordshire, we identified the probable consequences of developing the energy system to deploy wind turbines or grow bioenergy feedstocks. By using ecosystem services linked to Broad Habitats we could show how and where developments would have impacts and how different people and groups valued the change. |
Exploitation Route | The approach has been presented at a number of meetings, including the discussions with Defra for the Sustainable Pathways to Low Carbon Energy (SPLiCE) and helped shape the call. It was also discussed in the preparations for NERC's Valuing Natural Capital for Low Carbon Pathways. |
Sectors | Agriculture Food and Drink Energy Environment Government Democracy and Justice |
URL | http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/research/research-activity/current-projects/research-projects/energyscapes-and-ecosystem-services.html |
Description | So far our research has been used to help shape studies into the impacts of deployment of new renewable energy technology. Groups assessing the potential for major development (e.g. NW Energy² examining the use of estuaries in NW England) have appreciated from the study the need to think of the tradeoffs and how to balance all the externalised costs and benefits for different people and groups. The approach is valuable in encouraging dialogue between potentially conflicting groups (e.g. developers and conservationsists) as it helps both sides recognise their own position and then compare it to other positions. |
First Year Of Impact | 2011 |
Sector | Energy,Environment |