Offshore Cable Burial: How deep is deep enough?
Lead Research Organisation:
Durham University
Department Name: Engineering
Abstract
Offshore Wind (OSW) is critical for the UK's economy and energy security. It is also an area of huge investment, for example £14bn has been committed up to the end of 2021 for new OSW sites - the 4th largest construction programme in the UK. Beyond this, the UK's current 2030 OSW installed capacity targets will require £48bn of investment and provide direct employment for 27,000 people.
Despite the growing maturity of the OSW sector, certain elements of the installed infrastructure remain problematic. Principally, problems associated with subsea power cables that transport and distribute the electricity generated offshore in wind turbine generators to the onshore transmission system currently account for 75% of the cost of all insurance claims and faults typically take 100+ days to rectify. This leads to breaks in supply and loss of revenue for the wind farm operator which in the long term can lead to longer payback periods and reduced investment elsewhere in their renewables portfolio. In shallow waters these cables must be protected from anchors and fishing gear and the primary protection method is to bury the cable below the seabed. The cable burial depth is a compromise between economic cost of burial (going deeper takes longer, requires larger ships and may require more complex operations) and risk to the cable being damaged by anchors/fishing gear penetrating the seabed. Within this context, anchor-cable interactions currently account for 85% of power cable failures. The planned rapid expansion of offshore wind around the UK - installed capacity increasing 7.5 times over the next 30 years - will require new cable installations within some of the busiest shipping/fishing waters in the world and it is essential that these new cables are installed at the appropriate depth. However, the industry currently lacks appropriate scientific tools to determine anchor penetration depths in different soil conditions. Instead they use simple look-up tables based on very broad descriptive classifications of the soils on the seabed that basically split the huge spectrum of real soil conditions into two categories - soft or hard. This approach has been shown to be highly conservative in some soils leading to unnecessarily deep (and costly) burial. However, it is clearly non-conservative in other conditions as anchor-cable interactions dominate cable failures.
This proposal will tackle the lack of sound anchor penetration models head on and, through physical testing and computational modelling, develop a toolkit to assess anchor penetration in different soil conditions. This anchor penetration prediction tool will be based on the site investigation data typically available along cabling routes and avoid the use of oversimplistic look-up tables. Its development will be guided by an industrial project steering group made up of key parties from the OSW sector. Crucially, this innovative anchor penetration model will be calibrated and validated using a geodatabase comprising actual site investigation data. Model performance will be assessed against proven, demonstrable ground conditions and therefore will not rely on hypothetical ground conditions which can be oversimplified using current cable burial assessment techniques (e.g. descriptive single-type soils that do not change with burial depths, as opposed to more complex, multi-layered soil types). In addition to the anchor penetration predictive tool, a number of spatial mapping layers (specific to the UK Continental Shelf) will be created, derived from the tool application to known ground conditions across the UK seafloor. These mapping layers will be made openly available, and are anticipated to feed into high-level spatial planning decisions at project concept stage.
In summary, this project will provide an industry usable anchor penetration model allowing the OSW sector to answer the key cable burial question - how deep is deep enough?
Despite the growing maturity of the OSW sector, certain elements of the installed infrastructure remain problematic. Principally, problems associated with subsea power cables that transport and distribute the electricity generated offshore in wind turbine generators to the onshore transmission system currently account for 75% of the cost of all insurance claims and faults typically take 100+ days to rectify. This leads to breaks in supply and loss of revenue for the wind farm operator which in the long term can lead to longer payback periods and reduced investment elsewhere in their renewables portfolio. In shallow waters these cables must be protected from anchors and fishing gear and the primary protection method is to bury the cable below the seabed. The cable burial depth is a compromise between economic cost of burial (going deeper takes longer, requires larger ships and may require more complex operations) and risk to the cable being damaged by anchors/fishing gear penetrating the seabed. Within this context, anchor-cable interactions currently account for 85% of power cable failures. The planned rapid expansion of offshore wind around the UK - installed capacity increasing 7.5 times over the next 30 years - will require new cable installations within some of the busiest shipping/fishing waters in the world and it is essential that these new cables are installed at the appropriate depth. However, the industry currently lacks appropriate scientific tools to determine anchor penetration depths in different soil conditions. Instead they use simple look-up tables based on very broad descriptive classifications of the soils on the seabed that basically split the huge spectrum of real soil conditions into two categories - soft or hard. This approach has been shown to be highly conservative in some soils leading to unnecessarily deep (and costly) burial. However, it is clearly non-conservative in other conditions as anchor-cable interactions dominate cable failures.
This proposal will tackle the lack of sound anchor penetration models head on and, through physical testing and computational modelling, develop a toolkit to assess anchor penetration in different soil conditions. This anchor penetration prediction tool will be based on the site investigation data typically available along cabling routes and avoid the use of oversimplistic look-up tables. Its development will be guided by an industrial project steering group made up of key parties from the OSW sector. Crucially, this innovative anchor penetration model will be calibrated and validated using a geodatabase comprising actual site investigation data. Model performance will be assessed against proven, demonstrable ground conditions and therefore will not rely on hypothetical ground conditions which can be oversimplified using current cable burial assessment techniques (e.g. descriptive single-type soils that do not change with burial depths, as opposed to more complex, multi-layered soil types). In addition to the anchor penetration predictive tool, a number of spatial mapping layers (specific to the UK Continental Shelf) will be created, derived from the tool application to known ground conditions across the UK seafloor. These mapping layers will be made openly available, and are anticipated to feed into high-level spatial planning decisions at project concept stage.
In summary, this project will provide an industry usable anchor penetration model allowing the OSW sector to answer the key cable burial question - how deep is deep enough?
Organisations
Publications
C. Macdonald
(2023)
Depth of Lowering and layered soils; a case study from across the North Sea
Coombs W
(2023)
Ghost stabilisation of the material point method for stable quasi-static and dynamic analysis of large deformation problems
in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Robert E. Bird
(2023)
Cone Penetration Tests (CPTs) in layered soils: a Material Point approach
Y.U Sharif
(2024)
Characterisation of the penetration behaviour of AC14 anchor in sands
Description | EPSRC Engineering Net Zero Showcase, June 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | The showcase was an interactive event, with exhibition, panels, workshops and keynote sessions all taking place in person and all accessible to engage with through the virtual platform. The event was an opportunity to: - bring researchers, industry leaders and policy makers together to reflect on and raise awareness of the EPSRC investments made in this space continue the conversations that took place at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) - highlight how our activities link to the sustainable development goals - show our response to the outcomes of COP26 and how EPSRC-supported research and innovation can substantially contribute to net zero solutions. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
URL | https://www.ukri.org/events/epsrc-engineering-net-zero-showcase/ |
Description | Industrial stakeholder engagement event (Problematic soil conditions in relation to CBRA), March 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | The aims of this activity were: 1. To compile a list of "problematic soil" conditions in relation to CBRA, incl. details of how they negatively impact cable protection performance. 2. Identify areas of the North Sea where these "problematic soil" conditions are known to exist (dependent on confidentiality). 3. Ascertain whether there are any site investigation datasets (again, confidentiality allowing) that can be used to exemplify these "problematic" conditions. 4. Identification of specific scenarios that should be explored in both numerical & physical modelling. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Industrial stakeholder engagement event, October 2023 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Technical discussion with Orsted on research findings from physical modelling and the consequence of these results for their design methodology. Participants from Durham University, the University of Dundee, BGS and Orsted (2 technical experts). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
Description | Industrial stakeholder engagement event, September 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | This was a combined event, with a full day workshop in Dundee on the 20th September 2022, focused on the Cable Burial Risk Assessment process with one of the industrial partners plus a wider, online, industrial engagement event with key stakeholders on the 22nd September 2022. The primary focus of the wider industrial event was on the findings of WP1 (North Sea characterisation) but also provided an updated on WP2 and WP3, including preliminary results from the physical modelling. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Research presentation at Vanderbilt University, September 2023 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Research presentation on the 15th September 2023 at Vanderbilt University (USA) focused on this research project and the underpinning numerical methods/techniques. Audience: postgarduate students (~20), post-doctoral researchers, academics, undergraduate students. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
Description | Research presentation at the Aura CDT annual meeting, January 2024 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Research presentation on this research project at the Aura CDT (https://auracdt.hull.ac.uk/) annual meeting. The CDT is focused on Offshore Wind Energy and the Environment. Audience included: PhD students, industry professionals, policy makers, academics at partner universities. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
URL | https://auracdt.hull.ac.uk/conference/ |
Description | Research presentation to Cathie Associates, February 2024 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Online lecture to 40+ practitioners in the area of offshore geotechnics on the 2nd February 2024 on the research undertaken as part of, and underpinning, this research project. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |