Early Modern India and the Role of Sanskrit Literati
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Oxford
Department Name: Oriental Institute
Abstract
This project is designed to bring about the completion of a book project. The book is about an Indian intellectual called Nilakantha Caturdhara. Nilakantha lived in Banaras in the late seventeenth century. He wrote many works in Sanskrit, the principle medium of educated discourse in India in those days. His most famous work was a commentary on the great Sanskrit epic, the Mahabharata. This is the principle commentary on the epic that is still in use by scholars to this day. No intellectual figure of this period who wrote in Sanskrit has had an intellectual biography written about him.
The aim of the book is not just to provide an intellectual biography of Nilakantha, but through studying him to shed light on the intellectual scene in Banaras in the period from 1600-1700. This was a period of tremendous dynamism in Indian intellectual activity. Many of the great works of Indian legal, political and moral discourse, and of the other learned arts and sciences in Sanskrit that modern scholars have been so interested in since the end of the eighteenth century were written in Banaras during this flourishing moment.
What were the circumstances that brought this moment about? How did Banaras become the centre for a continent-wide network of intellectual activity? What were the settings in which so many ideas were developed, revised, and argued over? How did scholars communicate with each other so quickly over long distances? How did they support themselves? How did they maintain their intellectual freedom from rulers and from religious organizations? Why did they continue to communicate in Sanskrit?
These questions and others about Indian intellectuals of the period make the study of Nilakantha and other Sanskrit scholars of his day a part of what is now referred to as the 'early modern' history of India and South Asia. How India arrived at the modern experience that it enjoys today is not very well explained by the old story, that is, that colonial rulers forced a distinctively European modern transformation onto a supposedly backward and benighted Indian populace. In fact many transformations to a form of modernity were already under way in India before the British and the French took power over any part of the subcontinent. The role in this transformation of scholars, scribes, bureaucrats and intellectuals who used Persian and Urdu has been studied already, but the role of the Sanskrit intellectuals, by which is mostly meant the Brahmins, has not.
Until recently modern Orientalist scholarship about Sanskrit authors has not been interested in authors of the early modern period, despite their importance. Nor has there been much attempt to connect their literary activities with the historical setting in which they worked. This project will be one of the first contributions to writing the larger history of early modern India, and to including figures like Nilakantha within it.
The aim of the book is not just to provide an intellectual biography of Nilakantha, but through studying him to shed light on the intellectual scene in Banaras in the period from 1600-1700. This was a period of tremendous dynamism in Indian intellectual activity. Many of the great works of Indian legal, political and moral discourse, and of the other learned arts and sciences in Sanskrit that modern scholars have been so interested in since the end of the eighteenth century were written in Banaras during this flourishing moment.
What were the circumstances that brought this moment about? How did Banaras become the centre for a continent-wide network of intellectual activity? What were the settings in which so many ideas were developed, revised, and argued over? How did scholars communicate with each other so quickly over long distances? How did they support themselves? How did they maintain their intellectual freedom from rulers and from religious organizations? Why did they continue to communicate in Sanskrit?
These questions and others about Indian intellectuals of the period make the study of Nilakantha and other Sanskrit scholars of his day a part of what is now referred to as the 'early modern' history of India and South Asia. How India arrived at the modern experience that it enjoys today is not very well explained by the old story, that is, that colonial rulers forced a distinctively European modern transformation onto a supposedly backward and benighted Indian populace. In fact many transformations to a form of modernity were already under way in India before the British and the French took power over any part of the subcontinent. The role in this transformation of scholars, scribes, bureaucrats and intellectuals who used Persian and Urdu has been studied already, but the role of the Sanskrit intellectuals, by which is mostly meant the Brahmins, has not.
Until recently modern Orientalist scholarship about Sanskrit authors has not been interested in authors of the early modern period, despite their importance. Nor has there been much attempt to connect their literary activities with the historical setting in which they worked. This project will be one of the first contributions to writing the larger history of early modern India, and to including figures like Nilakantha within it.
Organisations
People |
ORCID iD |
Christopher Minkowski (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Christopher Minkowski (Author)
(2010)
Nilakantha's Mahabharata
in Seminar
Christopher Minkowski (Author)
(2012)
BEHE 154 Aux abords de la clairiere. Etudes en l'honneur de Charles Malamoud
Minkowski C
(2016)
Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices - A Global Comparative Approach
Minkowski C
(2015)
Nilaka??ha´s Teachers and Gurus, Part 1: Lak?ma?a Pa??ita
in Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens
Minkowski C
(2014)
Appayya's Vedanta and Nilaka??ha's Vedantakataka
in Journal of Indian Philosophy
Minkowski C
(2014)
Social history in the study of Indian intellectual cultures?
in South Asian History and Culture
Minkowski C
(2014)
Apurva? Pa??ityam: On Appayya Dik?ita's Singular Life
in Journal of Indian Philosophy
Minkowski C
(2011)
Advaita Vedanta in early modern history
in South Asian History and Culture
Minkowski C
(2018)
An Early Modern Account of the Views of the Misras
in Journal of Indian Philosophy
Description | Through sustained reading of manuscripts of his unpublished works, I was able to develop an intellectual profile of one Indian author of the early modern period, and through him gain a sense of the cultural energies driving a period of Indian cultural florescence, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. |
Exploitation Route | Some of the published research has been cited in other scholarly research on this period, and some of the arguments have given rise to a doctoral thesis and an application for a large team grant project in the United States and Canada. |
Sectors | Creative Economy Education Culture Heritage Museums and Collections |
Description | So far the main impact has been in other researchers working in higher education institutions. Some of the works have been cited, and others are used as an argument in grant applications that will be submitted this year. |
First Year Of Impact | 2012 |
Sector | Education |
Impact Types | Cultural |
Description | 'Old Habits of Taxonomy in new Doxographic Circumstances' |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Scientific meeting (conference/symposium etc.) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Type Of Presentation | paper presentation |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.) |
Results and Impact | A talk about Sanskrit intellectuals habit of surveying the competing views in a disciplinary field, and the changes that came over this textual genre in the early modern period. A work by Nilakantha is featured in the talk. This work is previously unedited and unknown, and so this talk brought it to the attention of the scholarly community. 'Discipline, Sect, Lineage and Community: Scholar-Intellectuals in India, c. 1500-1800' Oxford, May 2013. Organised by C. Minkowski, Polly O'Hanlon and David Washbrook. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2013 |
Description | 'mary?d?m ulla?ghya: the Boundaries of Interpretation in Early Modern India |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Scientific meeting (conference/symposium etc.) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Type Of Presentation | paper presentation |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | This talk at Chicago was the basis for the article that will appear in the volume edited by Most and Grafton, Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices, described elsewhere in this site. Excellent feedback during the question period, which has enabled me to take the research forward. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2012 |
Description | Appayya in Nilakantha's Clearing Nut |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Scientific meeting (conference/symposium etc.) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Type Of Presentation | paper presentation |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.) |
Results and Impact | A talk at the annual meeting of the American Oriental Society 2012. This talk is the first announcement of some breakthroughs in understanding two of Nilakantha's less well known writings, which turn out to be lengthy and detailed critiques of two works by a slightly earlier author from South India, Appayya Diksita. This talk will appear as two different articles. A colleague who was working on a related topic came up and discussed his work with me. This has led on to further publications, including the Journal of Indian Philosophy journal issue that I edited, on Appayya Dik?ita. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2012 |
Description | Sanskrit polymaths in the early modern Deccan |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | A series of 4 lectures given in Paris as a visiting directeur d'etudes of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales. The principal figure of the discussion was Suryadasa, someone other than Nilakantha, but the focus was on the context of this region and period, and for that the Nilakantha research was the principal source. I was asked to turn the four lectures into a short volume for EPHE publications. That volume is still in process. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2011 |
Description | The Asvistuti and the Enigma of the Mahabharata |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Scientific meeting (conference/symposium etc.) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Type Of Presentation | paper presentation |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.) |
Results and Impact | A talk given at a conference in honour of Charles Malamoud, and the College de France in Paris. The talk is about a passage of the commentary of Nilakantha Caturdhara on a section of the Mahabharata called the Asvistuti. The talk was included in a published volume that recorded the events of the day. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2010 |
Description | Why is Nilaka??ha's Commentary the Way it is: Vedanta in the Intellectual History of early modern India |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | A talk to the University of Chicago South Asia Seminar on the subject matter of the research project, during the tenure of the grant. The talk elicited comments that enabled me to take the research forward. It has resulted in three publications, with a fourth pending. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2010 |