📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

UK Net Domestic Consumer Surplus (1700-2020), Inequality and the Environment

Lead Research Organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science
Department Name: Grantham Research Inst on Climate Change

Abstract

GDP per capita has been the primary proxy of welfare and wellbeing across the world for several decades. GDP captures the value of goods and services produced. But how much do consumers actually benefit from what they consume? Generally, consumers value what they purchase at least as much as the prices they are paying for goods and services, otherwise they would not make the purchase. How much beyond the market prices do consumers value these goods? This concept of net benefit from consumption is called consumer surplus.

The proposed research aims to provide the first estimates of consumer surplus called NDCS (Net Domestic Consumer Surplus) and its historical evolution for an entire economy, the UK from 1700-2020, combining detailed consumer expenditure and price data with demand modelling and econometric methods from causal inference. Our first central research question is: how much consumer surplus does the UK economy generate with its produced (and net imported) goods and how has this evolved over the past decades and centuries? Recognising that the UK economy has experienced a number of shocks, we also explore the impact of major structural transformation, such as the digital age, and events like major recessions or pandemics on consumer surplus.

The research project will also shed light on two important challenges discussed throughout academia, policy circles and the general public alike: inequality and climate change. Consumers from different income groups purchase different baskets of goods - for example lower income consumers tend to spend relatively more on food than higher income consumers. We therefore estimate how NDCS varies across income groups, which allows us to answer our second central research question: How much inequality is there in consumer surplus, and has inequality increased or decreased over time?

Finally, we want to compare the estimated benefits from consumption with the environmental costs associated with consumption, focussing on carbon emissions. This allows us to answer our third central research question: How does consumer surplus compare with environmental costs from carbon emissions. Since a key policy instrument to curb carbon emissions is the introduction of carbon taxes, we also ask: What would be the impact of carbon pricing on consumer surplus in the UK, and the distribution of consumer surplus across income groups?

The proposed research will benefit (i) academic researchers in the relevant field through dissemination of findings and making output, code and methodology available for replication and extension, (ii) policy makers and stakeholders through engagement and consultation throughout the project, and (iii) the general public, given that part of the output is an easily accessible indicator of general interest and relevant for topics discussed widely throughout society, such as inequality and climate change.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The research funded by this award has significantly advanced our understanding of how economic development and changing prices impact the wellbeing of consumers over time in the UK, the USA, and France. By developing statistical methods and combining them with detailed household and historical data, the study found that people's quality of life (measured as "consumer surplus") has improved considerably due to falling prices and shifts in consumption patterns across different groups of society. However, these benefits were not evenly distributed: lower-income households saw fewer improvements because essential goods like food and energy saw relatively less price decreases over time. In contrast, wealthier households benefited more substantially from substantially cheaper prices in leisure activities, or communication, as wealthier households spend a relatively larger share of their budgets on these goods and services.

Over a longer historical perspective spanning 300 years, the research uncovered that consumer wellbeing dramatically increased with key economic transformations, technological innovations (such as railways, motor vehicles, and modern communications), and globalization through trade. The findings also highlighted that while economic growth has greatly enhanced consumer welfare overall, the recent decades have seen increasing environmental costs from carbon emissions associated with consumption, growing faster than the gains in consumer welfare, although the overall consumer welfare gains are still much larger than environmental damages.
Exploitation Route The data, especially the long run data series over 300 years is a significant contribution in itself. This will likely be used by other researchers and stakeholders, such as knowledge exchange platforms like Our World in Data (we had preliminary discussions). The data is not published yet and will be with published with a journal article in the future. The outcomes and insights of the analysis can be used for informing broad based developments in consumer welfare and policy.
Sectors Agriculture

Food and Drink

Education

Environment

Government

Democracy and Justice

 
Title Data for "The Welfare of Nations: Historical and Distributional Consumer Surplus" 
Description This data accompanies the research article. It contains the long run data on prices and expenditures for the UK, the USA, and France over three centuries. It also contains the estimated changes in real money metric utility, a key output of the project. The data will be published alongside the journal article version, once accepted. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2025 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact This dataset is not published yet. 
 
Description Fouquet/Singer 
Organisation National University of Singapore
Country Singapore 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution This collaboration between Roger Fouquet at the National University of Singapore and Gregor Singer from the London School of Economics is crucial for this project. Gregor Singer is the PI leading the project and responsible for its development, analytical framework, and all of the distributional analysis.
Collaborator Contribution Roger Fouquet is an economic historian that provided critical input for the historical part of the analysis.
Impact Working paper as listed in publications
Start Year 2023
 
Description Discussions 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Engagement with several professional practitioners, policymakers and academics via direct conversations and discussions by Roger Fouquet and Gregor Singer:
Jonathan Athow (Office of National Statistics)
Giovanni Compiani (University of Chicago)
Diane Coyle (University of Cambridge)
Angus Deaton (Princeton University)
Simon Dietz (LSE)
Jared Finnegan (University College London)
Ian Gazeley (LSE)
Gordon Hanson (Harvard University)
Richard Heys (Office of National Statistics)
Ken Gillingham (Yale University)
Rick Hornbeck (University of Chicago)
Anders Humlum (University of Chicago)
Arthur Lewbel (Boston College)
Richard Lipsey (Simon Fraser University)
Chris Minns (LSE)
Peter Pearson (Imperial College London)
John Quah (National University of Singapore)
Ferdinand Rauch (Heidelberg University)
Albrecht Ritschl (LSE)
Max Roser (University of Oxford)
Max Schulze (LSE)
Gregor Semieniuk (University of Massachusetts Amherst, World Bank)
Rachel Soloveichik (USA Bureau of Economic Analysis)
Nick Stern (LSE)
Ryland Thomas (Bank of England)
Arthur Turrell (Bank of England)
Hans-Joachim Voth (University of Zurich)
Patrick Wallis (LSE)
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022,2023,2024,2025