Towards a Bio-Social Model of Well-being: The Synergetic Relationship of the Oxytocin System and Social Factors Promoting Interpersonal Sensitivity
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Cambridge
Department Name: Psychology
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms that can help us lead happier lives has long been a central goal of researchers and laypeople alike. Recently, researchers have become interested in the biological systems related to well-being which could potentially be manipulated through pharmacology. Oxytocin-a chemical messenger in the brain and bloodstream-has emerged as a leading candidate to support trust, cooperation, nurture of children, romantic pair bonding, and ultimately, well-being. Research on oxytocin and the oxytocin receptor gene (a gene centrally important to the functionality of the oxytocin system) suggests that greater levels of oxytocin (and a more functional receptor) are biological underpinnings of well-being. Enthusiasm over oxytocin has already led to its suggestion as a method for treating autism, social phobia, and borderline personality disorder. Even more strikingly, companies such as Oxytocin Factor and Liquid Trust now sell oxytocin nasal sprays to the general public, promising relief from stress, elevated levels of trust, and happier relationships.
The reality of oxytocin, however, is far more complex. Numerous findings now demonstrate that oxytocin can in fact be damaging to some individuals, reducing their sociability and well-being. Some work on the oxytocin receptor gene has also found that individuals with two copies of the supposedly more functional version of the oxytocin receptor gene have lower levels of well-being and social functioning than carriers of the purported less functional variant of the gene. Thus, a new framework must be developed for understanding when and for whom oxytocin may provide beneficial outcomes.
In the present proposal, I develop a bio-social model of the oxytocin system relationship with well-being. The model holds that oxytocin functions by increasing people's level of interpersonal sensitivity-that is, the degree to which people can detect and act upon the thoughts and feelings of others. I argue that such interpersonal sensitivity is good only to a certain extent. Specifically, too little sensitivity, and the person is disengaged from others and struggles to form relationships; too much sensitivity, and the person may become hyper-sensitive to social inputs, resulting in anxiety and unhealthy engagement patterns. Oxytocin, however, is only one factor that affects interpersonal sensitivity-several social factors are also important which develop as a function of our childhood experiences and cultural backgrounds. Within my model, I argue that oxytocin (and the oxytocin receptor) are beneficial for well-being when these social factors have led individuals to low levels of interpersonal sensitivity, boosting them into a moderate range. Furthermore, I argue that oxytocin (and the oxytocin receptor gene) can be maladaptive for individuals already high in interpersonal sensitivity, as it may push them into a very high range on interpersonal sensitivity.
Thus, the new model aims to provide an explanatory framework for understanding why oxytocin (and the oxytocin receptor gene) appear to be beneficial only for a select group of individuals, and in particular, how social forces may act as important determinants of whether a person will benefit from oxytocin or not. Given the interest in oxytocin to treat mental illness and use in everyday life, the present work will provide important answers to both regulators and private enterprises in understanding when and for whom oxytocin may provide benefits.
The reality of oxytocin, however, is far more complex. Numerous findings now demonstrate that oxytocin can in fact be damaging to some individuals, reducing their sociability and well-being. Some work on the oxytocin receptor gene has also found that individuals with two copies of the supposedly more functional version of the oxytocin receptor gene have lower levels of well-being and social functioning than carriers of the purported less functional variant of the gene. Thus, a new framework must be developed for understanding when and for whom oxytocin may provide beneficial outcomes.
In the present proposal, I develop a bio-social model of the oxytocin system relationship with well-being. The model holds that oxytocin functions by increasing people's level of interpersonal sensitivity-that is, the degree to which people can detect and act upon the thoughts and feelings of others. I argue that such interpersonal sensitivity is good only to a certain extent. Specifically, too little sensitivity, and the person is disengaged from others and struggles to form relationships; too much sensitivity, and the person may become hyper-sensitive to social inputs, resulting in anxiety and unhealthy engagement patterns. Oxytocin, however, is only one factor that affects interpersonal sensitivity-several social factors are also important which develop as a function of our childhood experiences and cultural backgrounds. Within my model, I argue that oxytocin (and the oxytocin receptor) are beneficial for well-being when these social factors have led individuals to low levels of interpersonal sensitivity, boosting them into a moderate range. Furthermore, I argue that oxytocin (and the oxytocin receptor gene) can be maladaptive for individuals already high in interpersonal sensitivity, as it may push them into a very high range on interpersonal sensitivity.
Thus, the new model aims to provide an explanatory framework for understanding why oxytocin (and the oxytocin receptor gene) appear to be beneficial only for a select group of individuals, and in particular, how social forces may act as important determinants of whether a person will benefit from oxytocin or not. Given the interest in oxytocin to treat mental illness and use in everyday life, the present work will provide important answers to both regulators and private enterprises in understanding when and for whom oxytocin may provide benefits.
Planned Impact
Interesting in oxytocin application has centered on usage in clinical populations to treat various mental illnesses and as a general public pharmaceutical for increasing well-being. The present research is likely to make an impact in both arenas.
Amongst clinicians, oxytocin has been proposed to treat various mental illnesses, including autism, phobias, and borderline personality disorder. However, since the underlying effects of oxytocin are still poorly understood, the applicability of oxytocin to treat these illnesses is questionable. The present work will provide new evidence for oxytocin's functionality to center on boosting interpersonal sensitivity. Understanding this global function of oxytocin will allow clinicians to apply oxytocin to illnesses specifically characterized by deficits in interpersonal sensitivity.
The present work also has potential to make a large impact on regulators and private enterprises engaged in the selling of oxytocin nasal sprays to the general public. Companies, such as Liquid Trust, promise users greater levels of intimacy, lower levels of anxiety, and higher levels of trust. However, recent work suggests that the benefits of oxytocin are selective, and in fact, many individuals may experience no benefits and some potentials detriments from oxytocin usage. My proposal offers a framework for understanding who may benefit from oxytocin usage and a mechanism for why. Furthermore, by working with regulators and private enterprises, I hope to help develop tools for screening individuals who may benefit from those who may experience detriments when using oxytocin.
Amongst clinicians, oxytocin has been proposed to treat various mental illnesses, including autism, phobias, and borderline personality disorder. However, since the underlying effects of oxytocin are still poorly understood, the applicability of oxytocin to treat these illnesses is questionable. The present work will provide new evidence for oxytocin's functionality to center on boosting interpersonal sensitivity. Understanding this global function of oxytocin will allow clinicians to apply oxytocin to illnesses specifically characterized by deficits in interpersonal sensitivity.
The present work also has potential to make a large impact on regulators and private enterprises engaged in the selling of oxytocin nasal sprays to the general public. Companies, such as Liquid Trust, promise users greater levels of intimacy, lower levels of anxiety, and higher levels of trust. However, recent work suggests that the benefits of oxytocin are selective, and in fact, many individuals may experience no benefits and some potentials detriments from oxytocin usage. My proposal offers a framework for understanding who may benefit from oxytocin usage and a mechanism for why. Furthermore, by working with regulators and private enterprises, I hope to help develop tools for screening individuals who may benefit from those who may experience detriments when using oxytocin.
People |
ORCID iD |
Aleksandr Kogan (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Pavarini G
(2019)
The role of oxytocin in the facial mimicry of affiliative vs. non-affiliative emotions.
in Psychoneuroendocrinology
Sun R
(2020)
Oxytocin increases emotional theory of mind, but only for low socioeconomic status individuals.
in Heliyon
Yearwood M
(2015)
On wealth and the diversity of friendships: High social class people around the world have fewer international friends
in Personality and Individual Differences
Description | Initial analyses of our genetics data is highlighting three key findings. First, the rs53576 genotype has three possible genotypes (GG, GA, AA). However, the AA genotype is less common (occurs in only 10% in the Caucasian population), and thus most previous work has had few participants with this genotype. This led to most previous analyses treating the GA and AA groups as the same. This assumes that the impact of rs53576 is binary: a person has the A allele or they do not. However, we are finding that AA and GA are different. In particular, the groups appear to line up linearly in impact, with the AA and GA representing extremes, and GA being in the middle. Second, we have found that people who are low in attachment avoidance (tendency to be distrusting of others and thus keeping people at arms length) tend to show greater positive coping behaviour if they have more G alleles (GG > GA > AA). However, for individuals high in attachment avoidance, there is little impact of rs53576 on positive coping. Third, individuals with lower subjective social class also show a benefit to having more G alleles for their positive coping behaviour; individuals high in social class show little association between rs53576 and positive coping. The last two findings collectively are underscoring the interplay between social and biological factors in influencing how we have, in particular in relation to processes that contribute to well-being. |
Exploitation Route | Once we complete our research, our findings will be of interest to researchers who are working in the areas of sociability, well-being, and oxytocin. Furthermore, our findings will be of interest to policy makers and regulators of oxytocin. |
Sectors | Agriculture Food and Drink Communities and Social Services/Policy Healthcare |
Description | The data from this award was used in conjunction with data from another grant, and thus publications have taken longer to complete and submit. We currently have several papers under review, from which we expect to have non-academic impacts arise. In discussion of our situation with a coordinating officer, I was advised to respond to this item as a yes and provide the above explanation. |
First Year Of Impact | 2018 |
Title | Genetics Study A |
Description | Over a span of two years, we recruited approximately 500 people based on the rs53576 genotype. Each individual completed a number of behavioural and survey tasks online using our custom written software suite. What is unique about this data collection is that rather than collecting a random sample of participants--as has been the case in every previous rs53576 study we are aware of--we recruited in equal numbers across the 3 possible genotypes. This is especially helpful given that one of the genotypes (AA) is relatively rare in the population (less than 10%) and so most previous studies have had very small sample sizes of this genotype. We are currently writing several manuscripts based on this dataset exploring how social class and attachment moderate the impact of rs53576 on various social outcomes. |
Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
Provided To Others? | No |
Impact | Publications are currently being prepared. |
Title | Nasal Spray Experimental Study A |
Description | We are currently in the final stages of recruiting a sample of approximately 200 participants for an oxytocin experimental manipulation study. In particular, we administer intranasally either oxytocin or placebo to each participant, and ask them to partake in a number of social behavioural tasks (focusing on well-being, prosociality, morality, and emotional processes). Before they come to the lab, they also complete a number of individual difference questionnaires. Our goal is to understand how individual differences moderate the impact oxytocin make on social processes. The study is unique in the literature in particular for its sample size; most previous work has been extremely underpowered to detect moderations because of their small sample sizes. |
Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
Provided To Others? | No |
Impact | Data collection is presently completing. We expect to be done approximately around June. |
Description | Oxytocin and Well-being |
Organisation | McGill University |
Country | Canada |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | The research team funded by the grant is leading the data collection and heavily contributing to design. We are acting as primary administrators of the studies, including the following activities: collating study materials, handling ethics, recruiting participants, and conducting the study. |
Collaborator Contribution | Our partners are contributing their expertise in selection study measures and materials. Furthermore, they will heavily contribute to data analysis and writing of manuscripts based on the data we collect. |
Impact | Still ongoing. |
Start Year | 2013 |
Description | Oxytocin and Well-being |
Organisation | University of British Columbia |
Country | Canada |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | The research team funded by the grant is leading the data collection and heavily contributing to design. We are acting as primary administrators of the studies, including the following activities: collating study materials, handling ethics, recruiting participants, and conducting the study. |
Collaborator Contribution | Our partners are contributing their expertise in selection study measures and materials. Furthermore, they will heavily contribute to data analysis and writing of manuscripts based on the data we collect. |
Impact | Still ongoing. |
Start Year | 2013 |
Description | Oxytocin and Well-being |
Organisation | University of Cambridge |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | The research team funded by the grant is leading the data collection and heavily contributing to design. We are acting as primary administrators of the studies, including the following activities: collating study materials, handling ethics, recruiting participants, and conducting the study. |
Collaborator Contribution | Our partners are contributing their expertise in selection study measures and materials. Furthermore, they will heavily contribute to data analysis and writing of manuscripts based on the data we collect. |
Impact | Still ongoing. |
Start Year | 2013 |
Description | Oxytocin lecture in Netherlands |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Schools |
Results and Impact | The discussion provided a new perspective on the biology of sociability--in particular, the role of oxytocin--to students. There was substantial discussion afterwards of the implications. Several students reached out to gain research experience in my lab in the area. We had one visit over the summer for a formal internship. Others engaged in research on the topic locally. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2013 |
Description | Oxytocin talks |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Following my talk, we had a deep discussion with the audience members of the implications of our research and past work on oxytocin for the study of human happiness and kindness. There was substantial shift in the perspectives of the audience members on the topic--even for individuals who already had a background in oxytocin research. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2014 |