Developing an interactional model for question production: Evidence from Scots dialects
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Edinburgh
Department Name: Sch of Philosophy Psychology & Language
Abstract
What we say does not always map directly to what we mean. Even seemingly simple sentences can be loaded with additional layers of complex social and interactional meaning. Speakers and hearers must be attuned to these layers of meaning in order to successfully build a dialogue.
Questions are one instance where this happens frequently: seemingly straightforward constructions in which the speaker simply wishes to find out some information can carry out additional purposes: e.g. indicating the speaker has an existing belief about the answer. For example, by asking the question 'Won't you be late?', the speaker indicates that they believe that you will be late. These questions are used especially when something in the immediate context is challenging the speaker's belief, such as that you seem to be making a cup of tea.
We therefore know that the speaker's belief and the context surrounding the interaction, two discourse/pragmatic factors, can affect what type of question is produced. This has been shown to be relevant to question production cross-linguistically.
However, are these the only factors that constrain this production choice? How about the speaker's desires, or what the hearer is expected to know? Once the context for the choice of these questions has been established, there is then a further question as to how these meanings are communicated to the hearer. Do hearers simply infer them from their own interpretation of the knowledge they share with the speaker, or are these meanings encoded into the structure of the question itself when the speaker produces it?
In this research, I will build on the work that I carried out in my PhD that explored these questions in two Scots dialects. In my PhD, I gathered data from speakers in Glasgow and Shetland to show that the variation we see in the syntax of these questions in these dialects is a result of variation in the discourse/pragmatic factors that permit their production. Furthermore, I made theoretical predictions about the pragmatic, semantic and syntactic content of these questions. In this fellowship, I will test these predictions using experimental methodologies in standard English in order to address these questions further, and will produce and submit three articles to leading semantics/pragmatics journals over the course of the fellowship that work towards establishing a taxonomy of question types incorporating the different contexts for their usage as well as indicating different ways that they can be encoded.
These three journal articles and the experiments I carry out towards them will also be used as a basis for writing a grant application for the ESRC New Investigator scheme. This grant will use experimental methodologies learned during this fellowship in tandem with my knowledge of Scots dialect variation in order to develop an probabilistic model for question production and comprehension based on discourse/pragmatic factors.
Finally, I will communicate the results of my Scots research to the public in ways which are targeted at the specific linguistic needs of the communities in Glasgow and Shetland by hosting two separate knowledge exchange events. For Scotland as a whole, I will also work to improve teaching in Scots at both secondary and primary level, targeting a worksheet resource at learners at the Scots Language Award level as well as a CPD session for primary teachers about incorporating grammatical varation into the primary curriculum.
Questions are one instance where this happens frequently: seemingly straightforward constructions in which the speaker simply wishes to find out some information can carry out additional purposes: e.g. indicating the speaker has an existing belief about the answer. For example, by asking the question 'Won't you be late?', the speaker indicates that they believe that you will be late. These questions are used especially when something in the immediate context is challenging the speaker's belief, such as that you seem to be making a cup of tea.
We therefore know that the speaker's belief and the context surrounding the interaction, two discourse/pragmatic factors, can affect what type of question is produced. This has been shown to be relevant to question production cross-linguistically.
However, are these the only factors that constrain this production choice? How about the speaker's desires, or what the hearer is expected to know? Once the context for the choice of these questions has been established, there is then a further question as to how these meanings are communicated to the hearer. Do hearers simply infer them from their own interpretation of the knowledge they share with the speaker, or are these meanings encoded into the structure of the question itself when the speaker produces it?
In this research, I will build on the work that I carried out in my PhD that explored these questions in two Scots dialects. In my PhD, I gathered data from speakers in Glasgow and Shetland to show that the variation we see in the syntax of these questions in these dialects is a result of variation in the discourse/pragmatic factors that permit their production. Furthermore, I made theoretical predictions about the pragmatic, semantic and syntactic content of these questions. In this fellowship, I will test these predictions using experimental methodologies in standard English in order to address these questions further, and will produce and submit three articles to leading semantics/pragmatics journals over the course of the fellowship that work towards establishing a taxonomy of question types incorporating the different contexts for their usage as well as indicating different ways that they can be encoded.
These three journal articles and the experiments I carry out towards them will also be used as a basis for writing a grant application for the ESRC New Investigator scheme. This grant will use experimental methodologies learned during this fellowship in tandem with my knowledge of Scots dialect variation in order to develop an probabilistic model for question production and comprehension based on discourse/pragmatic factors.
Finally, I will communicate the results of my Scots research to the public in ways which are targeted at the specific linguistic needs of the communities in Glasgow and Shetland by hosting two separate knowledge exchange events. For Scotland as a whole, I will also work to improve teaching in Scots at both secondary and primary level, targeting a worksheet resource at learners at the Scots Language Award level as well as a CPD session for primary teachers about incorporating grammatical varation into the primary curriculum.
People |
ORCID iD |
Description | We know that seemingly simple sentences can be layered with complex social and interactional meaning. One of the major aims of this project was to investigate, using experimental methods, how hearers interpret the complex meanings that speakers try to convey in questions - for example, "Won't you be late?" indicates that the speaker believes you will be late, rather than simply seeking information about whether you will be late. Previous research has shown that speakers choose to produce particular question forms given existing beliefs and biases. However, in experimental work in English and German, outputs from this award show that hearers do not process different questions forms differently when the existing belief/bias contexts are varied, as we might expect if the question forms were semantically prescribed to their contexts. This suggests that hearers probabilistically derive these meanings from context, contra the general assumption in the theoretical literature, and the evidence from production tasks. In conducting this research, the use of psycholinguistic methodologies has been extended to a new semantic-pragmatic field. |
Exploitation Route | The outcomes of this funding are relevant for digital communication and NLP - for example, in understanding how people make requests from smart speakers. They can also be utilised in education, in terms of understanding how questions are proposed to learners, and how learners engage with material. The adaption of the methodologies used this research opens up the possibility of further experimental research on question bias, which can complement and enrich the ongoing theoretical semantic-pragmatic work in the field. |
Sectors | Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software) Education |
Description | Processing polar questions in contexts with varying epistemic biases |
Organisation | University of Osnabrück |
Country | Germany |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I led on the theoretical conception of the study and the design of the materials. I worked with my collaborator to analyse and draw conclusions from the data we collected, bringing in my expertise in the syntax and pragmatics of question bias. |
Collaborator Contribution | My collaborator brought experience of the psycholinguistic methodologies we chose to use in our study. He built the experimental tasks and led on the statistical analysis of the data. We worked together to draw conclusions from the data we collected, with my collaborator bringing his expertise in the analysis of discourse phenomena through processing. |
Impact | My collaborator and I have presented the results of this research at three international conferences: - Biased Questions: Experimental Results and Theoretical Modelling (ZAS Berlin, 4-5 February 2021) - 34th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (UPenn, 4-6 March 2021) - 44th Annual Conference of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (University of Tübingen, 23-25 February 2022) We have also submitted a chapter on which I am first author, entitled 'Psycholinguistic processing tasks and the study of question bias'. The chapter will appear in 'Biased Questions: Experimental Results and Theoretical Modelling', eds. Benz, A., Krifka, M. Trinh, T. & Yatushiro, K., to be published with Language Science Press. |
Start Year | 2020 |