📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

Financial Rewards for Improved Biodiversity Outcomes (FRIBO)

Lead Research Organisation: Queen's University Belfast
Department Name: Sch of Biological Sciences

Abstract

It is estimated that environmental mitigation costs are in the region of $1 trillion per year of which ~$120 billion is provided largely by government and charitable foundations. Private investment is relatively small, providing a large untapped funding source that needs to be mobilised to help cover the massive shortfall. There are many impediments to private sector investment, including lack of appropriate and marketable financial instruments that can provide a satisfactory level of assurance regarding the outcome of environmental projects. The problem is exacerbated, in terms of biodiversity, due to the lack of financial value attributed to biodiversity and biodiversity assets. Current financial instruments that support the environment comprise mainly of green bonds. While the green bond market is expanding, these assets are not environmental performance related instead representing a commitment to simply fund more "straight forward" sustainable projects such as tree planting and renewable energy. As a result they have been linked to "green washing". FRIBO will identify with stakeholder partners (from the finance, land-use, wildlife, ecosystem service civil society and policy sectors) the opportunities and impediments to developing more fit-for-purpose performance related financial instruments that would be attractive to private investors while incentivising the delivery of real nature-based solutions (NBSs), with a focus on improved and measurable biodiversity outcomes. Examples of candidate instruments are Environmental Impact Bonds (EIBs); they link financial return to the success of the intervention by repaying the initial loan and interest using the financially valuable and marketable benefits of the project, such as carbon offsets, or cost reducing outcomes such as reduced flood damage, to pay off the full project costs. They are termed as "pay for performance" instruments. Sustainability Linked Bonds (SLBs) work in a similar way, but depend on meeting broader pre-defined sustainability goals such as reduction in GHG emissions to avoid penalty payments. FRIBO will analyse the linkages and drivers within the Finance-Biodiversity Nexus to assess opportunities and impediments to progress. Extensive stakeholder interaction, face to face, virtual and via surveys and questionnaires, will be conducted to identify key areas of research needed and critique optimum strategies for developing and incentivising the instruments. Challenges that will need to be taken into account are: how to measure and financially value biodiversity and biodiversity outcomes and NBSs in a market context (FRIBO will exploit links with existing NERC projects in this area), defining an improved biodiversity outcome; developing suitable biodiversity metrics; the role and function of Environmental Impact Assessments, the role and function of biodiversity in NBSs; the evaluation and quantification of wider societal benefits; identifying how to obtain additional payments for the wider biodiversity benefits that are realised in NBSs; the immaturity of EIBs and NBSs requires that their marketability within the financial sector requires study. Finally, there may be unintended consequences such as divesting/offshoring of environmental damage, non-equivalence of some "offsets" such as the carbon and biodiversity value of new tree plantations to offset deforestation of old growth forests;. Comprising a core group of researchers from Queen's University Belfast and Newcastle University, with a range of national and international partners, FRIBO will produce a Strategic Research Agenda that will identify the research required to address these challenges and accelerate investment in biodiversity related NBSs. In addition, FRIBO will produce an Implementation Roadmap that will outline key activities and timelines that need to be undertaken in order for stakeholders to implement Biodiversity focused "Rewards for performance" investment schemes.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description This small exploratory project held two international workshops (1 two day, 1 one day) comprising over 100 attendees from the UK and Europe. The first workshop successfully identified some of the key obstacles to private investement in nature restoration, e.g. in terms of land owners- inheritance tax, lack of real examples of financial/business models, disconnect between the disciplines (ecology and finance) resulting in the lack of products/resources taylored for end users. FRIBO did provide a real world example of €7M private investment (co-ordinated by the Bank of Ireland) from Axa and Aviva in new native woodland, the ist of its kind.
Exploitation Route Tangible example of how a Bank has evaluated nature restoration as a business opportunity and an assessment of the associated fiancial risks of such an investment.
Sectors Agriculture

Food and Drink

Environment

Financial Services

and Management Consultancy

Leisure Activities

including Sports

Recreation and Tourism

 
Description The work has allowed key stakeholders to reappraise:1) what good looks like in terms of private investment into nature restoration; 2) new realworld successful business modes 3) the requirements for biodiversity metrics to substantiate the restoration aspects of those business models.
First Year Of Impact 2024
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy
Impact Types Societal

Economic

Policy & public services

 
Description Horizon Europe Guarantee Fund
Amount £508,399 (GBP)
Funding ID 10092956 
Organisation Innovate UK 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2024 
End 12/2026
 
Description Integrating Finance and Biodiversity for a Nature Positive Future
Amount £3,021,258 (GBP)
Funding ID NE/Z503368/1 
Organisation Natural Environment Research Council 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2024 
End 04/2026
 
Description Extensive stakeholder network generated from 1st FRIBO workshop on 22-23 February 2023. • Agri-Food Biosciences Institute • Blakiston-Houston Estates, • Central Association of Agricultural Valuers • Danske Bank • Ecosytem Knowledge Network • Fera Science Ltd • Hahu Organics • Moy Park • Middlesex University* • Newcastle University • NERC • Nottingham University* • Queen Mary University of London • Queen's University Belfast • Rabobank* • Texas A&M University* • The Gibson Trust Charity • Ul 
Organisation Newcastle University
Department School of Natural and Environmental Sciences
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Bringing together researchers and stakeholders in the area of finance and biodiversity
Collaborator Contribution Getting other stakeholders involved in this project
Impact Contribution to 1st FRIBO workshop. Contribution to 2nd FRIBO workshop stakeholder involvement and promotion.
Start Year 2023
 
Description FRIBO International workshop "Implementing nature-based solutions in the real world:what does good look like? 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The aim of this exploratory workshop, hosted by Queen's University Belfast at the Europa hotel Belfast, was to produce a vision of an improved biodiversity future and indicate key research and policy needs required to realise that vision. The 2-day event "Implementing nature-based solutions in the real world: what does good look like?" aimed to bring together relevant stakeholders and researchers working in the finance-biodiversity nexus and explore opportunities and impediments for implementing nature-based solutions.

The workshop comprised stakeholders and researchers from environment, land use, finance and civil society sectors who wanted to explore the linkages between improved biodiversity and financial rewards. A total of 43 attendees (face to face or on-line) attended the workshop over the 2 days from the following sectors (academia, agriculture, banking, food production, government, land-use, private investment, wildlife trusts and charities). Day 1 was designed for biodiversity subject specialists and other related stakeholders. Day 2 was designed for finance subject specialists. Biodiversity subject specialists were in attendance to answer questions and comment on technical aspects of biodiversity actions as required. Key points arising from the workshop

1. There is a need for some creative thinking to produce new win-win scenarios for stakeholders. New policies, new financial models and new public-private partnerships are needed to accelerate change.

2. We need to clarify what we mean by biodiversity, and that focus must be informed by local knowledge (at least in UK and NI contexts).

3. Focusing on charismatic species can be problematic in some circumstances in some circumstances it may be better to focus on habitat.

4. In some circumstances it may be better to focus on action-based approaches rather than specific outcome-based approaches, as outcomes can be difficult to measure (within a designated timeframe) and can be impacted by other factors. (e.g. disease, climate change etc).

5. There is a need for metrification to ensure the integrity of reporting e.g. annual business auditing and reporting. Metrics also need to be pragmatic, i.e. not overly burdensome such that they disincentivise nature finance.

6. Potential mismatch between supply and demand for investment and nature restoration

7. The need to bundle environmental projects into sufficiently large financial investments, whilst acknowledging that environmental projects are best implemented at a local level. Scaling up will also potentially reduce transaction costs.

8. It is necessary to de-risk the process, not only in terms of financial risk but especially in terms of the environmental project, i.e. banks ultimately can be bailed out by the public finance, nature loss is much more difficult to restore.

9. Policy (e.g. land owner inheritance tax) urgently needs to keep pace with, and incentivise nature finance developments

10. There will likely to have a role for the public sector (policy and finance) through subsidies to incentivize and/or regulation to reign in risk-taking activities in the private finance sector.

11. The interaction between public and private schemes - compete or complement? In the past some carbon schemes have competed with Govt schemes (simpler process, higher payments).

12. This is a very dynamic area with practices and even language within the finance sector changing rapidly.

13. Work needs to be done across the board to bridge the gap between the two disciplines (natural sciences and finance) in order to align incentives.

14. The biodiversity-finance nexus is a complex "ecosystem" with a range of actors and stakeholders that needs to be better understood in order to speed up implementation and maximise impact in terms of financing natural capital.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description International Workshop on Mobilising private capital for nature resoration: opportunities and impediments. Europa Hotel, Belfast 22-23 February 2023 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact An international workshop that aimed to explore the role and impediments to accessing private finance for nature resoration. Speakers from the financial sector in Ireland provided in sight into the current state of teh art in the financial sector and provided a real life case study where the Bank of Ireland devised and successfully received investment for €7M of funding for planting of new native woodland in Ireland. Key recommendations from teh workshop were:

. Showcasing successful examples of privately funded biodiversity initiatives and presenting straightforward information on the current policy and regulatory framework to enable investor education and facilitate cross-disciplinary collaboration.

• Reviewing the existing policy landscape to identify opportunities to reduce the lack of policy co-ordination and resolve conflicting policy agendas and instruments. Current schemes may need more granular approaches in their management, and there were mixed viewpoints on the success of subsidy schemes. Other financial instruments may need a greater degree of regulation to ensure they do not harm biodiversity and disclosures may need to move from voluntary to compulsory. Tax is also worthy of attention, to understand who the tax regime can be modified to prioritise public good and reduce taxation on biodiversity related instruments.

• Mapping the actors within this landscape to understand matters of power, control, and influence, and finding effective ways to connect investors with nature restoration projects.

• Building trust for investing in biodiversity within the financial industry. Existing models of risk will need to be adapted to include biological indicators and lending increased that basis decision on natural asset criteria.

• Determining effective standards of assessing nature for investment and returning on said investment. This could be through frameworks of Natural Capital and Biodiversity Net Gain, with an understanding that there are no win-win situations, and that trade-offs will be required. Pricing models will need to be determined, as there is currently no consensus on the value of natural resources.

• Locating geographical areas or habitat types that will yield the highest returns for both biodiversity and finance and understanding the broader priorities to have maximum positive gain for biodiversity.

• Understanding if combining carbon and biodiversity systems strengthens or dilutes outcomes, and if adapting existing schemes such as Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) is a viable approach.

• Resolving conflicts between agri-food and biodiversity interests. While some conflicts are inherent, generally protecting biodiversity is often framed as an alternative to food security rather than being a part of it. Relief on agricultural property appropriately managed for biodiversity may need to be extended and labelling of the biodiversity credentials of agri-food products introduced, enhanced, and verified
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description International Workshop: Mobilising private capital for nature restoration: Opportunities and Impediments, 21 March 2024 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact A one-day international knowledge exchange workshop on 21 March 2024, focussing on how private sector investment in nature restoration (with a focus on biodiversity)
can be mobilised. The one-day event in Belfast presenetd case studies from Bank of Ireland that will highlighttg current and emerging best practice examples from the financial sector, covering design and implementation of nature finance products from a finance perspective. In addition KPMG presented their recently published 'Nature of Finance' report, authored by KPMG Sustainable Futures and commissioned by
the International Sustainable Finance Centre of Excellence (ISFCOE) through support from Skillnet Ireland. This report is understood to be the first independent
assessment of nature-related risks and opportunities for Ireland's financial sector. In an afternoon workshop session the participants explored the opportunities and impediments to incentivising private finance in nature restoration.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2024
 
Description Joint meeting of Integating Finance and Biodiversity programme and Economics of Biodiversity programme 29-30 January 2024 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Joint meeting of two UKRI research programmes concerned with Biodiversity. Some stakeholders were in attendance e.g. GFI.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2024
URL https://infinbio.org/news-and-media/news/first-integrating-finance-and-biodiversity-conference-under...
 
Description Presentation at Centre for Greening Finance and Investment (CGFI) Annual Forum 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The UK Centre for Greening Finance and Investment (CGFI) held its second Annual Forum on Monday 12th of June 2023. The Forum focused on the role of data, analytics and innovation in advancing green finance in the UK and internationally. FRIBO was one of 12 Integrating Finance and Biodiversity projects presented at that forum.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
URL https://www.cgfi.ac.uk/2023/06/cgfi-annual-forum-2023/