Selection Footprints and Mapping
Lead Research Organisation:
Roslin Institute
Department Name: UNLISTED
Abstract
Abstracts are not currently available in GtR for all funded research. This is normally because the abstract was not required at the time of proposal submission, but may be because it included sensitive information such as personal details.
Technical Summary
The research funded by this grant explores a relatively new approach to gene mapping. The selection (or hitchhiking) mapping approach exploits the fact that genetic diversity will be reduced near a gene under strong selection, due to statistical associations that develop along a chromosome. The recent increase in availability of genetic diversity data, due to technical improvements and reductions in cost of genome-wide sequencing, have made such techniques feasible. So far, this approach has primarily been applied to human data sets, with the goal of understanding the selective processes that have acted on the human genome over the course of evolution. An important issue is that while there has been a large effort applied to data generation and analysis (including the publication of some controversial conclusions regarding human evolution), the power and limitations of this approach have not been seriously addressed by researchers. The importance of our work is that it focuses on genes for which there is strong historical evidence of selection, allowing us to characterize the diversity patterns generated by selection. In most wild species and humans, this would not be possible since it is rare that a gene or genetic region is definitely known to have been under selection. However, in domesticated species, where the selection pressure has been strong and often on well-defined traits, there are more opportunities for implementation of this approach to identify genes related to the domestication process. This research has examined the diversity patterns at neutral markers in the region of three cattle genes with strong evidence of selection as well as for simulated genotypic data, generated under specific selection regimes.
Planned Impact
unavailable
People |
ORCID iD |
| John Woolliams (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Woolliams J
(2010)
A note on the growth and food consumption of crossbred lambs of five sire breeds
in Animal Science
Sinnett-Smith P
(2010)
Adipose tissue metabolism and cell size: variation between subcutaneous sites and the effect of copper supplementation
in Animal Science
Woolliams J
(2009)
Analysis of factors affecting superovulatory responses in ruminants
in The Journal of Agricultural Science
Lipschutz-Powell D
(2012)
Bias, accuracy, and impact of indirect genetic effects in infectious diseases.
in Frontiers in genetics
Sinnett-Smith P
(2010)
Biochemical and physiological responses to metabolic stimuli in Friesian calves of differing genetic merit for milk production
in Animal Science
Wiener G
(2009)
Breed differences in copper metabolism in sheep
in The Journal of Agricultural Science
Wiener G
(2010)
Consequences of inbreeding for financial returns from sheep
in Animal Science
Luo Z
(2010)
Controlling inbreeding in dairy MOET nucleus schemes
in Animal Science
Jenko J
(2017)
Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population.
in Journal of dairy science
Woolliams J
(2010)
Decision rules and variance of response in breeding schemes
in Animal Science
| Description | The major finding was that the regression method developed in the project was able to detect the positive selection near the selected genes and furthermore was able to detect new putative QTL. However the regression methodology proved relatively sensitive to the variability of the markers in the dataset. The greatest power of detection of the selection footprint was shown to be when the favoured allele had reached high frequency and had moved beyond intermediate frequencies. |
| Exploitation Route | In evolutionary studies and, in livestock, understanding the functional consequences of domestication, and recent natural and artificial selection. |
| Sectors | Agriculture Food and Drink |
| Description | The development of new software to identify segments of DNA that can be used directly for genetic improvement or the removal of deleterious effects by breeding organisations. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2013 |
| Sector | Agriculture, Food and Drink |
| Impact Types | Societal Economic |
| Description | Membership of Drafting Group for UK Country Report on Farm Animal Genetic Resources, 2002 |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Membership of a guideline committee |
| Impact | UK Country Report on Farm Animal Genetic Resources 2002. This was the first time this policy area was addressed and formed an international report to FAO. |
| URL | https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-country-report-on-farm-animal-genetic-resources-2002 |
| Description | INIA |
| Organisation | National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology |
| Country | Spain |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Training, design and interpretation of studies, writing papers for journals |
| Collaborator Contribution | Personnel, funding for personnel, scientific discussion, writing papers. |
| Impact | Scientific papers. New PhDs and trained post-docs in Spain. |
| Start Year | 2008 |
| Description | Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Aas, Norway |
| Organisation | Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) |
| Country | Norway |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Supervised and lectured to postgraduate students. Provided intellectual input into science proposals, ongoing projects and outputs, including research papers. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Facilities, students, intellectual stimulation, new project ideas, data, and other academic outputs such as scientific papers. |
| Impact | Joint scientific papers. Joint scientific projects (UoE/NMBU). |
| Description | University of Leon |
| Organisation | University of Leon |
| Country | Spain |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Training, design and interpretation of studies. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Personel. Funding for personnel. |
| Impact | Training, papers, new PhDs. |
| Start Year | 2008 |