📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

Newton001-THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF STEM CELL THERAPIES IN MOUSE MODELS OF KIDNEY DISEASE

Lead Research Organisation: University of Liverpool
Department Name: Institute of Translational Medicine

Abstract

It is now recognized that renal disease is a global public health problem, with the incidence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) rising annually. Current treatment options for ESRD are dialysis or renal transplantation, which apart from their significant drawbacks in terms of increased morbidity and mortality, are also placing an increasing economic burden on society. ESRD usually develops from a progressive worsening of chronic renal disease. In most cases, however, there is a time-window of several years from the onset of mild/moderate kidney disease to the development of ESRD, which could present an opportunity to design therapies aimed at preventing disease progression by repairing or replacing damaged renal tissue. Over recent years, stem cells have been identified in the kidneys of mice and humans that are able to generate some of the specialised cells that are essential for the kidneys to function. Studies have shown that if these kidney-derived stem cells (KSCs) are injected into mice with kidney disease, they populate the damaged tissue and in some cases, can even improve kidney function. Furthermore, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow or adipose tissue have also been shown to ameliorate kidney disease in rodents. However, no studies have directly compared the therapeutic efficacy of these two stem cell types, nor investigated whether they remain in the kidneys and are able to benefit the recipient over the long-term, or if their presence is only short-lived.

There are also a number of safety issues surrounding such therapies that need to be addressed; for instance, the possibility that the stem cells populate other tissues besides the kidney has not been thoroughly investigated. This information is important because if the stem cells end up in the wrong environment, they could generate inappropriate cell types, or could potentially from tumours, which would be detrimental to the recipient.

In this project, we will compare the therapeutic efficacy of human KSCs and MSCs in mice with kidney disease. To check if the stem cells populate tissues other than the kidney, in some experiments, we will label the cells so that they can be monitored non-invasively using various imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging, photoacoustic imaging and bioluminescence imaging. We will also follow some animals over the long-term to investigate if they develop tumours.

Technical Summary

1. Determining the efficacy of KSC and MSC therapies in mice with ischaemic reperfusion (IR) and adriamcyin (Adr)-induced kidney injury
We will use MSCs derived from human adipose tissue, as it has been established that such cells have more potent immunomodulatory effects than those derived from bone marrow. Immunodeficient (SCID) BALB/c mice will be used for both models.
Targets to be met: (i) establish the optimal administration route for each injury model (i.e., intravenous (IV), intracardiac via left ventricle (LV) or intraperitoneal (IP)); (ii) establish the optimal dosing regime for each injury model (i.e. number of administered cells, number of doses); (iii) establish efficacy using the following analyses: blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, albuminuria, urine albumin/creatinine ratio and novel-FDA qualified biomarkers of renal toxicity which reflect different regions of the nephron, such as Kim-1, NGAL, NAG and Cystatin C. The extent of fibrosis will be determined quantitatively using established histological and immunohistological assays. We will use a novel transcutaneous device to measure GFR in living animals.
2. Determining the safety of KSC and MSC therapies in mice with IR and Adr-induced kidney injury
In order to evaluate the safety of the cell therapies, we will monitor the biodistribution of the transplanted cells in our injury models, using a combination of bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT). Tissues and organs populated by the cells will then be subjected to safety evaluation. These in vivo imaging experiments will also allow us to assess the biodistribution of the administered cells within the kidney itself.
Targets to be met: Using biomarker and pathology assays, we will determine if any of the cell therapies cause adverse reactions; i.e. (i) inflammation, (ii) fibrosis, (iii) mal-differentiation or (iv) tumourigenesis in the tissues they populate.

Planned Impact

N/A
 
Title Evaluating kidney function in awake mice 
Description We trained the Brazilian group how to use a transcutaneous device for measuring the clearance of FITC-sinistrin, and hence, the glomerular filtration rate in awake mice over time. 
Type Of Material Technology assay or reagent 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact The use of the device means that fewer animals are used in experiments to monitor kidney disease progression. Typically, groups of animals need to be culled at set time points to obtain sufficient blood to undertake renal function analyses. By using the device, it is possible to monitor renal function in the same animal over time. As well as reducing animal numbers, the device gives more accurate information about renal function than blood biochemical analyses. 
 
Description Visit to University of Sao Paulo 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact During my time in brazil in summner 2015, I gave several lectures to University students and patient groups relating to the work of the joint collaboration and potential future impact. There was time at the end of the lectures for discussion and questions, which led to the participants having a greater understanding of wider objectives of our work.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015