The impact of childhood adversity on violent crime in adolescence and early adulthood
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Bristol
Department Name: Bristol Medical School
Abstract
Even though rates of overall crime have gone down in the UK over the last two decades, levels of serious violence in the past four years indicate a reversal of this trend. As a result, tackling serious violence has become a UK Government priority. One of the main ways to prevent youth involvement in violence is to identify and limit its early causes.
It is well-known that individuals who have had traumatic or stressful experiences during childhood (referred to as adverse childhood experiences or childhood adversity) - such as being a victim of child abuse or having a parent who suffers from a mental illness - are more likely to engage in violence during adolescence and early adulthood. However, it is not clear which adverse experiences contribute most to violence nor whether they have a greater or lesser impact if experienced at different ages. The aim of our project is to answer these questions.
We will address several research questions about the relationship between childhood adversity and serious violence during adolescence and early adulthood. We will consider a wide range of adversities including (but not restricted to) abuse (emotional, physical, and sexual), bullying, bereavement, and parental substance abuse, mental illness, and criminality. The choice of adversities to include in our analyses will be informed in part by the Ambassadors for Vulnerable Children and Young People on our steering group (these are young people who have experience of adversity in childhood, and who are employed by local authorities as ambassadors). We will identify whether any of these adversities have a particularly large impact on the risk of being involved in violent crime as a teenager or a young adult. Another goal is to determine whether there are critical periods during childhood where exposure to adversity - either in general or to one or more specific adversities - puts a child at particularly high risk. We also plan to investigate what role school attainment and attendance, mental health, and risk-taking behaviours (such as taking drugs) play in the relationship between childhood adversity and violence.
To fulfil the goals of our project, we will use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a world-leading data resource that has recorded extremely detailed information on the health, development and family circumstances of approximately 14,500 families living in the Bristol area since the early 1990s. Data collection started during pregnancy and has continued year on year ever since. The richness of this data resource makes it possible to answer questions that previous studies have been unable to address. We will link ALSPAC to data provided by Avon and Somerset police to generate the richest data set on violence and childhood adversity ever created in the UK, further enhancing this unique resource and enabling other researchers to investigate the causes and consequences of offending in new ways.
Our findings will shed light on how and when we can best intervene with children (or families) at risk of violence. Addressing these key questions has the potential to help reduce rates of violent crime and to provide a better understanding of how childhood experience contributes to violence that will benefit perpetrators and their families, victims, practitioners, policy makers and the general public.
It is well-known that individuals who have had traumatic or stressful experiences during childhood (referred to as adverse childhood experiences or childhood adversity) - such as being a victim of child abuse or having a parent who suffers from a mental illness - are more likely to engage in violence during adolescence and early adulthood. However, it is not clear which adverse experiences contribute most to violence nor whether they have a greater or lesser impact if experienced at different ages. The aim of our project is to answer these questions.
We will address several research questions about the relationship between childhood adversity and serious violence during adolescence and early adulthood. We will consider a wide range of adversities including (but not restricted to) abuse (emotional, physical, and sexual), bullying, bereavement, and parental substance abuse, mental illness, and criminality. The choice of adversities to include in our analyses will be informed in part by the Ambassadors for Vulnerable Children and Young People on our steering group (these are young people who have experience of adversity in childhood, and who are employed by local authorities as ambassadors). We will identify whether any of these adversities have a particularly large impact on the risk of being involved in violent crime as a teenager or a young adult. Another goal is to determine whether there are critical periods during childhood where exposure to adversity - either in general or to one or more specific adversities - puts a child at particularly high risk. We also plan to investigate what role school attainment and attendance, mental health, and risk-taking behaviours (such as taking drugs) play in the relationship between childhood adversity and violence.
To fulfil the goals of our project, we will use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a world-leading data resource that has recorded extremely detailed information on the health, development and family circumstances of approximately 14,500 families living in the Bristol area since the early 1990s. Data collection started during pregnancy and has continued year on year ever since. The richness of this data resource makes it possible to answer questions that previous studies have been unable to address. We will link ALSPAC to data provided by Avon and Somerset police to generate the richest data set on violence and childhood adversity ever created in the UK, further enhancing this unique resource and enabling other researchers to investigate the causes and consequences of offending in new ways.
Our findings will shed light on how and when we can best intervene with children (or families) at risk of violence. Addressing these key questions has the potential to help reduce rates of violent crime and to provide a better understanding of how childhood experience contributes to violence that will benefit perpetrators and their families, victims, practitioners, policy makers and the general public.
Planned Impact
In this project we aim to identify which childhood adversities are the strongest predictors of involvement in serious violence during adolescence and early adulthood. Further, we intend to determine whether there are critical periods during childhood when exposure to adversity (or specific types of adversity) has a particularly negative impact and whether the duration of exposure to adversities plays an important role. We also aim to better understand the mediating role of school attainment, school absence, mental health, and adolescent risk behaviours such as smoking and drug use. Answering these questions will shed light on how best and when to intervene with children (and families) at risk of violence. We will have input from the Ambassadors for Vulnerable Children and Young People in interpreting, presenting and disseminating our findings.
We list below several audiences that will benefit from the outputs of our project.
1) Children experiencing adversities or at-risk of perpetrating violence, those caring for them (families, schools, social services) and the wider public: our research is primarily aimed at helping children who experience adversities. Our goal is to better understand the pathways between childhood adversity and involvement in serious violent crime. By identifying those children at greater risk, our project has the potential to influence decisions on how best to support these children. In the long term this could reduce the burden of violent harm perpetrated and experienced by these vulnerable individuals. It is important to note that exposure to childhood adversities has been shown to have many other negative consequences, including poorer educational as well as health/health-related outcomes (32,33). Thus, interventions aimed at reducing exposure to adversity are likely to have many additional benefits, both for the individuals themselves and for wider society.
2) Policy makers involved in developing and/or commissioning interventions aimed at reducing rates of serious violent crime. As mentioned above, our findings will help to optimise the timing and nature of intervention with at-risk young people. The Youth Endowment Fund (YEF) will distribute £200m in funding to practitioner organisations and research organisations in an effort to make a substantial breakthrough in identifying what works to prevent youth violence and improve the lives of 10-14 year olds. By refining the understanding of the adversity-offending pathway and the contribution of other experiences and environments, our research will provide the evidence base for the YEF, in turn advancing early intervention initiatives and refining the practice of youth work with statutory and voluntary sector organisations.
3) The scientific community (see Academic Beneficiaries) will benefit from the insights the project yields and the added capacity for longitudinal research into childhood and adolescent behaviour that our data linkage will enable.
4) Government and tax payers: violence in England and Wales cost the tax payer approximately £38bn in 2015/16 (health, social and economic costs) (34). In 2019, the Government announced a £100 million "Serious Violence Fund" of which around a third will support multi-agency violence reduction units aimed at tackling violent crime and its causes and a £200m Youth Endowment Fund that will focus on early intervention to prevent violence. Driven by our multi-disciplinary impact activities, our research has the potential to reshape the understanding of adverse childhood experiences and to result in temporally-tailored and more effective interventions to reduce this harmful and expensive behaviour.
We list below several audiences that will benefit from the outputs of our project.
1) Children experiencing adversities or at-risk of perpetrating violence, those caring for them (families, schools, social services) and the wider public: our research is primarily aimed at helping children who experience adversities. Our goal is to better understand the pathways between childhood adversity and involvement in serious violent crime. By identifying those children at greater risk, our project has the potential to influence decisions on how best to support these children. In the long term this could reduce the burden of violent harm perpetrated and experienced by these vulnerable individuals. It is important to note that exposure to childhood adversities has been shown to have many other negative consequences, including poorer educational as well as health/health-related outcomes (32,33). Thus, interventions aimed at reducing exposure to adversity are likely to have many additional benefits, both for the individuals themselves and for wider society.
2) Policy makers involved in developing and/or commissioning interventions aimed at reducing rates of serious violent crime. As mentioned above, our findings will help to optimise the timing and nature of intervention with at-risk young people. The Youth Endowment Fund (YEF) will distribute £200m in funding to practitioner organisations and research organisations in an effort to make a substantial breakthrough in identifying what works to prevent youth violence and improve the lives of 10-14 year olds. By refining the understanding of the adversity-offending pathway and the contribution of other experiences and environments, our research will provide the evidence base for the YEF, in turn advancing early intervention initiatives and refining the practice of youth work with statutory and voluntary sector organisations.
3) The scientific community (see Academic Beneficiaries) will benefit from the insights the project yields and the added capacity for longitudinal research into childhood and adolescent behaviour that our data linkage will enable.
4) Government and tax payers: violence in England and Wales cost the tax payer approximately £38bn in 2015/16 (health, social and economic costs) (34). In 2019, the Government announced a £100 million "Serious Violence Fund" of which around a third will support multi-agency violence reduction units aimed at tackling violent crime and its causes and a £200m Youth Endowment Fund that will focus on early intervention to prevent violence. Driven by our multi-disciplinary impact activities, our research has the potential to reshape the understanding of adverse childhood experiences and to result in temporally-tailored and more effective interventions to reduce this harmful and expensive behaviour.
Publications
Teyhan A
(2023)
Linkage of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) to Avon & Somerset Police regional police records.
in Wellcome open research
Kent H
(2023)
Looked after children in prison as adults: life adversity and neurodisability.
in International journal of prisoner health
Cornish R
(2025)
Measuring serious violence perpetration: comparison of police-recorded and self-reported data in a UK cohort
in International Journal of Population Data Science
Brennan I
(2023)
Prevalence and patterns of domestic abuse victimisation in an English police workforce
in Policing and Society
| Description | Measuring violence The main way in which offending is measured is via self-report or using official (police) records. Both of these measures have issues: not all offences come to the attention of the police; not everyone will agree to answer questions about offending, and those who do may not accurately report their criminal activity. In this study we compared police-recorded violence to self-reported violence among young people aged 17 to 25 years using a birth cohort study linked to police records. We used multiple imputation to impute missing self-reported violence, using information from the police records as well as a range of socio-demographic and other factors to help predict this missing information. We found that rates of police-recorded violence were lower than rates of self-reported violence at all ages. We also found violence was underestimated in self-reported data because the individuals more likely to be involved in violent behaviour tended to drop out of the study: the imputed prevalence of self-reported violence was higher at all ages than the observed prevalence; this difference was more marked for males, particularly in late adolescence. Our work underlines the difficulties in measuring violence. However, knowing how the two measures of violence are related is useful as it helps to give a better overall picture of actual rates of violence as well as improving understanding of the limitations of the different measures. Childhood adversity and serious violence Our objective was to examine whether the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and serious violence depends on the type, timing or duration of ACEs. We used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (born 1991-1992) linked to local (Avon and Somerset, A&S) police records on charges and cautions. The outcome was having an A&S police record for a serious violence offence from age 16 to 24 years. We divided childhood into three age periods: 0 to <4yrs, 4 to <8 years, and 8 to <12 years and used logistic regression to examine associations between parent-reported ACEs at each of these ages and serious violence, adjusted for child sex, ethnicity, and family socioeconomic position. Approximately 60% of the participants had experienced at least one ACE in childhood. The most common were parental mental ill health, parental emotional intimate partner violence, and parental separation/divorce (all reported for >20% of participants). 6% of the participants had experienced physical abuse and 17% emotional abuse (by a parent). Most ACEs were associated with an increased risk of serious violence; these associations were strongest for physical abuse and parental physical intimate partner violence. There were differences by age of exposure for some ACEs: for parental substance use, severe financial difficulties, and emotional abuse, associations with serious violence were greater when experienced at 8 to <12 years compared to when experienced at younger ages. Overall, our work shows that the strength of association between childhood adversity and serious violence differs by the type of ACE and, for some ACEs, by the timing of exposure. While the strongest associations overall were observed for physical abuse by a parent, parental substance abuse and financial difficulties had the strongest associations in later childhood. This detail is lost in studies which aggregate ACEs into sum scores. |
| Exploitation Route | Work on this award is ongoing. We expect to have further outcomes in the next few months. |
| Sectors | Government Democracy and Justice |
| Description | Examining the links between persistent absence and school exclusion and serious violence, homicide and near-miss homicide |
| Amount | £17,750 (GBP) |
| Organisation | Home Office |
| Sector | Public |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 01/2023 |
| End | 08/2023 |
| Description | Identification and evaluation of A&E navigator services |
| Amount | £41,199 (GBP) |
| Organisation | Youth Endowment Fund |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 01/2025 |
| End | 05/2025 |
| Description | Investigating the links between bullying and offending |
| Amount | £132,904 (GBP) |
| Organisation | Youth Endowment Fund |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 04/2024 |
| End | 12/2025 |
| Description | What is the effect of school absence and exclusion on self-reported and official sanction for violent behaviour? |
| Amount | £93,000 (GBP) |
| Organisation | Youth Endowment Fund |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 02/2023 |
| End | 03/2024 |
| Title | Local police data linked to the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children |
| Description | As part of this project we established linkage between the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children and local (Avon and Somerset) police data. The data is described in this data note: https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18720.1. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2023 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| Impact | Other researchers have successfully applied to use these data in their research projects. |
| URL | https://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/linkage/ |
| Description | Another Chance Evaluation |
| Organisation | University of Hull |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | I am an expert advisor on using linked administrative data to evaluate a violence reduction intervention among young people. |
| Collaborator Contribution | The partner is leading this evaluation activity |
| Impact | No outputs or outcomes yet; evaluation is ongoing. |
| Start Year | 2022 |
| Description | School to prison pipelines |
| Organisation | University of Exeter |
| Department | School of Psychology |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Between January and August 2022, I supervised a visiting PhD student from the University of Exeter (who was part of the Turing Enrichment Scheme). This has led to ongoing collaboration. |
| Collaborator Contribution | The visiting PhD student carried out her PhD research, supervised by her supervisors from Exeter University and Bristol University. |
| Impact | Publication: Looked after children in prison as adults: life adversity and neurodisability. International Journal of Prisoner Health |
| Start Year | 2022 |
