Sustainable development and resilience of UK coastal communities
Lead Research Organisation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Department Name: Plymouth Marine Lab
Abstract
The climate and ecological emergencies, Brexit and Covid-19 illustrate the enormity of change and disturbance currently impacting coastal communities in the UK, and the urgency of building resilience to accelerating, multi-faceted and new forms of risk. Our research aims to build the knowledge and know-how to enhance the resilience of marine resource-users to environmental, regulatory and socio-cultural change, while simultaneously improving their wellbeing and reducing adverse impacts on the marine environment.
Marine investment, policy and management decisions are often understood as prioritisation decisions ("this or that"), but they can also involve system interactions and trade-offs, and so create winners and losers. Trade-off conflicts manifest in policy consultation, planning and licensing decisions, and in the everyday behaviours of resource-users choosing to support (or not) particular interventions. There is, therefore, increasing impetus to be explicit about trade-offs where they can explain the political acceptability, effectiveness and durability of marine plans, fisheries regulations, protected area designations or offshore wind farms. To date, research has focused on ecological trade-offs or social-ecological trade-offs related to tensions between environmental sustainability and human welfare and wellbeing, with little attention to resilience. Yet, emerging research shows trade-offs between resilience and wellbeing, and between resilience and sustainability with important implications for marine policy and practice.
Our research will be the first to develop a nexus perspective on resilience, wellbeing and sustainability to acknowledge that any solution for one objective must equally consider the other two in the nexus. We apply the nexus perspective to on-the-ground and policy interventions to systematically evaluate synergies and trade-offs among resilience, wellbeing and sustainability across scales and sectors, and to identify opportunities to improve these outcomes together. We address the three call themes by:
THEME 1: Investigating how diverse marine resource-users respond to varied disturbance events, how their resilience intersects with their wellbeing and engagement with sustainability, and what they VALUE as important for maintaining and improving nexus outcomes.
THEME 2: Applying the nexus perspective to the policy context to understand how diverse values and nexus dynamics are traded off in decision-making currently. Working closely with policy and industry stakeholders we will develop a DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK to interrogate the acceptability of trade-off decisions within and across marine sectors.
THEME 3: Applying the nexus perspective to on-the-ground INTERVENTIONS to assess how initiatives intend to improve resilience, wellbeing and/or sustainability, and currently deal with trade-offs across the nexus. Working closely with practitioners, we will identify opportunities to improve future iterations of these interventions so they can better deliver triple benefits across the nexus.
Project deliverables include: a new nexus perspective; a low-tech trade-off decision-support framework for use by policy-makers and implementers, and; evidence that applying a nexus perspective can improve both policy and on-the-ground interventions in marine social-ecological systems in the UK across the domains of marine heritage, sustainable development of communities, and marine environmental regulation.
This research will be world leading and of international importance. The resilience of people, communities and ecosystems underpins global action to sustainably manage aquatic ecosystems (SDG14), respond to climate change (SDG13), and deliver enduring improvements in wellbeing (SDG1+2). Our research addresses a significant gap in knowledge of how nexus dynamics play out across scales that will be fundamental to successful delivery of these Sustainable Development Goals.
Marine investment, policy and management decisions are often understood as prioritisation decisions ("this or that"), but they can also involve system interactions and trade-offs, and so create winners and losers. Trade-off conflicts manifest in policy consultation, planning and licensing decisions, and in the everyday behaviours of resource-users choosing to support (or not) particular interventions. There is, therefore, increasing impetus to be explicit about trade-offs where they can explain the political acceptability, effectiveness and durability of marine plans, fisheries regulations, protected area designations or offshore wind farms. To date, research has focused on ecological trade-offs or social-ecological trade-offs related to tensions between environmental sustainability and human welfare and wellbeing, with little attention to resilience. Yet, emerging research shows trade-offs between resilience and wellbeing, and between resilience and sustainability with important implications for marine policy and practice.
Our research will be the first to develop a nexus perspective on resilience, wellbeing and sustainability to acknowledge that any solution for one objective must equally consider the other two in the nexus. We apply the nexus perspective to on-the-ground and policy interventions to systematically evaluate synergies and trade-offs among resilience, wellbeing and sustainability across scales and sectors, and to identify opportunities to improve these outcomes together. We address the three call themes by:
THEME 1: Investigating how diverse marine resource-users respond to varied disturbance events, how their resilience intersects with their wellbeing and engagement with sustainability, and what they VALUE as important for maintaining and improving nexus outcomes.
THEME 2: Applying the nexus perspective to the policy context to understand how diverse values and nexus dynamics are traded off in decision-making currently. Working closely with policy and industry stakeholders we will develop a DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK to interrogate the acceptability of trade-off decisions within and across marine sectors.
THEME 3: Applying the nexus perspective to on-the-ground INTERVENTIONS to assess how initiatives intend to improve resilience, wellbeing and/or sustainability, and currently deal with trade-offs across the nexus. Working closely with practitioners, we will identify opportunities to improve future iterations of these interventions so they can better deliver triple benefits across the nexus.
Project deliverables include: a new nexus perspective; a low-tech trade-off decision-support framework for use by policy-makers and implementers, and; evidence that applying a nexus perspective can improve both policy and on-the-ground interventions in marine social-ecological systems in the UK across the domains of marine heritage, sustainable development of communities, and marine environmental regulation.
This research will be world leading and of international importance. The resilience of people, communities and ecosystems underpins global action to sustainably manage aquatic ecosystems (SDG14), respond to climate change (SDG13), and deliver enduring improvements in wellbeing (SDG1+2). Our research addresses a significant gap in knowledge of how nexus dynamics play out across scales that will be fundamental to successful delivery of these Sustainable Development Goals.
Organisations
- Plymouth Marine Laboratory (Lead Research Organisation)
- Department For Environment, Food And Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (Collaboration)
- Association of Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities (Collaboration)
- Newcastle University (Collaboration)
- Andy Hughes Photography (Collaboration)
- Cornwall Council (Collaboration)
- Cornwall Rural Community Charity (Collaboration)
- Social Life (Collaboration)
Publications
| Description | As examples of the new understanding and evidence we summarise the key findings from one of the intended publications from each work-package. - WP1: Marine resource-users responded differently to Covid-19 than to regulatory change. They were more likely to try new things during Covid-19 but more likely to consider exiting an industry and to feel they had not been able to respond at all well to regulatory changes. The incremental and additive nature of regulatory change (regulatory squeeze) appears to be particularly challenging for resource-users. The capacities that were most likely to support effective responses included: flexibility, agency and social networks. - WP2: Looking to the past, marine resource users experience a wide range of positive and negative changes throughout their lives, and the ways in which they cope, adapt and transform differs depending on their livelihood position. For example, individuals who are well established in their livelihood and managing a business/other people, are more likely to transform in response to change than those at other stages in their livelihood trajectory. Findings also suggest that connections to place and relationships with people are particularly important for people's coping responses. - WP3: Decision-making processes lack systematic approaches to assessing the full range of social, economic and environmental trade-offs across scales. The trade-offs that are visible to decision-makers are skewed by the availability of existing evidence and the lack of meaningfully stakeholder participation in decisions that affect them (despite considerable efforts to consult). Importantly, how and why 'visible' trade-offs are deemed acceptable or not by decision-makers is not always transparent, and therefore responses or mitigation of 'unacceptable' trade-offs is not always considered upfront. |
| Exploitation Route | Conceptually, the project offers a new way to consider resilience, wellbeing and marine sustainability together in research, practice and policy making. The conceptual advances are developed in marine systems but applicable to multiple domains on environmental and sustainable development scholarship and policy. Empirically, the project shows that marine resource-users and communities are responding to myriad disturbance events (not just singular events, one at a time). The project also reveals which capacities are important for different resilience responses over time, how values influence resilience responses and how, in particular, a fast changing and overlapping regulatory landscape is challenging for people to respond to. The project provides vital social science understanding for Defra, MMO and Natural England's programmes on Resilient fisheries in England, the social value of fisheries, the social impacts of marine and fisheries policy. It also showcased a participatory trade-off decision tool that could complement ongoing consultation processes. |
| Sectors | Agriculture Food and Drink Environment Culture Heritage Museums and Collections Security and Diplomacy |
| URL | https://www.smmr.org.uk/funded-projects/resilience-of-coastal-communities/ |
| Description | Two public installations: - Resilience exhibition NMMC Nov 2024 - Jan 2026 reaching + 100,000 visitors. - Voices of the Exe Trail Apr 2025 - Oct 2026 + an additional collaboration with Exmouth Town Council, Shanty Singers and local schools. Three practitioner led pilots: - Transforming fisheries LIFE accreditation video. Already attracted additional funding by Patagonia - Young Fishers Network. Additional funding from the Seafarers charity. - Blue Doughnut. In progress. Two pilots of the Marine Planning Trade-off Analysis Tool: - Lyme Bay Sole Fishery. MMO-led pilot to sense-check decisions around reducing sole catch limits, and banning fishing within 200 feet from shore. - Bass FMP. Pilot co-led with the Plymouth Fish and Seafood Association to explore trade-offs arising from removal of the Bass authorisation system. Helped to re-iterate what regulations need to be retained, where they could be tweaked, and where additional ones were seen as important (e.g., enforcement of regulations on recreational angling). The project has led to three additional commissions from MMO, Defra and Natural England: 1. Developing resilience indicators for fishing in England 2. Morecambe Bay cockle fishery values 3. Oral history repository for fisheries. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2023 |
| Sector | Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections |
| Impact Types | Cultural Societal Economic Policy & public services |
| Description | Sustainable Management of UK Marine Resources (tranche II) |
| Amount | £250,000 (GBP) |
| Funding ID | NE/V016601/1 (Exeter) and NE/V017454/1 (PML) |
| Organisation | Natural Environment Research Council |
| Sector | Public |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 03/2024 |
| End | 07/2025 |
| Description | MaPTA Pilots - MMO/DEFRA |
| Organisation | Department For Environment, Food And Rural Affairs (DEFRA) |
| Department | Marine Management Organisation (MMO) |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Piloting of MaPTA on management measures for sole fishery in Lyme Bay as part of the Channel FMP process. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Exercise (Led by Ed Baker, MMO) informally fed into decision on management measures |
| Impact | Phan, Fortnam, Chaigneau. Trade-off analysis of proposed management measures for the Lyme Bay sole fishery. ROCC policy report submitted to MMO/DEFRA for approval. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | MaPTA Pilots - MMO/DEFRA |
| Organisation | Department For Environment, Food And Rural Affairs (DEFRA) |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Piloting of MaPTA on management measures for sole fishery in Lyme Bay as part of the Channel FMP process. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Exercise (Led by Ed Baker, MMO) informally fed into decision on management measures |
| Impact | Phan, Fortnam, Chaigneau. Trade-off analysis of proposed management measures for the Lyme Bay sole fishery. ROCC policy report submitted to MMO/DEFRA for approval. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Research co-development and delivery (mostly WP2) - Cornwall Council |
| Organisation | Cornwall Council |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Involvement in project meetings, research activities and joint development of outputs. Case-studies (WP2.3) selected on advice from partner. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Involvement in project meetings, research activities and joint development of outputs. Guidance on stakeholder engagement in Cornwall. Update on policy development in Cornwall. |
| Impact | Identified two case-studies in Cornwall and completed oral history interviews (WP2.3). |
| Start Year | 2021 |
| Description | Research co-development and delivery - CRCC |
| Organisation | Cornwall Rural Community Charity |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| PI Contribution | Involvement of partner in project meetings, research activities and joint development of outputs. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Pro-active involvement of partner in project meetings, research activities and joint development of outputs. This include guidance on how to ensure equitable partnerships with fishers and local communities in the South-west UK. Also involved engagement in public outreach activities. |
| Impact | Connection to networks. E.g., strong engagement with Cornish Fish Producers Organisation (Cornwall) and their youth board (case-study WP1.4) Provision of facilities. Facilitated oral history interviews (WP2.3) Public Engagement. Participation in a panel discussion of the film Bait for a public audience (01 Dec 22) |
| Start Year | 2021 |
| Description | Research co-development and delivery - MMO |
| Organisation | Department For Environment, Food And Rural Affairs (DEFRA) |
| Department | Marine Management Organisation (MMO) |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Involvement in project meetings, research activities and joint development of outputs. Responding to partner needs in policy roll-out |
| Collaborator Contribution | Involvement in project meetings, research activities and joint development of outputs. Guidance on opportunities to apply ROCC activities in policy settings. |
| Impact | Networks - introductions to other MMO evidence and policy colleagues Research design - input into sampling and interview protocol design (WP3.3) Research application - joint working to apply MaPTA to Fisheries Management Plans + Inshore Quote Allocations |
| Start Year | 2021 |
| Description | Turning the Tide proposal development |
| Organisation | Andy Hughes Photography |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Private |
| PI Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. Provision of networks related to young people and marginalised groups in coastal communities in Cornwall and Northumberland. |
| Impact | Full funding proposal submitted. Unfortunately this was not ultimately funded. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Turning the Tide proposal development |
| Organisation | Association of Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| PI Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. Provision of networks related to young people and marginalised groups in coastal communities in Cornwall and Northumberland. |
| Impact | Full funding proposal submitted. Unfortunately this was not ultimately funded. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Turning the Tide proposal development |
| Organisation | Cornwall Rural Community Charity |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| PI Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. Provision of networks related to young people and marginalised groups in coastal communities in Cornwall and Northumberland. |
| Impact | Full funding proposal submitted. Unfortunately this was not ultimately funded. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Turning the Tide proposal development |
| Organisation | Department For Environment, Food And Rural Affairs (DEFRA) |
| Department | Marine Management Organisation (MMO) |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. Provision of networks related to young people and marginalised groups in coastal communities in Cornwall and Northumberland. |
| Impact | Full funding proposal submitted. Unfortunately this was not ultimately funded. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Turning the Tide proposal development |
| Organisation | Newcastle University |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| PI Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. Provision of networks related to young people and marginalised groups in coastal communities in Cornwall and Northumberland. |
| Impact | Full funding proposal submitted. Unfortunately this was not ultimately funded. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Turning the Tide proposal development |
| Organisation | Social Life |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Co-development of full proposal for the UKRI Resilient Communities and Seas call. Provision of networks related to young people and marginalised groups in coastal communities in Cornwall and Northumberland. |
| Impact | Full funding proposal submitted. Unfortunately this was not ultimately funded. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | MaPTA DEMO to DEFRA family |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Demonstration of the MaPTA tool to DEFRA, MMO and Natural England to inform discussions about its application in policy implementation |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| Description | Pilot of Marine Planning Trade-off Analysis (MaPTA) tool applied to the south west UK sea bass fishery |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
| Results and Impact | Small-scale fishers and marine managers engaged in a structured process to explore trade-off decision making about regulation of the sea bass fishery. This was a pilot of the MaPTA decision-making tool, and participants included managers and policy-makers (Marine Management Organisation, Defra) who may use the tool in future. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Practitioner 'experiences' workshops (WP1.2) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Diverse set of practitioner organisations invited to share how their interventions (in the South-west) are intended to improve the wellbeing of marine resource-users, their resilience and/or marine sustainability. Intended and intended positive and negative impacts identified across the ROCC nexus. Led to selection of case-studies for further investigation. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| Description | Trade-offs in UK marine decision-making |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A talk at the Sustainable Management of Marine Resources conference, aimed at marine managers, decision-makers and researchers. It is now available online |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://www.smmr.org.uk/rocc-smmr-2024-presentation-trade-offs-in-uk-marine-decision-making/ |
| Description | Workshop "Diverse voices in marine research and policy" |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Attendees at the Sustainable Management of Marine Resources conference discussed the challenge of engaging with a full range of people who are affected by marine policy decisions. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Workshop for marine decision-makers |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | We presented initial findings from interviews with organisations involved in trade-off decision making, to ask whether these resonated with their experience and to discuss ways that decision-making could be improved. There was good attendance and the findings were well received - the discussion will feed into a report and policy briefing. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
