📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

Landscapes of (Re)Conquest: Dynamics of Multicultural Frontiers in Medieval SW Europe

Lead Research Organisation: UNIVERSITY OF READING
Department Name: Archaeology

Abstract

Mediterranean societies were characterised by multiple and shifting frontiers during the Middle Ages, a formative period for modern Europe. These frontiers were created by periods of conflict between opposing societies defined, above all, by religious differences - between Christians, Muslims and Jews, but also between different groups of Christians. All these frontiers absorbed existing communities and supplemented them with migrants. They were governed by authorities from imposing castles, whose remit was to ensure security and promote the ideology of the conquerors. As the most striking material legacy of the former frontiers, today these castles are the focus of regional and national tourism, tied into narratives of cultural struggles. However, they remain disconnected from their associated territories, both in the academic and public domains. As frontiers, these territories encompassed multicultural communities and articulated tensions between the conquering authorities and conquered populations. This project will address this disconnection between frontier castles and their cultural landscapes, with two aims. Firstly, to broaden regional and international interest in the full spectrum of medieval heritage in South West Europe, building on existing interest in iconic monuments. Secondly, to develop public awareness of past multiculturalism as an essential context for the current debate on migration and multiculturalism, especially since traditional historical narratives are regularly used to validate political and social agendas.

This will entail a comparative investigation of three different frontier regions in Spain and Pyrenean France. The key questions we will ask are how did conquering authorities deal with the creation of multicultural societies in these frontiers, how did they relate to central authorities and how did conquered communities respond to the imposition of new political and social norms? Drawing on a range of archaeological, environmental and historical data, we will investigate changes in settlements, religious, commercial and political centres alongside environmental changes, assessing whether territorial reorganisation resulted in intensified resource exploitation, or to what extent earlier trends continued and can be linked to established practices and worldviews. We will then consider how much freedom there was to move across these frontiers, traditionally linked to the widespread practice of transhumance. Finally, we will bring all this information together and produce a comparative map of what we will define as cultural resilience - the ability of conquered communities to adapt to the imposition of a new regime. Environmental exploitation is an increasingly used index of this resilience. We will then develop a visual and digital infrastructure to enable visitors to engage with the cultural landscapes associated with the iconic monuments of frontier authorities.

Planned Impact

The project will have multi-faceted international and national impact, drawing attention to the connection between key monuments which are lynchpins in the tourist industry of SW European countries and lesser known heritage sites, situated within connective cultural landscapes. The aim of the project in terms of non-academic beneficiaries is to raise awareness of the complexity of multiculturalism in the past, particularly relevant to current concerns in Europe, including the UK. We expect a broad range of people to benefit from the project's findings across multiple regions of Europe:

1. Visitors to museums, monuments and cultural landscapes in SW Europe. The historical monuments of SW Europe are typically disconnected from their cultural landscapes, and to synchronise them with our state-of-the-art research, we will promote this connection through a portable exhibition, as well as digital information packs which will highlight the connections between castles, frontiers and their dynamic communities. Adding information to public display boards will be possible for some key sites (e.g. Molina), and we will facilitate this for all sites through our mobile app which will integrate local gastronomy and enotourism with heritage and cultural landscape.

2. Museum professionals. The project will provide new data, reassess existing data and most importantly provide a landscape context for key monuments. This will provide museum professionals with substantial new information, enabling them to contextualise their collections more effectively, and enhance current and future displays. Our information packs will provide regionally and internationally important museums (e.g. Molina, Alhambra, Carcassonne) with an additional resource to use in outreach activities.

3. Local government agencies and the commercial sector in SW Europe. In providing a new and accessible resource, our research will benefit archaeologists working in government and commercial sectors in Spain, Portugal and France. The project's results, the archived data and our public outreach will have the potential to inform practice at the regional level, and to guide future research strategies. The landscape remains a neglected component in commercially driven archaeology of historical sites, and this project will draw significant attention to this, providing an additional resource for government agencies in Spain and Pyrenean France.

4. Public audiences interested in medieval Europe and the history of multiculturalism. The project website will make our research available to all. It will be written accessibly in English, Spanish and French, and feature an interactive map which will allow people to find out information about the cultural landscapes in our key case study regions. We will also publicise the project's events and key findings in local and national media.
 
Description The Landscapes of (Re)Conquest project was a comparative study of frontier societies in medieval Iberia and Occitania, created by episodes of conquest and regime change. The regions included within the project represented a range of frontier dynamics, although all were associated with state expansion and framed in the rhetoric of ethno-religious hostilities. Though not geographically contiguous, all were at one time part of Umayyad Al-Andalus and subsequently shaped by the expansion of Christian polities. Nonetheless, the inclusion of Occitania was also intended to provide a further contrast to the Iberian Christian-Muslim frontier regions, by examining a major, lasting Christian-Christian frontier. In each region, the creation of a new frontier following conquest and territorial annexation resulted in general continuity in the principal centres of power, represented by major castles. However, there were significant changes in both rural and urban settlement and in social organisation. Regime change was accompanied in all cases by the intensive exploitation of natural resources, which became closely connected to the new settlement patterns. Natural topography defined these frontiers, played a key role in determining how these resources would be exploited and also ensured their permeability. At the same time, there is evidence of discontinuity in Iberia between the Islamic and Christian periods in terms of where and how the landscape was exploited, suggesting that resilience to conquest was comparatively limited. Here there were clear differences between the Iberian and Occitan examples, where the former saw large scale population movements, and the latter consisted largely of an elite colonisation following the region's absorption into the Kingdom of France. In Iberia, agrarian production and animal husbandry changed, in part reflecting new dietary regimes connected with ethno-religious identities. There is also evidence for the creation of new religious landscapes, represented by investments in churches and monasteries. In both Iberia and Occitania, these societal changes were relatively slow, represented by a lag in the dated archaeological sources compared to historically recorded events. The presence of a more stable, long-lasting frontier did result in a certain militarised element, but this varied between regions, and in some cases internal frontiers saw more investment in fortification than external borderlands. In all the case study areas, frontier societies were culturally diverse to varying degrees, with examples of resilience evident from specific cases of persistant language, religion, art, architecture and food.
Exploitation Route From an academic perspective, the project outcomes provide an updated interpretative model for future research into frontier societies, highlighting the benefits of multi-proxy approaches to these societies. The limitations of our data and approaches are also instructive. From the heritage perspective, the project outcomes provide new information on the cultural landscape which can be connected with the key historical monuments of the former frontiers - castles. These are the most important points of historical information for the public and our research can be used to contextualise them more effectively for visitors. Perhaps more importantly, our outcomes will also inform the creation of new itineraries beyond the immediate bounds of these monuments.
Sectors Education

Leisure Activities

including Sports

Recreation and Tourism

Culture

Heritage

Museums and Collections

URL https://research.reading.ac.uk/re-conquest/
 
Description They are being used to inform and update museum information in the provinces of Guadalajara and Andalusia (Spain). They will also be used, in the near future, to update museum information in the French eastern Pyrenees, specifically associated with the castles of Le Pays Cathare.
First Year Of Impact 2024
Sector Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections
Impact Types Cultural

 
Description Re-thinking the Green Revolution in the Medieval Western Mediterranean (6th - 16th centuries)
Amount € 8,520,592 (EUR)
Funding ID 101071726 
Organisation European Research Council (ERC) 
Sector Public
Country Belgium
Start 05/2023 
End 05/2029
 
Title Archaeological Soil Micromorphology dataset from excavations of the Campus of Cartuja, Granada, Spain, in 2013 and 2014 
Description Soil micromorphology data from the analysis of samples collected during excavations by the University of Granada on the campus of Cartuja during 2013 and 2014. Analysis of the samples was supported by AHRC 'Landscapes of (Re)Conquest' project (Grant no. AH/R013861/1, PI Pluskowski, Co-PIs García-Contreras Ruiz and (Michelle) Alexander). Micromorphological investigation was carried out using a Leica DMLP polarising microscope at magnifications of x40 - x400 under Plane Polarised Light (PPL), Crossed Polarised Light (XPL), and where appropriate Oblique Incident Light (OIL). Thin-section description is conducted using the identification and quantification criteria set out by Bullock et al. (1985) and Stoops (2003), with reference to Courty et al. (1989), Mackenzie and Adams (1994) and Mackenzie and Guilford (1980) for rock and mineral identification, Nicosia and Stoops (2017) for anthropogenic inclusions, and Stoops et al. (2018) for further identification of post-depositional alterations. The tables of results use the descriptions, inclusions and interpretations format following Bullock et al. (1985). List of tables: Summary Table Cartuja, Granada, Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology Summary Table 1 Cartuja, Granada Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Deposit type descriptions Table 2 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Abundance of inclusions (% of area of thin section). Table 3 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: abundance of post-depositional alterations and pedofeatures References Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N. Jongerius, A. Stoops, G. Tursina, T. 1985- Handbook for Thin Section Description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research. Courty, M. A., Goldberg, P., Macphail, R. 1989 - Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mackenzie, W. S., Adams, A. E. 1994 - A Colour Atlas of Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Mackenzie, W. S., Guilford, C. 1980 - Atlas of Rock Forming Minerals. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd. Nicosia, C., Stoops, G. 2017 - Archaeological Soil and Sediment Micromorphology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Stoops, G. 2003 - Guidelines for Analysis and Description of Soil Thin Sections. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., Mees, F. 2018 - Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths. Amsterdam: Elsevier 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Archaeological_Soil_Micromorphology_dataset_from_excavations_o...
 
Title Archaeological Soil Micromorphology dataset from excavations of the Campus of Cartuja, Granada, Spain, in 2013 and 2014 
Description Soil micromorphology data from the analysis of samples collected during excavations by the University of Granada on the campus of Cartuja during 2013 and 2014. Analysis of the samples was supported by AHRC 'Landscapes of (Re)Conquest' project (Grant no. AH/R013861/1, PI Pluskowski, Co-PIs García-Contreras Ruiz and (Michelle) Alexander). Micromorphological investigation was carried out using a Leica DMLP polarising microscope at magnifications of x40 - x400 under Plane Polarised Light (PPL), Crossed Polarised Light (XPL), and where appropriate Oblique Incident Light (OIL). Thin-section description is conducted using the identification and quantification criteria set out by Bullock et al. (1985) and Stoops (2003), with reference to Courty et al. (1989), Mackenzie and Adams (1994) and Mackenzie and Guilford (1980) for rock and mineral identification, Nicosia and Stoops (2017) for anthropogenic inclusions, and Stoops et al. (2018) for further identification of post-depositional alterations. The tables of results use the descriptions, inclusions and interpretations format following Bullock et al. (1985). List of tables: Summary Table Cartuja, Granada, Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology Summary Table 1 Cartuja, Granada Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Deposit type descriptions Table 2 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Abundance of inclusions (% of area of thin section). Table 3 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: abundance of post-depositional alterations and pedofeatures References Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N. Jongerius, A. Stoops, G. Tursina, T. 1985- Handbook for Thin Section Description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research. Courty, M. A., Goldberg, P., Macphail, R. 1989 - Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mackenzie, W. S., Adams, A. E. 1994 - A Colour Atlas of Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Mackenzie, W. S., Guilford, C. 1980 - Atlas of Rock Forming Minerals. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd. Nicosia, C., Stoops, G. 2017 - Archaeological Soil and Sediment Micromorphology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Stoops, G. 2003 - Guidelines for Analysis and Description of Soil Thin Sections. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., Mees, F. 2018 - Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths. Amsterdam: Elsevier 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Archaeological_Soil_Micromorphology_dataset_from_excavations_o...
 
Title Archaeological Soil Micromorphology dataset from excavations of the Campus of Cartuja, Granada, Spain, in 2013 and 2014 
Description Soil micromorphology data from the analysis of samples collected during excavations by the University of Granada on the campus of Cartuja during 2013 and 2014. Analysis of the samples was supported by AHRC 'Landscapes of (Re)Conquest' project (Grant no. AH/R013861/1, PI Pluskowski, Co-PIs García-Contreras Ruiz and (Michelle) Alexander). Micromorphological investigation was carried out using a Leica DMLP polarising microscope at magnifications of x40 - x400 under Plane Polarised Light (PPL), Crossed Polarised Light (XPL), and where appropriate Oblique Incident Light (OIL). Thin-section description is conducted using the identification and quantification criteria set out by Bullock et al. (1985) and Stoops (2003), with reference to Courty et al. (1989), Mackenzie and Adams (1994) and Mackenzie and Guilford (1980) for rock and mineral identification, Nicosia and Stoops (2017) for anthropogenic inclusions, and Stoops et al. (2018) for further identification of post-depositional alterations. The tables of results use the descriptions, inclusions and interpretations format following Bullock et al. (1985). List of tables: Summary Table Cartuja, Granada, Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology Summary Table 1 Cartuja, Granada Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Deposit type descriptions Table 2 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Abundance of inclusions (% of area of thin section). Table 3 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: abundance of post-depositional alterations and pedofeatures References Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N. Jongerius, A. Stoops, G. Tursina, T. 1985- Handbook for Thin Section Description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research. Courty, M. A., Goldberg, P., Macphail, R. 1989 - Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mackenzie, W. S., Adams, A. E. 1994 - A Colour Atlas of Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Mackenzie, W. S., Guilford, C. 1980 - Atlas of Rock Forming Minerals. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd. Nicosia, C., Stoops, G. 2017 - Archaeological Soil and Sediment Micromorphology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Stoops, G. 2003 - Guidelines for Analysis and Description of Soil Thin Sections. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., Mees, F. 2018 - Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths. Amsterdam: Elsevier 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Archaeological_Soil_Micromorphology_dataset_from_excavations_o...
 
Title Archaeological Soil Micromorphology dataset from excavations of the Campus of Cartuja, Granada, Spain, in 2013- 2019 
Description Soil micromorphology data from the analysis of samples collected during excavations by the University of Granada on the campus of Cartuja from 2013-2019. Analysis of the samples was supported by AHRC 'Landscapes of (Re)Conquest' project (Grant no. AH/R013861/1, PI Pluskowski, Co-PIs García-Contreras Ruiz and (Michelle) Alexander). Micromorphological investigation was carried out using a Leica DMLP polarising microscope at magnifications of x40 - x400 under Plane Polarised Light (PPL), Crossed Polarised Light (XPL), and where appropriate Oblique Incident Light (OIL). Thin-section description is conducted using the identification and quantification criteria set out by Bullock et al. (1985) and Stoops (2003), with reference to Courty et al. (1989), Mackenzie and Adams (1994) and Mackenzie and Guilford (1980) for rock and mineral identification, Nicosia and Stoops (2017) for anthropogenic inclusions, and Stoops et al. (2018) for further identification of post-depositional alterations. The tables of results use the descriptions, inclusions and interpretations format following Bullock et al. (1985). List of tables: Summary Table Cartuja, Granada, Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology Summary Table 1 Cartuja, Granada Spain (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Deposit type descriptions Table 2 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: Abundance of inclusions (% of area of thin section). Table 3 Cartuja, Granada (LoR Project) Micromorphology: abundance of post-depositional alterations and pedofeatures References Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N. Jongerius, A. Stoops, G. Tursina, T. 1985- Handbook for Thin Section Description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research. Courty, M. A., Goldberg, P., Macphail, R. 1989 - Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mackenzie, W. S., Adams, A. E. 1994 - A Colour Atlas of Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Mackenzie, W. S., Guilford, C. 1980 - Atlas of Rock Forming Minerals. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd. Nicosia, C., Stoops, G. 2017 - Archaeological Soil and Sediment Micromorphology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Stoops, G. 2003 - Guidelines for Analysis and Description of Soil Thin Sections. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., Mees, F. 2018 - Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths. Amsterdam: Elsevier 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Archaeological_Soil_Micromorphology_dataset_from_excavations_o...