Defining Freedom of the Press: A Cross national examination of press ethics and regulation in ten European countries

Lead Research Organisation: University of Derby
Department Name: College of Arts, Humanities & Education

Abstract

Inquiries into the ethics of the UK press, prompted by a series of scandals associated with newspapers, have hitherto been far too parochial: too focussed on the UK itself, they have missed opportunities to learn from parallel developments and concerns overseas. This project, in contrast will develop knowledge and understanding of how press councils in comparable jurisdictions from around Europe approach the difficult questions in media ethics of balancing freedom and responsibility. Significantly, it will also examine news work itself and explore the extent to which ethical codes impact on the daily working practices of journalists, news workers and those directly affected by the activities of the press. The isolationism that has characterised the debates about press ethics has hitherto hindered the possibility of benchmarking and learning from other societies in which problems of ethics and regulation have been addressed by legislators, journalists and the general public. By examining the top European nations in the World Press Freedom rankings, this project will develop a set of evidence based recommendations to the UK regulator (IMPRESS) that can be used to provide a benchmark for the UK press code of ethics. This project will directly help IMPRESS and other organisations review and update future iterations of their codes and related guidance. It will help establish norms of journalism ethics in these areas. Moreover, by examining how the press councils in these countries intersect with the law (e.g., do they have statutory status or recognition; are their judgments recognised by the courts; how do their codes overlap with the law?), we will gain a much richer understanding of how press regulation operates in practice, rather than in theory. This would then offer the possibility of learning from best practice as to what can work and what can be viable in addressing issues around press self-regulation. By holding them accountable to more comprehensive standards, this research will allow regulators to support publishers in achieving a new status and profile, which will allow them to both pursue the classical liberal rationale for journalism as 'watchdog' or 'fourth estate' - and challenge the hegemony of the corporate press. This could have far-reaching social impact given the technological and societal changes that that the news landscape faces not only in producing viable and sustainable codes of conduct but also helping to strengthen this new sector of the news media and protect groups that have hitherto been subject to press abuses.

Planned Impact

There are a number of beneficiaries of the research and impact will be generated at various levels:

Individual journalists (citizen and traditional), regulators and the UK journalism industry: the key findings of the research will be disseminated amongst industry players including the Press Association and the Guardian newspaper.
How might they benefit? Journalists will have cause to reflect on the broader scope of press ethics and regulation given the international environment and range of new challenges and opportunities within the new media ecology. Activities aiding change: Stakeholder workshops; capacity building workshops; project website; final written report.

Regulatory bodies and organisations who have developed their own ethical codes of practice, including IMPRESS, IPSO and the National Union of Journalists
How might they benefit? Regulators and organisations with their own set of ethical guidelines will be able to adapt and refine their ethical codes of practice which will be underpinned by substantive research. Activities aiding change: Stakeholder workshops; capacity building workshops; project website; written report, end of project conference.

Organisations (participants and stakeholders) such as the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom; Index on Censorship; Article19; the Ethical Journalism Network; Association of Journalism Education; Society of Editors. Outside the UK the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom and individual press regulators across Europe. How might they benefit? A wider appreciation and understanding of the principle and practice of freedom of the press will be garnered from interviews and stakeholder workshops. This will then be incorporated into their own specific programmes and press ethics principles. Activities aiding change: Stakeholder workshops; capacity building workshops; project website; MOOC, written report, end of project conference and published research.

Minority groups and organisations who have regularly been subject to significant discrimination and abuse by sections of the press. Organisations such as Faith Matters, Tell Mama, TransMediaWatch and the Travellers movement. The formulation of the clear parameters of press ethics may stifle negative representations of discriminated against groups and enable and empower such groups to clearly identify and challenge such breaches of press ethics. Activities aiding change: Project website and dissemination activities including capacity building workshops, written report, end of project conference, MOOC and exhibition.

General Public. How might they benefit? Our project envisages that a clearer understanding of the parameters of freedom of the press and press ethics will empower and enable citizens to better understand and utilize press freedom for social benefit. Activities aiding change: Project website, Public exhibition, MOOC.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The work carried out under this project has provided insight into the workings of press ethics and regulatory environments in a number of counties ranked highly in the RSF press freedom rankings. Chief amongst our findings are that trust in journalism amongst the public spring, in part from knowledge of how media works in their own countries. As such, greater levels of media literacy, especially concerning the regulatory environment journalist operate within, are vital in building media cultures that work for the public. In countries with her levels of trust in journalism (e.g. Finland) there is evidence of greater levels of media literacy amongst the public. Likewise, the broader journalism culture within each country, impacts on ethical practices of journalists given that their knowledge of greater public awareness, reflexively acts to police ethical boundaries. In response to this research, we suggest that greater effort need to be placed on building knowledge and trust between journalism institutions and members of the public. A greater role for the public in the regulatory system and knowledge amongst the public of this system is imperative if trust in the legitimacy of these institutions is to be repaired. The original objectives of the research, to explore and examine the lived experience of journalists, regulators and third sector organisations in top ranked countries, has provided interesting findings which have generated impact within the industry and wider society. These impacts include changes to the ethics codes of one of the UK's press regulators IMPRESS which has built on our suggestions to their code review to develop a more public focussed system of press regulation. This has also prompted further funding and a follow-on project with IMPRESS into public understanding of ethics and regulation in journalism. We have also fed into a number of inquiries in Parliament with regards the future of journalism and ethical reporting of religious matters. We intend to publish further findings of the project in due course and have these published in appropriate outlets.
Exploitation Route We suggest that regulators pay more attention to their public facing roles and engage the public in their regulatory activity if at all possible. This is particularly important in relation to public service provision such as journalism. We have already built upon the findings of this research in the development of further research activity to empower stakeholders within the media as well as those outside the sector.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software)

URL https://www.derby.ac.uk/departments/humanities/defining-freedom-of-the-press/
 
Description We have contributed to evidence to two parliamentary inquiries into the future of journalism and religion and the media. We have also contributed to the standards code review for one of the UK's press regulator's IMPRESS.
First Year Of Impact 2021
Sector Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software)
Impact Types Societal,Policy & public services

 
Description All-Party Parliamentary Group on Religion in the Media Contribution of Oral Evidence
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://www.appgreligioninmedia.uk
 
Description Evidence submitted to the press regulator IMPRESS's Standards Code Review
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL http://defining-freedom-of-the-press.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/web_-DFoP-submission-of-evidenc...
 
Description Submission to the call for evidence to the Select Committee on Communications and Digital: The future of Journalism: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/3707/documents/36111/default/
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/2073/html/
 
Description ESRC Impact Acceleration Account
Amount £14,981 (GBP)
Organisation University of Leeds 
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 07/2021 
End 06/2022
 
Description Impact Accelerator
Amount £3,500 (GBP)
Organisation University of Derby 
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 06/2021 
End 05/2022
 
Description APPG Media panel member 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact John Steel (PI) and Martin Conboy (Co-I) were invited by Yasmin Qureshi (MP for Bolton South East) to participate as panel members to this APPG on media. Our contribution was in relation to the portrayal of religion in the media and our intervention was drawn from research undertaken for this project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.parallelparliament.co.uk/APPG/media
 
Description Conference presentation at the International Communication Association Journalism Studies division 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Conference paper entitled: Understanding public expectations of journalism and the role of regulation in improving trust in journalism at the Political Studies Association Media and Politics group conference. University of Liverpool.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Engaging the public in regulating for ethical journalism conference paper to International Communication Association, Paris 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Conference presentation.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Exhibition: A Matter of Life and Press 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact As part of the project's promised outcomes and outputs I put on a public exhibition examining the state of press freedom around the world in June 2022. The exhibition was at the St. Brides Foundation in London and ran from 7th-19th of June. The work shown in the exhibition was produced by level 2 University of Derby graphic design and illustration students who were given the brief of providing a visual interpretation of threats to press freedom and the challenges of journalism ethics. The exhibition was designed to be public facing and run along side the project's capacity building event and symposium which formally drew the project to a close.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://pressfreedom.cargo.site
 
Description Press Ethics and Media Freedom - Symposium/capacity building event 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact This capacity building event combined formal dissemination of the research results and an industry focussed roundtable event. It was held at the St. Brides Foundation in London and open to members of the public, third sector organisations and media industry professionals. Aproximately 60 people attended the event including invited speakers and participants.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://ajeuk.org/press-ethics-and-media-freedom-one-day-symposium-register-here/
 
Description Submission of Evidence to the House of Lords 'Breaking News? Future of UK Journalism' report. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact The submission of evidence to the House of Lords Inquiry into the future of news provided summary findings of our research project to date and was included in the final report.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5801/ldselect/ldcomuni/176/17602.htm