📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

"Forward Ever, Backward Never": Documenting and (Re)Vitalising Revolutionary Agriculture and Sustainable Food Systems in Grenada

Lead Research Organisation: University of Liverpool
Department Name: Geography and Planning

Abstract

History, culture and politics have shaped the rise and fall of agricultural production in Grenada. During the Grenada Revolution (1979-1983), there was progress in advancing agricultural development in Grenada, with women and youth playing a central role.

Despite the progress made during the Revolution, however, agricultural activity has declined, attributable to a combination of several factors. These include inadequate policy and institutional frameworks that have not recognized and incorporated critical tenets such as gender and agricultural entrepreneurship; a rudimentary market structure locally, as well as the loss of preferential regional and international markets; inadequate numbers of skilled persons in the agricultural sector taken together with the complete absence of gender-responsive training within the sector; the lack of financial support for agricultural activities from almost all sources - government, private and lending; a breakdown in the social networks that support agriculture (e.g. farmers' groups); a grossly under-developed agro-processing industry; and finally, the devastating effects of hurricanes on the island over the last few decades.

Currently, Grenada's development outlook, including its food security and ability provide adequate employment are under threat. A 2017 World Bank Report indicated that Grenada's poverty and unemployment rates at that time were 37.7% and 28.9% respectively, with poverty and unemployment having the greatest impact on youth and women-headed households, especially in rural areas. The report also stated that improving the current socio-economic conditions in Grenada could rest heavily on revitalizing and boosting its agricultural sector, which in turn will have benefits for local livelihoods and the national economy, as well as for improving food and nutrition security. Moreover, it is expected that reenergizing the agriculture sector, especially with crops that are of cultural and traditional importance (e.g. Nutmeg and Cassava), will help to boost national pride and create a greater sense of national cohesion and well-being.

This project is constructed around a growing recognition that both the research basis (knowledge) and capacity to address the systemic agricultural challenges in Grenada are inadequate; and that getting to the heart of the problem rests on an interdisciplinary and multifaceted view into the country's history, culture and environmental exposure-with special emphasis on gender justice and youth empowerment. The project is designed to utilize a suite of complementary methods, tools, and approaches (Photovoice; visual story-telling, arts-based envisioning sessions)--from the Arts and Humanities and the Sciences (Natural and Social)--to undertake its research, build stakeholders' awareness and capacity, and bridge the research-policy divide. Fundamentally, the Action also seeks to establish sustainable partnerships both within Grenada itself and between Grenada and researchers in the UK and other Caribbean countries so as to ensure that the foundation that it will establish can be built upon in future initiatives.

The primary beneficiaries of this Action are agricultural stakeholders in Grenada, namely 1) small-scale farmers, especially women and youths; 2) civil society organisations that have an interest/stake in agriculture; 3) Policy-makers and technical staff in Grenada's Ministry of Agriculture and Land, as well as other associated Ministries and public agencies; and (4 Research institutions in Grenada, across the English-speaking Caribbean, and the UK.

It is also expected that the learning and results of this project could be of benefit to other small island "developing" states, principally other English-speaking Caribbean countries, where the unique combination of approaches and tools utilized could assist in addressing similar agricultural challenges.

Planned Impact

Academic Impacts: This project will combine a range of scholarly disciplines, including political economy, Caribbean history, arts and culture, and the natural sciences, to address important policy-related, research questions in Grenada. Its design fully incorporates an investigation of local and traditional practices, and the perspectives of women and youth, which can offer novel solutions, but which have not been well-understood, documented, or given consideration in decision-making in Grenada. The research will also contribute to the current discourse on some of the adaptation strategies to climate change that can help small island states achieve better food and nutrition security and improve prospects for development. This research specifically seeks to build and strengthen partnerships and collaboration between important stakeholders in Grenada (government officials and statutory agricultural boards); relevant regional research institutions in the Caribbean (the University of the West Indies); and UK-based researchers in order to achieve the project's aims and objectives, and to ensure sustainability and deepening of the results produced by the Action. The experience of the UK-based researchers in undertaking similar-type research, and in applying multidisciplinary approaches to build capacity and create an impact in the developing world, will be overlaid onto the knowledge and expertise of local partners and collaborators to bring tremendous benefits for identifying solutions to some of Grenada's persistent agricultural challenges. At a regional scale, this project will help to address important data gaps and needs in the Caribbean Region. Hitherto, most available insights on gender and agricultural development for the Caribbean Region are based on amalgamated datasets for Latin America and the Caribbean. Yet, literature on 'Latin America and the Caribbean' is often comprised of data primarily from Latin American countries, leading to misrepresentations of the Caribbean. Additionally, if information about the Caribbean is directly incorporated into regional and/or international reports, the data presented are often sourced or based upon a few of the larger Caribbean states. This initiative will therefore boost awareness about the local realities and situated challenges of smaller Caribbean islands such as Grenada. Finally, gender-disaggregated data from the Caribbean is largely non-existent for a host of pertinent parameters related to social development, including agriculture. Given that the region currently has an agenda to review gender policies, this research is intended to be an important contribution to the differentiated and place-based empirical research on women, agriculture, and development that has recently begun across the West Indies.

Socio-Economic Impacts: Grenada's poverty and unemployment rates are high, with poverty and unemployment having the greatest impact on youth and women-headed households, especially in rural areas. Given the assertion that improving the current socio-economic conditions in Grenada could rest heavily on revitalising and boosting its agricultural sector, this project is expected to be extremely salient. By offering policy-relevant data and information about options for agricultural development, which are climate sensitive and geared towards achieving better gender equity and youth empowerment, it is hoped that agricultural policy-making in Grenada (principally via the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands) could be strengthened. It is also intended that sustainable livelihood options for marginalised social groups, including women and youth, could be more effectively designed and implemented. It is hoped that the project could elevate citizens' appreciation of the historical and cultural aspects of Grenada's agricultural sector as a means of building social cohesion and national pride. Finally, this research will contribute much-needed archival material on the Grenadian Revolution.
 
Description This report offers a comprehensive overview of the project's key findings and a critical analysis of Grenada's agricultural history, with a distinct emphasis on the ways in which the absence of gender equality serves as a major obstacle to sectorial development and progress. The nation's intricate colonial past, intertwined with phases of transformative political change like the Grenada Revolution, underscore the profound manner in which governance systems shape agricultural trajectories. This influence was particularly salient in how marginalised groups like women and youth are impacted .

While the Grenadian Revolution inarguably introduced advancements within Grenada's agricultural sector, an undeniable decline subsequently ensued. This regression stemmed from a confluence of interconnected factors, including the lasting legacies of colonialism that created deeply entrenched power structures and dependencies on larger, more economically powerful nations. Foremost among other factors were policy and institutional frameworks deficient in their meaningful incorporation of vital considerations, such as gender equality and principles of sustainable and self-determined agricultural entrepreneurship. Under imperialism and the contemporary corporate food regime that prevails in the world food system, Grenada's farmers, food producers, and agriculturalists have historically contended with a rudimentary market structure, characterised by limitations in both domestic and international spheres, with the latter reflecting the loss of preferential trade agreements. This restricted market access, compounded by the pronounced absence of gender-responsive training within the sector and a near-complete lack of financial support from all potential sources-government, private investors, and lending institutions-represent formidable barriers to advancement.

The breakdown of longstanding social networks integral to agricultural work, along with an underdeveloped agro-processing industry that has been profoundly impacted by the enduring aftermaths of empire and corporatised technocratic approaches to economic development, further exacerbate these challenges. Moreover, the devastating and recurrent impact of climate disasters, e.g., hurricanes, has added an additional layer of complexity and adversity. Women farmers face specific barriers linked to patriarchal notions of land ownership, difficulty in securing adequate collateral for credit, and the undervaluing of their vital contributions within the realm of social reproduction.

The cumulative effect of these factors cast a concerning shadow over Grenada's future. The nation's prospects for food sovereignty, its ability to provide meaningful employment opportunities, and its overall development ambitions have historically been and continue to be demonstrably placed under threat via colonial-capitalist logics, policies, and modes of thinking. Disproportionately high levels of poverty and unemployment, particularly evident amongst women and youth residing in rural communities, bore a direct correlation to the declining state of the agricultural sector. Yet, the revitalisation and expansion of Grenada's agriculture were widely recognised as key to enhancing local livelihoods, bolstering the national economy, and confronting the issues of food and nutrition insecurity. Additionally, a re-invigorated agricultural sector similar to the efforts of the New JEWEL Movement, with a deliberate focus on crops of traditional and cultural significance (such as nutmeg and cassava), carries the potential to foster national pride, social cohesion, and a sense of shared identity.

The realisation of these aspirations, however, require confronting systemic challenges through rigorous and concerted action. As an island targeted by colonialism, Grenada has historically confronted deficits in both its research base and its institutional capacity to effectively address complex issues. This report thereby advocates for an interdisciplinary, multifaceted approach-one that continues to draw upon participatory bottom-up methods and tools from the arts, humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences-to enhance knowledge and address the identified challenges. A grassroots approach that recognises the expertise and acumen of local communities and famers is crucial for building stakeholder awareness and capacity, ultimately bridging the gap that persisted between research and effective policy implementation within Grenada. For this project, the establishment of lasting partnerships, both within the nation and with external collaborators in the United Kingdom and the greater Caribbean region, has been paramount to ensuring the longevity and transformative impact of this crucial work.

Notably, the ODA cuts damaged the project considerably. Specifically, the UKRI's handling of the GCRF reduction epitomised its flawed governance structure. The cuts themselves were communicated with frustrating delays and a bewildering lack of clarity, leaving researchers in the dark. By forcing universities to shoulder the burden of managing these cuts, the UKRI abandoned its crucial role as a research partner, fuelling an environment of competition and uncertainty within the academic community. These actions intensified existing structural inequalities, with less research-intensive institutions finding themselves more vulnerable. Throughout this process, the lack of transparent communication, respect for research teams, and adherence to basic ethical principles exposed a profound disregard for the values that should underpin a national research funding body. Regrettably, the UKRI's actions eroded trust and undermined its ability to effectively champion the UK's research landscape. Nevertheless, the research team forged ahead and accomplished what we could amidst the cuts, chaos, and avoidable havoc.

Overall, the project placed a firm emphasis upon supporting Grenadian agricultural stakeholders, particularly small-scale farmers with women and youth as the primary beneficiaries. It additionally focused on civil society organisations with interests in agriculture, gender equality, policymakers, and researchers. The success of this project had the potential to serve as a valuable template for other small island developing states confronting comparable agricultural challenges, especially concerning the pursuit of gender justice. Given the project placed resources in the hands of local organisers and was led by Grenadian researchers and participants, the endeavour stands as a catalyst for reimagining a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient agricultural landscape throughout the Caribbean and beyond.
Exploitation Route The UKRI's management of the ODA cuts and budget reductions revealed significant governance issues, particularly a neglect of established research governance norms, ethical integrity, transparency, and accountability. The dissemination of these cuts was marked by confusion and inefficiency, with initial alerts emerging via social media, leading to widespread uncertainty and conjecture. The approach to communication-characterised by delays and indirectness, favouring senior administrative channels over direct interaction with those leading projects-compromised the management and adaptability of research teams to the financial challenges. Additionally, the UKRI's strategy of shifting crucial decisions about funding reductions to university leaders and promoting an environment of competition for scarce resources failed to align with its role as a supportive partner in the research ecosystem. This strategy disproportionately affected projects at smaller, less funded universities, undermining the GCRF's commitment to inclusivity and support for diverse research communities. These actions reflect a significant departure from the ethical standards expected in research, underscoring a lack of honesty, transparency, and respect towards the research community.
Sectors Agriculture

Food and Drink

Communities and Social Services/Policy

Education

Government

Democracy and Justice

Other

 
Description Despite the unforeseen challenges posed by ODA funding cuts and the far-reaching impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have made significant strides in addressing the pressing issues of food insecurity, rural poverty, sustainable agriculture, the effects of climate change, women's realities within the sector, and the preservation of food culture in the Caribbean. Our initial approach was firmly rooted in community-based participatory research. Collaborating closely with local NGOs in Grenada, we meticulously documented the sustainable farming practices of rural farmers. Crucially, we engaged extensively with ministry officials and agriculture extension agents. This ensured that national policies would actively reflect the needs and perspectives of marginalised communities, including women, the rural poor, farmers with disabilities, and the nation's youth. The pandemic introduced substantial hurdles, necessitating a strategic reorientation of the project. As Grenada contended with the economic fallout and escalating food insecurity, we made a concerted effort to address these urgent needs with utmost priority. Project Activities and Outcomes: Policy Dialogue: We conducted an extended policy dialogue that placed a particular emphasis on the experiences of rural farmers with disabilities, women, and youth - groups that often receive insufficient attention in policymaking. Participatory photography proved invaluable in this process. National Exhibition: In partnership with the government, we organised a well-received 3-day national exhibition, complete with capacity-building workshops. This event will provide a vital platform for policymakers, farmers, small industry operators, and youth to engage in knowledge exchange and build valuable networks. It's worth noting that the exhibition will garner positive media coverage, further amplifying the voices of those communities we sought to empower. Video Series: Collaborating with professional videographers, we produced a thought-provoking video series. It highlights Grenada's rich rural food culture and heritage, showcasing local approaches to health, sustainability, and agroecology in the face of the challenges presented by climate change. This series serves as both an invaluable educational resource and a powerful tool for advocacy. Website: A professional team developed a dedicated website to host our diverse project outputs, including research papers, policy briefs, videos, and photo-narratives. We were also mindful of the website's long-term sustainability and provided training to members of the research team to ensure it continues to serve as a valuable resource in the years to come. In addition to these activities, we undertook rigorous community-based research that addressed gender equity and disability inclusion within Grenada's agricultural sector. Key Accomplishments: Rapid Execution: Our strong collaboration with the Government of Grenada and JRI Consulting facilitated the project's timely completion within a demanding three-month period. Robust Partnerships: Our success and the project's sustainability can be attributed to the robust and enduring partnerships we forged with stakeholders. These ranged from government ministries to local NGOs and the communities themselves. Tangible Policy Impact: Through data collection exercises, including surveys, focus groups, and in-depth interviews, we identified critical gaps in existing policies. The targeted recommendations and interventions we provided to the Ministry of Agriculture will have far-reaching positive impacts. Capacity Building: We conducted entrepreneurial training sessions and participatory workshops that empowered farmers and food producers, with a marked focus on marginalised groups. Knowledge Exchange: By facilitating Dr. Tessa Barry's travel we fostered international dialogue and laid the foundation for a peer-reviewed special issue focused on the themes of agrarian labour, race, and empire. This project, I firmly believe, offers a blueprint for addressing multifaceted development challenges. The collaborative approach, the focus on community empowerment, and our evidence-based policymaking have the potential to inform future initiatives, benefiting not only Grenada but the Caribbean region as a whole.
First Year Of Impact 2021
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Communities and Social Services/Policy,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Cultural

Societal

Economic

Policy & public services

 
Description Participatory research 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact Despite the unforeseen challenges posed by ODA funding cuts and the far-reaching impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have made significant strides in addressing the pressing issues of food insecurity, rural poverty, sustainable agriculture, the effects of climate change, women's realities within the sector, and the preservation of food culture in the Caribbean.

Our initial approach was firmly rooted in community-based participatory research. Collaborating closely with local NGOs in Grenada, we meticulously documented the sustainable farming practices of rural farmers. Crucially, we engaged extensively with ministry officials and agriculture extension agents. This ensured that national policies would actively reflect the needs and perspectives of marginalised communities, including women, the rural poor, farmers with disabilities, and the nation's youth.

The pandemic introduced substantial hurdles, necessitating a strategic reorientation of the project. As Grenada contended with the economic fallout and escalating food insecurity, we made a concerted effort to address these urgent needs with utmost priority.

Project Activities and Outcomes:

Policy Dialogue: We conducted an extended policy dialogue that placed a particular emphasis on the experiences of rural farmers with disabilities, women, and youth - groups that often receive insufficient attention in policymaking. Participatory photography proved invaluable in this process.
National Exhibition: In partnership with the government, we organised a well-received 3-day national exhibition, complete with capacity-building workshops. This event will provide a vital platform for policymakers, farmers, small industry operators, and youth to engage in knowledge exchange and build valuable networks. It's worth noting that the exhibition will garner positive media coverage, further amplifying the voices of those communities we sought to empower.
Video Series: Collaborating with professional videographers, we produced a thought-provoking video series. It highlights Grenada's rich rural food culture and heritage, showcasing local approaches to health, sustainability, and agroecology in the face of the challenges presented by climate change. This series serves as both an invaluable educational resource and a powerful tool for advocacy.
Website: A professional team developed a dedicated website to host our diverse project outputs, including research papers, policy briefs, videos, and photo-narratives. We were also mindful of the website's long-term sustainability and provided training to members of the research team to ensure it continues to serve as a valuable resource in the years to come.

In addition to these activities, we undertook rigorous community-based research that addressed gender equity and disability inclusion within Grenada's agricultural sector.

Key Accomplishments:

Rapid Execution: Our strong collaboration with the Government of Grenada and JRI Consulting facilitated the project's timely completion within a demanding three-month period.
Robust Partnerships: Our success and the project's sustainability can be attributed to the robust and enduring partnerships we forged with stakeholders. These ranged from government ministries to local NGOs and the communities themselves.
Tangible Policy Impact: Through data collection exercises, including surveys, focus groups, and in-depth interviews, we identified critical gaps in existing policies. The targeted recommendations and interventions we provided to the Ministry of Agriculture will have far-reaching positive impacts.
Capacity Building: We conducted entrepreneurial training sessions and participatory workshops that empowered farmers and food producers, with a marked focus on marginalised groups.
Knowledge Exchange: By facilitating Dr. Tessa Barry's travel we fostered international dialogue and laid the foundation for a peer-reviewed special issue focused on the themes of agrarian labour, race, and empire.

This project, I firmly believe, offers a blueprint for addressing multifaceted development challenges. The collaborative approach, the focus on community empowerment, and our evidence-based policymaking have the potential to inform future initiatives, benefiting not only Grenada but the Caribbean region as a whole.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021,2022,2023