Digital Knowledge: A New Framework for Digital Epistemic Virtues
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Glasgow
Department Name: School of Humanities
Abstract
We are increasingly in the grips of an information epidemic, which the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic - and the spread of health misinformation online along with rising distrust of experts - has only served to highlight with tragic emphasis. Our project takes as a starting point that addressing the infodemic requires serious engagement not only with its symptoms but also with its fundamental causes - which fall within the remit of social epistemology, which studies how knowledge is shared, and how individuals can become more responsible consumers of information. Those who share fake news online often present themselves as trustworthy and well-informed, in a way that might easily deceive not only dedicated conspiracy theorists, but also those unskilled at distinguishing reliable from unreliable sources. The problem is amplified even further by what science has shown about the spread rate of online misinformation. For example, a 2018 study of Twitter retweets showed that false rumours circulated significantly 'farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth in all categories of information'. Most academic research and policy initiatives have focused on treating symptoms of this infodemic rather than the causes. One prominent political strategy aimed at combatting the spread of disinformation has taken the form of deleting content (Facebook) and censoring posters who violate social media terms of policy (Twitter). Such strategies have important shortcomings, as there is evidence that simply hiding content or banning users in cases where the media consumer is not privileged to the rationale for doing so can itself exacerbate conspiratorial thinking patterns, thus, furthering the problem. Even more, content removal policies effectively only sanction violations of existing norms online; such policies neither identify the source of the problem, nor clearly outline positive norms.
The project team will use the latest tools of social epistemology and virtue epistemology (the area of philosophy that studies intellectual character traits and cognitive faculties) in order to put our understanding of online inquiry and information sharing on an entirely new footing, to better understand the sources of online epistemic risk, and to better train ourselves to navigate them skilfully. One limitation to previous epistemological approaches to the online infodemic is that they have placed the theoretical focus on brainbound cognition, in isolation from the technologies in which we are deeply and inextricably scaffolded. This kind of focus is unsurprising, given that traditional epistemology has only in the past decade or so - and driven by work by the PI and Co-I - begun to theorise about knowledge and intellectual virtues in a way that appreciates how good thinking is not clearly separable in many cases from good cognitive scaffolding, that is, from good and responsible ways of relying on our environments and on technology to further our intellectual goals. The present project develops a new and innovative framework for theorizing about digital epistemic virtues, and vices - traits of thinkers that can enable them to better navigate information online, better assess online epistemic risk, and more efficiently convert digital information into digital knowledge. In addition to academic outputs, the project has a practical objective, which is to work with educationalists and policy makers in order to propose new and innovative ways we can educate for digital virtues, and in this way, to put our theory into practice.
The project team will use the latest tools of social epistemology and virtue epistemology (the area of philosophy that studies intellectual character traits and cognitive faculties) in order to put our understanding of online inquiry and information sharing on an entirely new footing, to better understand the sources of online epistemic risk, and to better train ourselves to navigate them skilfully. One limitation to previous epistemological approaches to the online infodemic is that they have placed the theoretical focus on brainbound cognition, in isolation from the technologies in which we are deeply and inextricably scaffolded. This kind of focus is unsurprising, given that traditional epistemology has only in the past decade or so - and driven by work by the PI and Co-I - begun to theorise about knowledge and intellectual virtues in a way that appreciates how good thinking is not clearly separable in many cases from good cognitive scaffolding, that is, from good and responsible ways of relying on our environments and on technology to further our intellectual goals. The present project develops a new and innovative framework for theorizing about digital epistemic virtues, and vices - traits of thinkers that can enable them to better navigate information online, better assess online epistemic risk, and more efficiently convert digital information into digital knowledge. In addition to academic outputs, the project has a practical objective, which is to work with educationalists and policy makers in order to propose new and innovative ways we can educate for digital virtues, and in this way, to put our theory into practice.
Publications
Andrada G
(2025)
Mind-Technology Problems for Know-How Anti-Intellectualism
in Social Epistemology
Carter
(2024)
Digital Knowledge: A Philosophical Investigation
Carter J
(2024)
Abduction, Skepticism, and Indirect Realism
in Philosophical Studies
Carter J
(2024)
Fake knowledge-How
in The Philosophical Quarterly
Carter J
(2023)
Stratified Virtue Epistemology - A Defence
Carter J
(2024)
Intentional action, knowledge, and cognitive extension
in Synthese
Carter J
(2023)
Intentional action and knowledge-centered theories of control
in Philosophical Studies
Carter J
(2024)
Safety and dream scepticism in Sosa's epistemology
in Synthese
Carter J
(2022)
On some intracranialist dogmas in epistemology
in Asian Journal of Philosophy
Carter J
(2024)
The Epistemology of Conversation - First Essays
| Description | Q1: What were the most significant achievements from the award? A1: Along with the breadth of publications and KE activity reported, the PI and Co-I have discovered, as part of their co-authored monograph in progress, two important findings: first, a new way to reconcile an old epistemological problem about knowledge and deference: how can knowledge gained through deference be creditable to the knower if it primarily depends on others' cognitive work? We (Carter and Kallestrup) have developed over the past year a novel solution by developing a telic account of doxastic deference as a distinctive kind of social-epistemic performance. On our view, such deference succeeds when a deferrer forms a true belief that p in domain d, which answers their query, on the basis of the fact that a deferee states that p because of their epistemically superior competence in d. Drawing on Sosa's framework of performance assessment, we identify a metaphysical hierarchy of increasingly creditable achievements in deferential belief-formation, from mere accurate doxastic deferral through to fully apt doxastic deferral. This hierarchy reveals that the apparent tension between individual credit and epistemic dependence rests on an 'inverse creditability' thesis which fails to apply in cases of deferential belief. Instead, the highest forms of deferential achievement often align with and track the cognitive achievements of those deferred to. This framework also illuminates expert identification and epistemic trespassing as problems of exercising deferential skill under suitably normal conditions. Secondly, the PI and Co-I have, as part of their book manuscript, introduces the concept of epistemic pollution as an unintended consequence of our rapidly expanding informational ecosystem. Drawing parallels with environmental pollution resulting from economic growth, we investigate how the expansion of our datasphere and cognitive augmentation technologies for accessing it introduces various forms of epistemic pollution. We analyse three modes or structures by which pollution can be conceptualised as spreading across an environment - veritistic, topological, and temporal. Q2: To what extent were the award objectives met? If you can, briefly explain why any key objectives were not met. Q3: Our objectives have been met and exceeded, especially in publication outputs and knowledge exchange. Q3: How might the findings be taken forward and by whom? A3: These findings are ones we are building on in the course of our manuscript; they will help to address the wider challenges this grant aims to address: how can we reliably acquire knowledge in an age where traits that are helpful in getting knowledge in friendly environments will not be as successful; how can we equip ourselves to skillfully navigate digital environments with 'warped' topologies? What virtues are needed to do this? Our initial findings over the past year take us a long way towards answering these questions, which we will continue to do over the remainder of the grant as we finalize the monograph. |
| Exploitation Route | The results from the project resolve some questions in digital epistemology but raise new ones; the final chapter of our manuscript in progress sets a research agenda for further work. Apart from further research impact, our results have impact for digital literacy initiatives; in particular, literacy initiatives that can prepare young persons to navigate polluted epistemic environments without tending so far towards a distrusting stance that they risk unwarranted science and expertise denial. Getting this balance right is a serious challenge for digital literacy in an age of misinformation, and our results have a direct bearing on how this may be achieved. |
| Sectors | Education |
| Description | Our research results have led to a collaboration with DSIT as part of the UK's Future of the Internet initiative; our project was one of three initial host venues in the UK for a "Future of the Internet" scoping workshop with a wide range of non-academic stakeholders, including the BBC, Ofcom, UK Safer Internet Institute, Turing Institute. This collaboration between the Digital Knowledge project and the Future of the Internet initiative has led to several spin-off collaboration projects our team is exploring this year. Our findings from the workshop have been consolidated as part of a large-scale protocol on how to combat misinformation in a future internet, currently under review. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2024 |
| Sector | Creative Economy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education |
| Impact Types | Societal Policy & public services |
| Description | Written Evidence to UK Parliament: Foreign Affairs Committee's inquiry, Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy. |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| URL | https://gla-my.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/adam_carter_glasgow_ac_uk/EZbgouAczRpJkyefviMchLQBfanBq... |
| Description | Collaboration with Learning Innovation Office at Glasgow University |
| Organisation | University of Glasgow |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Collaboration with Learning Innovation Office to create a Massive Online Open Course with Coursera. As part of this collaboration, my colleagues and I have developed a Course Map of a 4 week online course on "An Introduction to Digital Knowledge". This was a necessary step that has been developed under the guidance of members of the Learning Innovation Office. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Our partners at the Learning Innovation Office have provided us with the specialist and technical support to develop a MOOC. This included supervision and advice at the content writing process. This collaboration will continue over the next months. The partners will provide us with the technical support required for the production stage of this project. |
| Impact | First draft of course map for MOOC - Coursera |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Delete the Filter |
| Organisation | Banff Academy |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Prof Kallestrup provides expertise on a project at Banff Academy (https://www.banffacademy.co.uk) with secondary school pupils to instil digital media literacy. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Banff Academy's teachers and Community Support Officer provide valuable qualitative data to our research. |
| Impact | None so far as the collaboration has just begun. |
| Start Year | 2025 |
| Description | Blog Post (forthcoming) in "Open for Debate" |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | I am currently assigned a blog post in Alessandra Tannesini's "Open for Debate" that will appear in April 2025 talking about digital technology, cognitive scaffolding, and epistemic agency. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| URL | https://blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/openfordebate/category/open-for-debate/ |
| Description | Interdisciplinary talk on Echo Chambers and polarized beliefs in Vaccine Hesitancy debates |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | This event was an interdisciplinary workshop bringing together philosophers, immunologists and epidemiologists, psychologists, media stakeholders (including BBC, Ofcom), and local community organizers to better understand why science communication fails, and what explains distrust in vaccine science; my contribution was to discuss how digital information environments can contribute to polarized thinking about these issues. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| Description | Invited as a commentator for the youtube series "Philosophers meet Critics" |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | I was one of the commentators to Chris Kelp's book on the nature of Inquiry. This round table was an installment of the youtube Series "Philosophers meet critics". |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
| URL | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxxQitPSQN4&t=1965s&ab_channel=FigmentsoftheBrain |
| Description | New Directions in Epistemology |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | 40 students, staff, and visiting researchers and public attended this conference. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| Description | Philosophy in Prison Low Moss Prison, Glasgow |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Other audiences |
| Results and Impact | I co-led two philosophy classes to a group of inmates at the Low Moss Prison. This was part of a project led by Glasgow University, aimed at providing education to prisoners. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Podcast - Interview with Joshua Habgood-Coote on conspiracy theories |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Media (as a channel to the public) |
| Results and Impact | Dr Joshua Rowan Thorpe interviewed Dr Joshua Habgood-Coote about conspiracy theories for a podcast, to be made available to the public. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023,2024 |
| Description | Public Engagement You tube video on Legal Risk |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | 5 minute video summarizing the main results of a published paper for the public audience via a youtube video |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8hvkNoYbDE&t=9s&ab_channel=VarietiesofRisk |
| Description | Talk on Knowledge and Action, Barcelona Spain |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Other audiences |
| Results and Impact | I have a talk on knowledge and action, exploring themes related to the project (particularly concerning rational action on incomplete information), to a high profile audience in Sitges, Spain, as an invited keynote to an ERC conference on Knowledge First Social Epistemology. This talk led to fruitful discussions about my work from among others Timothy Williamson and Carlotta Pavese, leaders in the area. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Talk to high school pupils at Fraserburgh Academy |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Schools |
| Results and Impact | The purpose was to talk to school pupils about how laypeople may identify reliable experts in a digital age |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Talk to high school pupils at George Watsons College |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Schools |
| Results and Impact | The purpose was to talk to school pupils about how laypeople may identify reliable experts in a digital age |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | The World Wars of Disinformation |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Together with Prof Tom Weber at the University of Aberdeen and Dr Annelotte Janse from the University of Utrecht, Prof Kallestrup discussed disinformation, 'fake news' and demagoguery. We considered why some people are pulled towards extremes and even conspiracy theories. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| URL | https://www.abdn.ac.uk/events/21711/ |
