Developing a network for measuring and addressing disability-related extra costs
Lead Research Organisation:
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Department Name: Epidemiology and Population Health
Abstract
People with disabilities frequently incur disability-related extra costs, such as for rehabilitation, personal assistance or additional healthcare or transportation. These costs can be significant, and heighten the risk of poverty amongst people with disabilities and their households. In turn, unmet expenses can lead to worsening functioning, social participation, well-being and ultimately poverty. Addressing extra costs is central to the fulfilment of the UNCRPD and the commitments of the Global Summit, including promoting full and effective participation and ensuring the economic, social and cultural rights of people with disabilities.
There is growing interest from researchers and policymakers in measuring extra costs and identifying strategies to cover them in policies and programmes, particularly social protection. However, a recent systematic review highlighted that there is a lack of consensus on best practices for measuring and interpreting extra costs across frequently used methodologies despite the rapid proliferation of studies this area. As such, estimates generated are often not comparable and are highly sensitive to design choices. Newer methods, particularly the Goods and Services Required approach require development, including input from people with disabilities, for widespread use. Guidance is also needed for interpreting extra costs estimates across methodologies and identifying solutions to improving access to required goods and services while minimising out-of-pocket spending.
Consequently, this proposal will establish a network for measuring and addressing disability-related extra costs. It will develop a toolkit that provides best practices and step-by-step guidance for collecting and analysing data on extra costs across three commonly used methods (Goods and Services, Goods and Services Required, Standard of Living). These best practices will be informed through consensus-building and participatory co-development. The network will also produce a policy brief with co-developed recommendations for strategies to cover extra costs through social protection and other policies and an edited journal edition on extra costs with summary articles on the toolkit and recommendations. The outputs of the network will be disseminated widely to other academics, national governments, OPDs, NGOs and international organisations (e.g., World Bank, ILO, UN agencies, WHO).
The network will be comprised of six core members and an active advisory group. The core members and advisory group include people with disabilities, researchers, OPD representatives, policymakers and practitioners working in this field. The network will have a cross-disciplinary approach, with researchers from public health, economics, sociology, social policy and law backgrounds. Members of the network are based in a wide range of countries (e.g., UK, US, Colombia, Peru, Georgia, Indonesia, South Africa) and have experience working on disability, extra costs and social protection in multiple contexts and from different perspectives (e.g., research, policy, programmatic, advocacy). They will work in equitable partnership through online and in-person meetings and workshops to develop the proposed outputs and strengthen current and future collaborations on this topic.
There is growing interest from researchers and policymakers in measuring extra costs and identifying strategies to cover them in policies and programmes, particularly social protection. However, a recent systematic review highlighted that there is a lack of consensus on best practices for measuring and interpreting extra costs across frequently used methodologies despite the rapid proliferation of studies this area. As such, estimates generated are often not comparable and are highly sensitive to design choices. Newer methods, particularly the Goods and Services Required approach require development, including input from people with disabilities, for widespread use. Guidance is also needed for interpreting extra costs estimates across methodologies and identifying solutions to improving access to required goods and services while minimising out-of-pocket spending.
Consequently, this proposal will establish a network for measuring and addressing disability-related extra costs. It will develop a toolkit that provides best practices and step-by-step guidance for collecting and analysing data on extra costs across three commonly used methods (Goods and Services, Goods and Services Required, Standard of Living). These best practices will be informed through consensus-building and participatory co-development. The network will also produce a policy brief with co-developed recommendations for strategies to cover extra costs through social protection and other policies and an edited journal edition on extra costs with summary articles on the toolkit and recommendations. The outputs of the network will be disseminated widely to other academics, national governments, OPDs, NGOs and international organisations (e.g., World Bank, ILO, UN agencies, WHO).
The network will be comprised of six core members and an active advisory group. The core members and advisory group include people with disabilities, researchers, OPD representatives, policymakers and practitioners working in this field. The network will have a cross-disciplinary approach, with researchers from public health, economics, sociology, social policy and law backgrounds. Members of the network are based in a wide range of countries (e.g., UK, US, Colombia, Peru, Georgia, Indonesia, South Africa) and have experience working on disability, extra costs and social protection in multiple contexts and from different perspectives (e.g., research, policy, programmatic, advocacy). They will work in equitable partnership through online and in-person meetings and workshops to develop the proposed outputs and strengthen current and future collaborations on this topic.
Organisations
Publications
Banks L
(2023)
The Impact of the Disability Allowance on Financial Well-Being in the Maldives: Quasi-experimental Study
in The European Journal of Development Research
Kuper Hannah
(2024)
Building disability-inclusive health systems
in LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH
Mont D
(2023)
Methods for Estimating the Impact of Disability Costs for Designing Inclusive Policies
in Disabilities
Description | World Bank technical guidance |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
Impact | The official guidance document will inform upcoming research supported by the World Bank and by UNICEF in partnership with national governments who are undertaking extra costs assessments. For 2024, so far this includes studies in Nigeria, Namibia, Nepal, Armenia, Fiji and Saudi Arabia, with more to be added. |
Description | Adjusting poverty lines by extra costs |
Organisation | Inter-American Development Bank |
Country | United States |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
PI Contribution | Led by Monica Pinilla (co-I), with input from Morgon Banks (PI), Daniel Mont (project partner) and Alex Cote (project partner), we are developing guidance on how to adapt poverty lines to account for extra costs. |
Collaborator Contribution | Intellectual contribution based on the methodologies refined through the AHRC network. |
Impact | There will be a guidance note and exploratory research in at least one setting. |
Start Year | 2024 |
Description | World Bank technical guidance |
Organisation | World Bank Group |
Country | United States |
Sector | Public |
PI Contribution | We are now working with the World Bank (who is providing additional funding) to develop official guidance on measuring and using extra costs. The technical guidance report will be published by the World Bank. |
Collaborator Contribution | The authors of this technical report are part of this AHRC network group. Further, the PI will be a consultant for World Bank to apply the new guidance for a study commissioned by the World Bank/Nigerian government in Nigeria. |
Impact | - 2.5 day hybrid meeting in Washington, DC at the World Bank January 31-February 2, 2024. It involved members of the core network/network's advisory committee (PI, Monica Pinilla, Dan Mont, Alex Cote, Ludovico Carraro, Ketevan Melikadze, Maia Bagrationi, Zachary Morris, Pamela Smith). Meeting costs/travel were covered by World Bank - This technical working group will draft/review an official World Bank guidance document on measuring and applying extra costs estimates as part |
Start Year | 2024 |
Description | Consultations with research group in Saudi Arabia |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Ongoing consultation with research group and government officials in Saudi Arabia who are undertaking an extra costs assessments. Myself and other members of the AHRC network are providing methodological into how they implement an extra costs study. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023,2024 |
Description | Presentation to UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Morgon Banks gave a presentation to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office on disability and social protection, which included information about how extra costs impact poverty and how social protection can be used to offset extra costs. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
Description | Presentation to UNICEF Social Protection team |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | The meeting gave an overview of work done on extra costs so far and its implications for social protection. The presentation and discussion was with the UNICEF team working on social protection. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |