Developing a network for measuring and addressing disability-related extra costs
Lead Research Organisation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Department Name: Epidemiology and Population Health
Abstract
People with disabilities frequently incur disability-related extra costs, such as for rehabilitation, personal assistance or additional healthcare or transportation. These costs can be significant, and heighten the risk of poverty amongst people with disabilities and their households. In turn, unmet expenses can lead to worsening functioning, social participation, well-being and ultimately poverty. Addressing extra costs is central to the fulfilment of the UNCRPD and the commitments of the Global Summit, including promoting full and effective participation and ensuring the economic, social and cultural rights of people with disabilities.
There is growing interest from researchers and policymakers in measuring extra costs and identifying strategies to cover them in policies and programmes, particularly social protection. However, a recent systematic review highlighted that there is a lack of consensus on best practices for measuring and interpreting extra costs across frequently used methodologies despite the rapid proliferation of studies this area. As such, estimates generated are often not comparable and are highly sensitive to design choices. Newer methods, particularly the Goods and Services Required approach require development, including input from people with disabilities, for widespread use. Guidance is also needed for interpreting extra costs estimates across methodologies and identifying solutions to improving access to required goods and services while minimising out-of-pocket spending.
Consequently, this proposal will establish a network for measuring and addressing disability-related extra costs. It will develop a toolkit that provides best practices and step-by-step guidance for collecting and analysing data on extra costs across three commonly used methods (Goods and Services, Goods and Services Required, Standard of Living). These best practices will be informed through consensus-building and participatory co-development. The network will also produce a policy brief with co-developed recommendations for strategies to cover extra costs through social protection and other policies and an edited journal edition on extra costs with summary articles on the toolkit and recommendations. The outputs of the network will be disseminated widely to other academics, national governments, OPDs, NGOs and international organisations (e.g., World Bank, ILO, UN agencies, WHO).
The network will be comprised of six core members and an active advisory group. The core members and advisory group include people with disabilities, researchers, OPD representatives, policymakers and practitioners working in this field. The network will have a cross-disciplinary approach, with researchers from public health, economics, sociology, social policy and law backgrounds. Members of the network are based in a wide range of countries (e.g., UK, US, Colombia, Peru, Georgia, Indonesia, South Africa) and have experience working on disability, extra costs and social protection in multiple contexts and from different perspectives (e.g., research, policy, programmatic, advocacy). They will work in equitable partnership through online and in-person meetings and workshops to develop the proposed outputs and strengthen current and future collaborations on this topic.
There is growing interest from researchers and policymakers in measuring extra costs and identifying strategies to cover them in policies and programmes, particularly social protection. However, a recent systematic review highlighted that there is a lack of consensus on best practices for measuring and interpreting extra costs across frequently used methodologies despite the rapid proliferation of studies this area. As such, estimates generated are often not comparable and are highly sensitive to design choices. Newer methods, particularly the Goods and Services Required approach require development, including input from people with disabilities, for widespread use. Guidance is also needed for interpreting extra costs estimates across methodologies and identifying solutions to improving access to required goods and services while minimising out-of-pocket spending.
Consequently, this proposal will establish a network for measuring and addressing disability-related extra costs. It will develop a toolkit that provides best practices and step-by-step guidance for collecting and analysing data on extra costs across three commonly used methods (Goods and Services, Goods and Services Required, Standard of Living). These best practices will be informed through consensus-building and participatory co-development. The network will also produce a policy brief with co-developed recommendations for strategies to cover extra costs through social protection and other policies and an edited journal edition on extra costs with summary articles on the toolkit and recommendations. The outputs of the network will be disseminated widely to other academics, national governments, OPDs, NGOs and international organisations (e.g., World Bank, ILO, UN agencies, WHO).
The network will be comprised of six core members and an active advisory group. The core members and advisory group include people with disabilities, researchers, OPD representatives, policymakers and practitioners working in this field. The network will have a cross-disciplinary approach, with researchers from public health, economics, sociology, social policy and law backgrounds. Members of the network are based in a wide range of countries (e.g., UK, US, Colombia, Peru, Georgia, Indonesia, South Africa) and have experience working on disability, extra costs and social protection in multiple contexts and from different perspectives (e.g., research, policy, programmatic, advocacy). They will work in equitable partnership through online and in-person meetings and workshops to develop the proposed outputs and strengthen current and future collaborations on this topic.
Organisations
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Lead Research Organisation)
- Inter-American Development Bank (Collaboration)
- Government of Saudi Arabia (Collaboration)
- World Bank Group (Collaboration)
- Society and Disability (SODIS) (Project Partner)
- UNICEF (Global) (Project Partner)
- Center for Inclusive Policy (Project Partner)
Publications
Banks L
(2023)
The Impact of the Disability Allowance on Financial Well-Being in the Maldives: Quasi-experimental Study
in The European Journal of Development Research
Kuper Hannah
(2024)
Building disability-inclusive health systems
in LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH
Mont D
(2023)
Methods for Estimating the Impact of Disability Costs for Designing Inclusive Policies
in Disabilities
RodrÃguez Gatta D
(2024)
Additional file 2 of Inclusion of people with disabilities in Chilean health policy: a policy analysis
| Description | This is a networking grant, designed to bring together experts to develop methodology on how to measure extra costs of disability. As a result of this grant, the team has: - Held three hybrid events with diverse experts from OPDs, academia, UN agencies and NGOs on how to measure and address extra costs (Stellenbosch University, World Bank x2) - Held an in-person conference in Stellenbosch, South Africa to share key findings from extra costs studies with other academics - Held a webinar on approaches to measure disability related costs for inclusive social protection - Developed a guidance document for using different methodologies, which is being reviewed by the World Bank |
| Exploitation Route | There has been a significant expansion in research in this area. The advances in the methodology developed as part of this research have been applied in recent and upcoming studies in Malaysia (new grant to the PI, with collaboration of other network members), Namibia, Saudi Arabia, Nepal, Moldova, Armenia, Tunisia and other settings. Members of the network are leading or advising these projects. |
| Sectors | Government Democracy and Justice |
| Description | The networking award has led to improvements in methodologies for how to measure and address extra costs of disability. Members of the network have shared their experiences applying the methodology in different settings, which has led to improvements in our own practices and to knowledge sharing beyond the network (e.g., through advisory roles, sharing of key materials) that has informed research in other settings. It has also contributed to a significant expansion in research in this area. The advances in the methodology developed as part of this research have been applied in recent and upcoming studies in Malaysia (new grant to the PI, with collaboration of other network members), Namibia, Saudi Arabia, Nepal, Moldova, Armenia, Tunisia and other settings. Members of the network are leading or advising these projects. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2023 |
| Sector | Government, Democracy and Justice |
| Impact Types | Societal Economic Policy & public services |
| Description | World Bank technical guidance |
| Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| Impact | The official guidance document will inform upcoming research supported by the World Bank and by UNICEF in partnership with national governments who are undertaking extra costs assessments. For 2024, so far this includes studies in Nigeria, Namibia, Nepal, Armenia, Fiji and Saudi Arabia, with more to be added. |
| Description | Adjusting poverty lines by extra costs |
| Organisation | Inter-American Development Bank |
| Country | United States |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| PI Contribution | Led by Monica Pinilla (co-I), with input from Morgon Banks (PI), Daniel Mont (project partner) and Alex Cote (project partner), we are developing guidance on how to adapt poverty lines to account for extra costs. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Intellectual contribution based on the methodologies refined through the AHRC network. |
| Impact | There will be a guidance note and exploratory research in at least one setting. |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Extra costs of disability in Saudi Arabia |
| Organisation | Government of Saudi Arabia |
| Country | Saudi Arabia |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Three of the core members have provided technical guidance to support a study on extra costs of disability in Saudi Arabia. The study is commissioned by the Saudi government and intends to inform planning of services. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Funding for new study; research uptake into policy |
| Impact | New study on extra costs in Saudi Arabia. |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | World Bank technical guidance |
| Organisation | World Bank Group |
| Country | United States |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | We are now working with the World Bank (who is providing additional funding) to develop official guidance on measuring and using extra costs. The technical guidance report will be published by the World Bank. |
| Collaborator Contribution | The authors of this technical report are part of this AHRC network group. Further, the PI will be a consultant for World Bank to apply the new guidance for a study commissioned by the World Bank/Nigerian government in Nigeria. |
| Impact | - 2.5 day hybrid meeting in Washington, DC at the World Bank January 31-February 2, 2024. It involved members of the core network/network's advisory committee (PI, Monica Pinilla, Dan Mont, Alex Cote, Ludovico Carraro, Ketevan Melikadze, Maia Bagrationi, Zachary Morris, Pamela Smith). Meeting costs/travel were covered by World Bank - 2 day hybrid meeting in Washington DC in February 2025 to further refine the guidance. It involved many of the core network members. - This technical working group has drafted a guidance document on measuring and applying extra costs estimates. It is currently being reviewed by the World Bank so that it can be an official World Bank document. |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Consultations with research group in Saudi Arabia |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Ongoing consultation with research group and government officials in Saudi Arabia who are undertaking an extra costs assessments. Myself and other members of the AHRC network are providing methodological into how they implement an extra costs study. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023,2024 |
| Description | Presentation to UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Morgon Banks gave a presentation to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office on disability and social protection, which included information about how extra costs impact poverty and how social protection can be used to offset extra costs. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Presentation to UNICEF Social Protection team |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Other audiences |
| Results and Impact | The meeting gave an overview of work done on extra costs so far and its implications for social protection. The presentation and discussion was with the UNICEF team working on social protection. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Webinar talk "Approaches to measure disability related costs for inclusive social protection" |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Webinar hosted by UNICEF and World Bank on how to measure extra costs of disability. Over 200 participants attended, mainly practioners who could apply the methodology and or better interpret results from existing studies. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://socialprotection.org/learn/webinars/approaches-measure-disability-related-costs-inclusive-so... |
