An Integrated Parasite Control Framework for Ruminants

Lead Research Organisation: University of Liverpool
Department Name: Infection Biology & Microbiomes

Abstract

Parasites, if they are not controlled effectively, have a major impact on the productivity, health and welfare of sheep and cattle. Cattle and sheep pick up parasites, such as roundworms, whilst they graze. These parasites are normally controlled by treating the whole flock or herd with a worming medicine that either prevents infection or that kills the parasites before they cause damage. However, this type of approach to parasite control has resulted in the development of resistance to the medicines used, meaning the parasites are no longer killed by the treatment. In this project we will identify ways in which the control of parasitic diseases could be improved to reduce the impact and spread of resistance. We will focus on roundworm parasites found in the stomach and intestines of sheep, since anthelmintic resistance is prevalent in sheep roundworm populations, and it is a growing threat to the sheep industry in the UK.

To achieve this aim we will first establish in partnership with farmers, vets and Registered Animal Medicine Advisors, what farmers need enable them to integrate new parasite control strategies on their farms. Secondly, using mathematical models, we will identify new options that could be used to improve parasite control on farms. These models will build on existing mathematical models and develop them further to include farm and stock management data together with parasite burdens within individual animals. In this way the impact on parasite burden of specific interventions such as selecting heavily parasitised individual animals to treat or changing to a mob-based pasture management system can be assessed before they are rolled out onto farms.

The outputs from the project will be a better understanding of what inhibits farmers from adopting new approaches to parasite control and secondly will present new options that could be used on farms to improve parasite control.

Technical Summary

Parasitic diseases are ubiquitous and compromise the health, productivity and welfare of farmed animals. Such diseases are currently controlled using chemoprophylactic programmes, but this practice has led to the emergence of resistance to anti-parasite medicines. Anthelmintic resistance (AR) has been reported in UK to all but one of the major classes of anthelmintic and multi-drug resistance is prevalent. AR has been identified by the industry as one of the top disease/syndromes impacting on sheep and cattle in the UK and is seen as the biggest challenge to the future profitability of the sheep farming sector. In this proof-of-concept project, we will focus on sheep production systems in the UK and gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) infections that cause parasitic gastro-enteritis (PGE).
We will work with farmers, RAMA and vet focus groups across the UK, to identify current practices around helminth control in sheep flocks and to identify impediments to sustainable parasite control. We will address issues around parasite diagnosis prior to treatment and what impedes their use.
We will use high level mathematical agent based systems model that can be interrogated to address the effectiveness of different control interventions at a farm level whilst including individual animal parasite burdens. For example, by developing rational integrated control strategies based on improved diagnosis or farm management options or targeting treatment at infected animals using a Targeted Strategic Treatment approach.
In partnership with farmers, we will share outputs from the project, build an understanding of what farmers need to improve control of parasites in their animals without relying solely on traditional blanket treatment regimes, and assess the feasibility of implementing possible control options that emerge from the modelling framework.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The aim of this project was to improve control of gastro-intestinal nematodes (GIN) in sheep by understanding barriers to sustainable use of medicines used to treat GIN infections. Through engagement with farmers, we identified potential interventions and developed a mathematical model that tests the likely effect of proposed control strategies on parasite transmission and lamb live weight gain.
GIN are common and highly pathogenic in sheep, especially first season grazing lambs. They are traditionally controlled using routine veterinary medicines or anthelmintics. In recent years, populations of GIN, resistant to all three major anthelmintic classes and multi-drug resistant parasites have been reported on many farms in the UK.
To reduce the rate of development of resistance, advice to farmers has changed and is now focussed on using anthelmintics only when indicated e.g. by high faecal egg counts or failure to meet weight gain targets and using alternative strategies such as pasture management to reduce exposure. Many farmers do not engage with these messages. The aim of this study was to identify the barriers behind this lack of engagement and, by developing a mathematical model, to demonstrate the impact of sustainable parasite control measures, on a typical farm.

An online questionnaire was used to provide a snapshot of management and worming practices on a cross section of sheep farms across the UK. Focus groups on sustainable parasite control were held across the UK, either in person or online between December and June 2023. Nine meetings were held with farmers, including some 'seldom seen' farmers, i.e. people who had no history of engaging with their Veterinary Practice's knowledge exchange programmes. In addition, one focus group was held with farm animal veterinarians and two with registered animal medicines advisors. Discussions were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis.
A mathematical model of a 'typical' sheep farm was developed, informed by data collected through the online questionnaire and evaluated using data from previous studies (Kenyon et al 2013). By adopting an individual-based modelling framework that links environmentally driven pasture contamination with parasite burdens within individual hosts we were able to consider impacts of management decisions and interventions at the level of the farm whilst retaining detail on parasite burden at the level of individual sheep. Four proposed treatment scenarios were evaluated: (i) Neo-suppressive treatment (NST): 4-weekly treatments from weaning to sale; (ii) Strategic prophylactic treatment (SPT): treatment at weaning and 6 weeks later; (iii) Treatment minus 10 (T-10): 4-weekly treatments that exclude 10% randomly selected animals from the heaviest half of the flock; (iv) Targeted treatment (TT): treatment of the whole group based on monthly composite faecal egg counts from ten lambs.
The farmer focus groups identified four main categories of barriers to change; not seeing any need due to the perceived success of current strategies, a lack of information and support on how to change, a lack of faith in proposed new methods, and practical and logistical issues. There were also positive findings, notably an appetite for information and knowledge, an awareness of anthelmintic resistance and its consequences, growing uptake of faecal egg counts which were proving to be beneficial to their businesses. Our mathematical model can be used to help address the first three of the issues described above by exploring the potential efficacy of a range of GIN control strategies.The model predicts that approaches that reduce the number of treatments can provide similar body weights at a flock level while reducing the number of treatments administered. The NST approach, which administers the most anthelmintic treatments predicts the greatest body weights across the flock in the absence of resistance; however, the efficacy of this treatment regime decreases notably under increasing anthelmintic resistance. Under the assumption that the alternative treatment scenarios would at least slow the development of resistance, we see that over time we would expect better performance in terms of body weight under the alternative treatment scenarios e.g. comparing NST under 40% resistance to T-10 under 20% resistance.

Conclusions: Amongst farmers there was a deep sense of anxiety around leaving lambs untreated and changing their normal worming practices for fear it might compromise the health and productivity of their animals, which could impact their business. To address these barriers, we present a mathematical model developed to explore the potential impacts of proposed treatment regimes, showing that any short-term losses due to adopting some of these novel approaches may be offset by slowing the development of anthelmintic resistance. The model has been built with flexibility in mind following consultation with stakeholders and so can be readily adapted and employed to explore a wide range of novel control scenarios such as weight-based targeting of treatment or rotational/mob grazing. Such model outputs could be used to identify promising control strategies for trial on farm and, together with bespoke educational programmes, to convince farmers to focus their efforts onto more sustainable control of GINs.
Exploitation Route Two manuscripts are in preparation for submission to (1) International Journal for Parasitology and (2) Veterinary Record.
Sectors Agriculture

Food and Drink

Education

Environment

 
Description We have engaged with farmers and farming organisations to discuss how farmers implement parasite control programmes and identify the barriers to sustainable control of gastro-intestinal nematode infections. Outputs from the project have been delivered to the boards of Sustainable Control of Parasites in Sheep and Control of Worms (in cattle). We presented the outcomes at the British Veterinary Cattle Association Conference in October 2023 and will also present the findings at the upcoming BSAS conference in Belfast, April 2024.
First Year Of Impact 2023
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment
Impact Types Societal

Economic

 
Description collaboration with partner Ewing at BIOSS 
Organisation James Hutton Institute
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution through the ELD1 workshop, established collaboration with Ewing at BIOSS to develop mathematical model for behaviour of gastro-intestinal nematode infection in sheep under differing management and resistance scenarios.
Collaborator Contribution Collaboration between Ewing developing a novel Mathematical model and Williams/Howell bringing biological and parasitological expertise to inform model development.
Impact Manuscript in preparation
Start Year 2022
 
Description Invited presentation to BCVA 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Invited presentation on COWS and parasite control.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description Presentations to the Boards of both SCOPS and COWS 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presented outputs from the project to boards of SCOPS and COWS to feed into policy around knowledge and training for vets, farmers and animal health advisors (SQP/RAMA).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023,2024
 
Description Update revise control advice in COWS technical chapters, including liver and rumen fluke; gastrointestinal nematodes; integrated control programmes and lungworm. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Revision and update of technical chapters of the COWS technical manual - this is an on-line resource for farmers, vets, students, other prescribers and animal health advisors.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
URL https://www.cattleparasites.org.uk