Realigning UK Food Production and Trade for Transition to Healthy and Sustainable Diets
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Reading
Department Name: Sch of Agriculture Policy and Dev
Abstract
Recognition of the enormous costs of ill-health, disease and obesity associated with current UK dietary consumption patterns and the environmental damage inflicted by current food production systems have made the transition to healthy and sustainable diets the key objective of UK food policy for the 21st century. The dietary consumption patterns of all segments of the UK population show large divergences from the UK dietary guidelines for healthy eating, with the poorer sections of the population having the most unhealthy diets. The UK also remains substantially reliant on imports for its food consumption. The transition to healthy and sustainable diets requires a significant shift in consumer preferences and dietary choices that could be induced through a combination of fiscal measures, behavioural, public health, regulatory and supply-side interventions. However, this transition cannot be successfully accomplished without a realignment of UK food production, trade and supply chains consistent with the anticipated shifts in consumer demand and environmental sustainability constraints.
This project directly addresses the two overarching questions posed by the Transforming UK Food Systems programme that relate to (1) the changes in dietary consumption, food production and trade patterns that would be required for a transition to healthy and sustainable diets and (2) the interventions that would be needed across government, business and civil society to deliver this transformed food system. The project takes a food systems approach through a simultaneous consideration of consumption, production, trade and supply chain implications of a transition to healthy and sustainable diets and brings together multidisciplinary expertise encompassing: (1) economic modelling of consumer demand and shifts in consumer preferences (2) dietary pattern analysis (3) derivation of environmental sustainability indicators at food product level (3) partial equilibrium modelling of production and trade incorporating environmental impacts of green house gas (GHG) emissions, land use, water use and soil nutrient balances (4) elicitation of consumer preferences using stated preference techniques (discrete choice experiments) (5) trade policy analysis in the context of current and emerging international and regional trade policy regimes (6) structural changes in the supply and value chains for the agri-food sector and (7) co-design approaches for industry-led initiatives - in designing a coherent policy framework for supporting the transition to healthy and sustainable diets. Our analysis will address the complex policy challenges arising from (1) the need to consider the impact of fiscal measures on consumers' entire food baskets rather than on the consumption of individual food products (2) the distributional (equity) impacts of fiscal measures (3) the potential trade-offs between healthy and sustainable diets (4) the constraints imposed on trade policy measures by the architecture of international and regional trade policy regimes and the need to balance the interests of consumers, domestic producers, importers and trading partners in the implementation of trade policy measures (5) food industry incentives for food product development and marketing strategies that may not support the transition to healthy and sustainable diets (6) the socio-culturally embedded nature of dietary patterns that tend to be slow to change and (7) the very limited avenues for restricting consumer dietary choices in a market economy that respects consumer choice. The project aims to develop a blueprint for a coordinated set of fiscal and trade policy interventions along with structural changes to food supply and value chains and industry-led initiatives for supporting the transition to healthy and sustainable diets.
This project directly addresses the two overarching questions posed by the Transforming UK Food Systems programme that relate to (1) the changes in dietary consumption, food production and trade patterns that would be required for a transition to healthy and sustainable diets and (2) the interventions that would be needed across government, business and civil society to deliver this transformed food system. The project takes a food systems approach through a simultaneous consideration of consumption, production, trade and supply chain implications of a transition to healthy and sustainable diets and brings together multidisciplinary expertise encompassing: (1) economic modelling of consumer demand and shifts in consumer preferences (2) dietary pattern analysis (3) derivation of environmental sustainability indicators at food product level (3) partial equilibrium modelling of production and trade incorporating environmental impacts of green house gas (GHG) emissions, land use, water use and soil nutrient balances (4) elicitation of consumer preferences using stated preference techniques (discrete choice experiments) (5) trade policy analysis in the context of current and emerging international and regional trade policy regimes (6) structural changes in the supply and value chains for the agri-food sector and (7) co-design approaches for industry-led initiatives - in designing a coherent policy framework for supporting the transition to healthy and sustainable diets. Our analysis will address the complex policy challenges arising from (1) the need to consider the impact of fiscal measures on consumers' entire food baskets rather than on the consumption of individual food products (2) the distributional (equity) impacts of fiscal measures (3) the potential trade-offs between healthy and sustainable diets (4) the constraints imposed on trade policy measures by the architecture of international and regional trade policy regimes and the need to balance the interests of consumers, domestic producers, importers and trading partners in the implementation of trade policy measures (5) food industry incentives for food product development and marketing strategies that may not support the transition to healthy and sustainable diets (6) the socio-culturally embedded nature of dietary patterns that tend to be slow to change and (7) the very limited avenues for restricting consumer dietary choices in a market economy that respects consumer choice. The project aims to develop a blueprint for a coordinated set of fiscal and trade policy interventions along with structural changes to food supply and value chains and industry-led initiatives for supporting the transition to healthy and sustainable diets.
Description | Stakeholder Consultation |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | The stakeholder consultation was organised for Work Package 3 of the project which examines the trade policy implications of a transition to healthy and sustainable diets in the UK. The subject matter of the consultation: The consultation reached out to stakeholders to introduce them to the grant-funded project, seeking to reflect on how best to effect change in the UK food system to achieve healthy and sustainable diets. The engagement sought stakeholder participation to co-design and provide initial feedback on the project. This was specifically regarding views concerning the work package on trade-related regulatory levers for securing healthy and sustainable diets. This work package has been led by Professor Chris Hilson at the Law School at the University of Reading, along with Professor Christine Riefa and Associate Professor Kyriaki Noussia. The Stakeholder consultation document WP3 was shared with stakeholders to provide an outline of the project (entitled Realigning UK Food Production and Trade for Transition to Healthy and Sustainable Diets) and the context of the relevant Work Package (WP3) which formed the basis of the communication. Stakeholders were asked to provide input to identify what they see as the key issues for the work package's research topic and what are the gaps that they think we should be addressing (bearing in mind the trade-related scope of the original grant call). There were several specific questions on which we asked for their thoughts (see below questions) or to select particular questions of interest, or to respond with more general observations. Questions: 1. In your opinion, what are the key fiscal and trade policy instruments (broadly conceived) that need to be introduced by the UK Government so as to enable the shift to a HSD? 2. In your opinion, what tariffs, if any, need be applied to unhealthy and unsustainable food imports at the UK border and why? 3. Do you think that measures such as the imposing of 'internal' taxes (e.g. sugar taxes) or subsidies should be introduced and applied to relevant foods sold on the UK market, whether domestically produced or imported? If so, please specify. 4. What regulatory standards (or non-tariff barriers) should be introduced and applied to foods sold on the UK market, both domestically produced and imported, in order to ensure HSD? 5. What role do you see for labelling and reporting requirements in achieving HSD? Are there key gaps here in existing UK policy? 6. What are the trade law implications of both tariffs and non-tariff barriers? What role can and should the UK's trade agreements with other countries play in helping establish HSD (e.g. sustainability, or healthy diet, clauses)? Are there particular WTO concerns? 7. How is food sustainability contested by different interest groups and lobbies? How can such groups be better included in food governance, including trade policy? 8. What are the trade-offs, if any, between healthy diets and sustainable diets? 9. What trade policy measures and interventions (including industry initiatives) are required to align UK trade patterns in agricultural commodities and food so as to have a HSD and an effect on environmental policy and climate change policy? 10. Are trade-related HSD measures helped or hindered by devolved government within the UK? Are there any specific examples you can give of either? 11. Are there any missing questions in relation to trade policy measures (tariff and non-tariff barriers) which need be addressed? Stakeholders consulted: NGOs/charities/campaigners: The Global Alliance for the Future of Food The Food Foundation Sustain Soil Association Feedback Global Sustainable Food Trust Bite Back 2030 Obesity Health Alliance British Nutrition Foundation Proveg International Future Food Movement / Childrens Alliance WWF Future Food Movement Cancer Research UK Jamie Oliver Limited Oak Foundation Share Action Eating Better FAIRR Trade Justice Movement IATP FIAN International Greener UK Friends of the Earth RSPCA Consensus Action on Salt, Sugar and Health Which? The Consumer Association Business/industry trade associations: The Food and Drink Federation National Farmers Union Government Departments, executive agencies and Non-Departmental Public Bodies: DEFRA Department for Business and Trade Trade and Agriculture Commission Natural England Food Standards Agency MPs/Parliament EFRA (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Select Committee 10 MPs were included in the consultation Approaches and responses received: Commencing on 5th October 2023, the contacts listed were approached (via LinkedIn, websites and direct email addresses). The stakeholders were invited to respond by 30 November 2023. This initial contact led to recommendations to approach an additional 9 organisations (all NGOs/charities/campaigners). Each initial approach was followed by at least one, and in most cases, two, response chasers. Please find below the summary of approaches by sector: 24 NGOs/charities/campaigners 8 Government Departments, executive agencies and NDPBs 2 Business/industry trade associations 12 MPs/Parliament 46 Total From the approaches: 4 detailed responses were received from NGOs/charities/campaigners, representing 16.6% of this sector. Non-detailed or information/links to articles were received from a further 7 NGOs/charities/campaigners, representing 29.1% of this sector. 1 response (with no detail or referrals) was received from Business/industry trade associations, representing 50% of this sector. 1 response (with no detail or referrals) was received from Government Departments, executive agencies and NDPBs, representing 12.5% of this sector. 1 response (with no detail or referrals) was received from MPs/Parliament, representing 8.3% of this sector. A total of 14 responses, representing 30% from the combined sectors, were received from the overall stakeholder consultation. Next steps: The responses (in the form of question responses, linked articles, and published papers) are being further researched by the WP3 team. The intention is to host an in-person stakeholder kick-off event, which is scheduled to take place in April/May 2024, involving 20 academics and legal scholars. Towards the end of the project (end date 31 July 2025) around May-June 2025 - we plan to hold an end-of-project online or hybrid workshop/conference to which we will invite all the stakeholders. This will provide an opportunity for the whole team to share the results of the research with a policy, practitioner and academic audience. The event will be sectioned so that relevant stakeholders can attend the parts most relevant to them. In between the start and end of the project, we aim to communicate with various stakeholders directly where relevant but also via social media platforms, in particular LinkedIn (where much of the ag-food and healthy and sustainable diets community have an active presence, and where the Law WP lead Prof Chris Hilson already has many contacts). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |