Future Resilient Transport Networks - FUTURENET

Lead Research Organisation: H R Wallingford Ltd
Department Name: Water Management

Abstract

Much current discussion about transport and climate change focuses on the impact of transport on climate change. Indeed, many mitigation measures are focussed upon the transport change, and many mitigation measures are focussed upon the transport sector. However, FUTURENET recognizes that climate change also has an impact on transport. This impact has two dimensions: an engineering dimension derived from the interaction between climate design, weather events and the physical network, and a socio-economic dimension derived from the interaction between weather and climate and the patterns of transport demand. FUTURENET integrates both in assessing the future resilience of the UK transport system. This interdisciplinary approach will assist stakeholders in adapting the transport network and increasing resilience of critical transport infrastructure. Specifically FUTURENET seeks to develop a number of scenarios for how the transport system in the UK might look in 2050, and will investigate the resilience of each of these scenarios to the effects of climate change. The investigation will be carried out through the five work packagesa) WP1- The development of possible UK transport scenarios for 2050, through detailed literature surveys and the results of a number of expert workshops.b) WP2 - Identification of route corridor for study and development of an inventory of infrastructure that covers the complete range of infrastructure for the chosen route.c) WP3 - Models of the failure modes of transport systems, which will identify existing models and thresholds for the effects of climate on transport systems, and will develop new models where there are gaps in knowledge.d) WP4- Model development and application, which will develop an overarching model framework that will combine the models identified in WP3 with climate change scenarios and the transport scenarios outlined in WP1, to enable the resilience of different types of transport network to be evaluated.e) WP5 - Generic Tools and Dissemination, through which the results of the project will be made available in an accessible form to a wide variety of stakeholders, and the model of WP4 made available for application to other route corridors.FUTURENET brings together a wide variety of academic expertise spanning the engineering, environmental and social sciences, together with a diverse group of stakeholders in the transport industry. It has the potential both to develop a deeper understanding of the underlying science on the effects of climate change on transport systems and to provide information and useful tools on how such systems can be made more resilient.
 
Description Regional water resources and infrastructure Database (WP1):

Through publically available reports and meetings with the different water companies and other stakeholders involved in the project, HR Wallingford has set-up a database of water resources information for the South East region. This database of information includes but is not limited to:

- Surface water and Ground water abstraction locations, licenses, and Deployable Outputs

- Transfer agreements information: locations, volumes and restrictions

- Reservoirs locations and capacities

- Water loses

- Water demands: sectoral demands and returned flows

- Supply demand Balances

- Population & Geological maps







Regional water system model (WP4):

A substantial part of HR Wallingford involvement has been to conceptualised and set up the Regional water system model (RWSM) using an free and open source rule-based water resource management simulation program called IRAS-2010 which has a particular focus on computational efficiency to support large ensemble modelling studies. The philosophy of approach of the model developed has been to:

- Build a model at the water resources zone level with all surface water sources modelled as independent nodes, groundwater sources typically represented as a node per licence and key infrastructure such as reservoirs and inter and intra-company transfers included;

- With a unique network skeleton replicable across the different water resource zones

- And flexible enough to enable future transfers and storage options to be "switched on" for options testing without having to rebuild a model



The model set up includes demands reductions, monthly demand profiles, abstractions and transfers limits, and rivers connectivity. It is made of over 1000 nodes and 1000 links with nearly 50 surface water abstraction points and 360 Ground water license abstractions.



It requires only few seconds to run several decades and outputs a lot of information such as:

- Water demand met of each water resource zone: it is the main indicator of a bad water management as it indicates any water demand not met (frequency and quantity).

- Reservoirs water levels at each time steps: it helps identifying any near shortage of water, or any under-used reservoir

- Transfers quantities and frequencies: We can assess for each transfer, how often it is used, and if there would be an interest to modify the quantity agreed

- 'Hands-off' flow and compensation releases: The frequencies and the durations of environmental flows and compensation released can be obtained







Projections of climate and hydrological changes (WP2).

A high proportion of water sources in the South East region are from groundwater, which is inherently difficult to simulate through physically based simulation models. Furthermore the computational expense of considering groundwater modelling was too high given the large number of sites and length of future time series being considered in the ARCC water project. To be able to assess spatially coherent current and future groundwater yields for input into the regional water resources model a practicable approach to groundwater analysis was needed.

This study adopted a multiple linear regression (MLR) based analysis to create statistical models between groundwater and precipitation between groundwater signature sites representative of different aquifers within the region. A total of 44 signature sites were used in the analysis. Recharge modelling was also undertaken for all sites to provide an alternative to the use of precipitation as recharge also accounts for variations in temperature. The MLR procedure was applied to the recharge data in the same way as precipitation to see whether an improved model could be realised. The statistical model was then used to simulate groundwater levels for an extended baseline time series (extended through resampling) and an extended future time series from UKCP09. The spatially coherent UKCP09 projections (SCPs), which are used to maintain consistency between sites, are available as 11 realisations for each of the low, medium and high emissions scenarios. The time horizon considered were the 2030s, 2050s and 2080s. The final goal of the groundwater modelling was to provide time series of deployable output (DO) for groundwater sources considered to be drought vulnerable by the water companies for input into the regional water resources model. The DO time series were created using a drought curve 'shifting' method with the scaling of groundwater levels at signature borehole sites to source DO based on information made available by the water companies.

An overview of the analysis for each groundwater site is provided in the following steps:

1. Quality check of observed groundwater data and removal of any years which had poor coverage of the groundwater minimum.

2. Derivation of MLR model between annual groundwater minimum and precipitation (and in some cases a lagged groundwater variable).

3. Application of MLR model with the resampled baseline climatology to produce an extended time series of groundwater minima.

4. Application of MLR model with all resampled future climatology (33 - 3 emissions x 11 SCPs) to produce extended future time series of groundwater minima.

5. Derivation of DO time series for each source through analysis of signature borehole with drought curve 'shifting'.
Exploitation Route ARCC-Water work has required close interactions with water companies and could lead to future investigations for them such as building a more localised\detailled model of their area and test the water management strategy of that model on is own and incoporated within the full regional model.



ARCC-Water approach\findings could be used at an event broaden (national ?) scale for an even more global water management strategy. ARCC-Water is of first relevance to water companies and regulators as it demonstrates that a spatially coherent, simulation based model that enables supports scenario and ensemble modelling are possible at a regional model. It opens the door to all sort of decision making analysis studies such as RDM or real options analysis at that level, which was not possible before.
Sectors Environment

 
Description ADB climate change knowledge partnership 
Organisation Asian Development Bank
Department Environment, Climate Change and Disaster Risk Management
Country Philippines 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Providing training in climate change and adaptation
Collaborator Contribution Sharing knowledge
Impact Training Research Dissemination
Start Year 2014
 
Description World Bank Disaster Risk Assessment 
Organisation World Bank Group
Department Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery
Country Unknown 
Sector Multiple 
PI Contribution Developing training in disaster risk assessment including drought risk assessment
Collaborator Contribution Sharing knowledge from around the world
Impact Training of around 70 economists in developed and developing countries
Start Year 2014