Multi-Scale Mathematics for Mitigating Severe Environmental Events

Lead Research Organisation: University of Leeds
Department Name: Applied Mathematics

Abstract

Severe weather, with heavy rainfall and strong winds, has been the cause of recent dramatic land and coastal flooding, and of strong beach and cliff erosion along the British coast. Both the winters of 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 have seen severe environmental disasters in the UK. The prediction of severe rainfall and storms and its use to forecast river flooding and storm surges, as well as coastal erosion, poses a significant challenge. Uncertainties in the prediction of where and how much precipitation will fall, how high storm surges will be and from which direction waves and wind will attack coast lines, lie at the heart of this challenge.

This and other environmental challenges are exacerbated by changing climate and need to be addressed urgently. As the latest IPCC reports confirms, sea level rise and storm intensity combined are very likely to cause more coastal erosion of beaches and cliffs, and of estuaries. However, it is also clear that there remains considerable uncertainty.

To address the challenges posed by the prediction and mitigation of severe environmental events, many scientific and technical issues need to be tackled. These share common elements: phenomena involving a wide range of spatial and temporal scales; interaction between continuous and discrete entities; need to move from deterministic to probabilistic prediction, and from prediction to control; characterisation and sampling of extreme events; merging of models with observations through filtering; model reduction and parameter estimation. They also share a dual need for improved mathematical models and for improved numerical methods adapted to high-performance computer architectures. Since all these aspects are underpinned by mathematics, it is clear that new mathematical methods can make a major contribution to addressing the challenges posed by severe events. To achieve this, it is crucial that mathematicians with the relevant expertise interact closely with environmental scientists and with end-users of environmental research. At present, the UK suffers from limited interactions of this type. We therefore propose to establish a new Network - Maths Foresees - that will forge strong ties between researchers in the applied mathematics community with researchers in selected strategic areas of the environmental science community and governmental agencies.

The activities proposed to reach our objectives include:
(i) three general assemblies,
(ii) three mathematics-with-industry style workshops, in which the stakeholders put forward challenges,
(iii) focussed workshops on mathematical issues,
(iv) outreach projects in which the science developed is demonstrated in an accessible and conceptual way to the general public,
(v) feasibility projects, and
(vi) workshops for user groups to disseminate the network progress to government agencies.

Planned Impact

The central aims of the Network "Maths Foresees" are to exchange knowledge, set up collaborations, stimulate breakthroughs in science and policy and, finally, communicate this clearly to the public. The members in the Network are:
- mathematical scientists;
- environmental scientists with expertise in weather forecasting, hydrology, flood forecasting and urban pollution spreading; as well as
- environmental and risk agencies and companies as stakeholders.

The scientific and technological focus of the Network concerns advanced mathematical techniques and their practical use in local weather (storm, precipitation and fog) forecasting coupled to overland flood forecasting models, coastal flooding and erosion models, as well as urban air pollution spreading. The outcomes will be advances in the following areas: assessment of probabilistic forecasting, multi-scale numerical methods used in coupling weather and hydrological models etc., dispersed multiphase modelling (air and water regarding clouds and precipitation, air and water in breaking waves, water and sediment/grains at beaches, aerosols and urban pollution), mathematical control theory (of floods), and understanding extreme (flooding) events.

The beneficiaries of these advances will be, in order of immediacy of impact:
- environmental researchers, in industry and in universities, whose work relies on mathematical and numerical models;
- environmental agencies and companies which will be able to deliver or exploit better forecasts of severe events, e.g., to design better prevention and adaptation measures;
- decision makers in the public and private sectors, the insurance sector in particular, who will benefit from improved advice;
- the general public, through better protection and information.

Vigorous interactions with the beneficiaries are central to the Network and will be primarily achieved through the close involvement of industrial/public agency stakeholders. The following activities have been designed to drive these interactions and maximise the Network's impact.
- General assemblies will provide an annual overall knowledge exchange between the members (all academics and stakeholders). Our collaborative style of network management will ensure productive interactions between the mathematics and environmental science communities.
- The math-with-industry style workshops give stakeholders explicitly the opportunity to put forward their challenges to the mixed mathematical and environmental academic community. Where practical popular science summaries will involve exemplar applications to real world problems.
- Smaller workshops (10 to 15 people) will be held with a specific mathematical theme.
- Specific user workshops (10 people) will disseminate knowledge and deal with (policy) questions from the stakeholders as the end users through face-to-face communication.
- The findings of the feasibility projects will be promoted through webinars and promoted via the network website.
- Finally, outreach projects will be defined by the members with the aim to reach the general public and demonstrate a proof-of-concept. The interest of two stakeholders (Penine Prospects and the Environment Agency) was specifically kindled by these outreach opportunities (regarding use in high schools and neighbourhood centres). Furthermore, we have discussed the potential to integrate these outreach projects within the Doctoral Training Centres (in Edinburgh, Imperial/Reading, Leeds) that embraced our Network.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The Maths Foresees network launched in May 2015. Within the first nine months we organised the following successful events:
1. General assembly to launch the network held at the University of Leeds in May 2015 (http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/mathsforesees/worksh opleeds2015.html). The event was attended by 40 delegates and included several research talks and two mini-workshops on the themes on convection and rapid inundation modelling.
2. Environmental Modelling in Industry Study Group held at the Turing Gateway to Mathematics, Cambridge, in collaboration with the PURE Network in September 2015. Interim model solutions were found for the following challenges put forward by four different companies/institutes:
(i) Statistical Framework for Utilisation of Modelled Data for Tropical Cyclones (Fugro GEOS);
(ii) Identification of Coherent Weather Features in Three Dimensions (JBA Trust);
(iii) Validating Convective-Scale Rainfall Forecasts and Estimating their Uncertainty (Met Office);
(iv) Convection-Wave Coupling, the Adjustment of a Moist Unstable Column of Air, and their Representation in Numerical Models Dealing with Spatial Rainfall Distribution in Flood Forecasts (Met Office); and,
(v) Dealing with Spatial Rainfall Distribution in Flood Forecasts (Environment Agency).
Online reports, presentations, and recordings can be found at:
http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/mfsg_sep2015-live.shtml

The Maths Foresees network has awarded funding for the following feasibility and outreach projects, and focussed mathematics workshops to seed new research:

FEASIBILITY STUDIES:
- Sergei Lukaschuk (PI) with Victor Shrira on `Laboratory wave tank confirmation of rogue waves on focused currents' (awarded May 2015)
- Jacques Vanneste (PI) with Ruth Doherty and Alexandra Tzella on A multiscale model of urban dispersion (awarded May 2015)
- Colin Cotter (PI) with Alastair Gregory, David Ham and Rob Lamb on `Multilevel Monte Carlo methods for flood risk assessment' (awarded January 2016)
- Andrew Hogg (PI) with Jonty Rougier, Paul Bates, Mark Woodhouse and Rob Lamb on `The effects of topographic uncertainty on flood and debris flow modelling' (awarded January 2016)
- David Dritschel (PI) with Steef Boeing, Doug Parker and Alan Blyth on `A prototype vortex-in-cell algorithm for modelling moist convection' (awarded January 2016)
- Sandhya Patidar (PI) with Heather Haynes, Ji Li (all Heriot-Watt University) and Fiona McLay (SEPA) on 'a stochastic modelling approach for future flood risk modelling' (awarded September 2016, ends March 2017)
- Rebecca Killick (PI) with Suzana Ilic (both Lancaster University) and Iain Gold (Environment Agency) on 'forecasting river levels utilising nonstationarity' (awarded September 2016, ends April 2017)

OUTREACH PROJECTS
- Onno Bokhove (PI) with Robin Gray (Pennine Prospects) and Louise Walker (water@leeds) `Conceptual Table-Top Demonstration of Catchments, River Floods and Flood Mitigation' (awarded May 2015).
- Sara Lombardo (PI) with Matteo Sommacal, Benoit Huard (all Northumbria University) and Carol Davenport (Think Physics) on 'giant waves in the ocean: from sea monsters to science' (awarded September 2016, ends May 2017)

FOCUSSED MATHEMATICS WORKSHOPS
- Alexandra Tzella (PI) with Gavin Esler and Jacques Vanneste on `Mathematics of dispersion in the environment' (awarded May 2015)
- Ian Roulstone (PI) with Matt Turner and Bin Cheng on `Coupling convection and large scale dynamics in numerical weather prediction models' (awarded September 2015)
- Vera Hazelwood (PI) with Helen Dacre and Matt Watson on `Volcanic ash forecasting' (awarded January 2016).
- Sara Lombardo (PI) with Matteo Sommacal (both Northumbria University), Miguel Onorato (University of Turin, Italy), Fabio Baronio (University of Brescia, Italy) and Amin Chabchoub (Aalto University, Finland & University of Tokyo, Japan) on 'the onset of rogue waves' (Northumbria University, Spring 2017 (dates TBC); awarded September 2016)

All subprojects have now been awarded.

See http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/mathsforesees/projects.html for further details.

2019 & 2020 publications and presentations:
1) O.B., Mark Kelmanson, Tom Kent, Giullaume Piton, Jean-Marc Tacnet 2019: Communicating (nature-based) solutions using flood-excess volume for three UK and French river floods. River Research and Applications 35, 1402-1414. Online and open access. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rra.3507
2) O.B., Mark Kelmanson, Tom Kent, Giullaume Piton, Jean-Marc Tacnet 2020: A cost-effectiveness protocol for flood-mitigation plans based on Leeds' Boxing Day 2015 floods Water. In press. O.B., Mark Kelmanson, Tom Kent 2018a: On using flood-excess volume in flood mitigation, exemplified for the River Aire Boxing Day Flood of 2015. 2x rejected evidence-synthesis (ie accessible also to decision-makers) article to Proc. Roy. Soc. A. July 2018 (was actually incorrectly reviewed as a research article, which it is not).
Note that for this work the lead author has been threatened with disciplinary action, thus restricting his intellectual and academic freedom as well as personal freedom. The threat was rather vague ("tone" of some my public media post referring to ArXived paper at https://eartharxiv.org/stc7r/ was undermining a university-stakeholder relation; I double checked recently and the issue is grossly overstated and in essence amount to bullying); in essence, this theat is constraining an open scientificdebate about flood mitigation, and several scientists (Prof Cloke and Prof Falconer) have now underscored the point of contention in public: that Natural Flood Management cannot handle extreme flood events. Spurred on by this threat I have now (Sept 2019 become a dual Dutch-British citizen to take away the threat, perceived by me, either correctly or incorrectly, that somebody could report me to the Home Office, which would have hampered my EU settlement status application.
3) The 2018 publication on the use of beavers as flood protection not being realistic has been rejected so we Arxived it: O.B. Kent, Kelmanson 2018: Using flood-excess volume to show that upscaling beaver dams for protection against extreme floods proves unrealistic.
https://eartharxiv.org/w9evx/
Given the recent public discussion (Andrew Marr show Feb 2020) and the defence by a member of the current government that the use of beaver colonies is important tool in flood mitigation, our comment arguing the opposite with clear and simple numerical examples is still pretty important.
4) On the Wetropolis flood demonstrator initiated in the Maths Foresees network:
a) Submission to HESS/still under public review (revision submitted to): https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-191/
b) Establishment of full and open access GitHub page: https://github.com/obokhove/wetropolis20162020 ; see also the feedback page: https://github.com/obokhove/wetropolis20162020/tree/master/feedback
Point of order is that the extensive outreach provided here is unfunded and not supported much by either university or funding agencies, the latter which in essence talk a lot about outreach but do not seriously support it.
c) Presentation of Wetropolis at Maths of Planet Earth CDT at Imperial College in London from 15-23 February 2020 and public lecture on flooding.
See: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/events/95817/mathematics-of-planet-earth-exhibition/
Exploitation Route Objectives:
1. To forge collaborations between the mathematical sciences and environmental change communities.
2. To facilitate an active exchange of knowledge between the academic mathematical and environmental science communities and environmental stakeholders.
3. To rethink the approach to extreme events analysis in the severe weather events proposed (quantify uncertainty).
4. To promote mathematical modelling of environmental hazards in the wider UK community.
5. To create awareness among the general public of the mathematical and engineering challenges involved in living with environmental change and severe weather hazards, and highlight the key role of mathematics through communication and outreach projects.

The interim solutions found for the study group challenges can be taken forward by the challenge proposers, as well as others who have disseminated our online findings. More detailed progress reports on these solutions are expected shortly.

The initial outcomes of the feasibility and outreach studies and focussed mathematics workshops have been reported at the second general assembly in Edinburgh held at St Leonard's Hall, Edinburgh, 5th-7th September 2016.

The second study group group has been held in Cambridge April 3-6 2017:

The final general assembly was in Leeds, January 2018.
Sectors Aerospace, Defence and Marine,Communities and Social Services/Policy,Education,Energy,Environment,Transport

URL http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/mathsforesees/
 
Description Note that publications a, b, c, 1& 2 are on the science-policy of flooding. Publication a) is in parts an expanded and extended summary of b). Impact case study b) summarises the overall research impact in France, Slovenia and The Netherlands, some outreach in London, and a local 20k pound saving by calling and assisting in a flood evacuation in Kirkstall (Yorkshire 2015 and 2020) based on a developed flood-evacuation plan that subsequently fed into the new science-policy tool. This policy tool was explicitly used in Slovenia and France but not in the UK. 2019 & 2020 & 2021 publications and presentations: a) O. Bokhove 2021: On Communicating Cost-Effectiveness of Flood-Mitigation Schemes. 31st European Safety Reliability Conference (ESREL). conference Angers, France. https://www.rpsonline.com.sg/proceedings/9789811820168/html/134.xml (pdf-link at bottom) b) M.A. Kelmanson & O. Bokhove, T. Kent, T. Hicks 2021: Flood mitigation: from outreach demonstrator to a graphical cost-effectiveness diagnostic tool for policy makers. REF Impact case. To be published in summer of 2022. c) O. Bokhove, M.A. Kelmanson, T. Kent 2020: Evidence entitled A new tool for communicating cost-effectiveness of flood-mitigation schemes for the UK Government Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee inquiry into flooding. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/9641/pdf/ 1) O.B., Mark Kelmanson, Tom Kent, Giullaume Piton, Jean-Marc Tacnet 2019: Communicating (nature-based) solutions using flood-excess volume for three UK and French river floods. River Research and Applications 35, 1402-1414. Online and open access. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rra.3507 Also presented at Coast and Flood 2019 in Telford, in June 2019. 2) O.B., Mark Kelmanson, Tom Kent, Giullaume Piton, Jean-Marc Tacnet 2020: A cost-effectiveness protocol for flood-mitigation plans based on Leeds' Boxing Day 2015 floods Water. In press. O.B., Mark Kelmanson, Tom Kent 2018a: On using flood-excess volume in flood mitigation, exemplified for the River Aire Boxing Day Flood of 2015. 2x rejected evidence-synthesis (ie accessible also to decision-makers) article to Proc. Roy. Soc. A. July 2018 (was actually incorrectly reviewed as a research article, which it is not). Note that for this work led to troubles for the lead author, in essence constraining his academic and personal freedom. Note that several scientists have now underscored the point of contention in public: that Natural Flood Management cannot handle extreme flood events. 3) The 2018 publication on the use of beavers as flood protection not being realistic has been rejected so we Arxived it: O.B. Kent, Kelmanson 2018: Using flood-excess volume to show that upscaling beaver dams for protection against extreme floods proves unrealistic. https://eartharxiv.org/w9evx/ Given the recent public discussion (Andrew Marr show Feb 2020) and the defence by a member of the current government that the use of beaver colonies is important tool in flood mitigation, our comment arguing the opposite with clear and simple numerical examples is still pretty important. 4) On the Wetropolis flood demonstrator initiated in the Maths Foresees network: a) Submission to HESS/still under public review (revision submitted to): https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-191/ b) Establishment of full and open access GitHub page: https://github.com/obokhove/wetropolis20162020 ; see also the feedback page: https://github.com/obokhove/wetropolis20162020/tree/master/feedback Point of order is that the extensive outreach provided here is unfunded and not supported much by either university or funding agencies, the latter which in essence talk a lot about outreach but do not seriously support it. c) Presentation of Wetropolis at Maths of Planet Earth CDT at Imperial College in London from 15-23 February 2020 and public lecture on flooding. See: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/events/95817/mathematics-of-planet-earth-exhibition/ Timeline of events surrounding and leading to the REF2021 Impact Case Study, made public in 2022: * 26-12-2015: While leading the EPSRC Living with Environmental Change (LWEC) network "Maths Foresees" (2015-2018) as PI, Onno Bokhove (OB) called the evacuation and helped evacuate a Kirkstall Crossfit gym during Leeds' 2015 Boxing Day flood. * Dec 2017-May 2018: Studied LCC's publicly-available flood-evacuation plans by inventing and using a new graphical cost-effectiveness tool; analysed plans and found a few inconsistencies/errors, in the end concerning science developed with an international team (three people from UoL/UK; two from France). * June/July 2018: duly reported the team's analysis and reports (none to the public at that time) to LCC, their consultant, member of national EA, head of Leeds' executive board; there was essential no reaction and no interest (except a few remarks from the national EA). * July 2018: the team decided to place and did place all reports online in public science archives prior to submission to journals, during which time the French collaborators came onboard with a new river-flood test case of the cost-effectiveness tool. * Oct 2018: referred to the team's main report in the comment (at the bottom of): https://westleedsdispatch.com/government-flood-defence-proposals-kick-in-teeth-for-kirkstall/ * Oct 2018: OB was warned that a member of LCC and a member of UoL had issued written complaints against OB (based on the post/comment found in the above link); OB was not allowed to see the two complaints; was advised to keep a low profile and first publish everything; it was said that when such complaints reach UM that may/would lead to disciplinary action or worse. * 2019: Confirmed in writing (email) that when these 2018 complaints would reach UM "this sort of thing" could lead to disciplinary action. * 2018-2020: The scientific team takes care that two of the archived reports become two published and peer-reviewed papers in international scientific journals, and that it becomes accepted evidence in a 2020 UK Government inquiry on flooding. * 2018-2019: The novel cost-effectiveness tool from the archived reports is used in an EU network and in EU municipalities in France and Slovenia, but (to date as of March 2023) not in the UK. * 2020: OB's bespoke flood-evacuation plan of 2015 was used again by the gym and nearby businesses [in 2020]; it saved 20.000 pounds in gym equipment in 2015; vice versa, data and photographs from both the Boxing Day 2015 flood and the Storm Ciara flood in 2020 have been used as evidence in our scientific papers. * 2021/2022: Flood Impact Case Study based on all work on flooding for REF2021 submitted and deemed internally worth at least level 3 (out of 4 with 4 as top score). * 2020 Sept: OB asked HR to either a) inform UM of OB's bad actions and punish OB for the team's work and OB's posting, as well as explain why (i.e. enforce the threat of disciplinary action); or, b) in writing state that there is no reason to punish OB or the team and state why, and that their is no threat of disciplinary action based on the teams' flooding research or public postings thereon. * Late 2020: OB put in a data request to see the factual complaints of 2018 by LCC and the UoL academic: OB received these; the five statements therein are either incorrect, subjective or unsubstantiated; it turns out that these complaints were statements both against OB's actions and against the scientific work done by the scientific team. * Late 2020: put in a data request on HR's investigation of the social media posts, an investigation triggered by the 2018 complaints; received that information: investigation had been undertaken and concluded in essence that OB was critical but that there was nothing illegal done by OB. * Early 2021: wrote and submitted an official yet informal counter-complaint to HR rebutting the five false statements in the 2018 complaints and asked several questions on the actions that ensued from these five statements. OB did not, to date (March 2023), receive a reaction on this written counter-complaint. In 2022, OB finds out that informal complaints are supposed to be dealt with in a formal and written manner; see page 23 of UoL's dignity-and-mutual-respect (DMR) document. * Sept 2020 to late 2021: verbal conversations take place with several people, including HR; no notes were ever provided or offered, or allowed, of these conversations. In 2022, OB finds out that such informal complaints are supposed to be dealt with in a formal way; see page 23 of UoL's dignity-and-mutual-respect (DMR) document. OB should have received notes of each conversation to be countersigned by the parties involved. OB receives a written statement: (UoL does) "not want to put strain on the relation between UoL and LCC"; it is unclear whether that statement means that pointing out inconsistencies in LCC plans is unwanted and, if so, how such a policy of withholding evidence on inconsistencies in public plans is in agreement with "University's commitment to improving research quality, transparency and reproducibility" -see below? * Call in UCU in summer 2021 [upon advice] to achieve two things: (i) get in writing that the team is not under any threat of disciplinary action; and, (ii) find out what happened with the informal and written counter-complaint. Re: (i) OB receives that email late 2021. Re: (ii) Unresolved. * In emails late 2021, it was stated that if OB was unhappy about the handling of OB's complaints or the team's issues, then one should submit a formal complaint to the UoL HR director. * July 2022: OB submitted two formal complaints to the UoL HR-director with: Complaint-I: A request to get notes of all conversations on the informal complaints following the UoL DMR document page 23 (including the remark that OB had requested such notes from the faculty HR person, referring to page 23 of DMR document as a formal UoL code of conduct, to which request OB never got a response; even though OB had sent along draft notes of those meetings); it was also noted formally that complaint-I takes precedence over complaint-II. Complaint-II: Restore trust after the mistrust created due to the breaching of procedures. * August 2022: OB asked for a formal acknowledgement of receipt by the director of HR of the formal complaint, which was received. * 14-03-2023: to date there has been no communication on the formal complaint as far as OB is aware. In 2021/2022, OB has spoken circa five times with a staff member of UoL's mental health service; a conclusion was that documents such as the DMR (dignity-and-mutual-respect) document and formal complaint procedures are documents and procedures of intent, if that. These are confidential conversations, but the impression is that OB is handling matters reasonably well with an eye on one's mental health and ability to perform tasks on the primary processes at a university: upholding standards of teaching and research. Regret was expressed that quite a bit of sleep was lost on these matters over the last four years. A question remains: do we work in safe research research environment in Leeds, or in the UK, or not? Can someone please explain, in general and to the (academic) public at large, how the above series of events are in accordance with: the principle of academic freedom, openness to scrutiny and accountability as laid out in LCC's code of conduct, the principles of open research and commitment therein as, e.g., laid out in the UK Reproducibility network (UKRN), in particular "Joining UKRN represents another clear example of the University's commitment to improving research quality, transparency and reproducibility", etc., please? Finally and most importantly, how does the above and seeming lack of willingness to be open to scrutiny and transparency aid in improving UK's flood-mitigation schemes, especially with an eye on the expected and predicted increased chances of flooding due to climate change? Bokhove, Kelmanson, Hicks, Kent 2021/2022: UK Research Excellence Framework (REF2021) Impact Case Study "Flood mitigation: from outreach demonstrator to a graphical cost-effectiveness diagnostic for policy makers". https://results2021.ref.ac.uk/impact/0ad7c1be-8e91-4aac-ab57-6c1e873cd3f1?page=1&fbclid=IwAR0l2_YmgcmEUWvgHwyMR0WyxJsaL3qM7L92fZ-qFkjzq_-JEAyDDnSTqbw
First Year Of Impact 2015
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Education,Environment,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Societal,Policy & public services

 
Description Evidence entitled A new tool for communicating cost-effectiveness of flood-mitigation schemes for the UK Government Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee inquiry into flooding
Geographic Reach Europe 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
Impact See the actual evidence.
URL https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/9641/pdf/
 
Description Network Stakeholder Fugro GEOS 
Organisation Fugro
Country Netherlands 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution We have solved an industry challenge set by Fugro GEOS at our study group in September 2015.
Collaborator Contribution Research presentations have been provided by Fugro GEOS at our general assemblies.
Impact See above. Furthermore, Furgro GEOS is involved in several feasibility projects.
Start Year 2015
 
Description Network Stakeholder JBA Trust 
Organisation JBA Trust
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution We have produced an outreach project (Wetropolis) with JBA Trust, and exchanged research presentations. We have also provided solutions to two study group challenges posed by JBA Trust in September 2015 and April 2017. See http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/event/tgmw26 and http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/event/tgmw41.
Collaborator Contribution JBA Trust have given presentations at each of our three general assemblies, provided two industrial challenges for our maths-with-industry study groups and supported the design of the second version of our outreach project Wetropolis.
Impact See above. Furthermore, JBA Trust is involved in several feasibility projects.
Start Year 2015
 
Description Network Stakeholder: Environment Agency 
Organisation Environment Agency
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Public 
PI Contribution We provided solutions to six study group challenges set by the Environment Agency (EA) at our two Environmental Modelling in Industry study groups held at the Isaac Newton Institute in Cambridge in September 2015 and April 2017. See http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/tgmw41.shtml and http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/event/tgmw26.
Collaborator Contribution We have exchanged research presentations with the EA on a number of occasions including at our three general assemblies in 2015, 2016 and 2018. The EA provided us with the research challenges for the study groups described above.
Impact See above. Furthermore, EA is involved in several feasibility projects.
Start Year 2015
 
Description Network stakeholder: Met Office 
Organisation Meteorological Office UK
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution We have exchanged research presentations with the Met Office and discussed various challenges in person and via email. Furthermore a team of network members found interim solutions to Met Office study group challenges at our two Environmental Modelling in Industry study groups at the INI Cambridge; see http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/event/tgmw26 and http://www.turing-gateway.cam.ac.uk/event/tgmw41.
Collaborator Contribution The Met Office has contributed via the input of a study group challenges in September 2015 and April 2017, by giving presentations at each of our three general assemblies, and through involvement in a feasibility study.
Impact See above. The Met Office is involved in a feasibility project.
Start Year 2015
 
Description Network stakeholder: Pennine Prospects 
Organisation Pennine Prospects
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution We have exchanged information at two general assemblies in Leeds (May 2015 and January 2018) and via email.
Collaborator Contribution Pennine Prospects supported one of our outreach projects (Wetropolis), particularly at the design stage.
Impact We gave a presentation, entitled 'Managing risk in an age of extremes', at a public event organised by Pennine Prospects (The Science of Floods, May 2016).
Start Year 2015
 
Description Demonstration of Wetropolis Flood demonstrator at Leeds Army Museum Boxing Day Flood Exhibition 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Demonstrating Wetropolis flood demonstrator to the general; public; showing the general public what an extreme rainfall and flooding event is. Reinvented for March 26th 2017.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL http://multi-story-shipley.co.uk/?p=1830
 
Description Outreach project led by Dr Sara Lombardo 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Mathematician Sara Lombardo (Northumbria University) and artist Gloria Ronchi joined forces to explore the concept of creativity both in science and art and to find out how these two disciplines influence each other. The workshop "Giant waves in the ocean: from sea monsters to science" focused on mathematical challenges coming from extreme environments and environmental hazards, in particular it explores the concepts of waves and extreme waves (also called rogue waves) and how they attracted recently the interest of scientists after being a piece of maritime folklore, a sailor's legend, for centuries.

Sara and Gloria, supported by NUSTEM engagement experts, took this workshop to a number of schools in the North East to inform and educate young people and members of the public around the theme of nonlinear science, nonlinear waves in particular promoting mathematical modelling of environmental hazards (such as rogue waves) in the wider UK community.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://nustem.uk/giantwaves/
 
Description Presentation at Science of Floods public event 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact The event comprised a series of talks from local residents of Hebden Bridge, researchers, volunteers and industry partners including JBA. A report from the event is available at https://www.pennineprospects.co.uk/news/the-science-of-floods.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL https://www.pennineprospects.co.uk/news/the-science-of-floods
 
Description Risk assessment in the age of extremes; presentation and live demonstration of flood demonstrator Wetropolis. 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Risk assessment in the age of extremes; presentation and live demonstration of the Wetropolis Flood Demonstrator by Valerie Zwart, Toom Kent and Onno Bokhove at the Flood Conference by Churchtown Flood Action Group; Jan. 28th 2017.
In the presentation I considered the following questions:
- Who am I? My background as applied mathematician.
- Is it going to rain more in the future?
- Can we define extreme precipitation & flooding events?
- How (well) can we predict heavy precipitation & floods?
- How (well) can we mitigate and control flooding?
- Can we visualise the above in an interactive, conceptual table-top flood demonstrator?
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://www.facebook.com/Churchtown.flood.action.group/
 
Description Showcasing of Wetropolis flood demonstrator at Mathematics of Planet Earth Exhibition 15-02 to 23-02 2020 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Mathematics of Planet Earth Exhibition 15-02 to 23-02 2020
About 1000 people attended.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL http://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/195539/planet-earth-alive-using-mathematics-understand/