Towards a legally-compliant Internet of Things
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Cambridge
Department Name: Computer Science and Technology
Abstract
This project is to forge new directions towards the important, but largely unexplored challenge of aligning the Internet of Things (IoT) with legal and regulatory realities.
The broad vision of the IoT is where the physical world comes online. It entails sensors and actuators seamlessly integrated with virtual services, as part of a wide-scale, potentially global systems infrastructure that dynamically reacts and responds to meet various goals.
This vision has captured mainstream imagination. The connected infrastructure, a large-scale distributed system, enables a potentially limitless range of applications, which can be customised to individuals, groups and organisations, in areas including cities, retail, energy, health and lifestyle, transport and agriculture.
However, with this vision comes legal, regulatory and social challenges. The scale and physical nature of this emerging systems environment involves sensors generating data on many detailed aspects of the world, much of it (potentially) highly personal or otherwise sensitive, and where actuation capabilities give systems a real, physical-world effect.
As such, IoT (and more generally, ICT) applications, systems and services are increasingly subject to law and visible to regulators, while consumers, businesses and governments are beginning to demand more transparency and agency. Having the means for managing the associated risks, responsibilities, and obligations of the IoT is crucial for realising its potential, and the significant economic and social benefits it promises.
This project directly targets these issues, by taking an interdisciplinary (tech-legal) approach towards legally-compliant distributed systems. The aim is to develop the conceptual frameworks for considering tech-legal compliance issues as well as the technical means for enabling systems (and therefore, those responsible) to comply with legal and regulatory obligations. By facilitating compliance, we work to improve agency, trust and accountability in the IoT, as well as reducing the overheads of compliance.
As the IoT is data driven, the specific focus is on data flow management. We seek to improve the *control* and *visibility* of data as it moves throughout the IoT, in line with data management policy, reflecting legal obligations. This is so that those who have rights over data (including end-users), and those responsible for data (including service providers), are able to ensure their requirements and obligations are met, even as data moves `out of their hands'.
This entails investigating how law and regulation, reflecting responsibilities and obligations, and personal preferences, can be embodied in policy, which technical mechanisms enforce end-to-end, system-wide. This includes auditing policy enforcement, to assist in demonstrating compliance, apportioning liability and indicating whether policy adequately captures legal responsibilities. This also entails the development of legal-technical frameworks that provide the methodology for investigating, enumerating and aligning compliance concerns across the disciplines, and identifying the mismatches between law and technology.
Addressing such challenges requires an interdisciplinary approach. This project embodies a technical/legal symbiosis: work on the technical mechanisms for system-wide control and audit will be driven by legal and regulatory realities, and at the same time, we consider how the technical work impacts the emerging liability and policy concerns arising from the physical and increasingly pervasive and intrusive nature of the IoT.
In undertaking this work, we seek to build the foundations for a broader area of multidisciplinary research concerning legally compliant systems.
The broad vision of the IoT is where the physical world comes online. It entails sensors and actuators seamlessly integrated with virtual services, as part of a wide-scale, potentially global systems infrastructure that dynamically reacts and responds to meet various goals.
This vision has captured mainstream imagination. The connected infrastructure, a large-scale distributed system, enables a potentially limitless range of applications, which can be customised to individuals, groups and organisations, in areas including cities, retail, energy, health and lifestyle, transport and agriculture.
However, with this vision comes legal, regulatory and social challenges. The scale and physical nature of this emerging systems environment involves sensors generating data on many detailed aspects of the world, much of it (potentially) highly personal or otherwise sensitive, and where actuation capabilities give systems a real, physical-world effect.
As such, IoT (and more generally, ICT) applications, systems and services are increasingly subject to law and visible to regulators, while consumers, businesses and governments are beginning to demand more transparency and agency. Having the means for managing the associated risks, responsibilities, and obligations of the IoT is crucial for realising its potential, and the significant economic and social benefits it promises.
This project directly targets these issues, by taking an interdisciplinary (tech-legal) approach towards legally-compliant distributed systems. The aim is to develop the conceptual frameworks for considering tech-legal compliance issues as well as the technical means for enabling systems (and therefore, those responsible) to comply with legal and regulatory obligations. By facilitating compliance, we work to improve agency, trust and accountability in the IoT, as well as reducing the overheads of compliance.
As the IoT is data driven, the specific focus is on data flow management. We seek to improve the *control* and *visibility* of data as it moves throughout the IoT, in line with data management policy, reflecting legal obligations. This is so that those who have rights over data (including end-users), and those responsible for data (including service providers), are able to ensure their requirements and obligations are met, even as data moves `out of their hands'.
This entails investigating how law and regulation, reflecting responsibilities and obligations, and personal preferences, can be embodied in policy, which technical mechanisms enforce end-to-end, system-wide. This includes auditing policy enforcement, to assist in demonstrating compliance, apportioning liability and indicating whether policy adequately captures legal responsibilities. This also entails the development of legal-technical frameworks that provide the methodology for investigating, enumerating and aligning compliance concerns across the disciplines, and identifying the mismatches between law and technology.
Addressing such challenges requires an interdisciplinary approach. This project embodies a technical/legal symbiosis: work on the technical mechanisms for system-wide control and audit will be driven by legal and regulatory realities, and at the same time, we consider how the technical work impacts the emerging liability and policy concerns arising from the physical and increasingly pervasive and intrusive nature of the IoT.
In undertaking this work, we seek to build the foundations for a broader area of multidisciplinary research concerning legally compliant systems.
Planned Impact
The IoT is seen by many as the next digital revolution, offering enormous promise to transform society and drive considerable economic growth. The UK Government's Blackett review makes clear the importance of the IoT to the nation, and the potential for the UK to become a world leader in the area. However, significant challenges remain in the path of realising this vision.
This project directly aims at such concerns. By taking a multidisciplinary approach to progress towards a legally-compliant IoT, the goal is to improve levels agency, trust and accountability in the IoT, while fostering innovation through better means for risk mitigation and obligation management.
As such, there is much potential for this work to have significant impact, in a range of areas, to various communities, including:
* Academics - This work will build the foundations for establishing the area of interdisciplinary research on legally-compliant systems, through a range of activities and outputs that better align the technical and legal disciplines. This will ensure that legal developments are technologically aware, and vice-versa. Moreover, this will help drive and consolidate progress on other areas of compliance beyond data management, such as general system availability and reliability.
* Public policy/government - As the IoT matures, a number of societal challenges will arise and require response. This work will provide the means for clarifying technical and legal horizons, and provide the methodologies and results for aligning the disciplines, to ensure that legal and socio-political developments are technology-aware, realistic, socially desirable, and enforceable, and that challenges can be anticipated and addressed with sensitivity.
* The IoT market - The IoT marketplace is evolving. Providing vendors with tools for facilitating compliance with legal obligations will significantly benefit commercial activities in the IoT space, by mitigating risk and liability exposure, while reducing the risks and concerns associated with data sharing. Our work will help shape the direction of the industry, where greater levels of trust and assurance will help encourage innovation.
* UK companies - From the IoT (business) user perspective, issues of compliance and data management represent barriers to adoption. Again, providing the means for better managing compliance and obligations will encourage general technology uptake (both by firms and end-users), thereby improving efficiency and fostering innovation.
* Data researchers/scientists - Big data is driving much academic and industrial research. Improved data management regimes, that entail more compliant systems, assist analytics processes by creating further mechanisms for control beyond the traditional focus on consent and application-specific access controls. This helps mitigate risks and encourage innovation.
* General public - Issues of agency, trust and accountability pervade the IoT. This project directly aims at these concerns, as compliance entails the means for managing rights, bringing transparency and control. As a result, this work will lead to more empowered users - crucial to the evolving digital society.
This project directly aims at such concerns. By taking a multidisciplinary approach to progress towards a legally-compliant IoT, the goal is to improve levels agency, trust and accountability in the IoT, while fostering innovation through better means for risk mitigation and obligation management.
As such, there is much potential for this work to have significant impact, in a range of areas, to various communities, including:
* Academics - This work will build the foundations for establishing the area of interdisciplinary research on legally-compliant systems, through a range of activities and outputs that better align the technical and legal disciplines. This will ensure that legal developments are technologically aware, and vice-versa. Moreover, this will help drive and consolidate progress on other areas of compliance beyond data management, such as general system availability and reliability.
* Public policy/government - As the IoT matures, a number of societal challenges will arise and require response. This work will provide the means for clarifying technical and legal horizons, and provide the methodologies and results for aligning the disciplines, to ensure that legal and socio-political developments are technology-aware, realistic, socially desirable, and enforceable, and that challenges can be anticipated and addressed with sensitivity.
* The IoT market - The IoT marketplace is evolving. Providing vendors with tools for facilitating compliance with legal obligations will significantly benefit commercial activities in the IoT space, by mitigating risk and liability exposure, while reducing the risks and concerns associated with data sharing. Our work will help shape the direction of the industry, where greater levels of trust and assurance will help encourage innovation.
* UK companies - From the IoT (business) user perspective, issues of compliance and data management represent barriers to adoption. Again, providing the means for better managing compliance and obligations will encourage general technology uptake (both by firms and end-users), thereby improving efficiency and fostering innovation.
* Data researchers/scientists - Big data is driving much academic and industrial research. Improved data management regimes, that entail more compliant systems, assist analytics processes by creating further mechanisms for control beyond the traditional focus on consent and application-specific access controls. This helps mitigate risks and encourage innovation.
* General public - Issues of agency, trust and accountability pervade the IoT. This project directly aims at these concerns, as compliance entails the means for managing rights, bringing transparency and control. As a result, this work will lead to more empowered users - crucial to the evolving digital society.
Publications
Ball-Burack A
(2021)
Differential Tweetment
Cloete R
(2021)
Auditable Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality The Practicalities of Mobile System Transparency
in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Cloete R
(2020)
A Call for Auditable Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality
Cobbe J
(2019)
Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and Principles
in SSRN Electronic Journal
Cobbe J
(2021)
Artificial intelligence as a service: Legal responsibilities, liabilities, and policy challenges
in Computer Law & Security Review
Cobbe J
(2021)
Reviewable Automated Decision-Making
Cobbe J
(2020)
What lies beneath: transparency in online service supply chains
in Journal of Cyber Policy
Cobbe J
(2020)
Reviewable Automated Decision-Making
in Computer Law & Security Review
Cobbe J
(2019)
Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and Principles
in European Journal of Law and Technology
Description | Provided interdisciplinary (tech-legal) evidence and ways forward for considering and taking a socio-technical, systems-oriented approach to governing emerging technologies. |
Exploitation Route | Indicating the need for multi-disciplinary approaches to tech governance challenges; providing practical methods and tools for managing obligations; highlighting grounded analysis/evidence-based background for sound policy interventions. |
Sectors | Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Government, Democracy and Justice |
URL | http://www.compacctsys.net |
Description | We have been frequently influencing various policy discussions (through engaging policy makers, being cited in policy documents and whitepapres, responding to calls for evidence, etc), and generally, drawing greater attention on the need for interdisciplinary approaches on tech-legal issues. We're also having impact in terms of technical outputs and our work is being increasingly recognised given the increasing public awareness of the issues of technology and society. |
Sector | Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Government, Democracy and Justice |
Impact Types | Societal,Economic,Policy & public services |
Description | Association for International Privacy Professionals - Advisory Board (Privacy Engineering) |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Impact | Association for International Privacy Professionals - Advisory Board (Privacy Engineering) |
Description | Cited in EU Consumer Organisation Report |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Description | Cited in EU Parliament assessment |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in systematic reviews |
Description | Cited in Global Partnership on AI report |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Cited in NSW Ombudsman Report - |
Geographic Reach | Australia |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Description | Cited in UN IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility report |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Description | Cited in WEF report Advancing Digital Safety: |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Description | Cobbe on UK Government's External Advisory Group on Smart Cities and Connected Places |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Membership of a guideline committee |
Description | DCMS workshop on online disinformation and harms |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Impact | Was providing guidance to a DCMS white paper |
URL | https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/digital-culture-media-an... |
Description | DCMS workshop re funding research into online disinformation and manipulation |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Membership of a guideline committee |
Description | EU-US Tech & Trade Council Working Group |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Description | Expert evidence for regulating AI/algs |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Description | Financial Conduct Authority - Academic Advisory Council |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Membership of a guideline committee |
Description | Janssen cited in EU Report on AI and Fundamental Rights |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
URL | https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2020/artificial-intelligence-and-fundamental-rights |
Description | Oral and written evidence for House of Lords Committee (Democracy and Digital Technology) |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
URL | https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/1634/documents/17731/default/ |
Description | Paper incorporated into NSW Ombudsman report |
Geographic Reach | Australia |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Impact | Informed guidance documents for the deployment of systems relating to public administration |
Description | Provided input to DCMS Call for Evidence on Secure by Design - regulating the consumer Internet of Things |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
Impact | Gave a series of recommendations for proposed policy on regulating the consumer IoT |
Description | Ran 2x training seminars for the Information Privacy Comissioner |
Geographic Reach | Australia |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Impact | Two training sessions to highlight educate the regulator's staff on current and emerging issues regarding digital rights, accountability and governance related to data and emerging tech (e.g. AI) |
Description | Technology & Law MPhil Course |
Geographic Reach | Local/Municipal/Regional |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Impact | Developed a course for MPhil level computer scientists to equip them with the policy and regulatory considerations surrounding the technologies they build. |
Description | Training for Information & Privacy Commissioner NSW |
Geographic Reach | Australia |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Impact | Helped skill staff to think about the way data-driven public services are automated and scrutinised |
Description | Two papers cited by EU assessment report re the proposed Digital Services Act |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
Impact | Our papers were cited in a report that seeks to shape and change the directions of the proposed EU Digital Services Act |
URL | https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=72160 |
Description | Two papers cited in HoL Select Committee on Democracy and Digital Technologies Report: Digital Technology and the Resurrection of Trust |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Citation in other policy documents |
URL | https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/1634/documents/17731/default/ |
Description | Aviva PhD Studentship |
Amount | £183,374 (GBP) |
Organisation | Aviva |
Sector | Private |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 10/2019 |
End | 09/2022 |
Description | INCLUsive Digital Economy Network+: INCLUDE+ |
Amount | £2,650,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | EP/W020548/1 |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2022 |
End | 09/2027 |
Description | Internet of Stings: Data flow auditing for compliance in the consumer Internet of Things |
Amount | £79,083 (GBP) |
Organisation | Information Commissioner's Office |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 10/2021 |
End | 01/2023 |
Description | Realising Accountable Intelligent Systems (RAInS) |
Amount | £1,108,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | EP/R033501/1 |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2019 |
End | 04/2021 |
Description | Trust and Technology Strategic Research Initiative |
Amount | £150,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | University of Cambridge |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2017 |
End | 12/2020 |
Description | Alan Turing Institute |
Organisation | Alan Turing Institute |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Collaborated with the ATI on two projects - one exploring issues of Data Justice for the Global Partnership on AI; another on issues of Data Sharing for Tackling Modern Slavery for the Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy Exchange Centre This will now extend to helping develop the Turing's new programme looking at technology and human rights |
Collaborator Contribution | Contributed to research undertakings and research outputs |
Impact | Various outputs in terms of literature reviews, reports, stakeholder analyses, papers, research tools, and so on. A multidisciplinary undertaking across various disciplines. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Title | Droiditor: Auditing toolkit for Android Extended Reality |
Description | Drioditor is an Android-based open-source software tool that concerns the auditing of augmented, virtual and mixed reality sysetms. Droiditor enables the passive capture of data relevant to audit, which is flexible and customisable, thus supporting investigation for a range of scenarios (situations of failure, development, etc.). |
Type Of Technology | Software |
Year Produced | 2021 |
Open Source License? | Yes |
Impact | Raised awareness of the need for XR audit, particularly given the growing consciousness around the metaverse |
Title | Technical infrastructure for data trusts/intermediaries |
Description | The software provides flexible open-source software infrastructure designed to support the deployment of various data intermediary (data trusts, collectives, cooperatives, etc). |
Type Of Technology | Software |
Year Produced | 2022 |
Open Source License? | Yes |
Impact | Helps conceptualise and make concrete the more abstract discussion in the space. |
Description | Article in Guardian: Behind Cambridge Analytica lay a bigger threat to our democracy: Facebook |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Media (as a channel to the public) |
Results and Impact | Cobbe invited to write op-ed for Guardian: Behind Cambridge Analytica lay a bigger threat to our democracy: Facebook |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
Description | Convened a panel on Privacy Enhancing Technologies and AI at the Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference in Brussels |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Hosted a panel on Privacy Enhancing Technologies for a policy maker, academic, industry and civil society forum |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
URL | https://www.cpdpconferences.org/cpdp-panels/privacy-enhancing-technologies-and-ai |
Description | Covenened a workshop on business-to-data sharing |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | A workshop about the legal framework as regards B2G data sharing between companies and local government for a study she conducted commissioned by the municipality of Amsterdam |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Cyber 9/12: Atlantic Council hosted student cyber-security challenge |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Mentor for a student team for a cyber-security challenge, aimed at policy issues around cyber security. Our team placed first. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
URL | https://www.cyber912uk.org/en/ |
Description | Discussant on the Encrypted Economy podcast |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Podcast epsiode 61: Building the Human Network Into the Law - J Cobbe and H Janssen both as discussants as part of the broader podcast, having our research reach a broad audience |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Ditchley Foundation |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Involved various workshops at the Ditchley site to explore various tech-society issues |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
URL | https://www.ditchley.com/ |
Description | Forum for Ethical AI - RSA/Deepmind Citizen Jury |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Invited as an expert panelist for a citizens jury on ethical AI issues |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | Interview by FT on Personal Data Stores |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Dr Heleen Janssen interviewed by the FT about PDS (Jan 2019) |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | Interview/quote/commentary for Wired |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | ''Menswear Guy' Marks a Shift in Twitter's Main Characters', Wired, January 2023 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
URL | https://www.wired.co.uk/article/menswear-guy-twitter-main-character-shift |
Description | Janssen wrote op-ed for Dutch newspaper: De Volkskrant |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Janssen wrote an Op-ed in De Volkskrant, "Personal data stores will not solve issues with big data". |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | PRIVACY PROHIBITION |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A roundtable public debate around issues of privacy. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | Participating on Panels at CPDP |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Cobbe presented on CPDP panels both years on issues of Automated and Algorithmic Decision Making (2020/2021); Janssen presented on regulating tech (2020) |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020,2021 |
Description | Presentation part of "Tech solutionism in tackling Covid-19" panel, at Digital Identity and the Digital Person (industry event) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Janssen, speaker at Hub of All Things/Dataswift conference "Digital Identity and the Digital Person", on Tech solutionism in tackling Covid-19, September 2020 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
Description | Public Trust in Future Cities (Heleen) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Discussion on the use of sensing technologies and AI to collect data about people's activities; Heleen (RA) was an invited discussant and covered issues of private actors developing technologies that public bodies account for. Organised by Future Cities and Digital Catapults. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | Quote for New Scientist |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Interview/quote in 'Elon Musk buying Twitter has set him up for a scuffle with the EU', New Scientist, April 2022 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Session on Algorithmic Impact Assessement @ European Digital Rights (ERDi)'s Privacy Camp 2020 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Third sector organisations |
Results and Impact | Janssen featured in a panel on algorithmic impact assessments |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
Description | Talking Politics - appearance on two podcasts |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Appeared on three episodes of Talking Politics - one on surveillance capitalism, one on machine learning and the IoT, one on tech democracy |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018,2019,2020 |
URL | https://www.talkingpoliticspodcast.com/ |
Description | Workshop with Liberty on personal data in online services |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Third sector organisations |
Results and Impact | A presentation and discussion at Liberty (NGO) on issues of personal data and online services |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |