SEXRATIO - Natural Sex Ratios at Birth and Missing Women: New Evidence and Implications
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Oxford
Department Name: Population Health
Abstract
Explaining variation in sex-ratios at birth (SRBs) has been a fascination of social scientists since the 1600s. It is also a priority for policy makers, as changes in SRBs often indicate sex-selective abortion and discrimination against women and girls. Over the past 50 years, a general consensus among demographers has emerged, that sex ratios at birth are mostly constant at 105 male births per 100 females across groups, with only small variations by race or ethnicity. Recently however, a new biological literature suggests that maternal condition may induce male conceptions to be lost at higher rates. These two literatures are in direct contradiction to each other, as the biological literature suggests that chronic indicators of maternal stress should be associated with heterogeneous SRBs, which is generally not found in large population datasets.
This project proposes a novel explanation for this contradiction. Specifically, the PI documents that all previous analyses fail to properly control for time-invariant heterogeneity in maternal condition, and develops a new methodology to do so. Once implemented, the PI demonstrates that this new methodology confirms that maternal condition changes of SRBs, challenging the scientific consensus on the constancy of SRBs and reconciling the contradictory findings of these literatures.
This project has three main goals. In Project 1, the PI seeks to investigate these preliminary findings across various countries and settings, thereby establishing a new scientific consensus on the effect of socioeconomic status on SRBs. Project 2 utilizes the new methodology to refine global estimates of the number of missing women by providing new country-level estimates. In Project 3, we seek to reconcile various long-standing puzzles in the literature on SRBs, socioeconomic factors, and maternal stress, including changing sex ratios during and after wars, economic downturns, and across racial groups.
This project proposes a novel explanation for this contradiction. Specifically, the PI documents that all previous analyses fail to properly control for time-invariant heterogeneity in maternal condition, and develops a new methodology to do so. Once implemented, the PI demonstrates that this new methodology confirms that maternal condition changes of SRBs, challenging the scientific consensus on the constancy of SRBs and reconciling the contradictory findings of these literatures.
This project has three main goals. In Project 1, the PI seeks to investigate these preliminary findings across various countries and settings, thereby establishing a new scientific consensus on the effect of socioeconomic status on SRBs. Project 2 utilizes the new methodology to refine global estimates of the number of missing women by providing new country-level estimates. In Project 3, we seek to reconcile various long-standing puzzles in the literature on SRBs, socioeconomic factors, and maternal stress, including changing sex ratios during and after wars, economic downturns, and across racial groups.
