New Political Spaces? Enhancing the Legitimacy of Delegated Agencies

Lead Research Organisation: University of Sheffield
Department Name: Politics

Abstract

This research project will examine how to improve the legitimacy of delegated agencies. Examples of delegated agencies range from Non-ministerial Departments like the Forestry Commission, to Non-departmental Public Bodies such as the Environment Agency, and European agencies like the European Banking Authority. These agencies or 'quangos' offer a range of practical benefits such as meeting long-term policy commitments, instituting expertise in policymaking, and helping to reduce overload on central government. At the same time, however, they often suffer from problems relating to their democratic legitimacy, as they cannot claim the same electoral mandate as politicians. This research project will examine ways in which the legitimacy of agencies can be improved, or made more robust, and hence how the benefits they have for governance can be maximised. In particular, the research looks at how legitimacy can be enhanced via external engagement with stakeholders, the media, and the wider public, focusing on six delegated agencies at the UK and EU levels in three policy areas (health technology regulation, disease control and prevention, and food safety). Through a mixture of surveys of stakeholders, semi-structured interviews, and analysis of media coverage and agency documents, the research will examine what strategies agencies have for engaging with the public, and whether those strategies help improve trust and confidence in the agencies. The project will then produce recommendations for how agencies may adopt improved strategies for engagement to enhance public trust and confidence and increase their levels of legitimacy. Workshops with agencies and policy documents will be produced to help agencies implement the recommendations from the project. Moreover, the PI will engage more widely with the public by holding a public event, writing online blog posts, and producing a factual documentary on the issue of legitimacy in contemporary governance, translating the specific academic themes of the project into broader topics of discussion for enhancing public knowledge and understanding of complex forms of delegated governance.

Planned Impact

In order to achieve impact the project will pursue strategies in both the policy and wider public realms, as follows (see pathways to impact):

Firstly, in order to enhance impact and facilitate the aims of institutional learning across policy spheres and levels of governance, three workshops will be held in Sheffield bringing all agencies involved in the study together to: discuss initial research design; receive feedback and suggestions on survey questions, provide results of an initial analysis and discuss issues raised and collect comments on findings, and discuss the policy document produced by the PI. These workshops will provide an initial base for achieving impact, and can then be 'rolled out' to address stakeholder engagement in other delegated agencies at the national and European levels. In order to facilitate this 'rolling out' of findings to other agencies, the PI will draw on contacts within the UK Cabinet Office, in particular Ross Neilson, at the Efficiency and Reform Group, who has expressed interest in developing measures of stakeholder engagement for the Cabinet Office's independent 'What works' Institutes. In particular, the PI will produce a document detailing the methodology used to measure external legitimacy, which will provide a framework for delegated agencies to track their own levels of trust and confidence from stakeholders and can be distributed via the Cabinet Office. To enable dissemination at the EU level and internationally, the PI will draw on an international network (see Case for Support), for example, presenting findings at the Notre Europe think tank (headed by Renaud Dehousse) and the Utrecht School of Governance (where Mark Bovens is Chair of Public Administration), which has close links to European civil servants.

In terms of wider public relevance of this project relating to the broader issue of legitimacy, the PI will use general insights from the study to generate an impact in three distinctive and innovative ways. Firstly, the PI will develop an innovative and original proposal for a documentary to be screened at the Sheffield International Documentary Festival (Doc/fest). Doc/fest is an internationally renowned showcase for documentary films and will create vast opportunities for impact and engagement previously unavailable to an academic project of this kind. The specific documentary proposal will be entitled 'Who Runs Europe?' and will seek to inform the audience in an easy and accessible manner about the roles, responsibilities and competencies of delegated agencies, as well as raising broader debates about the nature of accountability, responsibility and legitimacy in a multi-level political system. In order to develop the skills necessary to make the documentary, the PI will hire a documentary mentor, provided by Doc/fest, to run four two hour one-to-one sessions over three months. The PI will report on his experience of documentary making via the Political Studies Association's blog and newsletter, and suggest how other political scientists may use documentaries as an impact tool. Secondly, the PI will seek to write a column in the Guardian Public Leaders Network on stakeholder engagement and legitimacy. Thirdly, the PI will hold an event open to the public entitled 'A New Politics', to discuss new ways of improving the local and national political system and improving accountability and legitimacy. The one day event will be based at Firth Court and will invite members from up to 30 local community groups (such as youth organisations, religious bodies, and campaign groups) to a discussion with local politicians and academics from the University. This event will be run in conjunction with, and partially funded by, the PSA special group on Anti-politics and Depoliticisation, co-founded by the PI. In order to achieve these aims the PI will have the substantial backing of the newly established Crick Centre at Sheffield Politics Department.
 
Description The theory developed in the research so far has been about how the EU can become a legitimate set of institutions. The key finding from the theoretical analysis has been that legitimacy is something developed at an everyday level rather than being an abstract standard we should judge the EU against. In order to evaluate the legitimacy EU in general, and more specifically EU agencies, a sociological approach can show how EU legitimacy is differentiated and uneven across different policy areas. It is very different, for example, in the area of medicine and food regulation to, for example, migration and health and safety. It is seen as far more legitimate in some areas than others.

Empirically analysing all 33 EU agencies, the project has developed a clear map of how those agencies strive to achieve legitimacy through external engagement with stakeholders. Through analysing documents and interviewing a range of officials, the project found agencies tend to adopt four approaches, termed: technical-functional, insulating, network-seeking and politicised. This means that agencies sometimes engage more with stakeholders to manage how politically salient they are, or try to become more well-known. Alternatively, they may engage less to maintain their image of independence in a politically volatile environment, or keep to a relatively discrete technical task with low salience. Knowing this means that by analysing how stakeholders view specific agencies, we can assess which approach is best for securing public trust and confidence, and therefore legitimacy.

Specific findings from an article now published in the world leading journal Public Administration Review suggest that an agency adopting a more 'politicised' approach that is closely engaged with its stakeholders in a controversial policy area is better able to facilitate their understanding of different aspects of the agency's reputation. This does not necessarily mean that the agency is viewed entirely positively by those stakeholders (for example industry and practitioners), rather they hold a more nuanced, and potentially sympathetic view, than those stakeholders that are more distant (the media or wider public).
Exploitation Route The grant has produced a pioneering survey tool for measuring the reputation of delegated agencies, a key aspect of their legitimacy. The tool can be used in further research and innovation to provide more scientifically accurate measures of reputation in the public sector.
Sectors Aerospace, Defence and Marine,Agriculture, Food and Drink,Chemicals,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Energy,Environment,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Healthcare,Government, Democracy and Justice,Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology,Transport

URL http://www.crickcentre.org/projects/eu-legitimacy-and-stakeholder-engagement/
 
Description This research project has fed directly into a number of current events and processes in public policy that have already generated significant impacts, at both European and national levels. First, the research project has involved analysis of a survey conducted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to examine the quality of its engagement with stakeholders. The EMA gave Matthew Wood exclusive access to the survey data after her advised them on questions to include in the survey, and he produced a series of presentations at EMA offices in London in which he analysed the data and produced recommendations. These included targeting communication at broader stakeholder groups including the general public, media and academics, and making the EMA website more accessible. This would improve the transmission of important information on new medicines, and more generally to improve public awareness and understanding of the Agency. These findings have been adopted by the Agency and will be incorporated in a new five year communications strategy. Moreover, the EMA has commissioned a second stakeholder survey utilising the original survey questions designed in this research project. Matthew Wood will again collaborate with EMA in analysing the results. The survey questions have also been developed into the first systematic survey of organisational reputation in the public sector. Hurdles to impact in disseminating the EMA survey have been agencies' increasing concern for 'survey fatigue' given a recent proliferation of stakeholder surveys and tightened budget situations, meaning agencies are less likely to support 'external' surveys. Adapting to this context, the project has evolved to develop the survey as a specific focus on the reputation of agencies, including rigorous scientific validity and the added value of creating a specific 'reputation scale' agencies can use in future. This has involved developing the survey questions to create a new, scientifically rigorous survey instrument for measuring reputation, which provides added value to standard agency stakeholder surveys. Collaborating with colleagues in Utrecht and Exeter, the project has developed this new instrument using rigorous techniques in survey methodology. With the European Chemicals Agency the project has co-produced two surveys of 3000 stakeholders that have enabled the development of a robust survey instrument. This instrument has been made available via an Open Access article in Public Administration Review journal. Second, at the national (UK) level the theoretical approach of the project on democratic legitimacy has influenced practitioner and policy debate on the Conservative-led government's devolution deals, and select committee deliberations over Brexit. Working with the New Economics Foundation, Matthew Wood produced analysis of the discourse over English devolution under the Coalition government, showing how the issue of democracy had been excluded from debate and suggesting it could be included through introducing citizens assemblies. This resulted in a co-authored report, which informed a submission of evidence to a Parliamentary Select Committee inquiry on the future of UK devolution. The Select Committee published the submission of evidence alongside its final report, 'Devolution: the next five years and beyond', which mirrored the recommendations of the research to 'inject more openness, transparency and public engagement into the deal-making process' (p.47). Matthew Wood presented the research findings to a workshop of the West Midlands Combined Authority, which stimulated discussion amongst participants and led to a member of Birmingham Council reporting that the Council would be interested in holding a citizens assembly in the future. Third, Matthew Wood's single authored article "Mapping EU Agencies as Political Entrepreneurs" was included in a private information pack prepared by Parliamentary clerks for MPs involved in the Brexit Select Committee, during debates about the future role of EU agencies in UK-EU relations. He also submitted findings linked to the article to the Lords Committee on the European Union, which were published as part of its deliberations on Brexit. Matthew Wood also presented findings from this article to stakeholders at the European Food Safety Authority scientific conference attended by 300 individuals from scientific organisations and agencies, resulting in a positive response from EFSA and interest in further engagement. Matthew was subsequently approached to co-author a book chapter entitled "Controlling the European Food Safety Authority" with a colleague from EFSA acting in a personal capacity. The chapter developed the key findings of Wood's article to suggest that EFSA might focus on communicating with stakeholders in an 'entrepreneurial' manner to demonstrate how it complies with the very highest legal standards and requirements. In making these impacts on practitioners and policy makers, this research project has contributed to enhancing the effectiveness of public services and policy, making them more open and engaged with the public (at the European level) and promoting their democratisation.
First Year Of Impact 2015
Sector Government, Democracy and Justice,Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description Analysis influences European Medicines Agency
Geographic Reach Europe 
Policy Influence Type Influenced training of practitioners or researchers
Impact The European Medicines Agency gave me exclusive access to the results from a stakeholder engagement survey that I advised them on designing, and sought my advice on the meaning and implications of the results. I presented this analysis in a series of presentations at the EMA offices in London, which advised on developing the accessibility of the EMA's website to wider groups of stakeholders in the media and general public. The advice has been accepted by the Stakeholder Engagement Team and cited in an internal report presented to the EMA's management board. Subsequent to this, the management board accepted the findings and EMA has published them in its 2015 Annual Report and adopted the recommendations of Matthew Wood's analysis (p.27). The agency is now following up this research for another survey seeking to analyse changes since the original survey, using questions designed by Matthew Wood in the first survey.
URL http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Annual_report/2016/05/WC500206482.pdf
 
Description Article in EJPR included by Parliamentary clerks in information pack for Commons Brexit Select Committee, December 2017
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Participation in a guidance/advisory committee
 
Description Gave evidence to a government review - House of Lords European Union Committee
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/european-union-comm...
 
Description Publication of evidence by Parliament Select Committee
Geographic Reach Europe 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
Impact A submission to Parliament based on analysis of the democratic legitimacy of the UK Conservative government's devolution deals in England was published by the Select Committee on Communities and Local Government's report, 'Devolution: The Next Five Years and Beyond'. The report recommended, in line with the evidence of the submission, that the government 'inject more openness, transparency and public engagement into the deal-making process' (p.47).
URL http://data.parliament.uk/WrittenEvidence/CommitteeEvidence.svc/EvidenceDocument/Communities%20and%2...
 
Description Visiting Fellowship at the University of Canberra
Amount $7,000 (AUD)
Organisation University of Canberra 
Sector Academic/University
Country Australia
Start 10/2015 
End 11/2015
 
Title EU Agencies Stakeholder Engagement Database 
Description The first comprehensive database of the formal requirements for stakeholder engagement and the most recent practical strategies of stakeholder engagement (2014) employed by EU Decentralised Agencies. Includes information on all 33 official decentralised agencies. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact This database has informed a research paper to be presented at the 2016 Political Studies Association General Conference, and empirical chapters in the book to be an output of this grant. 
 
Description Cultural Practices of Accountability 
Organisation Australian National University (ANU)
Department Crawford School of Public Policy
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Analysis of agency accountability the utilising an innovative web-scraping tool to systematically collect documents from the European Medicines Agency website using the term accountability. This provides original insights into how it thinks about accountability as an organisation. Co-authoring article comparing with agencies in Australia and Oceania.
Collaborator Contribution Partners at the Australian National University and University of Canberra also used the innovative web-scraping tool to systematically collect documents from two other regional agencies focused on environmental and health regulation. The partners are co-authoring a research article currently under review at Regulation & Governance journal.
Impact Outputs expected in Autumn 2017.
Start Year 2016
 
Description Cultural Practices of Accountability 
Organisation University of Canberra
Department Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Analysis of agency accountability the utilising an innovative web-scraping tool to systematically collect documents from the European Medicines Agency website using the term accountability. This provides original insights into how it thinks about accountability as an organisation. Co-authoring article comparing with agencies in Australia and Oceania.
Collaborator Contribution Partners at the Australian National University and University of Canberra also used the innovative web-scraping tool to systematically collect documents from two other regional agencies focused on environmental and health regulation. The partners are co-authoring a research article currently under review at Regulation & Governance journal.
Impact Outputs expected in Autumn 2017.
Start Year 2016
 
Description Felt Accountability 
Organisation Utrecht University
Department Governance Institute
Country Netherlands 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I lead the UK research team on an international collaborative project based in Utrecht, focused on public sector accountability. The aim of the project is to understand the extent to which public bodies are accountable in practice to parliaments, central government departments, the media and public. Through a survey methodology it will provide the first thorough measure of 'felt' accountability in the public sector. Matthew Wood's primary role is to manage distribution of the survey by employing a research assistant with €5,000 funding secured from Utrecht.
Collaborator Contribution The research team led by Professor Thomas Schillemans at the Utrecht School of Governance provides funds (€5,000) to finance a survey of accountability in public bodies in the UK. Prof Schillemans is also funding surveys in 7 other countries and will coordinate writing a research article bringing together the findings, as well as working with Matthew Wood to write up an article on the UK findings.
Impact The project will produce outputs towards the end of 2017
Start Year 2017
 
Description Stakkeholder Engagement Survey for CPVO 
Organisation Community Plant Variety Office
Country France 
Sector Public 
PI Contribution I am collaborating with a consultancy company that is conducting a stakeholder engagement survey for the EU Community Plant Variety Office. My role is to provide methodological advice on survey design, and I will be co-authoring an analysis of findings for the CPVO
Collaborator Contribution The consulting firm working with CPVO are conducting the stakeholder survey. CPVO will hold ownership of the survey findings and share with me.
Impact Outputs will be in May/June 2017
Start Year 2016
 
Description The Legitimation Crisis of Delegated Agencies 
Organisation Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Country Germany 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I have done research with Prof Claudia Landwehr at the University of Mainz on the legitimation crisis of delegated agencies.
Collaborator Contribution Prof Landwehr has co-written the research paper and employed a research assistant to help conduct empirical data collection.
Impact ECPR Workshop co-authored paper
Start Year 2016
 
Description The Pursuit of Devolution 
Organisation New Economics Foundation
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution I co-wrote a report on the democratic legitimacy of the UK Conservative Government's devolution deals.
Collaborator Contribution Sarah Lyall, researcher at the New Economics Foundation, co-wrote the report on the devolution deals, and had time bought out of her contract to do so by the University of Sheffield.
Impact A report was produced on the research and an event was held in London in December 2015 launching and debating the report.
Start Year 2015
 
Description The Reputation of EU Agencies 
Organisation University of Exeter
Department Physics and Astronomy
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I am designing the first survey instrument to study the reputation of EU decentralised agencies. I am responsible for coordinating administration of the survey in collaboration with decentralised agencies, and am working with two agencies to achieve this. I will present survey findings to agencies collaborating with the survey.
Collaborator Contribution Dr Madalina Busuioc (Exeter) and Dr Sjors Overman (Utrecht) are designing questions for the survey instrument. All contributors will analyse the survey results together and produce article outputs from the project.
Impact The survey findings will be presented at the ECPR research sessions in Cyprus, 2018.
Start Year 2016
 
Description The Reputation of EU Agencies 
Organisation Utrecht University
Department Governance Institute
Country Netherlands 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I am designing the first survey instrument to study the reputation of EU decentralised agencies. I am responsible for coordinating administration of the survey in collaboration with decentralised agencies, and am working with two agencies to achieve this. I will present survey findings to agencies collaborating with the survey.
Collaborator Contribution Dr Madalina Busuioc (Exeter) and Dr Sjors Overman (Utrecht) are designing questions for the survey instrument. All contributors will analyse the survey results together and produce article outputs from the project.
Impact The survey findings will be presented at the ECPR research sessions in Cyprus, 2018.
Start Year 2016
 
Description Throughput Legitimacy in the EU 
Organisation Boston University
Department Biomedical Engineering Department
Country United States 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I am coordinating an international research project developing the concept of throughput legitimacy in relation to the European Union. My contribution is to coordinate a Special Issue on throughput legitimacy for the European Journal of Political Research, bringing together contributions from six different institutions. I am responsible for authoring the lead introductory article for the Special Issue.
Collaborator Contribution Copenhagen Business School have conducted interviews with the European Environment Agency to complement my research on the European Medicines Agency, for a special issue article. Prof Vivien Schmidt at Boston University is co-authoring the introductory article, and coordinating submissions to the special issue.
Impact A blog has been published on the LSE EUROPP blog (9/3/2017), relating the research project to the EU Commission's recent White Paper on the future of the Union.
Start Year 2016
 
Description Throughput Legitimacy in the EU 
Organisation Copenhagen Business School
Country Denmark 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I am coordinating an international research project developing the concept of throughput legitimacy in relation to the European Union. My contribution is to coordinate a Special Issue on throughput legitimacy for the European Journal of Political Research, bringing together contributions from six different institutions. I am responsible for authoring the lead introductory article for the Special Issue.
Collaborator Contribution Copenhagen Business School have conducted interviews with the European Environment Agency to complement my research on the European Medicines Agency, for a special issue article. Prof Vivien Schmidt at Boston University is co-authoring the introductory article, and coordinating submissions to the special issue.
Impact A blog has been published on the LSE EUROPP blog (9/3/2017), relating the research project to the EU Commission's recent White Paper on the future of the Union.
Start Year 2016
 
Description 'How Democratic is the EU?' Information Video 
Form Of Engagement Activity A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press)
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Working with Shout Out UK and Prof Anand Menon at the UK and EU project I directed a short informatic video on EU legitimacy entitled 'How Democratic is the EU'. Several sites contacted Shout Out UK to request to repost the video and disseminate to wider audiences. This led to a large number of video reposts, earning over 500,000 views in total before and after the referendum of 2016.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grbkJRb1p_w
 
Description Blog - the UK and EU need major democratic reform 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Blog for The Conversation after the EU referendum suggesting democratic reform of both EU and UK delegated agencies, through stakeholder engagement.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL https://theconversation.com/uk-and-eu-both-need-major-democratic-reform-to-survive-brexit-fallout-55...
 
Description Blog for LSE EUROPP 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Blog on how the EU's crisis of democracy is about the institutions of the Union rather than public opinion. Communicating the outcome of workshop at the Free University Berlin.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017,2018
URL http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/07/03/europe-legitimacy-crisis-identity-institutions/
 
Description Blog for the Centre for Public Impact 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact A blog for the Centre for Public Impact focused on how delegated agencies can become political authorities through entrepreneurial activities. Communicating findings from article in European Journal of Political Research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/eu-agencies-political-entrepreneurs/
 
Description Blog for the UK in a changing Europe Project 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact A blog on why the British government should engage with European Union agencies to enable a transition towards exiting the European Union. This communicated the findings from an article in the European Journal of Political Research,
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://ukandeu.ac.uk/why-britain-needs-to-engage-with-the-eus-agencies/?platform=hootsuite
 
Description Blog on European Commission 2017 White Paper 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Written with Prof Vivien Schmidt, this blog applies the findings of the project to understanding the European Commission's White Paper released on 1/3/2017.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/03/10/the-eus-new-white-paper-underlines-why-europe-needs-to-...
 
Description Blog: David Cameron Needs a Vision for the Future of Europe 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The blog was intended to develop the insights from my theoretical work and apply them to contemporary. the blog independently received a response from Konrad Schiemann, former Judge at the European Court of Justice from 2004 to 2012. See here: http://britain-europe.com/2016/01/18/a-broader-vision-of-the-future-of-europe/
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL http://britain-europe.com/2015/12/15/david-cameron-needs-a-vision-for-the-future-of-europe/
 
Description Comment on Jeremy Corbyn (BBC Radio Sheffield) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact I was asked by BBC Radio Sheffield to comment on Jeremy Corbyn's campaign to reinvigorate the Labour party in light of his visit to Sheffield during his leadership campaign. This occurred on a Saturday morning and so reached a wide audience upwards of 220,000.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
 
Description Presentation at 2018 EFSA Scientific Conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact I presented the findings from an article in the European Journal of Political Research at a four-hour long panel in Parma, Italy run by the European Food Safety Agency, in front of an audience of 300. The panel included an hour-long panel discussion about how scientific bodies can effectively target their audiences. It was filmed for dissemination via the EFSA website.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/180918
 
Description Sheffield Quakers Society 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact I spoke on the issue of whether it is possible to achieve a 'fair, free and equal society' alongside Sheffield MP Paul Blomfield at an event for the general public in the Sheffield region. This sparked general discussion about the nature of a legitimate society and how it could practically be achieved, and the organisers reported an interest in holding further events in the future.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL https://twitter.com/Woodpoliticshef/status/698221009997058049
 
Description Talk at University of Birmingham 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact I presented research findings to a West Midlands Combined Authority workshop on the UK government's devolution deals on 21st January 2016. Representatives of all councils in the regional authority were at the workshop, and there was animated discussion about the findings, including about the possibility of citizens juries being included in devolved governance arrangements. Authority representatives reported interest in implementing the findings of the research, and the Authority has subsequently created a citizens jury for policy on mental health and access to public services.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL https://westmidlandscombinedauthority.org.uk/news/the-west-midlands-citizen-s-jury-application-proce...
 
Description The Future of Public Bodies 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Around 30 international practitioners attended a two hour intensive workshop in which the PI presented the findings from the project, as well as findings from the project's collaborative survey on public bodies accountability with 7 other countries. Postgraduate students from the PI's MA Democratic Governance module also attended. Practitioner organisations attending included:
UK Cabinet Office (5 attendees)
Association of Chief Executives
National Audit Office
NEST Corporation
OECD
DEFRA
Department for Education
Transport Focus
Business, Ministry of Defence
Scientific Council for Government Policy, Netherlands
Swedish Social Insurance Fund
Institute for Government
Netherlands Court of Audit.
The PI produced a final project report and blog summarising the event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/the-future-of-public-bodies/
 
Description YouTube video 'How Democratic is the EU?' 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact I curated and chaired a public-facing panel of academics, volunteers and business leaders focused on informing the public about EU institutions in advance of the EU referendum on 20th May 2016, collaborating with the UK and EU project led by Prof Michael Keating. The event was attended by 200 people at St. Mary's Church, Sheffield. I worked with the University of Sheffield engagement team to help monitor the impact of the event. Attendees were asked whether they were sure how they would vote in the referendum at the beginning and end of the session. Data collected by the engagement team shows the event made attendees weigh up the evidence, with the percentage of attendees agreeing they knew how they would vote increasing from 75% to 84%.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016