Democratic renewal in Civil Society Organisations

Lead Research Organisation: Nottingham Trent University
Department Name: Business School

Abstract

It is often argued Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) are central to a vibrant, democratic society. Charities, voluntary groups, community associations, and informal networks of like-minded individuals, are praised for being more responsive and in-touch than political parties and governmental organisations and able to articulate the needs of local communities, particularly those who lack influence and cannot speak for themselves. CSOs are driven by values to produce social change within their community. Therefore, they can be innovative in designing and delivering services that people actually need and, through active participation, CSOs can foster 'social capital': developing the networks, norms and trust, necessary for cooperation and social engagement. This not only increases community cohesion but harnesses local community resources, grassroots energy, enthusiasm and ideas to build a vibrant civil society. Together, these features mean that CSOs have the potential to facilitate civic democratic renewal and support citizens' services that are actively run by and for local communities, rather than being dictated to by central government or private enterprises driven by profit and market forces.
Over the past three decades successive governments have tried to capitalise on the responsive and democratic elements of CSOs to provide services previously delivered by the state. For instance, a written aim of the current government is to "support the creation and expansion of mutuals, co-operatives, charities and social enterprises, and enable these groups to have much greater involvement in the running of public services" (Cabinet Office, 2014). Consequently, in increasing numbers, schools, libraries, health and social care services, and many previously delivered public services are being run by CSOs or private organisations. To date, over 100 public services have been "spun out" in "Public service mutuals" and the government's stated aim is for 1 in 5 public sector workers to run their own mutuals (Mutuals Taskforce Report, 2015).
As CSOs are called upon to deliver public services, concerns have been raised over the impact this might have on the less measureable, democratic functions of a healthy civil society. As service providers, competing with private businesses, they are subject to regulation by both state and market forces, limiting members abilities to promote and respond to community and membership needs. The influential Baring's Foundation Report has recently argued CSOs are losing their democratic heritage (2015), highlighting the 2014 Lobbying Act which places new restrictions on CSOs campaigning and commissioning that does not support independence and diversity of the sector. CSO, they argue, have in effect become victims of a 'gagging clause' and can now be viewed as the contractual arm of the state, providing services rather than advocacy. There are also growing concerns this is accentuating the undemocratic of CSOs, centralising power and potentially corrupting them and their original independence and intentions.
This seminar series explores these issues and asks: what are the features that promote and undermine the role CSOs play within democratic civic renewal? With speakers from leading CSOs such as Greenpeace, UNESCO and Co-operatives UK, inter-disciplinary academics including from geography, business, economics, sociology, peace studies, philosophy and political theory and policymakers the seminar series investigates these issues from multiple perspectives. It will also build upon existing examples from the experiments that are occurring throughout the UK and Europe where new forms of CSOs are currently being developed.
The six seminars will examine the meaning, conditions, possibilities and promises of democracy within civil society. By bringing together an inter-disciplinary network of academics, policymakers and practitioners it will develop a long-term shared interest in civil society and democracy.

Planned Impact

The influential Baring's Foundation Report chaired by Sir Roger Singleton CBE has recently argued that the independence of civil society organisations (CSOs) is under threat. The report argued that independence lies at the heart of civil society but suggest that "unless we act now, the future of an independent voluntary sector [and by implication wider civil society] is at serious risk" (2015, p. 3). The report suggests that whilst CSOs offer the hope of greater participation and engagement they are becoming merely a shadow state that lacks transparency and voice.
This seminar series takes up this topic and broadens it to look not only at the conditions of democracy within civil society (the focus of the Barings Report) but also the meaning, practices and possibilities of democracy within civil society. The seminar series will contribute to this debate by bringing together academics from a diverse fields including geography, business, economics, sociology, peace studies, philosophy and political theory, practitioners, policymakers and activists all interested in the democracy within civil society. By engaging this diverse audience that often sit in silos the series will provide an opportunity to deepen and extend the debate.
Having multi-disciplined academics and internationally recognised speakers included in the proposal including Kumi Naidoo, International Executive Director of Greenpeace and former Secretary General of Civicuc, Janet Dalziell Director of Global Development Greenpeace, Rajesh Tandon co-director of UNESCO Chair on Community-based Research and Social Responsibility and Ed Mayo, Secretary General of Co-operatives UK, the series will provide opportunities to explore up-to-date theory and practice on democracy in civil society. The facilitated discussions will enable a range of practitioner experiences to be explored.
The seminar series will develop the links between policymakers, think tanks, funding commissioners, 2nd and particularly 3rd tier Third Sector organisations (such as NCVO) and government ministers with an interest in civil society and democracy. Government minister for Civil Society, members of the opposition and relevant policymakers, think-tanks and research groups including Compass, Co-ops Network, Institute of Volunteering Research, and consultancy and advocacy group MUTUO will be invited.
The seminar series will be located in Nottingham, Leicester, Leeds and London. Each seminar will attract approximately 20 local CSOs, invited through local infrastructure organisations (such as Council for Voluntary Services), grassroots community groups and through the host academics networks. Reports will be included in local and regional newsletters. This will give each seminar a distinct local feel and provide the opportunity to extend the connection between the university and their local community, providing opportunities for research, consultancy and impact.
The practitioners, policymakers and commissions benefit through the discussions of the latest research and debates around democracy within civil society. It will also provide the opportunity to meet fellow practitioners and forge relationships with researchers. Furthermore the policy and practice implications of the sessions will be distilled with the key implications for practice will be written in short, practical briefing documents.
Contact has been made with Third Sector, Charity Times, and The Guardian Voluntary Sector Network to build relations with journalists. The Press department of Nottingham Trent University will develop press releases based on research raised by the seminars.
The seminar series will also engage the industry body the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) to develop policy document for the HR implications for democratic accountability within CSOs. This will enable CSOs interested in more democratic forms of organising to have a long-term resource to develop their practice.

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
Parker, M (2017) Journal Article in Alternative Enterprises, Local Economies, and Social Justice: Why Smaller is Still more Beautiful

publication icon
Varkarolis O (2017) Voicing researched activists with responsive action research in Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal

 
Description Discoveries When this seminar series began we thought we had a common understanding of democracy and civil society. Yet, as the seminars progressed the divergent understandings of what these terms mean and how they are utilised by both academics, practitioners, policy-makers and activists varied. Academic understand of these as matters varied concerning social policy and sociology, geography and planning, business and management, politics and public policy, and so on. These variations might be understood as disciplinary differences between academic tribes, but equally there are similar divergences between practitioners and activists, depending on their understanding of the concept of civil society and its relation to their particular area of concern - employment, social movements, social inclusion, the state, development and so on. The seminar series was extraordinarily helpful in exploring these divergences, but also drawing attention to the common objects of enquiry and concern. The key issue here is less about any particular case or theory, but rather about the importance of finding common objects and ways of speaking - particularly between activists, practitioners and academics - in order that they can co-ordinate their attention on common problems. This means attention to translation, to deciding whether we have the same words for different things, or different words for the same things. In order to translate between different languages that address common areas of concern, congruence and trust must be discovered, not assumed. The idea of civil society, as suggested above, it depends on who you are talking to or writing for. It is a vague and contested concept, but also a very useful one because of the way that it addresses a series of practices which are not encapsulated by certain formal institutions. This gives us some particular problems in addressing it. On the one hand it can be referred to as no more than a kind of extra-state capacity which can be more or less present in modern societies, on the other as a set of (voluntary/third sector) institutions which are often working to ameliorate the problems or absences of state or capitalist institutions. The former is sometimes helpful but often very vague, the latter is quite specific, but potentially reductive. However, it is clear that the concept, practices and institutions play a valuable role in cutting between ideas about the capacities of the state and the market.
Exploitation Route A further deepening of the concept of civil society is important for both academic and practitioner purposes. Exploring and deepening our understanding of the concepts of democracy and civil society, translating between different philosophical and political positions can enable stronger connections.
Sectors Education

Government

Democracy and Justice

Culture

Heritage

Museums and Collections

 
Description The issue of democracy and particularly democracy at work have begun to shape some of the dialogues and work of non-academics that we have worked with throughout the seminar series. Professor Daniel King has begun work with the CIPD around employee Voice and workplace democracy drawing heavily on concepts from the seminar series. This is leading to funded research by the CIPD into employee voice in various organizational forms (hierarchical, non-hierarchical and the gig economy) and how employee voice is enabled or disabled through various forms of participation. Professor King has also begun work with Martin Strube to explore the possibilities of Workplace democratic audit again drawing on ideas from the seminar series. Professor Martin Parker has continued to work with Ed Mayo from Co-operatives UK, who spoke at one of the seminars. Seminar planning also led to work with people from Oxfam UK's research units in Oxford and Glasgow, the Labour Party, the centre for mutuals at Oxford University, and the Seedbed Trust. All this work is likely to feed into the long-term establishment of a research centre on the alternative economy to be based at the Management Department, University of Bristol. Professor's King and Parker are now book series editors for the book series Organizations and Activism, many of the ideas emerged out of the seminar series.
First Year Of Impact 2017
Sector Government, Democracy and Justice,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections
Impact Types Societal

 
Description Seminar 1 - The meaning of democracy 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact Approximately 55 people attended the seminar held at Cass Business School. The aim of the seminar was to explore what democracy in Civil Society means. The seminar had keynote speech from Debra Allcock-Tyler and talks from Professors Gilbert, Cooke and Sullivan and a talk from Rebecca Fisher from Corporate Watch. The participants reported finding the session interesting and challenging, opening up new questions about the purposes of Civil Society organizations and how they organise themselves.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL http://democraticrenewal.co.uk/home/about/seminar-1/
 
Description Seminar 2 - Democracy and Civil Society: Threats and Possibilities 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact The aim of the seminar was to explore the challenges and opportunities that Civil Society Organizations face regarding their democratic role. It also looked at the relationship between activism and civil society. It had participation between civil society organizations, activists and policy makers as well as academics, particularly postgraduate students. About 45 people attended the session.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL http://democraticrenewal.co.uk/home/about/seminar-2/
 
Description Seminar 3 - 'Democracy at Work: Co-operation and Civil Society' 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact The aim of this seminar was to explore cooperative organizations and ways of working. It featured Ed Mayo, Secretary General of Cooperatives UK and Bob Cannell, strategic thinker around cooperatives and Dorothy Francis Chief Executive of CASE and academics including Professor Ackers.
It has lead to connections with potential research outcomes with the research team working with some of the speakers and participants.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
 
Description Seminar 4 - Democratic decision making in CSOs 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The aim of the seminar was to explore the internal organizing of Civil Society Organizations and the challenges they face to be more democratic. The seminar had around 40 participants, including practitioners from the Third Sector, activists and some policy makers.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://democraticrenewal.co.uk/home/about/seminar-4/
 
Description Seminar 5 - Promises: Learning from current experiments in democratic organizing 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact This seminar explored a number of experimental community groups and the potential and challenges that they hold out for grassroots democratisation. The seminar saw collaboration between researchers in the Business School and School of geography. In particular there was strong attendance with Postgraduate students. Around 30 people attended the seminar. Some interesting links were made between researchers between these two schools and also developing post-graduate students understanding of these topics
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://democraticrenewal.co.uk/home/about/seminar-5/
 
Description Seminar 6- Promises: what is the future for a more democratic civil society? 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact This final seminar featured international participatory action research specialist Rajesh Tandon from PRIA (India), as well as emerging research from PhD students as well. One of the core members of the organizing team, Professor Chris Land brought together some of the themes from the seminar series with provocative questions. The audience was a mixture of academics, postgraduate students, activists and policy makers (from the CIPD). Links were made with the CIPD and consultation is currently ongoing regarding conducting research into "Employee Voice". One of the research team, Professor Chris Land, based on his reflections of the seminar series, is developing an in depth analysis of Workplace Democracy
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://democraticrenewal.co.uk/home/about/seminar-6/
 
Description Symposium: Knowledge(s) and expertise in participatory democracy Wed 25th October 2017 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The symposium brought together academics from Australia, the US, Scotland, Finland and the UK and practitioners working in a number of different third sector organisations in Finland to exhandge current research findings on the challenges of involving suers, or 'experts by experience' in democratic engagement with policy makers and service providerss.
What do you consider was the most significant outcome/impact of this activity?

Shared knowledge and understanding amongst the participants. Also, a direct outcome was a collaboration between researchers at the University of Jyväskalä in a funding proposal (EU- India Platform for the Social Sciences and Humanities (EqUIP) titled 'Contributing to the equity and sustainability of social welfare through the use of experience based knowledge(s)'.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://www.facebook.com/yfijyu/posts/14574123510223