Politicised Provision: Development and Welfare under Latin America's New Left

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Anthropology

Abstract

Latin America has in recent decades witnessed a dramatic political shift to the left. Numerous leftist political parties have achieved and retained power, primarily through the ballot box, in what scholars have described as a "Pink Tide" sweeping the continent. Central to the political platforms of many of these governments have been a range of novel social programs and welfare initiatives oriented towards the most disadvantaged members of society. In a continent where inequality remains staggeringly high, these forms of poverty-reduction program have been a central basis of the popularity achieved by the governments of the 'new left'.
Despite the centrality of these social programs to the political projects of 'new left' governments, we know little about how they are understood and experienced by the people at whom they are targeted. Much has been written about the policies and politics of the 'new left', but this commentary has often been polarised and contradictory. For some, the emergence of redistributive social programs after a period of neoliberalism has been welcomed and celebrated, and measurable improvements in well-being among impoverished beneficiaries have been emphasised. For others, the programs appear to be bound up with a rising tide of populism that threatens to undermine democracy and weaken liberal institutions across the continent; trends which are understood to be contrary to the interests of the poor majority.
Focusing on the Nicaraguan case, this fellowship aims to move beyond these polarised debates by exploring the perspective of the people whose lives these social projects affect most directly. Because one thing is clear: it is not just scholars who express strong feelings about this range of highly-politicised social programs. Participants themselves (along with potential participants) hold powerful opinions regarding the value and purpose of the projects. Indeed, in many of the countries which comprise the 'Pink Tide', the projects have become a focal point for intense political activity among the rural and urban poor. Based upon close ethnographic study of the experiences of project beneficiaries, the fellowship will seek to promote understanding of how these intense political hopes and aspirations invested in the social projects of the new left impact upon their successes and failures.
The key idea to be pursued here is that there is much to be gained from understanding the ways in which welfare provision overlaps with the forms of political subjectivity revealed by close ethnographic investigation. If participants in 'new left' social projects invest those programs with powerful desires for political inclusion and recognition as citizens, understanding why projects have the results they do requires that this complex dynamic be understood and taken into account. By making steps in this direction, the fellowship aims to promote the improvement of the design, delivery and evaluation of 'new left' social welfare programs in Nicaragua and beyond.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description This project looked at the role of state welfare projects in Latin American countries associated with what became known as the 'Pink Tide'. These countries were governed by parties of the left, which claimed to be opposing a history of 'neoliberal' reductions in state spending.

Focusing on the case of Nicaragua, the project demonstrated the extent to which these welfare projects constituted a distinctively populist governmental technology. The projects were 'populist' not because sociologists or political economists might classify them as such, but because absolutely central to their design and implementation were ideas about the role of 'The People' in the polity. For those who designed these welfare projects, poverty-reducing objectives were accompanied by the goal of producing in Nicaragua an 'Organised People'; a population motivated by 'solidarity', empowered to demand its rights, and closely integrated into organs of direct democracy such that executive power in Nicaragua might be conditioned and determined by the will of the people. Welfare projects were not just about improving participants' economic prospects, then, but about improving participants as political subjects, and about incorporating these refashioned, solidary subjects in a populist political bloc.

If this was the objective of welfare project designers, however, these blueprints for subjective and political transformation necessarily had to grapple with Nicaragua's highly constrained material and economic circumstances. The ethnographic perspective of this project showed that for participants in the politicised welfare projects associated with the Pink Tide, the most pertinent experience was frequently the everyday difficulties of access and eligibility. Far from functionally serving to 'incorporate' popular sectors into a coherent populist bloc, welfare projects served to remind poor Nicaraguans of the weakness of the Nicaraguan state, the extent to which infrastructural and institutional failures got in the way of stated government objectives, and the distance between peripheral communities and centres of administrative power. Government supporters frequently described their loyalty to the government in relation to the idea that welfare programs were 'helping' the poor, while simultaneously complaining about their own exclusion from programs, or their own difficulties in establishing entitlements. But this potent sense that a 'helpful' government wasn't succeeding in actually delivering on its promises didn't appear to result in a fundamental shift in loyalty. Among government supporters-and in the context of Nicaragua's highly polarised political history-people supported the government despite feeling that problems stood in the way of their own ability to benefit directly.
Exploitation Route Given the conditions of crisis that have obtained in Nicaragua since April 2018, it would be useful for future research to examine the ways in which political violence has shifted the use of welfare programs made by the Nicaraguan government, and the dynamics of loyalty and political identity that condition their reception among target populations.

The insights of this project into the ways in which development programs and welfare initiatives intersect with long-held political identities, dynamics of polarisation, and the politics of populism, may be of relevance to practitioners and policymakers. The ethnographic findings of the project could contribute to the development of welfare or development projects with sensitivity to political context.

The project's findings are also highly relevant for political commentators, journalists, and policymakers seeking to understand 'populism', and the role it plays in Latin America.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Government, Democracy and Justice

 
Description There has been no non-academic impact arising from this grant to date, but this section will be updated in future as and when this develops.
 
Description Collaboration with Nicaraguan anthropologist Fernanda Soto Joya of UCA, Managua 
Organisation Central American University
Country Nicaragua 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution In collaboration with Fernanda Soto I have been organising a conference, to be hosted by the UCA. I have undertaken planning and administrative work in preparation for the event, as well as working in collaboration with Fernanda Soto in formulating the theoretical agenda. The ESRC grant has provided the central source of funding for the event.
Collaborator Contribution Fernanda Soto has provided the main administrative support for the event's organisation within Nicaragua, identifying potential participants and liaising with them in the run-up to the workshop, as well as being integrally involved in developing the theoretical agenda underpinning the workshop's design and objectives. UCA university is providing event space for the event.
Impact The event is yet to take place, so outputs are yet to emerge.
Start Year 2017
 
Description International Workshop. Title; Politicised Provision: Ethnographic perspectives on welfare under Latin America's New Left. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact An international scholarly workshop held in March 2018 in the Department of Anthropology, UCL. The event was publicised nationally to scholars and students, was open to the public, and was well attended (around 35 participants over 2 days).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018