Working around drug war-torn communities on the U.S.-Mexico border
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Edinburgh
Department Name: Sch of Law
Abstract
The proposed research draws on my pioneering doctoral research to seek an alternative approach in tackling the
drug problem around U.S.-Mexico border communities. The idea emerges at a time when Latin American countries
such as Mexico, begin to recognise the high socioeconomic burden and human cost of ineffective and pernicious
drug policies. The drug trafficking phenomenon is a serious security challenge that has obstructed development in
Mexico in the last two decades and begs for new approaches to address the problem.
My research successfully extended a state crime perspective, to a new context to explicate the experience of
border communities at the centre of an unprecedented violent drug conflict in which multiple state actors were
active or complicit on both sides of the conflict. Key findings evidence that state security operations involving
militarised police operations to fight drug trafficking organisations have not only failed to address the problem
around the U.S.-Mexico border communities, but exacerbate and engender violence. Through its provision of a
more nuanced theoretical understanding of the drug problem blighting everyday life for border communities, my
research findings have significant potential to enhance practical strategies to address this problem. An important
first-step towards this would be funding for a follow-up research study to explore the potential application of
development frameworks common in studies of post-conflict settings, but hitherto absent from criminology as an
alternative to the security approaches.
I propose to conduct a short fieldwork trip to Juarez where I will collect data through semi-structured interviews
with staff members based at non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and civic community councils (CCCs) in
Juarez. Also, academics from the two institutions I plan to visit in Juarez will be recruited as research participants.
All individuals will be then invited to take part in the community-based events. These events will be research
impact workshops and meeting groups where I will share findings with user groups. The purpose of the follow-up
research is to a) identify the current problems and challenges set as priorities by third sector organisations and b)
to examine the extent to which the work of these organisations address local community needs. An analysis of the
post-conflict situation in Juarez contributes to a better understanding of the basic development needs of drug war torn
border communities that will inform the working agendas of NGOs and CCCs on the ground and indeed, inform
policy makers decisions in formulating drug policies.
After conducting this follow-up study I plan to visit academic institutions in Mexico City and Aguascalientes where there
is significant interest within academic circles in understanding insecurities caused by organised crime and the effectiveness of government responses.
A second series of institution visits will take place in the US, specifically in El Paso, Flagstaff. The universities in these
locations have been selected carefully in order to maximise the potential of building international networks.
Across all six academic institutions I'll have an excellent opportunity to communicate my doctoral findings
with academic audiences as it will cultivate a variety of capacity development and knowledge exchange prospects.
Finally, I'll be based at Edinburgh University for nine months where I aim to further develop my early academic career
as a recent doctorate graduate. I plan to fully engage in training sessions offered within the School of Law through Early Career Development Portfolio and Contract Researcher Programme. As the work plan in this proposal shows I will
be addressing the current gaps in my academic profile (producing publications and developing impact) by working alongside, and with the support of, my mentor and experienced socio-legal researchers at the Edinburgh Law School.
drug problem around U.S.-Mexico border communities. The idea emerges at a time when Latin American countries
such as Mexico, begin to recognise the high socioeconomic burden and human cost of ineffective and pernicious
drug policies. The drug trafficking phenomenon is a serious security challenge that has obstructed development in
Mexico in the last two decades and begs for new approaches to address the problem.
My research successfully extended a state crime perspective, to a new context to explicate the experience of
border communities at the centre of an unprecedented violent drug conflict in which multiple state actors were
active or complicit on both sides of the conflict. Key findings evidence that state security operations involving
militarised police operations to fight drug trafficking organisations have not only failed to address the problem
around the U.S.-Mexico border communities, but exacerbate and engender violence. Through its provision of a
more nuanced theoretical understanding of the drug problem blighting everyday life for border communities, my
research findings have significant potential to enhance practical strategies to address this problem. An important
first-step towards this would be funding for a follow-up research study to explore the potential application of
development frameworks common in studies of post-conflict settings, but hitherto absent from criminology as an
alternative to the security approaches.
I propose to conduct a short fieldwork trip to Juarez where I will collect data through semi-structured interviews
with staff members based at non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and civic community councils (CCCs) in
Juarez. Also, academics from the two institutions I plan to visit in Juarez will be recruited as research participants.
All individuals will be then invited to take part in the community-based events. These events will be research
impact workshops and meeting groups where I will share findings with user groups. The purpose of the follow-up
research is to a) identify the current problems and challenges set as priorities by third sector organisations and b)
to examine the extent to which the work of these organisations address local community needs. An analysis of the
post-conflict situation in Juarez contributes to a better understanding of the basic development needs of drug war torn
border communities that will inform the working agendas of NGOs and CCCs on the ground and indeed, inform
policy makers decisions in formulating drug policies.
After conducting this follow-up study I plan to visit academic institutions in Mexico City and Aguascalientes where there
is significant interest within academic circles in understanding insecurities caused by organised crime and the effectiveness of government responses.
A second series of institution visits will take place in the US, specifically in El Paso, Flagstaff. The universities in these
locations have been selected carefully in order to maximise the potential of building international networks.
Across all six academic institutions I'll have an excellent opportunity to communicate my doctoral findings
with academic audiences as it will cultivate a variety of capacity development and knowledge exchange prospects.
Finally, I'll be based at Edinburgh University for nine months where I aim to further develop my early academic career
as a recent doctorate graduate. I plan to fully engage in training sessions offered within the School of Law through Early Career Development Portfolio and Contract Researcher Programme. As the work plan in this proposal shows I will
be addressing the current gaps in my academic profile (producing publications and developing impact) by working alongside, and with the support of, my mentor and experienced socio-legal researchers at the Edinburgh Law School.
People |
ORCID iD |
Shadi Whitburn (Principal Investigator / Fellow) |
Description | In light of the 2008-2012 militarised anti-drug operations which impacted profoundly the social fabric of the border city of Juarez this pilot study aimed at exploring development frameworks as an alternative to security approaches as a response to the security problems affecting residents. In addressing its aim third sector organisations were visited and staff interviewed to assess their resources, capacity and efforts in restoring the social fabric in Juarez communities through public initiatives and support programs. And, also to explain to what extent security approaches in the form of militarised anti-drug operations hinder or interrupt the progress of social development initiatives carried out by non-governmental organisations and civic community councils. The key finding of this study suggests that although third sector organisations in Juarez have made significant progress in identifying and raising public awareness regarding the individual and local community needs, they still face serious challenges in supporting and benefiting marginalised communities. This is in part due to the lack of financial and human resources affecting non-profit organisations based in Juarez and also given high levels of insecurity and violence that development workers and human rights activists experience. Based on the qualitative data analysed from this study, since 2012 (end of anti-drug operations) the threats and attacks against human rights activists has increased in Ciudad Juarez. Activists work in an hostile environment and experience in(direct) forms of repression and violence affecting their job performance which has to certain extent also affected the outcome of their work around marginalised communities. Development workers and human rights activists identify the police and government agencies as the primary source of violence and hostility and organised criminal groups as the second source. They also point to the media and conservative groups as sources that either obstruct or hinder the progress of their development work in communities. They also recognise that criminal activity and the existence of organised criminal networks have had a direct impact in destabilising communities but so had the military and/or police intervention in dismantling such networks. |
Exploitation Route | Although the pilot study findings are not finalized and more data from the field is needed before drawing on any conclusions regarding the application of development frameworks in post-conflict settings, a proper research into third sector organizations around border communities can be conducted by either academic and/or non-academic institutes. The impact of transnational organised crime and its associated violence is a security challenge to the global community and to governance systems around the world. Therefore, to investigate the ways in which civilians maintain and build capacity for development within their communities despite security challenges is crucial as it serves to advance knowledge and criminological scholarship on social development approaches in tackling organised crime. |
Sectors | Communities and Social Services/Policy Government Democracy and Justice Other |
Description | Community Engagement with Stakeholders |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | The proposed impact for this award intended to build a network and organise workshops and group meetings with local NGO's, public authorities and academics to discuss and identify development challenges border communities face in the aftermath of the drug-related violence outbreak during the 2007-2012 militarised counter narcotic operations. At a local level, the main avenue to promote border residents' welfare and security was by engaging with such key stakeholders based within the community. The purpose was to create a platform where participants can discuss issues concerning the development of their communities and lay out necessary steps towards improving ongoing civic initiatives. As a result, during a two-month field visit existing networks were contacted and new channels of communication between third sector organisations, the academic community and local authorities were initiated. A series of academic literature reviews and relevant policy papers were provided and circulated across this network. Workshops were organised to discuss the working agendas of third sector organisations and policy discussions around development programs and the dynamics of violence around border communities. However, the lack of engagement of some stakeholder (local authorities and NGOs) and bureaucratic procedures halted further advancement beyond this stage. In part due to the poor quality of previous work collaborations and project experiences between stakeholders. Federal government funding to address the impact of drug-related violence through community development programs had been inadequate and/or tarnished by high levels of corruption. Such precedent made the development of platforms for dialogue a complex task for the researcher. In addition, the time spent in the field (two-months) and the award funding (one-year) were insufficient to follow-up and continue developing the project's network. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |