Oversight and intelligence networks: Who guards the guardians?

Lead Research Organisation: King's College London
Department Name: War Studies

Abstract

GUARDINT aims to address and redress the gap between increasingly transnational surveillance practices and national oversight mechanisms. Due to the expansion of intelligence networks and digital data collection and sharing, the traditional ways to understand and to practice the control of intelligence services have become dated and inefficient. Yet, robust intelligence oversight is crucial for the legitimacy of and public confidence in modern security. GUARDINT builds empirical and conceptual tools to shed light on the limitations and potential of oversight mechanisms. It theorises intelligence oversight through an International Political Sociology (IPS) approach to understand the concrete practices and the formal and informal roles of oversight. Using the IPS approach, the project examines intelligence oversight in a threefold way: as a democratic mechanism, as socio-technical networks, and as an emerging transnational practice. Second, it compares the efficiency and legitimacy of oversight bodies in different European countries. Third, it examines the possibilities and challenges for oversight bodies to operate at a transnational scale. By doing so, the project will generate tools and platforms to promote transnational collaboration. Overall, GUARDINT seeks to revitalise our democratic imaginary and to reinforce transnational connections by proposing creative solutions for effective democratic control of transnational intelligence cooperation within and beyond the EU.

Planned Impact

The project will build impact through the threefold strategy of communication, collaboration and capacity building with five categories of beneficiaries: European oversight professionals, intelligence professionals, NGOs reviewing oversight practices, telecommunication companies, students and ordinary citizens. We will communicate through a variety of media, adapted to each category of beneficiaries (from doctoral workshops, academic articles, online resources to the toolkit for oversight professionals and NGOs). The digital visualisation and the composite intelligence index are aimed at a broader range of civil society actors, the press, international organisations and the general public. Given that focus of the project relies on research and building up collaboration through transnational networks, we aim to participate in these networks, drawing upon their expertise and sharing the results of our research.
 
Description The GUARDINT project has proposed to shed light on the limitations, failures or successes of existing oversight mechanisms. It has developed a novel understanding of oversight as a necessary aspect of democratic life and transnational cooperation. The UK team has focused on three dimensions of oversight: i) mapping and understanding the bodies that have the capacity to play an oversight role; ii) analysing of the role of oversight in democracy; and iii) visualizing how oversight emerges in the debates about the activities of intelligence agencies and the relation between security and liberty.

Theoretically, the project has shown that oversight cannot be limited to institutional understandings. We need to move beyond the remit of institutions to understand how organisations and individuals can become informal 'overseers'. Through a practice-based approach, the project has shown that oversight takes much more agonistic, contentious, transnational, and public forms. By contrasting the dominant ways of construing 'intelligence oversight' as democratic in the academic and policy literature with case studies of litigation, whistleblowing, and advocacy, we have shown how competing understandings of democracy play out in the everyday struggles of actors engaged in legitimising and contesting intelligence surveillance, highlighting how these practices were usually excluded from the remit, justifications, and modes of the institutionalisation of oversight.

Another theoretical finding concerns the changes in discourse to demand better oversight of intelligence agencies. We have argued that a transformation has been underway from questions of 'abuse' to questions of 'trust'. 'Trust' discourses, somewhat counterintuitively, facilitate greater impunity for intelligence agencies, allowing them to evade accountability and scrutiny.

Methodologically, the project has shown how practice-based and digital methods can bring new insights into the transformations of oversight discourses, practices, and actors in the UK. Firstly, we have developed practice-based methods that started from the long history of scandals, controversies, and disputes about the activities of intelligence agencies, particularly mass surveillance. The world of intelligence institutions is known for scandals and affairs. From the 'Safari Affair' in France in 1970, through to the Zircon satellite and ECHELON controversies of the 80s and 90s, the past fifty years provides many examples of whistleblowing, denunciation, and counter-denunciations. Taking scandals, controversies, and disputes as methodological entry points into the study of practices means that we do not start with intelligence or with the justifications that security professionals give - or refuse to give - of their practices. Secondly, we have conducted qualitative and oral history interviews with participants in formal and informal 'oversight' practices. Thirdly, we have developed digital methods and curated new databases based on the Hansard parliamentary archive and the Internet archive. We have also visualised key scandals related to mass surveillance across France, Germany and UK in order to show that scandals are not exceptional, but they are actually endemic to the activities of intelligence agencies. This multi-modal methodology has shown why some discourses and practices of oversight are deemed unacceptable at specific historical moments.
Exploitation Route We envisage that the research findings from the GUARDINT project will play a two-fold role in further research in International Relations and the fields of intelligence studies and security studies. We invite scholars in these fields to address, on the one hand, the plurality of practices of intelligence oversight. On the other, we call for intelligence oversight scholarship and intelligence studies needs to open up to a wider range of views and disciplinary approaches. We have also shown how multi-modal methodologies, particularly through the integration of digital methods, yield new insights. Given the increase in digital material - both digital and digitised archives - International Relations scholarship can benefit from engagement with digital methods.
Sectors Government, Democracy and Justice,Security and Diplomacy

URL http://www.guardint.org
 
Title Surveillance Oversight Database 
Description The database offers an evolving document archive of laws and regulations, court decisions and official reports surrounding intelligence oversight. At this point, it compiles documents from France, Germany and the United Kingdom. This will both support our comparative research and improve public access to these important documents. The database is work in progress and supposed to grow over time, including more documents from more countries. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2020 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact There is existing database that brings together disperse documents. The database has only been recently made public and we expect impact to emerge as it becomes known and used. 
URL https://data.guardint.org/en/
 
Title Timeline of intelligence surveillance scandals 
Description This research report compiled for the GUARDINT research project collates short case-studies of scandals around intelligence surveillance in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. It is co-authored by Shen Ibrahimsadeh (WZB), Ibtehal Hussain (King's College London), Bernardino Léon Reyes (CERI Sciences Po), Ronja Kniep (WZB), Félix Tréguer (CERI Sciences Po), Emma Mc Cluskey (University of Westminster), Claudia Aradau (King's College London). 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact N/A 
URL https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03952751/file/W3D3_NONDEF_GUARDINT%20Timeline%20of%20Intelligence...
 
Description 14th Pan-European Conference on International Relations (EISA 2021) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact The GUARDINT project organised a panel on 'Intelligence and Oversight Networks: Who Guards the Guardians?', where members of the French, German and UK teams presented research findings from the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://eisa-net.org/programme/#topanchor
 
Description 25 years of British Oversight and Accountability (RUSI) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation of the initial findings from the GUARDINT project at RUSI (Royal United Services Institute), which sparked conversations with intelligence and oversight professionals on thinking of oversight in terms of democratic practice.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Back to Big Brother? 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Claudia Aradau participated at the Cheltenham Literature Festival. Claudia Aradau & James Ball (The System) examined the ethics around new technologies & consider the dangers posed to human rights when decision-making is put into the wrong hands.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://guardint.org/2020/09/15/back-to-big-brother-public-talk-with-james-ball-and-claudia-aradau/
 
Description European Workshops in International Studies, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, 6-9 July 2022 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Claudia Aradau and Ibtehal Hussain presented a paper co-authored with Tobias Blanke on visualising debates about oversight and intelligence. The paper develops an interdisciplinary dialogue between international relations and digital humanities.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://eisa-net.org/ewis-2022/
 
Description GUARDINT Conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Held online on the 26th and 27th January 2022, the conference 'Intelligence, surveillance, and oversight: tracing connections and contestations' aimed to situate the research done in GUARDINT within a broader conversation with intelligence studies, security studies, and International Relations. Participants addressed the meaning of democratic oversight, practices of formal and informal oversight, the role of contestation, actors, and publics in holding intelligence and security actors accountable and transforming practices of (in)security and surveillance. They also discussed challenges that transnational cooperation
between intelligence and security actors pose for oversight, as well as new digital technologies.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://guardint.org/2022/07/15/our-guardint-conference-report-is-out/
 
Description GUARDINT website 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact The website and associated Twitter account are one of the tools of dissemination of research findings and activities.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://guardint.org/
 
Description Intelligence, surveillance,and oversight: tracing connections and contestations 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact The conference 'Intelligence, surveillance, and oversight: tracing connections and contestations' aimed to situate the research done in GUARDINT within a broader conversation with intelligence studies, security studies, and International Relations. Participants addressed the meaning of democratic oversight, practices of formal and informal oversight, the role of contestation, actors and publics in holding intelligence and security actors accountable and transforming practices of (in)security and surveillance. They also discussed challenges that transnational cooperation between intelligence and security actors pose for oversight, as well as the new digital technologies.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/intelligence-surveillance-oversight-tracing-connections-contestations...
 
Description Presentation to delegation of intelligence and oversight professionals and policymakers 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Upon invitation of the High Commission of Canada in London, GUARDINT team member Dr. Emma Mc Cluskey was invited to speak to delegates from Canada's Security and Intelligence Policy Programme (SIPP) about transformations and challenges in the UK's oversight model. The event was held under Chatham House rules on 2 March 2020
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Public lecture (Bristol) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Claudia Aradau gave an invited lecture at the Global Insecurities Centre (University Bristol) on collaborative work by the UK team as part of the GUARDINT Project. The lecture was was open to the general public.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://guardint.org/2021/02/09/global-insecurities-centre-lecture/
 
Description Workshop on oversight and democratic rights 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact The GUARDINT project team met for a remote workshop to discuss preliminary research results and coordinate future planning in light of the Corona virus pandemic. The different GUARDINT researchers presented updates on their respective work packages and deliverables. This included the presentation and discussant on the draft paper on 'Security, digital surveillance and the grammar of democracy: a political sociology of disputes', which fed back into the final draft of the paper.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020