The 2019 Northern Ireland General Election Study

Lead Research Organisation: University of Liverpool
Department Name: Politics

Abstract

The 2019 Northern Ireland General Election survey will study the views of Northern Ireland's electors using a carefully weighted representative sample of 1500 electors.

It will identify the basis of party choice and political attitudes in the context of a Brexit-dominated election in the part of the UK most directly affected by departure from the EU. The 2019 contest takes place amid political difficulties for Northern Ireland. The devolved power-sharing Assembly established under the Good Friday Agreement has collapsed, absent for more than 1,000 days. Divisions between Unionists (mainly pro-Leave) versus nationalists (overwhelmingly pro-Remain) have been exacerbated by Brexit. In addition to providing the definitive survey of why people voted the way they did at the election, this study intends to provide a comprehensive analysis of the extent of polarity, prospects for the restoration of local political institutions and possibilities for thawing inter-communal relations. It will also test what sort of Brexit Northern Ireland's electors will - and will not - accept. Are borders on the island of Ireland or in respect of GB-Northern Ireland trade viewed as acceptable or unacceptable and by which groups?

We need to measure healing or thawing - and what creates either - along a range of axes. Sectarian division remains considerable, evidenced by a range of issues such as the maintenance of peace walls, segregated education and a low rate of 'intermarriage' There remains a residual security threat posed by dissident republicans, with successive Chief Constables cautioning against any return of a hard border.

Yet the percentage of the electorate identifying as unionist or nationalist appears to be in decline, as those saying they are not aligned to either tradition grows. This 2019 election survey will test the extent of dealignment, its reasons, how this shapes party choice and how far the acute sectarian divide between Protestant-British Unionists and Catholic-Irish nationalists amongst the electorate has diminished. The survey will also examine the rationale of those who remain within their ethnic blocs and explore the basis of party choice inside those two main blocs. It will also test the extent, if at all, to which 'British' or 'Irish' identities, the equal legitimacy of which were acknowledged in the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, have been supplanted by a common 'Northern Irish' identity, amid the dawning of a shared future.

The election survey will examine voters' views on whether and how devolution might be restored. It will assess where voters place the political parties on a range of local and national political issues and will examine how voters rate the performance of parties on each major policy area, including constitutional questions, the economy, education, health, social development and welfare.

Additionally, the study will ascertain the electorate's views and preferences on a range of post-conflict issues, as a truth and reconciliation commission, support for victims, reform of the judicial system and the integration of Northern Ireland society via, e.g. the removal of 'peace walls' and 'mixed' schooling. The 2019 election survey will evaluate the importance to the electorate - and its views on - various aspects of contested 'social liberalism', notably on abortion rights where Westminster has felt obliged to legislate for Northern Ireland.

Based upon a large representative sample , the project will yield a vital survey dataset for use by social scientists, policy-makers and media. Given the contemporary salience of Northern Ireland to the Brexit debate, systematic examination of public opinion via a large-scale in-depth survey of 1,500 completed face-to-face interviews of a representative sample of the electorate is vital. Interviews will be completed across Northern Ireland within 6 weeks of the election. Datasets will be of considerable value to policy-makers, parties and media.

Planned Impact

There will be a wide array of beneficiaries from this research, beyond immediate academic circles. Several of the investigators are using the previous studies as the basis of 2021 REF impact case studies. The list of committees which have requested oral and written evidence regarding the data from our previous studies is formidable and we expect likewise, if not even more so given the political context, this time. These committees include the House of Lords European Union Committee, 'Brexit: Devolution Inquiry', 2017; the European Parliament Constitutional Affairs Committee, on 'The Implications of Brexit for Northern Ireland', 2017, the House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Select Committee on Devolution, 2018 and the House of Commons Public Administration & Constitutional Affairs Select Committee, 2018.

The investigators have provided data from earlier studies, used and acknowledged, for a vast range of sources, including BBC Newsnight, BBC Radio 4's Today and PM programmes, BBC News, Sky News, the Washington Post, New York Times, NBC, ABC, among many, many other national and international outlets.

Other principal beneficiaries will include:

Politicians in Northern Ireland, at council, Assembly and Westminster elections, as they will be better informed as to the electorate's support for political institutions and political priorities.

Civil servants, currently maintaining Northern Ireland's services in the absence of a devolved administration, will be informed as to how the public views this role.

Political parties will benefit from the study in being able to calculate the demographic basis of their support, assess the extent to which their appeal is religiously or socially exclusive, gendered or age dependent, examine the expectations of the electorate and determine future political agendas. Key issues in terms of a the traditional faultline in politics (support for the Union/Irish unity) b) movement towards reconciliation and/or reintegration, e.g. mixed schooling; integrated public housing and c) non-constitutional/conflict based concerns (e.g. educational selection, university fees, health and maternity provision; abortion) will all be covered in the survey, which will inform future decision-making and party stances.

Journalists will benefit greatly from the study in providing an accurate survey of opinion in Northern Ireland which will go beyond the intuitive or descriptive. We expect extensive coverage of the study in the main outlets such as the Irish News, Irish Times, Newsletter and Belfast Telegraph. All of these outlets have run very extensive coverage of our 2010, 2015 and 2017 election surveys. The PI, for examine, provides a regular column in the Belfast Telegraph, which will be used to discuss the findings.

The general public will benefit from the study in being able to see where their views lie on a wide range of political questions and by being able to convey priorities to the Executive, Assembly, parties and the voluntary sector via the published results of the study. The public will be able to access the results via the survey website and be able, via the same resource, to offer suggestions in respect of future survey design.

Representatives of each of these groups will benefit directly from the dissemination of the survey findings via various means:

a) at two special post-election conferences to be held in Northern Ireland, to which representatives from all the above groups will be invited

b) The investigators all enjoy good contacts with a range of political and voluntary sector organisations in Northern Ireland, having worked in the past with them on various surveys and we will offer private briefings to the main organisations falling into the categories listed above.

c) Copies of the survey results will also be accessible to organisations and the public via a dedicated election survey website, which will also facilitate comments and interaction.
 
Description There were numerous key findings but here are a selection, followed by a little data:

There has been little change in attitudes towards Brexit since the 2016 referendum.
Checks at borders on the island of Ireland or in terms of GB-NI trade are both unpopular.
There has not been much movement in terms of a shift towards support for a united Ireland.
Non-voters and those not identifying as unionist or nationalist tend to prefer the constitutional status quo.
The growth in support for Alliance at the 2019 election came as a consequence of defections from the DUP and Sinn Fein plus the capture of the largest portion of previous non-voters.
Identification as unionist or nationalist is less popular than identification as 'neither unionist nor nationalist'.
Young people (regardless of religion or none) are more socially liberal than older people.
There is sizeable support for integrated education and mixed marriages.
There remains very extensive support for devolved government.
There has been an increase in support for a truth and reconciliation commission to deal with the past.

Brexit
• 62.8% of Northern Ireland's electors said they supported remaining in the EU. A mere 10.6% said they would not vote in a 2nd referendum.
• Regarding checks on goods travelling between Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the East-West border), 68.5% of those who stated an opinion believed that it was unacceptable.
• Regarding checks on goods travelling across the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland (the North-South border), 68.5% of those who stated an opinion believed that it was unacceptable.

The Constitution
• Between 2010 and 2019 the share of Protestants who support remaining in the union grew from 90.3% to 94.5%.
• In the same period the share of Catholics supportive of remaining in the union declined from 17.8% to 13.6%.
• More voters agree (40.3%) than disagree (30.9%) that the reunification of Ireland will happen.
• 76.9% of non-voters who stated a preference are pro-remain within the UK. In 2019 non-voters numbered c500k. Unionism has a significant problem in not attracting pro-union members of the electorate to vote compared to nationalists and republican parties.

Voting by Age:
• 30.7% of all respondents believed the voting age should be lowered to 16, compared to 48% who opposed.
• The majority of those aged 18-29 did not vote (52.6%).
• At least 70%+ of other age groups voted,
• Table 14 shows that roughly two-thirds of young (aged 18-25) Protestants who identify as unionist and young Catholics who identify as Catholics voted but only one-third of those who are neither unionist or nationalist voted.
• In sum, most young people who do not vote are generally from a socially progressive group and do not subscribe to being unionist or nationalist.

Identity Preference and Voting:
• Among those who are neither nationalist nor unionist the majority stated a preference to stay in the UK.
• Overall 28.4% state they are unionist and 24.6% nationalist . The largest group at 39.6% are neither unionist nor nationalist.
• Only the Alliance Party attracted a near equal share of voters by religion.
• SF (92.9%), DUP (87.8%) and SDLP (86.6%) generally maintained votes from those who had voted for them in 2017.
• The UUP maintained 66.9% of their previous voters but gained 15.4% of their total vote from previous DUP voters.
• The Alliance Party had the most interesting electoral performance in that they gained most of their vote from other political parties.
• Notable is their share of those who had voted DUP (18.6%) or SF (11.6%) in 2017.
• 16.4% of their total vote came from those who did not vote in 2017.

Those who voted by religion
Party No Religion/Catholics Protestant and other religions
DUP 2.4 97.6
UUP 5.1 94.9
Alliance 48.9 51.1
SDLP 89.5 10.5
Sinn Fein 97.6 2.4
Did not Vote55.3 44.7

Voting and non-voting by religion
Voted Did not Vote
No religion 42.1 57.9
Catholics 71.5 28.5
Prot/other 71.8 28.2


Vote shares among those who did not vote in 2017 but voted in 2019 by Political Party
DUP SF SDLP UUP Alliance
% share 22.5 12.9 12.9 11.2 24.1

Turnout by political identity
Unionist Neither Nationalist
2019 81.2 50.1 83.7

The Institutions - still extensive public support

• 81.4% supported the NI Assembly and Executive's restoration.
• Regarding whether 'legislation should require support from a majority of Unionist and Nationalist Assembly members', the majority (55.4%) agreed compared to 7.6% who opposed
• About 'devolved Power Sharing v Direct Rule', 43.8% support devolution compared to 15.1% who support Direct Rule (Table 17).

Devolved power-sharing between parties is better than direct rule from Westminster?
Strongly Agree/Agree 43.8
Neither Agree/Disagree/Do not Know 40.0
Strongly Disagree/Disagree 15.1

Unity or Reunification?
53.5% of the sample support remaining in the UK. This rises to 61% of voters and 65% of the sample when excluding do not knows, other preferences and refused options.
• What is most interesting is that 30.9% of non-voters do not know what the long-term constitutional future of NI should be.
• This is twice the sample average. Their ambiguity may change, and like young people they are critical to the decision to call a border poll.

What should be long-term policy for NI by party voted for?
• Over 90% of UUP and DUP voters support remaining in the union compared to lower shares for SF (81.1%) and SDLP (70.3%) voters.
• Alliance voters are split, with 58.8% for the union and 25.6% for reunification.
• 29.1% of SDLP voters are undecided or pro-union.
• Nearly half of the generally pro-union Alliance voters agree (Table 24).
• The survey suggests that if a similar turnout was achieved and non-voters engaged, then the result would be to remain within the union. This is based on the finding that most non-voters are presently pro-union.
• The significant share of the electorate who are undecided or indeed ambiguous indicates that political parties need to win support from non-voters and convert those who have yet to decide. This latter point is critical for nationalists and republicans.

To remain in UK or to reunify with Ireland by Political Party
DUP SF Alliance SDLP UUP
To remain part of the UK 96.5 10.0 58.8 20.3 94.8
To reunify with the rest of Ireland 1.9 81.1 25.6 70.3 0.7

It has become more likely that NI will eventually join the Republic of Ireland
Voters Non-Voters Overall
Agree/Strongly Agree 40.3 21.6 35.3
Neither Agree/Disagree/Don't Know 25.9 59.7 37.0
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 30.9 17.8 26.4

It has become more likely that NI will eventually join the Irish Republic by Party
Party Agree/Strongly Agree Neither Agree/Disagree/Do not Know Disagree/Strongly Disagree
DUP 21.2 28.9 49.2
Sinn Fein 69.0 22.9 7.4
SDLP 64.5 22.8 12.5
UUP 16.1 22.7 61.0
Alliance 45.5 23.2 31.3

It has become more likely that NI will eventually join the Irish Republic by Age
Age Group Agree/Strongly Agree Neither Agree/Disagree/Do not Know Disagree/Strongly Disagree
18-25 26.4 53.2 20.3
26-40 36.3 38.0 24.3
41-50 37.6 33.0 29.2
50-60 35.2 32.2 31.1
60+ 37.0 34.1 26.9

Marriage Equality
• 51.4% agreed or strongly agreed that it was right to make same sex marriage legal compared to 23.7% who disagreed or strongly disagreed
• As shown in Table 27 50.6% voters compared to 57.3% of non-voters support marriage equality.
• Those who tended to be most in favour were aged under 40 (64.5%).
• Only those aged 60+ had less than a 50% share who disagreed (Table 28).
• The highest level of support was among those who were not religious (62%) compared to around half of those who stated a faith.
• There was a near equal share between Protestants and Catholics agree with marriage equality.

It was right to make same sex marriage legal by age?
Age Group Agree/Strongly Agree with marriage equality
18-25 64.5
26-40 60.4
41-50 54.0
50-60 51.8
60+ 41.3

It was right to make same sex marriage legal by religion
Agree/Strongly Agree Neither Agree/Disagree/Do not Know Disagree/Strongly Disagree
No religion 62.6 20.7 15.5
Catholics 53.6 25.0 20.4
Prot/other 47.9 21.5 29.2


Integration
• Nearly a quarter (23.0%) of 18-25-year olds are living with a partner or married from another or no religion.
• This compares to 13.0% of 51-60s and 10.2% of 60+.
• When asked 'if you mind if a close relative was to marry someone from a different religion' 61.7% stated that they would not mind.
• Non-voters were more supportive, especially younger Protestant non-voters, at 83.7%. Only 47.7% of SF voters stated that they would not mind.
• Regarding 'if you were deciding where to send your children to school.?' we find only SF voters produce a majority (56.1%) who agree with own religion school.
• DUP voters are next highest on 47.5%.

Immigration good for economy and society?
• A mere 26.3% agreed or strongly agreed that immigration is good for the economy and society.
• 44.6% disagreed or strongly disagreed. 46% of Catholics and Protestants disagreed.
• Overall 50.4% of voters disagreed (Table 35).

Irish Language Act
• Responses to 'there should be an Irish Language Act?' remains linked to religious affiliation.
• 69.5% of Catholics agreed.
• 10.7% of Protestants and 22.4% of the non-religious agreed.

Which of these come closest to what you think should be the law on abortion for Northern Ireland by gender
Male Female
Allowed only where the mother's life is in danger 52.2 43.1
Allowed up to 12 weeks of pregnancy 24.3 29.1
Allowed up to 24 weeks of pregnancy 7.8 6.2
Allowed up to 28 weeks of pregnancy 5.4 9.2
Other (please specify) 10.1 12.2

Dealing with the Past
Only innocent peoples can be called victims of the Troubles:
• Overall 54.4% of the total sample agreed/strongly agreed.
• Unionists (UUP 80.1% and DUP 72.3%) were those most likely to concur.
• SF voters at 41.0% were the least likely to agree.

Those who admit to carrying out acts of violence during the Troubles should be given an amnesty?
• A mere 14.3% of all respondents and 16.8% of those who voted agreed.
• The highest level of agreement was within SF (21.3%) and the SDLP 28.1%.

There should be a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to look at all deeds committed during the Troubles?
• In 2017, 31% agreed or strongly agreed. This has now risen to 45.7%.
• If we exclude those who did not agree or disagree, 73.6% support a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Exploitation Route It is already happening in terms of a membership survey of the Alliance Party. Other parties are using the data to tailor their messages to the electorate. The PI and CI Shirlow have been requested by a NI Executive Minister to provide a briefing document on how to engage young people in decision-making. The Cabinet Office Devolution Unit requested a briefing in terms of the 'state-of-play' of devolution in NI.
Sectors Government, Democracy and Justice

URL https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/media/livacuk/research/heroimages/The-University-of-Liverpool-NI-General-Election-Survey-2019-March-20.pdf
 
Description 1. Political parties in Northern Ireland have requested the datasets and according to the Policy Director of one (in a written testimonial available on request and used for the REF impact case study) his party has "used our election surveys to shape agendas, declaring that they "impacted significantly upon our party in understanding who votes [for the party] and why highlighted the most important issues we need to address; and helped us tailor policy development and key election messages". 2. The media published our findings (e.g. led the coverage over several pages in Northern Ireland's largest circulation newspaper) and they have bee extensively debated via broadcast, press and social media. 3. The Alliance Party, Northern Ireland's largest non-unionist and non-nationalist party, has agreed to a survey of its members to be undertaken by the PI, building on some of the aspects of the growth of the centre ground which featured in the election results and data findings. This has now been completed. 4. The data from a survey of more than 2,000 non-unionist and non-nationalist electors is shortly to be deposited with the UK Data Service with open access on request for other researchers. 5. The Green Party of Northern Ireland has also agreed to a full membership survey as another non-unionist and non-nationalist party.
First Year Of Impact 2022
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Education,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Cultural,Societal,Economic,Policy & public services

 
Description Beyond Unionism and Nationalism in Northern Ireland: Electors, Voters and Party Members
Amount £441,838 (GBP)
Funding ID ES/V014072/1 
Organisation Economic and Social Research Council 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 11/2021 
End 10/2023
 
Title The Northern Ireland General Election Survey, 2019 
Description SPSS dataset of a representative sample of 2,003 Northern Ireland electors, conducted in the first six weeks after the Dec 2019 Westminster General Election in Northern Ireland, using face-to-face Computer Assisted Personal Interviews (fieldwork: Social Market Research Belfast). 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2020 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact Datasets requested by political parties. Private briefings to political parties Very extensive media coverage and debate (full list available) Several journal articles already published. Contributed significantly to Tonge-Shirlow 2021 REF impact case study. 
URL https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=8619
 
Description Alliance Party of Northern Ireland 
Organisation Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution Agreed a partnership with this political party to produce a membership survey, following the 2019 Northern Ireland General Election study. This will be published as a book with Oxford University Press later this year.
Collaborator Contribution Working with the Alliance Party to survey its entire membership in terms of demographics and political attitudes across a wide range of questions. This benefits the party - more knowledge of its members - and us as academics - more knowledge of the main non-unionist and non-nationalist party in Northern Ireland.
Impact Forthcoming book with Oxford University Press.
Start Year 2020
 
Description Briefing to the Cabinet Office Devolution Unit 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact I was asked to provide a briefing on the state-of-devolution in Northern Ireland to senior civil servants working in the Devolution Unit on 1/12/20.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Conference dissemination of General Election research findings 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Dissemination of General Election data findings in relation to the Northern Ireland Assembly as part of an 'Agenda NI' conference in Oct 2020 - mainly to politicians, senior civil servants, academics and journalists
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://www.niassembly.agendani.com/
 
Description Interviews with various newspapers and on radio/TV 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Circa 40-50 radio and television interviews in 2020-21 disseminating Northern Ireland General Election data
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020,2021
 
Description Newspaper columns for the Belfast Telegraph 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Various (circa 40) newspaper articles for the Belfast Telegraph disseminating election data findings
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020,2021
 
Description Oral briefings to Northern Ireland's political parties 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Private briefings to three of Northern Ireland's main political parties and presentation of the election survey data
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Preparation and delivery of a Labour Party training course on the Good Friday Agreement 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact I was asked by the Labour Party to write a training course covering its historical magnitude and relevance, its contemporary salience and the outstanding issues. I made extensive use of the election survey data to demonstrate continuing public support for the devolved Executive and Assembly and presented other election survey data on attitudes to e.g. greater integration. This is ongoing work, with a series of webinars being delivered by the Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Louise Haigh and myself to Labour Party members in 2021.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020,2021
URL https://labour.org.uk/good-friday-agreement/
 
Description Presentation of data findings to the Committee on the Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement, Oireachtas (Irish Parliament) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact I was invited to present to the Joint Committee on the Good Friday Friday Agreement (both houses of the Irish Parliament) electoral evidence on the levels of support for the Northern Ireland Executive and Assembly and on whether the Northern Irish electorate continued to support the principles of devolved power-sharing. I also presented suggestions for reform. My oral evidence was accompanied by a written presentation.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/press-centre/press-releases/20210712-oireachtas-committee-examines-stra...
 
Description Presentation to the Northern Ireland (Ministers, Elections and Petitions of Concern) Bill Committee, House of Commons 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact I presented an analysis of the draft proposals in the Northern Ireland (Ministers, Elections and Petitions of Concern Bill Committee
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.theyworkforyou.com/pbc/2021-22/northern_ireland_%28ministers%2C_elections_and_petitions_...
 
Description Submission of written evidence to the Northern Ireland Affairs Select Committee inquiry into the Effectiveness of the Good Friday/Belfast Agreement institutions 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Evidence to the Select Committee on the need for institutional reforms. Impacts may depend upon the Select Committee final report
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/113427/pdf/