Bilateral ESRC/FNR: Banking on Europe
Lead Research Organisation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Department Name: Politics
Abstract
This three-year project will bring together a team of four researchers in the UK and Luxembourg with the aim of generating new knowledge among academics and policymakers about the evolution and accountability of pan-European public financial institutions. Institutions with the authority to raise funds on financial markets to provide grants, loans or guarantees were part of the European Communities' early efforts in the 1950s to support the coal and steel sectors and regional development. Such institutions formed key elements of European responses to the economic crises of the 1970s, the reuniting of Europe in the 1990s and the euro crisis in the 2010s, and they are now pivotal to the EU's response to COVID-19. The Luxembourg-based European Investment Bank, now the world's largest multilateral lender, has provided EUR 25 billion in guarantees for European businesses hit by the pandemic. This is in addition to the EUR 750 billion that the European Commission plans to borrow to help with the economic costs of COVID-19. As a result of these and other initiatives, the EU will soon be borrowing on the scale of a large state.
As pan-European public financial institutions grow in importance, they face calls for greater accountability to governments, parliaments and NGOs. And yet, there is limited political science research on either the evolution or accountability of these bodies. Existing studies typically look at pan-European public financial institutions individually and ahistorically. The funding requested will support a Principal Investigator and Postdoctoral Research Associate in London and a Co-Investigator and Postdoctoral Research Associate in Luxembourg to undertake the first comparative study of pan-European public financial institutions, drawing out the institutional and historical interconnections between a range of such bodies created since 1950. We will refine and develop a novel theoretical account of pan-European public financial institutions based on new intergovernmentalism, which we will test against other contemporary theories of European integration through archival research, elite interviews, process tracing, meta-synthesis and a mixed method study of accountability practices.
Our findings will generate new knowledge on: (1) the evolution and accountability of pan-European public financial institutions since 1950; (2) who is driving these developments and what this means for accountability; and (3) how accountable these bodies are in practice and how their accountability to governments, parliaments and NGOs can be strengthened. Through journal articles, a monograph and conference presentations, this project will shape debates about public financial institutions among scholars of European integration and International Political Economy. Through working papers, policy briefs and workshops, the project will produce knowledge exchange with practitioners who work in and on pan-European public financial institutions. Our findings will encourage governments, parliaments, NGOs and pan-European public financial institutions themselves to explore new and stronger accountability practices.
This project is timely given public debates over how temporary responses to COVID-19 might permanently change the EU. It is relevant for understanding how Brexit will impact upon the UK's continued membership of the London-based European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the British government's search for a new relationship with the European Investment Bank. It is salient for debates about how a new generation of international public financial institutions, such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, can learn from Europe. The project offers considerable value-added by fostering international collaboration on a topic of shared importance for the UK and Luxembourg, which are home to important pan-European public financial institutions.
As pan-European public financial institutions grow in importance, they face calls for greater accountability to governments, parliaments and NGOs. And yet, there is limited political science research on either the evolution or accountability of these bodies. Existing studies typically look at pan-European public financial institutions individually and ahistorically. The funding requested will support a Principal Investigator and Postdoctoral Research Associate in London and a Co-Investigator and Postdoctoral Research Associate in Luxembourg to undertake the first comparative study of pan-European public financial institutions, drawing out the institutional and historical interconnections between a range of such bodies created since 1950. We will refine and develop a novel theoretical account of pan-European public financial institutions based on new intergovernmentalism, which we will test against other contemporary theories of European integration through archival research, elite interviews, process tracing, meta-synthesis and a mixed method study of accountability practices.
Our findings will generate new knowledge on: (1) the evolution and accountability of pan-European public financial institutions since 1950; (2) who is driving these developments and what this means for accountability; and (3) how accountable these bodies are in practice and how their accountability to governments, parliaments and NGOs can be strengthened. Through journal articles, a monograph and conference presentations, this project will shape debates about public financial institutions among scholars of European integration and International Political Economy. Through working papers, policy briefs and workshops, the project will produce knowledge exchange with practitioners who work in and on pan-European public financial institutions. Our findings will encourage governments, parliaments, NGOs and pan-European public financial institutions themselves to explore new and stronger accountability practices.
This project is timely given public debates over how temporary responses to COVID-19 might permanently change the EU. It is relevant for understanding how Brexit will impact upon the UK's continued membership of the London-based European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the British government's search for a new relationship with the European Investment Bank. It is salient for debates about how a new generation of international public financial institutions, such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, can learn from Europe. The project offers considerable value-added by fostering international collaboration on a topic of shared importance for the UK and Luxembourg, which are home to important pan-European public financial institutions.
People |
ORCID iD |
| Dermot Hodson (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Hodson D
(2023)
The EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility: An Exceptional Borrowing Instrument?
in Journal of European Integration
Hodson D
(2024)
Accountability in pan-European borrowing: mind the gap
in West European Politics
Howarth D
(2023)
The European Investment Bank to the rescue? COVID-related lending as incremental change
in Journal of Economic Policy Reform
Spielberger L
(2024)
EIB policy entrepreneurship and the EU's regulation of Green Bonds
in Journal of Economic Policy Reform
Spielberger L
(2024)
Building a European Union 'Treasury': Explaining the European Commission's New Approach to Debt Issuance and Management
in JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
Spielberger L
(2023)
Staying the course: The EIB's reluctant COVID-19 response
Related Projects
| Project Reference | Relationship | Related To | Start | End | Award Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES/W000733/1 | 10/01/2022 | 13/05/2023 | £505,248 | ||
| ES/W000733/2 | Transfer | ES/W000733/1 | 14/05/2023 | 09/01/2025 | £276,989 |
| Description | This project, which was funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and the Luxembourg National Research Fund, has generated a substantial new body of evidence regarding the evolution and accountability of European-level borrowers i.e. public financial institutions with the power to raise funds on capital markets to finance grants and loans to public and/or private actors. The project has exceeded expected outputs by publishing six articles in peer reviewed journals, thirteen policy briefs and a monograph with Oxford University Press, which is in press at the time of this report. It also organised a series of knowledge-exchange events with European policy-makers and representatives of NGOs. When the EU empowered the European Commission in 2020 to borrow up to €675.5 billion to support the green and digital transition and member states' economic recovery from Covid-19, it was greeted by many commentators as a step change for European integration. This project's findings show that the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility is merely the latest in a series of European-level borrowing instruments which stretch back to the European Communities' establishment in the 1950s. The European Commission is, moreover, one of several European-level borrowers alongside the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the European Stability Mechanism. While there is strong continuity between these borrowing instruments, member states have not been locked into specific institutional choices; instead, national governments have periodically preferred to borrow rather than increase contributions to the EU budget when faced with cross-border externalities. Since the 1990s, borrowing instruments have also been increasingly shaped by concerns over the EU's legitimacy. The project has also shown that European-level borrowers face significant accountability gaps with respect to parliaments, auditors, citizens and civil society groups and put forward ideas for strengthening accountability practices in this overlooked area of European decision-making. These findings are relevant for EU policy-makers and those in the UK, which remains a shareholder of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. |
| Exploitation Route | In March 2025, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen put forward a proposal to provide €150 billion in loans to member states for defence investment under the EU's ReArm Europe plan. At the same time, UK Defence Secretary David Lammy expressed support for the creation of a new Europe-wide rearmament bank. Our project findings are relevant for understanding how these and other proposals are merely the most recent in a series of institutional choices which span seven decades. Studying earlier borrowing instruments in the light of our findings can help to produce more robust and accountable pan-European public financial institutions. The project's findings are relevant for scholars and policy-makers seeking to understand the origins and evolution of European-level borrowing instruments and institutions. We have also put forward a range of specific suggestions for strengthening the accountability of European-level borrowers to governments, parliaments, auditors, civil society and citizens in this domain. These suggestions include a Parliamentary Accountability Charter and more robust independent accountability mechanisms. |
| Sectors | Government Democracy and Justice |
| Description | This project has generated societal impact by deepening European policy-makers' understanding of pan-European public financial institutions. The one-day event we organised at the European Court of Auditors on 15 March 2024 was designated as a 'training session' for Court of Auditors staff, which attended the event in large numbers and engaged with the findings of our project. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, there is now growing scholarly interest in the so-called second arm of the EU budget, which relies on bond issuance rather than 'own resources' to finance the Union's activities. This project has produced a new body of work in this overlooked area of EU policy-making, including on the European Commission's evolving funding strategy and debt management operations. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2024 |
| Sector | Government, Democracy and Justice |
| Description | Article in the Guardian |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | This comment piece by Hodson in the Guardian raised awareness of EU loans for Ukraine and the economic costs of reconstruction and accession as this country prepares to join the EU. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/11/ukraine-join-eu-membership-talks-subsidies |
| Description | BBC World Service |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Hodson appeared as a guest on the BBC World Service Programme (2 November), where he talked about the rapid growth of EU borrowing since the pandemic. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://wspartners.bbc.com/episode/w172zcx8nt466kh |
| Description | Comment piece in EU Observer |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | A comment piece by Howarth and Spielbeger in EU Observer raised awareness of the accountability challenges facing European-level borrowing institutions. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://euobserver.com/eu-political/ar1d62ff2a |
| Description | Conference at the Court of Auditors |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | This one-day conference at the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg involved 80 audience members from EU institutions, civil society, the wider public and academia. It generated discussion over the accountability and efficacy of EU borrowing mechanisms and involved a keynote speach by Mr Tony Murphy, the President of the European Court of Auditors. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Counter-Balance Workshop |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Third sector organisations |
| Results and Impact | In this event, the project team organised a half-day workshop with Counter-Balance, a Brussels-based NGO dedicated to holding public banks accountable This event generated discussion between policy-makers, representatives of NGOs and academics and led to requests for further information on the project, |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | EBRD Workshop |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | The project team presented its research to more than 50 officials at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) HQ in London. The event facilitated knowledge exchange on the evolution and accountability of the EBRD and generated a request for further information on the project's research and findings. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Guest lecture (Georgia Institute of Technology) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | The project PI gave a keynote lecture 'European Economic Governance in a Time of Pandemic and War' to faculty teaching on the EU Certificate Programme for the University System of Georgia on 6 October 2022. The online event was attended by more than 40 people and sparked questions and discussions on the EU's evolution as a borrower and its impact on EU economic governance. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| URL | https://www.gatech.edu/event/2022/10/04/european-economic-governance-time-pandemic-and-war |
| Description | Outreach Event |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | This outreach event at the University of Luxembourg presented the project's findings to an audience of over fifty policy-makers, NGO representatives, academics and students. The conference fostered discussion over how to strengthen the accountability, and foster greater cooperation between, public development banks. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Project newsletter |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A magazine, newsletter or online publication |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A quarterly online project newsletter was sent to approximately 100 policy-makers and researchers working in the field of European public finance. The newsletter, which provided updates on project activities and links to publications, yielded requests for further information. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| Description | Workshop at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | On 18 January 2023, the project team organised a workshop at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Headquarters in London entitled 'Rethinking the EBRD's role in the New Policy Environment: Evolution, Accountability and Future Challenges'. At this event, the team presented emerging project findings to a hybrid audience of more than 50 policy-makers and discussed plans for future engagement. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |