Mimesis in action: nuclear decommissioning as conceptual playground for societal and ecological future making
Lead Research Organisation:
The University of Manchester
Department Name: Social Sciences
Abstract
This interdisciplinary project is an inquiry into the assumptions people make when they try to prepare for the future in a context of uncertainty. The context we explore is nuclear decommissioning, which is full of unknowns: it combines the first human attempts to dispose of high-level radioactive waste in relation to time frames that potentially extend beyond the future of the human species and the dismantling of regional economies where the possibilities for future livelihoods are very unclear. We want to understand what people's assumptions are in areas of decommissioning, in which moral frameworks they are rooted, and how these enhance or hamper imaginations of the future. Amidst wide-spread anxieties about an environmentally sustainable future for humankind, we want to find out how people involved in or affected by nuclear decommissioning conceive of their futures, and those of future generations, and how their thinking and acting may be stimulated in imaginative ways. By combining research expertise in social anthropology, foresight studies, and ecology in designing techniques of imaginative modelling that challenge what is taken-for-granted, we aim to open up avenues for imagining alternative futures. The modelling (scenario building, simulations, and ecosystem modelling) in which we engage our research participants draws on mimesis as a form of human learning. Mimesis is both a creative, transformative force and an object of study in our project. By using modelling, we want to gain deeper insights into mimesis as a human practice of acquiring knowledge.
We undertake ethnographic fieldwork in four different settings in Europe (England, Scotland, France and the Netherlands) where nuclear decommissioning takes place. Nuclear decommissioning sites are interesting because of their relationship with time and the environment. Nuclear sites have often had a generations-long impact on local livelihoods and life experiences, both negative and positive. Because these sites are caught up in affective and socioeconomic entanglements, their decommissioning tends to be associated with job losses and a bleak future in the shorter term. And yet nuclear decommissioning is very much about the long term: it involves decades of retrieving and storing nuclear waste that will remain radioactive for thousands of years. It requires fundamental decisions about caring for wastes, living organisms and landscapes. So the process of nuclear decommissioning affords time to plan for long-term futures that go beyond human concerns only. Nuclear decommissioning is associated with technological innovation and experimentation. This technological endeavour would be incomplete without equally innovative conceptions of what can be imagined socially, which is what our proposed project offers. What is required is a more holistic approach that considers sustainability at ecosystemic levels and draws attention away from the short term towards long-term potentialities of decommissioning. By including workshops and art interventions in our research design, we hope to enliven public debate on nuclear decommissioning by foregrounding future unknowns and uncertainties as paths that open up opportunities rather than lead to paralysis. We invite people living in areas of nuclear decommissioning to help us create models meant to confront, live with, and perhaps take advantage of uncertainty. We would like such models to be disruptive in the sense that they do not take anything for granted. Our aim is to design models for future making that broaden out from human-centred concerns and bridge short-term economic and long-term ecosystemic interests. We want to ask, provocatively, whether ecosystem wellbeing may be posited as a necessary if not sufficient condition for human and more-than-human prosperity. Can ecosystem wellbeing, rather than economic growth, become a point of point of departure rather than an afterthought in local planning processes, and if so, how?
We undertake ethnographic fieldwork in four different settings in Europe (England, Scotland, France and the Netherlands) where nuclear decommissioning takes place. Nuclear decommissioning sites are interesting because of their relationship with time and the environment. Nuclear sites have often had a generations-long impact on local livelihoods and life experiences, both negative and positive. Because these sites are caught up in affective and socioeconomic entanglements, their decommissioning tends to be associated with job losses and a bleak future in the shorter term. And yet nuclear decommissioning is very much about the long term: it involves decades of retrieving and storing nuclear waste that will remain radioactive for thousands of years. It requires fundamental decisions about caring for wastes, living organisms and landscapes. So the process of nuclear decommissioning affords time to plan for long-term futures that go beyond human concerns only. Nuclear decommissioning is associated with technological innovation and experimentation. This technological endeavour would be incomplete without equally innovative conceptions of what can be imagined socially, which is what our proposed project offers. What is required is a more holistic approach that considers sustainability at ecosystemic levels and draws attention away from the short term towards long-term potentialities of decommissioning. By including workshops and art interventions in our research design, we hope to enliven public debate on nuclear decommissioning by foregrounding future unknowns and uncertainties as paths that open up opportunities rather than lead to paralysis. We invite people living in areas of nuclear decommissioning to help us create models meant to confront, live with, and perhaps take advantage of uncertainty. We would like such models to be disruptive in the sense that they do not take anything for granted. Our aim is to design models for future making that broaden out from human-centred concerns and bridge short-term economic and long-term ecosystemic interests. We want to ask, provocatively, whether ecosystem wellbeing may be posited as a necessary if not sufficient condition for human and more-than-human prosperity. Can ecosystem wellbeing, rather than economic growth, become a point of point of departure rather than an afterthought in local planning processes, and if so, how?
People |
ORCID iD |
Petra Tjitske Kalshoven (Principal Investigator) |
Description | Influence through ethnography |
Geographic Reach | Local/Municipal/Regional |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Description | Participation in Rathenau Institute workshop |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
Description | Research Associate was invited to present to Géoparc Scientific Committee in La Hague, Normandy |
Geographic Reach | Local/Municipal/Regional |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Description | SoSS small grant |
Amount | £2,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | University of Manchester |
Sector | Academic/University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2022 |
End | 06/2022 |
Description | WUR collaboration |
Organisation | Wageningen University & Research |
Country | Netherlands |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | My expertise in Anthropology and my ethnographic knowledge of the first field site (West Cumbria) have contributed to the collaboration with two subcontractors (WUR ecologist and an independent foresight consultant, both in the Netherlands). |
Collaborator Contribution | The two subcontractors have contributed their expertise in respectively landscape ecology and foresight methods at two research meetings we have had, helping me to target my ethnographic fieldwork to our collaborative themes of interest and working towards a workshop design as the first engagement output in our collaboration. |
Impact | This is a multidisciplinary collaboration, combining social anthropology, ecology, and foresight studies. We have worked towards designing our first engagement workshop in the first fieldwork site (West Cumbria) based on the ethnography that I have undertaken since May 2022. The first workshop will take place on 17 March 2023. |
Start Year | 2022 |
Description | WUR collaboration |
Organisation | Wageningen University & Research |
Country | Netherlands |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | My expertise in Anthropology and my ethnographic knowledge of the first field site (West Cumbria) have contributed to the collaboration with two subcontractors (WUR ecologist and an independent foresight consultant, both in the Netherlands). |
Collaborator Contribution | The two subcontractors have contributed their expertise in respectively landscape ecology and foresight methods at two research meetings we have had, helping me to target my ethnographic fieldwork to our collaborative themes of interest and working towards a workshop design as the first engagement output in our collaboration. |
Impact | This is a multidisciplinary collaboration, combining social anthropology, ecology, and foresight studies. We have worked towards designing our first engagement workshop in the first fieldwork site (West Cumbria) based on the ethnography that I have undertaken since May 2022. The first workshop will take place on 17 March 2023. |
Start Year | 2022 |
Description | Chair of a roundtable discussion 'What future for Sellafield?' as part of the international NuSPACES Nuclear Heritage project, Rosehill Theatre, Whitehaven, 18 May 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | I was invited to lead a debate about Sellafield nuclear heritage and what role this could play in future making in the area, which sparked lively discussion. I still get involved in discussions about this theme. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Ethnographic fieldwork West Cumbria |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | In my ethnographic fieldwork, I have had formal and informal conversations with a wide range of discussion partners in West Cumbria, ranging from nuclear industry professionals to farmers to ecologists and artists. I have participated in various meetings of the West Cumbria Sites Stakeholder Group (the formal forum that scrutinises the nuclear industry) where reference has been made to my work. I report on my fieldwork to colleagues in the University of Manchester's Anthropology department and the University's Beam nuclear and social research network. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022,2023 |
Description | Ethnographic fieldwork in Normandy, France |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | The Research Associate, who joined the research team in May 2023, carried out ethnographic fieldwork from August 2023 until February 2024, having formal and informal conversations with a broad range of people in Cap La Hague, Normandy, France. The goal of these conversations was to gain an understanding of local experiences of landscapes in an area of nuclear reprocessing and waste management, and explore initiatives for future making and their impact on these landscapes. Discussion partners included nuclear professionals, landscape and heritage professionals, activists, professionals involved in the establishment of a Geopark, and generally interested members of the public. Contacts and conversations led to further discussions and to invitations to relevant events. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023,2024 |
Description | Ethnographic fieldwork in Zeeland, the Netherlands |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | The PI carried out ethnographic fieldwork from July 2023 until January 2024, having formal and informal conversations with a broad range of people in Zeeland, the Netherlands (with additional conversations with relevant professionals elsewhere in the Netherlands and in Belgium). The goal of these conversations was to gain an understanding of local experiences of landscapes in an area of nuclear waste management, and explore initiatives for future making and their impact on these landscapes. Discussion partners included nuclear professionals, landscape, environment, and heritage professionals, arts institutions, activists, politicians and government officials, fruit growers, people involved in a citizens project around the initiatives for a planned energy transition in Zeeland, and generally interested members of the public. Contacts and conversations led to further discussions and to invitations to relevant events. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023,2024 |
Description | Interview for article in regional and national newspaper |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | The PI was interviewed by a journalist leading to a newspaper article about nuclear-related fieldwork in Zeeland, the Netherlands. This resulted in a feature article in Dutch regional and national newspapers (Provinciale Zeeuwse Courant and Algemeen Dagblad). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
URL | https://www.pzc.nl/borsele/onderzoekster-kijkt-rond-in-regios-met-kernafval-hoe-zou-borssele-er-over... |
Description | Interview for regional newspaper |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | The Research Associate was interviewed by a regional newspaper in Normandy, by journalist Loubris, Marie-Christine. "Insolite: une ethnologue de Manchester dans La Hague", La Manche Libre. Dec 7, 2023. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
URL | https://www.lamanchelibre.fr/actualite-1090820-insolite-une-ethnologue-de-manchester-dans-la-hague |
Description | Invited to participate in a futuring event by Sellafield Ltd |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | The PI was invited to participate in and present a talk to an on-line futuring workshop (on the benefits of foresight) organised by Sellafield Ltd in collaboration with the Risk Management Institute. Enabled the PI to share her research with an audience of risk professionals. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
Description | Invited to workshop in Belgium to discuss nuclear energy futures |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | The PI was invited to participate in an ECOSENS nuclear energy futuring workshop (2050 Here & Now), Mol, Belgium, 29 August 2023, meant to feed into policy initiatives having to do with nuclear power initiatives and climate change in Europe. I was able to share my fieldwork experiences and my views on attempts at future making in a context of climate change. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
Description | Research seminar University of Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre, and invitation to meet with the centre's Climate Citizens Team, 12 December 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | I engaged in a discussion with academics of the Climate Citizens Team at the University of Lancaster, followed by a research seminar that I presented to academics and PG students. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Talk for Rotary club in Rotterdam |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Supporters |
Results and Impact | The PI was invited to present on her project fieldwork in the Netherlands by the Rotary club Rotterdam-Noord, 28 November 2023. The talk was very well received and considered thought-provoking - the audience was intrigued to learn about reactions to the planned energy transition in Zeeland through the PI's dedicated fieldwork. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
Description | Two workshops organised in Egremont, West Cumbria |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | We organised two 'futuring' workshops at Florence Arts Centre, Egremont, West Cumbria. The first workshop attracted about 25 people (including nuclear professionals) interested in landscape, nature and future making; the follow-up workshop in May 2023 (designed for active discussion) attracted about 15 people. We experimented with futuring tools; participants created maps of the area showing future imaginings of the region, feeding into the project's ethnographic work. The workshops were very well received and considered thought-provoking. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
Description | Workshop organised in Zeeland fieldwork site, 11 January 2024 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Workshop organised in Zeeland fieldwork site, 11 January 2024. 25 people interested in landscape, nature and future making attended. We experimented with futuring tools. Participants asked for a workshop summary with research highlights, which the PI provided in February 2024. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |