Working memory and its relation to key outcomes in the real world
Lead Research Organisation:
Lancaster University
Department Name: Psychology
Abstract
Imagine someone tells you a phone number which you must remember until you can write it down a few seconds later. Successful completion of this task would rely on "working memory", a system which stores and processes information for tasks that you are currently completing. Working memory is our mental notepad; essential for many everyday activities including decision-making and following instructions. Whilst most people struggle to remember a large amount of information in working memory, approximately one in ten individuals experience particular working memory difficulties. Existing research has demonstrated that children with such difficulties are at risk of performing poorly academically and are often described as inattentive.
There are, however, key limitations in our current understanding. Firstly, although children with poor working memory have been described as inattentive, it is unclear what specific behaviours these children often show (e.g. being easily distracted, frequently making mistakes). Secondly, although working memory difficulties seem to increase the risk of poor educational achievement in childhood, it is not clear whether there are longer-term consequences. For instance, are children with working memory difficulties at risk of poor GCSE outcomes and/or poor employment outcomes in adulthood? We also lack evidence as to how poor working memory affects the behaviours and aspirations of adults. Finally, an important issue is that individuals with poor working memory often remain unidentified, preventing them from receiving support. Although formal working memory assessments exist, these are often only conducted on individuals who are suspected of having poor working memory. This approach is problematic, as research has demonstrated that practitioners (e.g. teachers) are poor at identifying people who may benefit from working memory assessments. Further research is thus needed to establish other ways of identifying such individuals.
These important gaps in existing knowledge prevent us from making recommendations to policymakers or practitioners (e.g. teachers) about how to identify and support individuals with poor working memory. Fortunately, there exists a unique dataset that can be used to address these important gaps in our understanding: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). This study has followed the lives of over 14,000 participants from birth to adulthood. Within the cohort, working memory was assessed during childhood (10 years of age) and adulthood (24 years of age). A wide range of other data are also available, including questionnaire responses and educational outcomes.
This project will use the ALSPAC dataset to examine:
1. What inattentive/hyperactive behaviours do children and adults with poor working memory often show? How does this compare to individuals without poor working memory?
2. Does poor working memory in childhood and adulthood increase the risk of poor outcomes? More specifically, we will examine whether having working memory difficulties in childhood increase the risk of poor academic achievement and poor employment outcomes later in life. We will also investigate whether having working memory difficulties in adulthood increase the risk of poor employment outcomes.
3. If poor working memory does increase the risk of having poor academic and/or employment outcomes, why is this? Do individuals with poor working memory display more inattentive/hyperactive behaviours, which then increases the risk of poor academic/employment outcomes?
4. Can information that schools or adults already have access to (e.g. prior academic achievement) identify individuals who may benefit from formal working memory assessments?
We will then work closely with the Centre for Applied Education Research and Bradford Research School to influence national policy and practice and share our findings widely (e.g. with educational professionals, occupational therapists).
There are, however, key limitations in our current understanding. Firstly, although children with poor working memory have been described as inattentive, it is unclear what specific behaviours these children often show (e.g. being easily distracted, frequently making mistakes). Secondly, although working memory difficulties seem to increase the risk of poor educational achievement in childhood, it is not clear whether there are longer-term consequences. For instance, are children with working memory difficulties at risk of poor GCSE outcomes and/or poor employment outcomes in adulthood? We also lack evidence as to how poor working memory affects the behaviours and aspirations of adults. Finally, an important issue is that individuals with poor working memory often remain unidentified, preventing them from receiving support. Although formal working memory assessments exist, these are often only conducted on individuals who are suspected of having poor working memory. This approach is problematic, as research has demonstrated that practitioners (e.g. teachers) are poor at identifying people who may benefit from working memory assessments. Further research is thus needed to establish other ways of identifying such individuals.
These important gaps in existing knowledge prevent us from making recommendations to policymakers or practitioners (e.g. teachers) about how to identify and support individuals with poor working memory. Fortunately, there exists a unique dataset that can be used to address these important gaps in our understanding: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). This study has followed the lives of over 14,000 participants from birth to adulthood. Within the cohort, working memory was assessed during childhood (10 years of age) and adulthood (24 years of age). A wide range of other data are also available, including questionnaire responses and educational outcomes.
This project will use the ALSPAC dataset to examine:
1. What inattentive/hyperactive behaviours do children and adults with poor working memory often show? How does this compare to individuals without poor working memory?
2. Does poor working memory in childhood and adulthood increase the risk of poor outcomes? More specifically, we will examine whether having working memory difficulties in childhood increase the risk of poor academic achievement and poor employment outcomes later in life. We will also investigate whether having working memory difficulties in adulthood increase the risk of poor employment outcomes.
3. If poor working memory does increase the risk of having poor academic and/or employment outcomes, why is this? Do individuals with poor working memory display more inattentive/hyperactive behaviours, which then increases the risk of poor academic/employment outcomes?
4. Can information that schools or adults already have access to (e.g. prior academic achievement) identify individuals who may benefit from formal working memory assessments?
We will then work closely with the Centre for Applied Education Research and Bradford Research School to influence national policy and practice and share our findings widely (e.g. with educational professionals, occupational therapists).
People |
ORCID iD |
| Amy Atkinson (Principal Investigator) | |
| Brian Francis (Co-Investigator) |
| Description | Improved understanding of working memory in educational professionals |
| Geographic Reach | Local/Municipal/Regional |
| Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
| Impact | Improved understanding of working memory amongst educational professionals - e.g.: - In one workshop, attendees rated confidence in their understanding of working memory as 5.6/10. prior to the session, and 7.9/10 after the session. - In another course, attendees rated confidence in their understanding of working memory as 6.5/10 prior to the session, and 8.5/10 after the session. |
| Description | Does reward affect executive functions? An examination across development and cultures |
| Amount | £224,336 (GBP) |
| Funding ID | ICA\R2\242105 |
| Organisation | The Royal Society |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 02/2025 |
| End | 01/2028 |
| Description | Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) |
| Organisation | University of Bristol |
| Department | Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Use of dataset, sharing knowledge about the organisation and dataset with academic and non-academic audiences. |
| Collaborator Contribution | Access to the dataset and support in understanding the dataset. |
| Impact | None yet. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | Leeds Trinity University |
| Organisation | Leeds Trinity University |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Working memory workshop for trainee teachers (see Engagement section for more details). |
| Collaborator Contribution | Opportunity to share information relating to working memory in the classroom with a large number of trainee teachers. |
| Impact | Increased understanding of working memory amongst trainee teachers. |
| Start Year | 2023 |
| Description | N8 Child of the North and Centre for Young Lives Special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) report |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A magazine, newsletter or online publication |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A report released by the N8 Child of the North and Centre for Young Lives. Report was co-led by the PI (Amy Atkinson), with postdoctoral researcher Katie Allen also a co-author. The report focused on the special educational needs and disabilities assessment and support crisis, and included explicit mention of the importance of working memory in the classroom. Report involved collaboration between 38 academics from 14 organisations as well as 26 contributing experts (e.g. educational psychologists, teachers). |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://www.n8research.org.uk/media/CotN_SEND-AP_Report_6.pdf |
| Description | Pint of Science talk - Children's learning and their memory |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Members of the general public attended a public talk on the role of working memory on children's learning. The talk sparked questions and discussions about the role of memory in education. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Working memory training session for qualified teachers at a local school |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Approximately 12 teachers at a local primary school received a training session on working memory in the classroom. The sparked discussion about the types of activities that might rely on working memory in the classroom and how best to identify and support pupils. Feedback was positive and demonstrated increased understanding about working memory. Prior to the course, participants rated confidence in their understanding of working memory as 5.6/10. Following the course, this increased to 7.9/10. Increased understanding was also apparent in written feedback (e.g. ""Understand this area a lot better now. Thank you"). |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Working memory workshop for trainee teachers |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Trainee primary school teachers received a training session on working memory in the classroom. This included training on signs of working memory difficulties and strategies to support working memory in the classroom. The talk sparked discussion and questions, and encouraged attendees to consider their of supporting children with working memory difficulties. Attendees reported greater confidence in their understanding of working memory after the training session (rating of 6.5/10 prior to the session and 8.5/10 after the session). Written feedback included: "It has made me realise how it [working memory difficulties] affected those in my class." and "Brilliant session and very informative." |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |