ADR UK Data First Evaluation Fellowship
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Surrey
Department Name: Sociology
Abstract
Until recently, the large amounts of administrative data routinely collected about offenders as they are moved through the Criminal Justice System have been inaccessible to research. Instead, our understanding has largely been restricted to static insights into particular points in the journey. The Ministry of Justice ADR UK linkage project has transformed this picture, allowing offenders to be tracked across all stages of the Criminal Justice System. This opens up vast potentials for cutting edge research that recognises the complex interconnections that exist between different parts of the Criminal Justice System. For example, this could help us to understand how and why some of those people that are sentenced by the courts return quickly (and repeatedly) following the completion of their sentence, whilst other offenders are never seen again. The effects of more complex criminal justice histories including multiple transitions back through the system can also be examined as well as the impacts of particular interventions on particular types of individual.
But the complexity and scale of this new wave of linked data necessitates new working approaches and understanding of new analytic techniques. The fellowship is an unrivalled opportunity to work directly alongside Ministry of Justice analysts to realise the full potential of this linked data. Working collaboratively, I will identify a number of clearly defined research questions that meet Ministry of Justice priorities and can be addressed with this data. In particular, the opportunities afforded by linking information from across different Criminal Justice stages will be exploited. The specific questions will be guided by my own academic understanding of individuals journeys through the Criminal Justice System built up over more than 15 years as an empirical criminologist. They will also appropriately reflect the structural complexities inherent in the linked data sources including correctly engaging with the role of context (the effect of being dealt with in a specific court and/or prison) and the fact that prior experiences shape subsequent ones.
Research questions will be refined in consultation with Ministry of Justice analysts in an interactive workshop. This will be informed by some initial 'proof of concept' data analysis exercises with the available data. Here the emphasis will be on providing a rapid evidence base for further discussion rather than on selecting the most technically sophisticated analysis solutions. These rapid data deep-dives will help to highlight specific data challenges, clarify the central research question, and facilitate further discussion and question development. The most promising questions would then be worked up into full-scale empirical projects supported by more statistically robust analytic approaches that appropriately reflect the patterns that emerge in the data.
Crucial to the fellowship is ensuring a legacy for future research. To achieve this, in addition to the more standard publication of key findings in academic and policy outlets, all work will be written up within data analysis worksheets. These worksheets link directly to the raw data and will run the computational code required to complete the data analysis, whilst also including explanatory text and publishable outputs. Keeping all elements of the data processing, analysis, and reporting within the same worksheet will ensure fully replicability of the empirical work, whilst also allowing new users to quickly adapt the code and/ or text to generate new reports. I will also run workshops for Ministry of Justice analysts where relevant.
But the complexity and scale of this new wave of linked data necessitates new working approaches and understanding of new analytic techniques. The fellowship is an unrivalled opportunity to work directly alongside Ministry of Justice analysts to realise the full potential of this linked data. Working collaboratively, I will identify a number of clearly defined research questions that meet Ministry of Justice priorities and can be addressed with this data. In particular, the opportunities afforded by linking information from across different Criminal Justice stages will be exploited. The specific questions will be guided by my own academic understanding of individuals journeys through the Criminal Justice System built up over more than 15 years as an empirical criminologist. They will also appropriately reflect the structural complexities inherent in the linked data sources including correctly engaging with the role of context (the effect of being dealt with in a specific court and/or prison) and the fact that prior experiences shape subsequent ones.
Research questions will be refined in consultation with Ministry of Justice analysts in an interactive workshop. This will be informed by some initial 'proof of concept' data analysis exercises with the available data. Here the emphasis will be on providing a rapid evidence base for further discussion rather than on selecting the most technically sophisticated analysis solutions. These rapid data deep-dives will help to highlight specific data challenges, clarify the central research question, and facilitate further discussion and question development. The most promising questions would then be worked up into full-scale empirical projects supported by more statistically robust analytic approaches that appropriately reflect the patterns that emerge in the data.
Crucial to the fellowship is ensuring a legacy for future research. To achieve this, in addition to the more standard publication of key findings in academic and policy outlets, all work will be written up within data analysis worksheets. These worksheets link directly to the raw data and will run the computational code required to complete the data analysis, whilst also including explanatory text and publishable outputs. Keeping all elements of the data processing, analysis, and reporting within the same worksheet will ensure fully replicability of the empirical work, whilst also allowing new users to quickly adapt the code and/ or text to generate new reports. I will also run workshops for Ministry of Justice analysts where relevant.
Organisations
People |
ORCID iD |
| Ian Brunton-Smith (Principal Investigator / Fellow) |
| Description | Administrative data has been used to undertake a retrospective evaluation of Electronic Monitoring in England and Wales. Drawing on data from more than 1,000,000 offenders, the evaluation compares those in receipt of a curfew order with EM to a matched cohort of offenders serving a community penalty without EM. Results suggest EM reduces reoffending whilst tags are worn and improves compliance with other sentence requirements. There was no consistent evidence of a longer lasting impact of EM after the disposal was completed. The research has also shown how administrative data can be used to approximate reoffending outcomes as a supplement to data from the Police National Computer. |
| Exploitation Route | The substantive findings in relation to Electronic Monitoring are in the final stages of publication as an official government social research report. The Ministry of Justice are exploring how they may use the learning in relation to the use of administrative data for approximating reoffending in future analysis. |
| Sectors | Government Democracy and Justice |
| Description | Current work on use of Administrative data is contributing to evidence base on effectiveness of Electronic Monitoring. Official reports have been written up and will be published on the Ministry of Justice website in the next few months. The work on the use of administrative data to approximate reoffending is being explored internally at the Ministry of Justice for subsequent use. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2023 |
| Sector | Government, Democracy and Justice |
| Impact Types | Policy & public services |
| Description | ADR UK Ambassadors event |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | ADR UK ambassadors event describing the main goals of the project and reflections on work. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Electronic Monitoring user group meetings |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Regular presentation of interim findings to EM working group at Ministry of Justice directly involved with development of EM related policy. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Presentation - Ministry of Justice policy briefing |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Presentation to outline key findings from Electronic evaluation research and amend approach following policy feedback. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |